- This topic has 180 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by
hipmatt.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:52 PM #157662February 21, 2008 at 5:09 PM #157293
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantMaybe I am reading this wrong, but at 310K that would be about 120 per sqf, Heck you can find a new place with nice upgrades and a deck off the master for less than that in Temecula valley these days, maybe not a golf course view but I think that is overrated anyway, I prefer a nature view (no one behind) myself.
February 21, 2008 at 5:09 PM #157583ParticipantMaybe I am reading this wrong, but at 310K that would be about 120 per sqf, Heck you can find a new place with nice upgrades and a deck off the master for less than that in Temecula valley these days, maybe not a golf course view but I think that is overrated anyway, I prefer a nature view (no one behind) myself.
February 21, 2008 at 5:09 PM #157598ParticipantMaybe I am reading this wrong, but at 310K that would be about 120 per sqf, Heck you can find a new place with nice upgrades and a deck off the master for less than that in Temecula valley these days, maybe not a golf course view but I think that is overrated anyway, I prefer a nature view (no one behind) myself.
February 21, 2008 at 5:09 PM #157605ParticipantMaybe I am reading this wrong, but at 310K that would be about 120 per sqf, Heck you can find a new place with nice upgrades and a deck off the master for less than that in Temecula valley these days, maybe not a golf course view but I think that is overrated anyway, I prefer a nature view (no one behind) myself.
February 21, 2008 at 5:09 PM #157677ParticipantMaybe I am reading this wrong, but at 310K that would be about 120 per sqf, Heck you can find a new place with nice upgrades and a deck off the master for less than that in Temecula valley these days, maybe not a golf course view but I think that is overrated anyway, I prefer a nature view (no one behind) myself.
February 21, 2008 at 5:21 PM #157299cashflow
ParticipantHey TG,
That’s a good one but last weekend we drove by this one in Harveston, and it doesn’t seem to even need much work…
We have an excellent realtor up there and she mentioned that there are the next round of REO’s to hit the market in March! Like I said, it’s getting interesting around there….
February 21, 2008 at 5:21 PM #157587ParticipantHey TG,
That’s a good one but last weekend we drove by this one in Harveston, and it doesn’t seem to even need much work…
We have an excellent realtor up there and she mentioned that there are the next round of REO’s to hit the market in March! Like I said, it’s getting interesting around there….
February 21, 2008 at 5:21 PM #157603ParticipantHey TG,
That’s a good one but last weekend we drove by this one in Harveston, and it doesn’t seem to even need much work…
We have an excellent realtor up there and she mentioned that there are the next round of REO’s to hit the market in March! Like I said, it’s getting interesting around there….
February 21, 2008 at 5:21 PM #157611ParticipantHey TG,
That’s a good one but last weekend we drove by this one in Harveston, and it doesn’t seem to even need much work…
We have an excellent realtor up there and she mentioned that there are the next round of REO’s to hit the market in March! Like I said, it’s getting interesting around there….
February 21, 2008 at 5:21 PM #157682ParticipantHey TG,
That’s a good one but last weekend we drove by this one in Harveston, and it doesn’t seem to even need much work…
We have an excellent realtor up there and she mentioned that there are the next round of REO’s to hit the market in March! Like I said, it’s getting interesting around there….
February 21, 2008 at 6:05 PM #157307golfproz
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices?
Jeepers, didn’t think of that. If it overshoots then we may well see ’89 pricing in some areas!
Detroit and Cleveland have already proven that homes in America can drop to essentially zero value; I wonder if the IE is next?
I remember looking at homes in Temecula in 90 or 91 and those 2500-3000 sq/ft houses were going for the high 200s to the low 300s. granted that was the peak of the last bubble but it would still be funny to show no change in value in 15+ years
February 21, 2008 at 6:05 PM #157597ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices?
Jeepers, didn’t think of that. If it overshoots then we may well see ’89 pricing in some areas!
Detroit and Cleveland have already proven that homes in America can drop to essentially zero value; I wonder if the IE is next?
I remember looking at homes in Temecula in 90 or 91 and those 2500-3000 sq/ft houses were going for the high 200s to the low 300s. granted that was the peak of the last bubble but it would still be funny to show no change in value in 15+ years
February 21, 2008 at 6:05 PM #157612ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices?
Jeepers, didn’t think of that. If it overshoots then we may well see ’89 pricing in some areas!
Detroit and Cleveland have already proven that homes in America can drop to essentially zero value; I wonder if the IE is next?
I remember looking at homes in Temecula in 90 or 91 and those 2500-3000 sq/ft houses were going for the high 200s to the low 300s. granted that was the peak of the last bubble but it would still be funny to show no change in value in 15+ years
February 21, 2008 at 6:05 PM #157620ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices?
Jeepers, didn’t think of that. If it overshoots then we may well see ’89 pricing in some areas!
Detroit and Cleveland have already proven that homes in America can drop to essentially zero value; I wonder if the IE is next?
I remember looking at homes in Temecula in 90 or 91 and those 2500-3000 sq/ft houses were going for the high 200s to the low 300s. granted that was the peak of the last bubble but it would still be funny to show no change in value in 15+ years
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.