- This topic has 180 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
hipmatt.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
February 21, 2008 at 2:27 PM #11884
-
February 21, 2008 at 2:57 PM #157135
kev374
Participantnow why isn’t that happening here in South Orange County??? Prices here are still sky high and I don’t see them coming down except for the very low end of the market.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:00 PM #157139
kewp
ParticipantEvery local market is like a Mexican standoff between the banks right now.
Looks like someone pulled the trigger in Temecula.
It will start inland and work its way out. Have a beer and come check back a year or so from now and see where the market is.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:19 PM #157162
HereWeGo
ParticipantGiven the amount of $$$ the banks have written off, they may have a lot of room to price down in order to move inventory.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:19 PM #157452
HereWeGo
ParticipantGiven the amount of $$$ the banks have written off, they may have a lot of room to price down in order to move inventory.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:19 PM #157468
HereWeGo
ParticipantGiven the amount of $$$ the banks have written off, they may have a lot of room to price down in order to move inventory.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:19 PM #157474
HereWeGo
ParticipantGiven the amount of $$$ the banks have written off, they may have a lot of room to price down in order to move inventory.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:19 PM #157544
HereWeGo
ParticipantGiven the amount of $$$ the banks have written off, they may have a lot of room to price down in order to move inventory.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:21 PM #157167
golfproz
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices? That’s be a helluva deal, picking it up for 92 prices. Lets show some bulls and realtards a ZERO appreciation home in 15+ years.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:29 PM #157172
(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant… and they won’t show you the inside but how bad can it be?
Well, they could have stripped all the copper plumbing out of the walls, removed every light fixture and stripped wiring to sell for scrap, they could have poured concrete mix into the plumbing and covered every remaining surface with human feces. That’s all I can think of off the top of my head based on other examples of foreclosures I’ve seen documented.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:34 PM #157182
nostradamus
ParticipantWell, they could have stripped all the copper plumbing out of the walls, removed every light fixture and stripped wiring to sell for scrap, they could have poured concrete mix into the plumbing and covered every remaining surface with human feces.
LOL. I don't see why they wouldn't put that in the description. They can call it a "modern art masterpiece". Gives the house that "cozy, lived-in" feeling.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:46 PM #157207
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantLOL. I don’t see why they wouldn’t put that in the description. They can call it a “modern art masterpiece”. Gives the house that “cozy, lived-in” feeling.
🙂
good idea, maybe they should even put a green spin on things … “say goodbye to utility bills, low carbon footprint, organic wall coatings”
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:46 PM #157497
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantLOL. I don’t see why they wouldn’t put that in the description. They can call it a “modern art masterpiece”. Gives the house that “cozy, lived-in” feeling.
🙂
good idea, maybe they should even put a green spin on things … “say goodbye to utility bills, low carbon footprint, organic wall coatings”
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:46 PM #157512
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantLOL. I don’t see why they wouldn’t put that in the description. They can call it a “modern art masterpiece”. Gives the house that “cozy, lived-in” feeling.
🙂
good idea, maybe they should even put a green spin on things … “say goodbye to utility bills, low carbon footprint, organic wall coatings”
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:46 PM #157519
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantLOL. I don’t see why they wouldn’t put that in the description. They can call it a “modern art masterpiece”. Gives the house that “cozy, lived-in” feeling.
🙂
good idea, maybe they should even put a green spin on things … “say goodbye to utility bills, low carbon footprint, organic wall coatings”
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:46 PM #157589
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantLOL. I don’t see why they wouldn’t put that in the description. They can call it a “modern art masterpiece”. Gives the house that “cozy, lived-in” feeling.
🙂
good idea, maybe they should even put a green spin on things … “say goodbye to utility bills, low carbon footprint, organic wall coatings”
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM #157218
jpinpb
Participant“covered every remaining surface with human feces.”
I guess that’s the proverbial and literal –
sh*t hitting the fan – and splattering the walls.
Are they urine-soaking the floors as well, rather than making payments on a place going under and p*ssing in the wind.
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:52 PM #157277
MANmom
ParticipantDon’t forget that the house could have been used for nefarious things like a Meth-producing operation…then it is virtually worthless…be vigilant!
MANmom
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:52 PM #157568
MANmom
ParticipantDon’t forget that the house could have been used for nefarious things like a Meth-producing operation…then it is virtually worthless…be vigilant!
MANmom
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:52 PM #157582
MANmom
ParticipantDon’t forget that the house could have been used for nefarious things like a Meth-producing operation…then it is virtually worthless…be vigilant!
MANmom
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:52 PM #157590
MANmom
ParticipantDon’t forget that the house could have been used for nefarious things like a Meth-producing operation…then it is virtually worthless…be vigilant!
MANmom
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:52 PM #157662
MANmom
ParticipantDon’t forget that the house could have been used for nefarious things like a Meth-producing operation…then it is virtually worthless…be vigilant!
MANmom
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM #157508
jpinpb
Participant“covered every remaining surface with human feces.”
I guess that’s the proverbial and literal –
sh*t hitting the fan – and splattering the walls.
Are they urine-soaking the floors as well, rather than making payments on a place going under and p*ssing in the wind.
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM #157522
jpinpb
Participant“covered every remaining surface with human feces.”
I guess that’s the proverbial and literal –
sh*t hitting the fan – and splattering the walls.
Are they urine-soaking the floors as well, rather than making payments on a place going under and p*ssing in the wind.
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM #157530
jpinpb
Participant“covered every remaining surface with human feces.”
I guess that’s the proverbial and literal –
sh*t hitting the fan – and splattering the walls.
Are they urine-soaking the floors as well, rather than making payments on a place going under and p*ssing in the wind.
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM #157599
jpinpb
Participant“covered every remaining surface with human feces.”
I guess that’s the proverbial and literal –
sh*t hitting the fan – and splattering the walls.
Are they urine-soaking the floors as well, rather than making payments on a place going under and p*ssing in the wind.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:34 PM #157472
nostradamus
ParticipantWell, they could have stripped all the copper plumbing out of the walls, removed every light fixture and stripped wiring to sell for scrap, they could have poured concrete mix into the plumbing and covered every remaining surface with human feces.
LOL. I don't see why they wouldn't put that in the description. They can call it a "modern art masterpiece". Gives the house that "cozy, lived-in" feeling.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:34 PM #157488
nostradamus
ParticipantWell, they could have stripped all the copper plumbing out of the walls, removed every light fixture and stripped wiring to sell for scrap, they could have poured concrete mix into the plumbing and covered every remaining surface with human feces.
LOL. I don't see why they wouldn't put that in the description. They can call it a "modern art masterpiece". Gives the house that "cozy, lived-in" feeling.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:34 PM #157494
nostradamus
ParticipantWell, they could have stripped all the copper plumbing out of the walls, removed every light fixture and stripped wiring to sell for scrap, they could have poured concrete mix into the plumbing and covered every remaining surface with human feces.
LOL. I don't see why they wouldn't put that in the description. They can call it a "modern art masterpiece". Gives the house that "cozy, lived-in" feeling.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:34 PM #157564
nostradamus
ParticipantWell, they could have stripped all the copper plumbing out of the walls, removed every light fixture and stripped wiring to sell for scrap, they could have poured concrete mix into the plumbing and covered every remaining surface with human feces.
LOL. I don't see why they wouldn't put that in the description. They can call it a "modern art masterpiece". Gives the house that "cozy, lived-in" feeling.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:29 PM #157462
(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant… and they won’t show you the inside but how bad can it be?
Well, they could have stripped all the copper plumbing out of the walls, removed every light fixture and stripped wiring to sell for scrap, they could have poured concrete mix into the plumbing and covered every remaining surface with human feces. That’s all I can think of off the top of my head based on other examples of foreclosures I’ve seen documented.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:29 PM #157478
(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant… and they won’t show you the inside but how bad can it be?
Well, they could have stripped all the copper plumbing out of the walls, removed every light fixture and stripped wiring to sell for scrap, they could have poured concrete mix into the plumbing and covered every remaining surface with human feces. That’s all I can think of off the top of my head based on other examples of foreclosures I’ve seen documented.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:29 PM #157484
(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant… and they won’t show you the inside but how bad can it be?
Well, they could have stripped all the copper plumbing out of the walls, removed every light fixture and stripped wiring to sell for scrap, they could have poured concrete mix into the plumbing and covered every remaining surface with human feces. That’s all I can think of off the top of my head based on other examples of foreclosures I’ve seen documented.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:29 PM #157554
(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant… and they won’t show you the inside but how bad can it be?
Well, they could have stripped all the copper plumbing out of the walls, removed every light fixture and stripped wiring to sell for scrap, they could have poured concrete mix into the plumbing and covered every remaining surface with human feces. That’s all I can think of off the top of my head based on other examples of foreclosures I’ve seen documented.
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:04 PM #157222
kewp
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices?
Jeepers, didn’t think of that. If it overshoots then we may well see ’89 pricing in some areas!
Detroit and Cleveland have already proven that homes in America can drop to essentially zero value; I wonder if the IE is next?
-
February 21, 2008 at 6:05 PM #157307
golfproz
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices?
Jeepers, didn’t think of that. If it overshoots then we may well see ’89 pricing in some areas!
Detroit and Cleveland have already proven that homes in America can drop to essentially zero value; I wonder if the IE is next?
I remember looking at homes in Temecula in 90 or 91 and those 2500-3000 sq/ft houses were going for the high 200s to the low 300s. granted that was the peak of the last bubble but it would still be funny to show no change in value in 15+ years
-
February 21, 2008 at 6:10 PM #157312
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantYep seems like a 2002 price to me, which looks a lot like a 1990 price.
There has been a little wage inflation since then I would think (I know mine has about tripled from 1990 and I owned a home back then).
One might start thinking we are coming up on the buying op of a life time, But that’s just me maybe..
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM #157340
temeculaguy
ParticipantNor- you are right $120 a sq isn’t crazy but this is one of the pricier areas of the valley and six months ago I was getting frustrated that it wouldn’t come down in price. Since I already waited for the prices to get to me rather than drive to the prices, no reason to reverse course now.
Cash, I dig that harveston house, excellent price for 2400+ and nobody behind you it appears, that is another of the price sticky areas that is falling finally. Interesting is a good word.
golf, not sure where you looked but in 1991 Redhawk was all just under 200k until about 1998 and then it started to rise montly, by 1999 things were in the 200’s for the nicest ones and of course location and lot changes things slightly, after that it kept going up until last year and in the last six months has gone into a free fall. I never saw a 3 in the first number of the price of a tract home in this valley from 1990 until about 1999 or 2000. Semi-custom, custom or land would be the exception.
Here is what 230k bought you in 1998 in redhawk’s rancho serrano (the most expensive at the time) http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1477711
Feb of 1999 in Augusta at redhwak 236k got you this http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1353661
May of 99 redhawk’s gated rancho madera 265k got you 3600 6br http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1494235
look near the bottom of each link to see the historical prices. I’m starting to think that Bearvine’s prediction of $75 a sq has some legs. So how do we tell if we are in the flat part or the overcorrection part, these knives are looking good enough to catch, with the only exception being that each week I find one that makes the previous week’s pick look overpriced.
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:08 PM #157345
temeculaguy
ParticipantSomebody make the itallic thing stop, I forget how
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:14 PM #157355
kewp
ParticipantI tried to stop the italics.
I tried and failed. 🙁
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:14 PM #157646
kewp
ParticipantI tried to stop the italics.
I tried and failed. 🙁
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:14 PM #157660
kewp
ParticipantI tried to stop the italics.
I tried and failed. 🙁
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:14 PM #157669
kewp
ParticipantI tried to stop the italics.
I tried and failed. 🙁
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:14 PM #157741
kewp
ParticipantI tried to stop the italics.
I tried and failed. 🙁
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:08 PM #157636
temeculaguy
ParticipantSomebody make the itallic thing stop, I forget how
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:08 PM #157650
temeculaguy
ParticipantSomebody make the itallic thing stop, I forget how
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:08 PM #157659
temeculaguy
ParticipantSomebody make the itallic thing stop, I forget how
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:08 PM #157731
temeculaguy
ParticipantSomebody make the itallic thing stop, I forget how
-
February 22, 2008 at 7:15 AM #157476
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantThanks TG
-
February 22, 2008 at 7:15 AM #157767
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantThanks TG
-
February 22, 2008 at 7:15 AM #157780
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantThanks TG
-
February 22, 2008 at 7:15 AM #157790
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantThanks TG
-
February 22, 2008 at 7:15 AM #157861
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantThanks TG
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM #157630
temeculaguy
ParticipantNor- you are right $120 a sq isn’t crazy but this is one of the pricier areas of the valley and six months ago I was getting frustrated that it wouldn’t come down in price. Since I already waited for the prices to get to me rather than drive to the prices, no reason to reverse course now.
Cash, I dig that harveston house, excellent price for 2400+ and nobody behind you it appears, that is another of the price sticky areas that is falling finally. Interesting is a good word.
golf, not sure where you looked but in 1991 Redhawk was all just under 200k until about 1998 and then it started to rise montly, by 1999 things were in the 200’s for the nicest ones and of course location and lot changes things slightly, after that it kept going up until last year and in the last six months has gone into a free fall. I never saw a 3 in the first number of the price of a tract home in this valley from 1990 until about 1999 or 2000. Semi-custom, custom or land would be the exception.
Here is what 230k bought you in 1998 in redhawk’s rancho serrano (the most expensive at the time) http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1477711
Feb of 1999 in Augusta at redhwak 236k got you this http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1353661
May of 99 redhawk’s gated rancho madera 265k got you 3600 6br http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1494235
look near the bottom of each link to see the historical prices. I’m starting to think that Bearvine’s prediction of $75 a sq has some legs. So how do we tell if we are in the flat part or the overcorrection part, these knives are looking good enough to catch, with the only exception being that each week I find one that makes the previous week’s pick look overpriced.
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM #157645
temeculaguy
ParticipantNor- you are right $120 a sq isn’t crazy but this is one of the pricier areas of the valley and six months ago I was getting frustrated that it wouldn’t come down in price. Since I already waited for the prices to get to me rather than drive to the prices, no reason to reverse course now.
Cash, I dig that harveston house, excellent price for 2400+ and nobody behind you it appears, that is another of the price sticky areas that is falling finally. Interesting is a good word.
golf, not sure where you looked but in 1991 Redhawk was all just under 200k until about 1998 and then it started to rise montly, by 1999 things were in the 200’s for the nicest ones and of course location and lot changes things slightly, after that it kept going up until last year and in the last six months has gone into a free fall. I never saw a 3 in the first number of the price of a tract home in this valley from 1990 until about 1999 or 2000. Semi-custom, custom or land would be the exception.
Here is what 230k bought you in 1998 in redhawk’s rancho serrano (the most expensive at the time) http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1477711
Feb of 1999 in Augusta at redhwak 236k got you this http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1353661
May of 99 redhawk’s gated rancho madera 265k got you 3600 6br http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1494235
look near the bottom of each link to see the historical prices. I’m starting to think that Bearvine’s prediction of $75 a sq has some legs. So how do we tell if we are in the flat part or the overcorrection part, these knives are looking good enough to catch, with the only exception being that each week I find one that makes the previous week’s pick look overpriced.
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM #157653
temeculaguy
ParticipantNor- you are right $120 a sq isn’t crazy but this is one of the pricier areas of the valley and six months ago I was getting frustrated that it wouldn’t come down in price. Since I already waited for the prices to get to me rather than drive to the prices, no reason to reverse course now.
Cash, I dig that harveston house, excellent price for 2400+ and nobody behind you it appears, that is another of the price sticky areas that is falling finally. Interesting is a good word.
golf, not sure where you looked but in 1991 Redhawk was all just under 200k until about 1998 and then it started to rise montly, by 1999 things were in the 200’s for the nicest ones and of course location and lot changes things slightly, after that it kept going up until last year and in the last six months has gone into a free fall. I never saw a 3 in the first number of the price of a tract home in this valley from 1990 until about 1999 or 2000. Semi-custom, custom or land would be the exception.
Here is what 230k bought you in 1998 in redhawk’s rancho serrano (the most expensive at the time) http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1477711
Feb of 1999 in Augusta at redhwak 236k got you this http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1353661
May of 99 redhawk’s gated rancho madera 265k got you 3600 6br http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1494235
look near the bottom of each link to see the historical prices. I’m starting to think that Bearvine’s prediction of $75 a sq has some legs. So how do we tell if we are in the flat part or the overcorrection part, these knives are looking good enough to catch, with the only exception being that each week I find one that makes the previous week’s pick look overpriced.
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM #157726
temeculaguy
ParticipantNor- you are right $120 a sq isn’t crazy but this is one of the pricier areas of the valley and six months ago I was getting frustrated that it wouldn’t come down in price. Since I already waited for the prices to get to me rather than drive to the prices, no reason to reverse course now.
Cash, I dig that harveston house, excellent price for 2400+ and nobody behind you it appears, that is another of the price sticky areas that is falling finally. Interesting is a good word.
golf, not sure where you looked but in 1991 Redhawk was all just under 200k until about 1998 and then it started to rise montly, by 1999 things were in the 200’s for the nicest ones and of course location and lot changes things slightly, after that it kept going up until last year and in the last six months has gone into a free fall. I never saw a 3 in the first number of the price of a tract home in this valley from 1990 until about 1999 or 2000. Semi-custom, custom or land would be the exception.
Here is what 230k bought you in 1998 in redhawk’s rancho serrano (the most expensive at the time) http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1477711
Feb of 1999 in Augusta at redhwak 236k got you this http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1353661
May of 99 redhawk’s gated rancho madera 265k got you 3600 6br http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1494235
look near the bottom of each link to see the historical prices. I’m starting to think that Bearvine’s prediction of $75 a sq has some legs. So how do we tell if we are in the flat part or the overcorrection part, these knives are looking good enough to catch, with the only exception being that each week I find one that makes the previous week’s pick look overpriced.
-
February 21, 2008 at 6:10 PM #157602
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantYep seems like a 2002 price to me, which looks a lot like a 1990 price.
There has been a little wage inflation since then I would think (I know mine has about tripled from 1990 and I owned a home back then).
One might start thinking we are coming up on the buying op of a life time, But that’s just me maybe..
-
February 21, 2008 at 6:10 PM #157617
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantYep seems like a 2002 price to me, which looks a lot like a 1990 price.
There has been a little wage inflation since then I would think (I know mine has about tripled from 1990 and I owned a home back then).
One might start thinking we are coming up on the buying op of a life time, But that’s just me maybe..
-
February 21, 2008 at 6:10 PM #157626
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantYep seems like a 2002 price to me, which looks a lot like a 1990 price.
There has been a little wage inflation since then I would think (I know mine has about tripled from 1990 and I owned a home back then).
One might start thinking we are coming up on the buying op of a life time, But that’s just me maybe..
-
February 21, 2008 at 6:10 PM #157697
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantYep seems like a 2002 price to me, which looks a lot like a 1990 price.
There has been a little wage inflation since then I would think (I know mine has about tripled from 1990 and I owned a home back then).
One might start thinking we are coming up on the buying op of a life time, But that’s just me maybe..
-
February 21, 2008 at 6:05 PM #157597
golfproz
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices?
Jeepers, didn’t think of that. If it overshoots then we may well see ’89 pricing in some areas!
Detroit and Cleveland have already proven that homes in America can drop to essentially zero value; I wonder if the IE is next?
I remember looking at homes in Temecula in 90 or 91 and those 2500-3000 sq/ft houses were going for the high 200s to the low 300s. granted that was the peak of the last bubble but it would still be funny to show no change in value in 15+ years
-
February 21, 2008 at 6:05 PM #157612
golfproz
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices?
Jeepers, didn’t think of that. If it overshoots then we may well see ’89 pricing in some areas!
Detroit and Cleveland have already proven that homes in America can drop to essentially zero value; I wonder if the IE is next?
I remember looking at homes in Temecula in 90 or 91 and those 2500-3000 sq/ft houses were going for the high 200s to the low 300s. granted that was the peak of the last bubble but it would still be funny to show no change in value in 15+ years
-
February 21, 2008 at 6:05 PM #157620
golfproz
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices?
Jeepers, didn’t think of that. If it overshoots then we may well see ’89 pricing in some areas!
Detroit and Cleveland have already proven that homes in America can drop to essentially zero value; I wonder if the IE is next?
I remember looking at homes in Temecula in 90 or 91 and those 2500-3000 sq/ft houses were going for the high 200s to the low 300s. granted that was the peak of the last bubble but it would still be funny to show no change in value in 15+ years
-
February 21, 2008 at 6:05 PM #157692
golfproz
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices?
Jeepers, didn’t think of that. If it overshoots then we may well see ’89 pricing in some areas!
Detroit and Cleveland have already proven that homes in America can drop to essentially zero value; I wonder if the IE is next?
I remember looking at homes in Temecula in 90 or 91 and those 2500-3000 sq/ft houses were going for the high 200s to the low 300s. granted that was the peak of the last bubble but it would still be funny to show no change in value in 15+ years
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:04 PM #157513
kewp
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices?
Jeepers, didn’t think of that. If it overshoots then we may well see ’89 pricing in some areas!
Detroit and Cleveland have already proven that homes in America can drop to essentially zero value; I wonder if the IE is next?
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:04 PM #157527
kewp
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices?
Jeepers, didn’t think of that. If it overshoots then we may well see ’89 pricing in some areas!
Detroit and Cleveland have already proven that homes in America can drop to essentially zero value; I wonder if the IE is next?
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:04 PM #157535
kewp
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices?
Jeepers, didn’t think of that. If it overshoots then we may well see ’89 pricing in some areas!
Detroit and Cleveland have already proven that homes in America can drop to essentially zero value; I wonder if the IE is next?
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:04 PM #157604
kewp
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices?
Jeepers, didn’t think of that. If it overshoots then we may well see ’89 pricing in some areas!
Detroit and Cleveland have already proven that homes in America can drop to essentially zero value; I wonder if the IE is next?
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:21 PM #157457
golfproz
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices? That’s be a helluva deal, picking it up for 92 prices. Lets show some bulls and realtards a ZERO appreciation home in 15+ years.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:21 PM #157473
golfproz
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices? That’s be a helluva deal, picking it up for 92 prices. Lets show some bulls and realtards a ZERO appreciation home in 15+ years.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:21 PM #157479
golfproz
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices? That’s be a helluva deal, picking it up for 92 prices. Lets show some bulls and realtards a ZERO appreciation home in 15+ years.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:21 PM #157549
golfproz
ParticipantIf it’s close to 1999 priced isn’t it also close to 1992 prices? That’s be a helluva deal, picking it up for 92 prices. Lets show some bulls and realtards a ZERO appreciation home in 15+ years.
-
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:00 PM #157427
kewp
ParticipantEvery local market is like a Mexican standoff between the banks right now.
Looks like someone pulled the trigger in Temecula.
It will start inland and work its way out. Have a beer and come check back a year or so from now and see where the market is.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:00 PM #157443
kewp
ParticipantEvery local market is like a Mexican standoff between the banks right now.
Looks like someone pulled the trigger in Temecula.
It will start inland and work its way out. Have a beer and come check back a year or so from now and see where the market is.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:00 PM #157451
kewp
ParticipantEvery local market is like a Mexican standoff between the banks right now.
Looks like someone pulled the trigger in Temecula.
It will start inland and work its way out. Have a beer and come check back a year or so from now and see where the market is.
-
February 21, 2008 at 3:00 PM #157520
kewp
ParticipantEvery local market is like a Mexican standoff between the banks right now.
Looks like someone pulled the trigger in Temecula.
It will start inland and work its way out. Have a beer and come check back a year or so from now and see where the market is.
-
-
February 21, 2008 at 2:57 PM #157422
kev374
Participantnow why isn’t that happening here in South Orange County??? Prices here are still sky high and I don’t see them coming down except for the very low end of the market.
-
February 21, 2008 at 2:57 PM #157438
kev374
Participantnow why isn’t that happening here in South Orange County??? Prices here are still sky high and I don’t see them coming down except for the very low end of the market.
-
February 21, 2008 at 2:57 PM #157446
kev374
Participantnow why isn’t that happening here in South Orange County??? Prices here are still sky high and I don’t see them coming down except for the very low end of the market.
-
February 21, 2008 at 2:57 PM #157515
kev374
Participantnow why isn’t that happening here in South Orange County??? Prices here are still sky high and I don’t see them coming down except for the very low end of the market.
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:06 PM #157232
jpinpb
ParticipantGuess they are doing all kinds of crazy sh*t:
http://themessthatgreenspanmade.blogspot.com/2008/02/im-going-to-strip-this-mother.html
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:27 PM #157242
temeculaguy
ParticipantEven if it is thrashed inside, it has already affected the others, here’s a model match a block away that was just lowered to 329k and it is not thrashed.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1435700
One trigger got pulled, now here go the rest.
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:27 PM #157532
temeculaguy
ParticipantEven if it is thrashed inside, it has already affected the others, here’s a model match a block away that was just lowered to 329k and it is not thrashed.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1435700
One trigger got pulled, now here go the rest.
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:27 PM #157548
temeculaguy
ParticipantEven if it is thrashed inside, it has already affected the others, here’s a model match a block away that was just lowered to 329k and it is not thrashed.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1435700
One trigger got pulled, now here go the rest.
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:27 PM #157555
temeculaguy
ParticipantEven if it is thrashed inside, it has already affected the others, here’s a model match a block away that was just lowered to 329k and it is not thrashed.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1435700
One trigger got pulled, now here go the rest.
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:27 PM #157627
temeculaguy
ParticipantEven if it is thrashed inside, it has already affected the others, here’s a model match a block away that was just lowered to 329k and it is not thrashed.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1435700
One trigger got pulled, now here go the rest.
-
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:06 PM #157523
jpinpb
ParticipantGuess they are doing all kinds of crazy sh*t:
http://themessthatgreenspanmade.blogspot.com/2008/02/im-going-to-strip-this-mother.html
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:06 PM #157538
jpinpb
ParticipantGuess they are doing all kinds of crazy sh*t:
http://themessthatgreenspanmade.blogspot.com/2008/02/im-going-to-strip-this-mother.html
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:06 PM #157545
jpinpb
ParticipantGuess they are doing all kinds of crazy sh*t:
http://themessthatgreenspanmade.blogspot.com/2008/02/im-going-to-strip-this-mother.html
-
February 21, 2008 at 4:06 PM #157616
jpinpb
ParticipantGuess they are doing all kinds of crazy sh*t:
http://themessthatgreenspanmade.blogspot.com/2008/02/im-going-to-strip-this-mother.html
-
February 21, 2008 at 5:09 PM #157293
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantMaybe I am reading this wrong, but at 310K that would be about 120 per sqf, Heck you can find a new place with nice upgrades and a deck off the master for less than that in Temecula valley these days, maybe not a golf course view but I think that is overrated anyway, I prefer a nature view (no one behind) myself.
-
February 21, 2008 at 5:21 PM #157299
cashflow
ParticipantHey TG,
That’s a good one but last weekend we drove by this one in Harveston, and it doesn’t seem to even need much work…
We have an excellent realtor up there and she mentioned that there are the next round of REO’s to hit the market in March! Like I said, it’s getting interesting around there….
-
February 21, 2008 at 5:21 PM #157587
cashflow
ParticipantHey TG,
That’s a good one but last weekend we drove by this one in Harveston, and it doesn’t seem to even need much work…
We have an excellent realtor up there and she mentioned that there are the next round of REO’s to hit the market in March! Like I said, it’s getting interesting around there….
-
February 21, 2008 at 5:21 PM #157603
cashflow
ParticipantHey TG,
That’s a good one but last weekend we drove by this one in Harveston, and it doesn’t seem to even need much work…
We have an excellent realtor up there and she mentioned that there are the next round of REO’s to hit the market in March! Like I said, it’s getting interesting around there….
-
February 21, 2008 at 5:21 PM #157611
cashflow
ParticipantHey TG,
That’s a good one but last weekend we drove by this one in Harveston, and it doesn’t seem to even need much work…
We have an excellent realtor up there and she mentioned that there are the next round of REO’s to hit the market in March! Like I said, it’s getting interesting around there….
-
February 21, 2008 at 5:21 PM #157682
cashflow
ParticipantHey TG,
That’s a good one but last weekend we drove by this one in Harveston, and it doesn’t seem to even need much work…
We have an excellent realtor up there and she mentioned that there are the next round of REO’s to hit the market in March! Like I said, it’s getting interesting around there….
-
-
February 21, 2008 at 5:09 PM #157583
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantMaybe I am reading this wrong, but at 310K that would be about 120 per sqf, Heck you can find a new place with nice upgrades and a deck off the master for less than that in Temecula valley these days, maybe not a golf course view but I think that is overrated anyway, I prefer a nature view (no one behind) myself.
-
February 21, 2008 at 5:09 PM #157598
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantMaybe I am reading this wrong, but at 310K that would be about 120 per sqf, Heck you can find a new place with nice upgrades and a deck off the master for less than that in Temecula valley these days, maybe not a golf course view but I think that is overrated anyway, I prefer a nature view (no one behind) myself.
-
February 21, 2008 at 5:09 PM #157605
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantMaybe I am reading this wrong, but at 310K that would be about 120 per sqf, Heck you can find a new place with nice upgrades and a deck off the master for less than that in Temecula valley these days, maybe not a golf course view but I think that is overrated anyway, I prefer a nature view (no one behind) myself.
-
February 21, 2008 at 5:09 PM #157677
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantMaybe I am reading this wrong, but at 310K that would be about 120 per sqf, Heck you can find a new place with nice upgrades and a deck off the master for less than that in Temecula valley these days, maybe not a golf course view but I think that is overrated anyway, I prefer a nature view (no one behind) myself.
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:26 PM #157365
pizzaman
ParticipantSold in 2006 for 715,000 now 331,000, you do the math (hint its over 50% off)
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1499608Model match same tract 649,000
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1384592Sold in 2006 for 999,999 now 484,900
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1495929Things are getting interesting
-
February 21, 2008 at 10:25 PM #157410
Doofrat
ParticipantItalics off.
-
February 21, 2008 at 10:46 PM #157430
bearvine
ParticipantAfter golf and Pechanga, tomorrow I will go check out a couple of those properties asking low 3’s with my in the area realtor buds, and will offer $50g less than the asking and see what will happen.
Even with a counter, and even though $ per sq ft is higher than we would like, the Redhawk property TG mentioned and the Murrieta property pizzaman mentioned will rent with positive cash flow, and are in decent enough neighborhoods.
Once the banks start taking the low ball offers, it’s on and $75 sq ft in Morgan Hill will be around the corner in 2010.
The trickle down effect in Temecula will become Niagra Falls.
I know the area, and the local economy cannot support the flood of homes that are on and will hit the market. The outside buyers the area relied on, do not need to buy there. If you work in SD, why buy Temecula, pay a bit more and live in 4S. If you work in OC, you can buy Chino Hills now at a deal, and soon in HB, FV, and the other old areas.
If you live out of area, there is no need to move there for affordable housing.
If you are a Marine, Oceanside will soon be affordable again.
FYI, 40 homes in the OC went to auction at the courthouse last week and only 2 sold.
IE will drop faster, but the rest of SoCal will follow.
-
February 21, 2008 at 11:18 PM #157435
Anonymous
GuestOk, somebody sing with me, “Happy days are here again…” :).
-
February 21, 2008 at 11:18 PM #157727
Anonymous
GuestOk, somebody sing with me, “Happy days are here again…” :).
-
February 21, 2008 at 11:18 PM #157740
Anonymous
GuestOk, somebody sing with me, “Happy days are here again…” :).
-
February 21, 2008 at 11:18 PM #157749
Anonymous
GuestOk, somebody sing with me, “Happy days are here again…” :).
-
February 21, 2008 at 11:18 PM #157821
Anonymous
GuestOk, somebody sing with me, “Happy days are here again…” :).
-
February 22, 2008 at 12:02 AM #157445
temeculaguy
ParticipantBear, do you think the rental market will hold. I have to admit it’s as tight as it has ever been right now. There is very little for rent so. of 79, 1500 gets you a condo in Auberry and 2000 will get you one of those houses I linked. With a purchase price of 250k and rent of 2k, it’s a 125x ratio, the townhouses can be had for 200k, similar ratio. The gamble is will the rentals stay rented. I had to pay double rent for two weeks just to make sure I got a place where I wanted it because of the limited supply yet every tenth house is vacant. The people moving out almost had to be pushed because their new place wasn’t vacant yet. Are the current rents and vacancy factor artificial because so many people were being foreclosed on and are essentially tying up two houses (one they rent, the other in the slow foreclosure process)? When this squeezes through will the rental market get tough for landlords? And do you think some of the forclosees are just hanging around in their rental until their kids finish the school year? It just seemed to me as I was rental shopping that if I didn’t have the roots I have here, I would rent somehwere else, I would think the average commuter would move on since rents are similar in S.D. and O.C. Then again, you are the mogul, I’m a hobbyist.
Your comment about the banks taking lowballs, I think that cherry is about to pop. look at these listings that are bank owned all listed for more than four months and notice near the bottom of the page the listing price drops, seems they drop 10-20k a month like clockwork, they have got to be getting tired of that. Some have reduced their price 30%, just wait sixty days and they will take the 50k off themselves. Now that football season is over I have something to replace it with, it’s like checking standings every week to see who is in the lead.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=867629
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1005156
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1230987
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1233457
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=858784
actually don’t buy that last one, save it for me, it’s dropped 6 times in the last eight months for a total of 164k in drops, thats over 20k a month, in six months it will be 270k, it’s a little old school inside but check out the sattelite photo, that’s the golf course parking lot and I can walk home drunk from the golf course bar. I like that Euro feel of being able to hoof it to the pub.
-
February 22, 2008 at 1:00 AM #157450
bearvine
ParticipantRental Observations-
The thought pattern is that the rental market will stay strong, and get stronger in better markets. This applies only for residences that fall into the general area of affordability for the masses. For example, in the heart of Irvine, an IAC 2br 2ba townhome will cost one close to $2500 mo. Small from a sq ft perception, yet great amenities, landlord security, and an easy lifestyle. And the townhomes rent fast. On the other hand I am in a 4000 sq ft rental at $5k month for a $2m home on the hill. These don’t rent easy because it doesn’t make sense to pay so much. BTW, a neighboring home near me in foreclosure, that didnt sell at the aforementioned auction, the owners are squatting and refuse to leave.
So how does this apply to Temecula? Good points about the tight market now, yet the double home occupancy effect. Right on about commuters simply moving out of the area.
I think the rental market in Temecula will take a hit. Where it will stay strong, is a newer, 2000 sq ft home will rent fast at $1700, and the closer to 3000 sq ft around $1900. One could get more, but that’s the fast rental zone.
There will be job growth however, but not be higher scale, which is good for the rental market.
Right now, if you buy right, there should not be a negative, and if there is, the overage would cost one less than $5k a year. Now if I’m being to bearish on rents, and the market is stronger, than you are making money. Best to prepare for the worst case.
So why buy? Just as Temecula is dropping like a rock, at the next cycle it will take off like a rocket. The area is nice, will improve, and more people will need to live there.
If you can make some money annually or at least break even, come 2014-15 you’ll see the big jump right then and there.That being said, right now is still not a great time to buy, especially from the rental standpoint. Why now when drops will be bigger?
The key IMO, is cherry picking, buying in the right neighborhood, finding the every now and then steal, etc. Of course the right price matters, but neighborhood is key. The only older tract homes I would consider are in Redhawk. The golf course, feel, location are all key.
I know I’ve bashed Wolf to death, and there is more about the area that I can’t share. If you have a family absolutely avoid it. Different story if you don’t. Great buys as rentals when they get into the low 2’s, proximity to Pechanga and Pala make it a great area to rent out.
Why buy now? If you find your dream home, meets all your needs, rent would cost you more, in a better area of Temecula, less than $300k, pay around $100 sq, why not.
Why would one start buying now to use as rentals? We believe we will be able to command a rental premium by giving the tenant piece of mind that we have the financial stability and won’t foreclose, as there is that issue right now for renters. Additionally, even if we are higher now, dollar cost averaging as the market continues to plummet will protect us. And once we establish with banks in the area that we are buying properties, we can negotiate sweetheart deals directly before they bring it to market. So we have to start somewhere, and it is beginning to look more interesting.
Last note, in regards to the fixers, remember contractors in the area are dying and the updating wont be as expensive.
-
February 22, 2008 at 1:00 AM #157742
bearvine
ParticipantRental Observations-
The thought pattern is that the rental market will stay strong, and get stronger in better markets. This applies only for residences that fall into the general area of affordability for the masses. For example, in the heart of Irvine, an IAC 2br 2ba townhome will cost one close to $2500 mo. Small from a sq ft perception, yet great amenities, landlord security, and an easy lifestyle. And the townhomes rent fast. On the other hand I am in a 4000 sq ft rental at $5k month for a $2m home on the hill. These don’t rent easy because it doesn’t make sense to pay so much. BTW, a neighboring home near me in foreclosure, that didnt sell at the aforementioned auction, the owners are squatting and refuse to leave.
So how does this apply to Temecula? Good points about the tight market now, yet the double home occupancy effect. Right on about commuters simply moving out of the area.
I think the rental market in Temecula will take a hit. Where it will stay strong, is a newer, 2000 sq ft home will rent fast at $1700, and the closer to 3000 sq ft around $1900. One could get more, but that’s the fast rental zone.
There will be job growth however, but not be higher scale, which is good for the rental market.
Right now, if you buy right, there should not be a negative, and if there is, the overage would cost one less than $5k a year. Now if I’m being to bearish on rents, and the market is stronger, than you are making money. Best to prepare for the worst case.
So why buy? Just as Temecula is dropping like a rock, at the next cycle it will take off like a rocket. The area is nice, will improve, and more people will need to live there.
If you can make some money annually or at least break even, come 2014-15 you’ll see the big jump right then and there.That being said, right now is still not a great time to buy, especially from the rental standpoint. Why now when drops will be bigger?
The key IMO, is cherry picking, buying in the right neighborhood, finding the every now and then steal, etc. Of course the right price matters, but neighborhood is key. The only older tract homes I would consider are in Redhawk. The golf course, feel, location are all key.
I know I’ve bashed Wolf to death, and there is more about the area that I can’t share. If you have a family absolutely avoid it. Different story if you don’t. Great buys as rentals when they get into the low 2’s, proximity to Pechanga and Pala make it a great area to rent out.
Why buy now? If you find your dream home, meets all your needs, rent would cost you more, in a better area of Temecula, less than $300k, pay around $100 sq, why not.
Why would one start buying now to use as rentals? We believe we will be able to command a rental premium by giving the tenant piece of mind that we have the financial stability and won’t foreclose, as there is that issue right now for renters. Additionally, even if we are higher now, dollar cost averaging as the market continues to plummet will protect us. And once we establish with banks in the area that we are buying properties, we can negotiate sweetheart deals directly before they bring it to market. So we have to start somewhere, and it is beginning to look more interesting.
Last note, in regards to the fixers, remember contractors in the area are dying and the updating wont be as expensive.
-
February 22, 2008 at 1:00 AM #157753
bearvine
ParticipantRental Observations-
The thought pattern is that the rental market will stay strong, and get stronger in better markets. This applies only for residences that fall into the general area of affordability for the masses. For example, in the heart of Irvine, an IAC 2br 2ba townhome will cost one close to $2500 mo. Small from a sq ft perception, yet great amenities, landlord security, and an easy lifestyle. And the townhomes rent fast. On the other hand I am in a 4000 sq ft rental at $5k month for a $2m home on the hill. These don’t rent easy because it doesn’t make sense to pay so much. BTW, a neighboring home near me in foreclosure, that didnt sell at the aforementioned auction, the owners are squatting and refuse to leave.
So how does this apply to Temecula? Good points about the tight market now, yet the double home occupancy effect. Right on about commuters simply moving out of the area.
I think the rental market in Temecula will take a hit. Where it will stay strong, is a newer, 2000 sq ft home will rent fast at $1700, and the closer to 3000 sq ft around $1900. One could get more, but that’s the fast rental zone.
There will be job growth however, but not be higher scale, which is good for the rental market.
Right now, if you buy right, there should not be a negative, and if there is, the overage would cost one less than $5k a year. Now if I’m being to bearish on rents, and the market is stronger, than you are making money. Best to prepare for the worst case.
So why buy? Just as Temecula is dropping like a rock, at the next cycle it will take off like a rocket. The area is nice, will improve, and more people will need to live there.
If you can make some money annually or at least break even, come 2014-15 you’ll see the big jump right then and there.That being said, right now is still not a great time to buy, especially from the rental standpoint. Why now when drops will be bigger?
The key IMO, is cherry picking, buying in the right neighborhood, finding the every now and then steal, etc. Of course the right price matters, but neighborhood is key. The only older tract homes I would consider are in Redhawk. The golf course, feel, location are all key.
I know I’ve bashed Wolf to death, and there is more about the area that I can’t share. If you have a family absolutely avoid it. Different story if you don’t. Great buys as rentals when they get into the low 2’s, proximity to Pechanga and Pala make it a great area to rent out.
Why buy now? If you find your dream home, meets all your needs, rent would cost you more, in a better area of Temecula, less than $300k, pay around $100 sq, why not.
Why would one start buying now to use as rentals? We believe we will be able to command a rental premium by giving the tenant piece of mind that we have the financial stability and won’t foreclose, as there is that issue right now for renters. Additionally, even if we are higher now, dollar cost averaging as the market continues to plummet will protect us. And once we establish with banks in the area that we are buying properties, we can negotiate sweetheart deals directly before they bring it to market. So we have to start somewhere, and it is beginning to look more interesting.
Last note, in regards to the fixers, remember contractors in the area are dying and the updating wont be as expensive.
-
February 22, 2008 at 1:00 AM #157764
bearvine
ParticipantRental Observations-
The thought pattern is that the rental market will stay strong, and get stronger in better markets. This applies only for residences that fall into the general area of affordability for the masses. For example, in the heart of Irvine, an IAC 2br 2ba townhome will cost one close to $2500 mo. Small from a sq ft perception, yet great amenities, landlord security, and an easy lifestyle. And the townhomes rent fast. On the other hand I am in a 4000 sq ft rental at $5k month for a $2m home on the hill. These don’t rent easy because it doesn’t make sense to pay so much. BTW, a neighboring home near me in foreclosure, that didnt sell at the aforementioned auction, the owners are squatting and refuse to leave.
So how does this apply to Temecula? Good points about the tight market now, yet the double home occupancy effect. Right on about commuters simply moving out of the area.
I think the rental market in Temecula will take a hit. Where it will stay strong, is a newer, 2000 sq ft home will rent fast at $1700, and the closer to 3000 sq ft around $1900. One could get more, but that’s the fast rental zone.
There will be job growth however, but not be higher scale, which is good for the rental market.
Right now, if you buy right, there should not be a negative, and if there is, the overage would cost one less than $5k a year. Now if I’m being to bearish on rents, and the market is stronger, than you are making money. Best to prepare for the worst case.
So why buy? Just as Temecula is dropping like a rock, at the next cycle it will take off like a rocket. The area is nice, will improve, and more people will need to live there.
If you can make some money annually or at least break even, come 2014-15 you’ll see the big jump right then and there.That being said, right now is still not a great time to buy, especially from the rental standpoint. Why now when drops will be bigger?
The key IMO, is cherry picking, buying in the right neighborhood, finding the every now and then steal, etc. Of course the right price matters, but neighborhood is key. The only older tract homes I would consider are in Redhawk. The golf course, feel, location are all key.
I know I’ve bashed Wolf to death, and there is more about the area that I can’t share. If you have a family absolutely avoid it. Different story if you don’t. Great buys as rentals when they get into the low 2’s, proximity to Pechanga and Pala make it a great area to rent out.
Why buy now? If you find your dream home, meets all your needs, rent would cost you more, in a better area of Temecula, less than $300k, pay around $100 sq, why not.
Why would one start buying now to use as rentals? We believe we will be able to command a rental premium by giving the tenant piece of mind that we have the financial stability and won’t foreclose, as there is that issue right now for renters. Additionally, even if we are higher now, dollar cost averaging as the market continues to plummet will protect us. And once we establish with banks in the area that we are buying properties, we can negotiate sweetheart deals directly before they bring it to market. So we have to start somewhere, and it is beginning to look more interesting.
Last note, in regards to the fixers, remember contractors in the area are dying and the updating wont be as expensive.
-
February 22, 2008 at 1:00 AM #157835
bearvine
ParticipantRental Observations-
The thought pattern is that the rental market will stay strong, and get stronger in better markets. This applies only for residences that fall into the general area of affordability for the masses. For example, in the heart of Irvine, an IAC 2br 2ba townhome will cost one close to $2500 mo. Small from a sq ft perception, yet great amenities, landlord security, and an easy lifestyle. And the townhomes rent fast. On the other hand I am in a 4000 sq ft rental at $5k month for a $2m home on the hill. These don’t rent easy because it doesn’t make sense to pay so much. BTW, a neighboring home near me in foreclosure, that didnt sell at the aforementioned auction, the owners are squatting and refuse to leave.
So how does this apply to Temecula? Good points about the tight market now, yet the double home occupancy effect. Right on about commuters simply moving out of the area.
I think the rental market in Temecula will take a hit. Where it will stay strong, is a newer, 2000 sq ft home will rent fast at $1700, and the closer to 3000 sq ft around $1900. One could get more, but that’s the fast rental zone.
There will be job growth however, but not be higher scale, which is good for the rental market.
Right now, if you buy right, there should not be a negative, and if there is, the overage would cost one less than $5k a year. Now if I’m being to bearish on rents, and the market is stronger, than you are making money. Best to prepare for the worst case.
So why buy? Just as Temecula is dropping like a rock, at the next cycle it will take off like a rocket. The area is nice, will improve, and more people will need to live there.
If you can make some money annually or at least break even, come 2014-15 you’ll see the big jump right then and there.That being said, right now is still not a great time to buy, especially from the rental standpoint. Why now when drops will be bigger?
The key IMO, is cherry picking, buying in the right neighborhood, finding the every now and then steal, etc. Of course the right price matters, but neighborhood is key. The only older tract homes I would consider are in Redhawk. The golf course, feel, location are all key.
I know I’ve bashed Wolf to death, and there is more about the area that I can’t share. If you have a family absolutely avoid it. Different story if you don’t. Great buys as rentals when they get into the low 2’s, proximity to Pechanga and Pala make it a great area to rent out.
Why buy now? If you find your dream home, meets all your needs, rent would cost you more, in a better area of Temecula, less than $300k, pay around $100 sq, why not.
Why would one start buying now to use as rentals? We believe we will be able to command a rental premium by giving the tenant piece of mind that we have the financial stability and won’t foreclose, as there is that issue right now for renters. Additionally, even if we are higher now, dollar cost averaging as the market continues to plummet will protect us. And once we establish with banks in the area that we are buying properties, we can negotiate sweetheart deals directly before they bring it to market. So we have to start somewhere, and it is beginning to look more interesting.
Last note, in regards to the fixers, remember contractors in the area are dying and the updating wont be as expensive.
-
February 22, 2008 at 12:02 AM #157737
temeculaguy
ParticipantBear, do you think the rental market will hold. I have to admit it’s as tight as it has ever been right now. There is very little for rent so. of 79, 1500 gets you a condo in Auberry and 2000 will get you one of those houses I linked. With a purchase price of 250k and rent of 2k, it’s a 125x ratio, the townhouses can be had for 200k, similar ratio. The gamble is will the rentals stay rented. I had to pay double rent for two weeks just to make sure I got a place where I wanted it because of the limited supply yet every tenth house is vacant. The people moving out almost had to be pushed because their new place wasn’t vacant yet. Are the current rents and vacancy factor artificial because so many people were being foreclosed on and are essentially tying up two houses (one they rent, the other in the slow foreclosure process)? When this squeezes through will the rental market get tough for landlords? And do you think some of the forclosees are just hanging around in their rental until their kids finish the school year? It just seemed to me as I was rental shopping that if I didn’t have the roots I have here, I would rent somehwere else, I would think the average commuter would move on since rents are similar in S.D. and O.C. Then again, you are the mogul, I’m a hobbyist.
Your comment about the banks taking lowballs, I think that cherry is about to pop. look at these listings that are bank owned all listed for more than four months and notice near the bottom of the page the listing price drops, seems they drop 10-20k a month like clockwork, they have got to be getting tired of that. Some have reduced their price 30%, just wait sixty days and they will take the 50k off themselves. Now that football season is over I have something to replace it with, it’s like checking standings every week to see who is in the lead.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=867629
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1005156
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1230987
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1233457
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=858784
actually don’t buy that last one, save it for me, it’s dropped 6 times in the last eight months for a total of 164k in drops, thats over 20k a month, in six months it will be 270k, it’s a little old school inside but check out the sattelite photo, that’s the golf course parking lot and I can walk home drunk from the golf course bar. I like that Euro feel of being able to hoof it to the pub.
-
February 22, 2008 at 12:02 AM #157750
temeculaguy
ParticipantBear, do you think the rental market will hold. I have to admit it’s as tight as it has ever been right now. There is very little for rent so. of 79, 1500 gets you a condo in Auberry and 2000 will get you one of those houses I linked. With a purchase price of 250k and rent of 2k, it’s a 125x ratio, the townhouses can be had for 200k, similar ratio. The gamble is will the rentals stay rented. I had to pay double rent for two weeks just to make sure I got a place where I wanted it because of the limited supply yet every tenth house is vacant. The people moving out almost had to be pushed because their new place wasn’t vacant yet. Are the current rents and vacancy factor artificial because so many people were being foreclosed on and are essentially tying up two houses (one they rent, the other in the slow foreclosure process)? When this squeezes through will the rental market get tough for landlords? And do you think some of the forclosees are just hanging around in their rental until their kids finish the school year? It just seemed to me as I was rental shopping that if I didn’t have the roots I have here, I would rent somehwere else, I would think the average commuter would move on since rents are similar in S.D. and O.C. Then again, you are the mogul, I’m a hobbyist.
Your comment about the banks taking lowballs, I think that cherry is about to pop. look at these listings that are bank owned all listed for more than four months and notice near the bottom of the page the listing price drops, seems they drop 10-20k a month like clockwork, they have got to be getting tired of that. Some have reduced their price 30%, just wait sixty days and they will take the 50k off themselves. Now that football season is over I have something to replace it with, it’s like checking standings every week to see who is in the lead.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=867629
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1005156
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1230987
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1233457
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=858784
actually don’t buy that last one, save it for me, it’s dropped 6 times in the last eight months for a total of 164k in drops, thats over 20k a month, in six months it will be 270k, it’s a little old school inside but check out the sattelite photo, that’s the golf course parking lot and I can walk home drunk from the golf course bar. I like that Euro feel of being able to hoof it to the pub.
-
February 22, 2008 at 12:02 AM #157759
temeculaguy
ParticipantBear, do you think the rental market will hold. I have to admit it’s as tight as it has ever been right now. There is very little for rent so. of 79, 1500 gets you a condo in Auberry and 2000 will get you one of those houses I linked. With a purchase price of 250k and rent of 2k, it’s a 125x ratio, the townhouses can be had for 200k, similar ratio. The gamble is will the rentals stay rented. I had to pay double rent for two weeks just to make sure I got a place where I wanted it because of the limited supply yet every tenth house is vacant. The people moving out almost had to be pushed because their new place wasn’t vacant yet. Are the current rents and vacancy factor artificial because so many people were being foreclosed on and are essentially tying up two houses (one they rent, the other in the slow foreclosure process)? When this squeezes through will the rental market get tough for landlords? And do you think some of the forclosees are just hanging around in their rental until their kids finish the school year? It just seemed to me as I was rental shopping that if I didn’t have the roots I have here, I would rent somehwere else, I would think the average commuter would move on since rents are similar in S.D. and O.C. Then again, you are the mogul, I’m a hobbyist.
Your comment about the banks taking lowballs, I think that cherry is about to pop. look at these listings that are bank owned all listed for more than four months and notice near the bottom of the page the listing price drops, seems they drop 10-20k a month like clockwork, they have got to be getting tired of that. Some have reduced their price 30%, just wait sixty days and they will take the 50k off themselves. Now that football season is over I have something to replace it with, it’s like checking standings every week to see who is in the lead.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=867629
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1005156
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1230987
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1233457
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=858784
actually don’t buy that last one, save it for me, it’s dropped 6 times in the last eight months for a total of 164k in drops, thats over 20k a month, in six months it will be 270k, it’s a little old school inside but check out the sattelite photo, that’s the golf course parking lot and I can walk home drunk from the golf course bar. I like that Euro feel of being able to hoof it to the pub.
-
February 22, 2008 at 12:02 AM #157831
temeculaguy
ParticipantBear, do you think the rental market will hold. I have to admit it’s as tight as it has ever been right now. There is very little for rent so. of 79, 1500 gets you a condo in Auberry and 2000 will get you one of those houses I linked. With a purchase price of 250k and rent of 2k, it’s a 125x ratio, the townhouses can be had for 200k, similar ratio. The gamble is will the rentals stay rented. I had to pay double rent for two weeks just to make sure I got a place where I wanted it because of the limited supply yet every tenth house is vacant. The people moving out almost had to be pushed because their new place wasn’t vacant yet. Are the current rents and vacancy factor artificial because so many people were being foreclosed on and are essentially tying up two houses (one they rent, the other in the slow foreclosure process)? When this squeezes through will the rental market get tough for landlords? And do you think some of the forclosees are just hanging around in their rental until their kids finish the school year? It just seemed to me as I was rental shopping that if I didn’t have the roots I have here, I would rent somehwere else, I would think the average commuter would move on since rents are similar in S.D. and O.C. Then again, you are the mogul, I’m a hobbyist.
Your comment about the banks taking lowballs, I think that cherry is about to pop. look at these listings that are bank owned all listed for more than four months and notice near the bottom of the page the listing price drops, seems they drop 10-20k a month like clockwork, they have got to be getting tired of that. Some have reduced their price 30%, just wait sixty days and they will take the 50k off themselves. Now that football season is over I have something to replace it with, it’s like checking standings every week to see who is in the lead.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=867629
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1005156
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1230987
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1233457
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=858784
actually don’t buy that last one, save it for me, it’s dropped 6 times in the last eight months for a total of 164k in drops, thats over 20k a month, in six months it will be 270k, it’s a little old school inside but check out the sattelite photo, that’s the golf course parking lot and I can walk home drunk from the golf course bar. I like that Euro feel of being able to hoof it to the pub.
-
February 21, 2008 at 10:46 PM #157722
bearvine
ParticipantAfter golf and Pechanga, tomorrow I will go check out a couple of those properties asking low 3’s with my in the area realtor buds, and will offer $50g less than the asking and see what will happen.
Even with a counter, and even though $ per sq ft is higher than we would like, the Redhawk property TG mentioned and the Murrieta property pizzaman mentioned will rent with positive cash flow, and are in decent enough neighborhoods.
Once the banks start taking the low ball offers, it’s on and $75 sq ft in Morgan Hill will be around the corner in 2010.
The trickle down effect in Temecula will become Niagra Falls.
I know the area, and the local economy cannot support the flood of homes that are on and will hit the market. The outside buyers the area relied on, do not need to buy there. If you work in SD, why buy Temecula, pay a bit more and live in 4S. If you work in OC, you can buy Chino Hills now at a deal, and soon in HB, FV, and the other old areas.
If you live out of area, there is no need to move there for affordable housing.
If you are a Marine, Oceanside will soon be affordable again.
FYI, 40 homes in the OC went to auction at the courthouse last week and only 2 sold.
IE will drop faster, but the rest of SoCal will follow.
-
February 21, 2008 at 10:46 PM #157735
bearvine
ParticipantAfter golf and Pechanga, tomorrow I will go check out a couple of those properties asking low 3’s with my in the area realtor buds, and will offer $50g less than the asking and see what will happen.
Even with a counter, and even though $ per sq ft is higher than we would like, the Redhawk property TG mentioned and the Murrieta property pizzaman mentioned will rent with positive cash flow, and are in decent enough neighborhoods.
Once the banks start taking the low ball offers, it’s on and $75 sq ft in Morgan Hill will be around the corner in 2010.
The trickle down effect in Temecula will become Niagra Falls.
I know the area, and the local economy cannot support the flood of homes that are on and will hit the market. The outside buyers the area relied on, do not need to buy there. If you work in SD, why buy Temecula, pay a bit more and live in 4S. If you work in OC, you can buy Chino Hills now at a deal, and soon in HB, FV, and the other old areas.
If you live out of area, there is no need to move there for affordable housing.
If you are a Marine, Oceanside will soon be affordable again.
FYI, 40 homes in the OC went to auction at the courthouse last week and only 2 sold.
IE will drop faster, but the rest of SoCal will follow.
-
February 21, 2008 at 10:46 PM #157744
bearvine
ParticipantAfter golf and Pechanga, tomorrow I will go check out a couple of those properties asking low 3’s with my in the area realtor buds, and will offer $50g less than the asking and see what will happen.
Even with a counter, and even though $ per sq ft is higher than we would like, the Redhawk property TG mentioned and the Murrieta property pizzaman mentioned will rent with positive cash flow, and are in decent enough neighborhoods.
Once the banks start taking the low ball offers, it’s on and $75 sq ft in Morgan Hill will be around the corner in 2010.
The trickle down effect in Temecula will become Niagra Falls.
I know the area, and the local economy cannot support the flood of homes that are on and will hit the market. The outside buyers the area relied on, do not need to buy there. If you work in SD, why buy Temecula, pay a bit more and live in 4S. If you work in OC, you can buy Chino Hills now at a deal, and soon in HB, FV, and the other old areas.
If you live out of area, there is no need to move there for affordable housing.
If you are a Marine, Oceanside will soon be affordable again.
FYI, 40 homes in the OC went to auction at the courthouse last week and only 2 sold.
IE will drop faster, but the rest of SoCal will follow.
-
February 21, 2008 at 10:46 PM #157816
bearvine
ParticipantAfter golf and Pechanga, tomorrow I will go check out a couple of those properties asking low 3’s with my in the area realtor buds, and will offer $50g less than the asking and see what will happen.
Even with a counter, and even though $ per sq ft is higher than we would like, the Redhawk property TG mentioned and the Murrieta property pizzaman mentioned will rent with positive cash flow, and are in decent enough neighborhoods.
Once the banks start taking the low ball offers, it’s on and $75 sq ft in Morgan Hill will be around the corner in 2010.
The trickle down effect in Temecula will become Niagra Falls.
I know the area, and the local economy cannot support the flood of homes that are on and will hit the market. The outside buyers the area relied on, do not need to buy there. If you work in SD, why buy Temecula, pay a bit more and live in 4S. If you work in OC, you can buy Chino Hills now at a deal, and soon in HB, FV, and the other old areas.
If you live out of area, there is no need to move there for affordable housing.
If you are a Marine, Oceanside will soon be affordable again.
FYI, 40 homes in the OC went to auction at the courthouse last week and only 2 sold.
IE will drop faster, but the rest of SoCal will follow.
-
-
February 21, 2008 at 10:25 PM #157701
Doofrat
ParticipantItalics off.
-
February 21, 2008 at 10:25 PM #157715
Doofrat
ParticipantItalics off.
-
February 21, 2008 at 10:25 PM #157725
Doofrat
ParticipantItalics off.
-
February 21, 2008 at 10:25 PM #157796
Doofrat
ParticipantItalics off.
-
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:26 PM #157656
pizzaman
ParticipantSold in 2006 for 715,000 now 331,000, you do the math (hint its over 50% off)
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1499608Model match same tract 649,000
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1384592Sold in 2006 for 999,999 now 484,900
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1495929Things are getting interesting
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:26 PM #157670
pizzaman
ParticipantSold in 2006 for 715,000 now 331,000, you do the math (hint its over 50% off)
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1499608Model match same tract 649,000
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1384592Sold in 2006 for 999,999 now 484,900
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1495929Things are getting interesting
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:26 PM #157679
pizzaman
ParticipantSold in 2006 for 715,000 now 331,000, you do the math (hint its over 50% off)
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1499608Model match same tract 649,000
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1384592Sold in 2006 for 999,999 now 484,900
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1495929Things are getting interesting
-
February 21, 2008 at 8:26 PM #157751
pizzaman
ParticipantSold in 2006 for 715,000 now 331,000, you do the math (hint its over 50% off)
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1499608Model match same tract 649,000
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1384592Sold in 2006 for 999,999 now 484,900
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1495929Things are getting interesting
-
March 13, 2008 at 1:34 AM #168433
Vertigo
ParticipantYou piggies make me sick. Vultures is more like it. Just circling and circling from above looking for the weak down below. Looking for financial deaths. Cant wait to feed off of poor homeowners can you?
Cant wait to turn homes over to renters.
And how many of you have links to the speculators, brokers, lenders, realtors, appraisers, underwriters and mortgage backed securities that helped create this mess?
Your greed is ugly.
-
March 13, 2008 at 2:36 AM #168453
djc
ParticipantYes, shame on all you people who didn’t buy assets they couldn’t afford like everyone else. How dare you act responsibly!
Your greed disgusts me also. Those poor homeowners losing their house since they couldn’t flip their ‘investment’ properties weren’t greedy, they were looking to get ahead.
shame shame shame
-
March 13, 2008 at 12:11 PM #168735
ctlmdjb
ParticipantOK here’s a question. I’d love to participate in the next housing price re-bound….where else can I get an asset where the bank will leverage 80% of the money and it generates a cash-flow that covers my investment from day one?
But I don’t want to be a landlord – been there done that, it’s a pain in the a**. Every week something goes wrong, every week hassle of fixing this, doing that.
So who can I buy shares in that professionally manages property and where the value of the company increases with the value of the property owned? I want to buy shares in a property management company that is smartly investing as we hit the low point of the cycle, not buy and manage property myself.
Thoughts?
-
March 13, 2008 at 7:08 PM #169071
hipmatt
ParticipantI know the guy who bought the first home that TG listed. He is a great guy who can easily afford the home and has a great job, income, and down payment. The second listing is smoking crack.
-
March 13, 2008 at 7:59 PM #169081
temeculaguy
ParticipantGood for him matt, that is actually a great little enclave and the 324k he paid is a very reasonable price. The second one I referenced dropped their price 60k to 339k two days ago, it will probably sell soon, 20% slashings are starting to work.
If you have another friend, this one was so underpriced it didn’t last a week, the link may not last long but 269k for a nice newer 4/3 2500 sq in one of the better parts of Redhawk and they even replaced the lawn (something the banks are starting to do lately). Only thing they can do is throw out a backup offer at this point, it sold before the pictures were posted.
I’m noticing the spread widening between the repos and the FB’s, sometimes the listing prices are close to double on model matches and only the bargains are selling but they are selling quick. I’ve also noticed that a bunch of the repos I saw last month are on craigslist for rent. Houses for rent on cl in temecula are blowing up, in three days there were one hundred ads, I also saw rents being reduced over a week’s time on the same house being relisted. I think a lot of people are deciding that some of these are penciling out as rentals and are taking the plunge, it’s likely the rental market is going to get more competative and rents will decline, especially as gas prices rise. I think there will be one more leg down this summer as potential landlords are scared away by all the for rent signs that will be coming very soon.
Then Vertigo can wag his/her finger at me, for now I’ll just ponder which BBQ sauce to use on all those carcasses.
-
March 14, 2008 at 6:42 AM #169293
Nor-LA-SD-guy
Participanttemeculaguy,
If you find a few more like these (269K) I will take five, Just kidding, don’t have the finances for that but wish I did,
With prices like these I think you might start seeing Temecula becoming a retirement Mecca again.
I don’t think I would want to be an apartment building owner in the TV or anywhere close for awhile, Seems these homes would be much nicer to rent than a small two bedroom etc.. appartment
-
March 14, 2008 at 11:05 AM #169456
temeculaguy
ParticipantNor, I can find you as many as you would like, this beauty just lowered it’s price today to 289k for 2800 sq, nice litle 65k drop and almost 100k below it’s original price in 2003.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1331174
Just to prove my point about the spread increasing, same model, same street, same sq feet, 619k, well over twice the price.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1429404
Only recently have I seen such disparity, there are more examples but this one is pretty distinct, 289k or 619k for the same house.
-
March 14, 2008 at 11:32 AM #169507
Nor-LA-SD-guy
Participanttemeculaguy ,
To be fair the 619K home looks to have about 100K more invested in the back yard, (not much of a pool man myself though – That’s why God made the beach and power boats).
Will be interesting to see what this closes at.Too late for me, already pulled the trigger .
Not gonig anywhere for 15 years if ever (like where I am at).
Not really interested in becomming a land lord either.
Maybe I should stop comming here, but it seems I am hooked somehow watching this thing.
happy home hunting everyone.
-
March 14, 2008 at 11:32 AM #169839
Nor-LA-SD-guy
Participanttemeculaguy ,
To be fair the 619K home looks to have about 100K more invested in the back yard, (not much of a pool man myself though – That’s why God made the beach and power boats).
Will be interesting to see what this closes at.Too late for me, already pulled the trigger .
Not gonig anywhere for 15 years if ever (like where I am at).
Not really interested in becomming a land lord either.
Maybe I should stop comming here, but it seems I am hooked somehow watching this thing.
happy home hunting everyone.
-
March 14, 2008 at 11:32 AM #169843
Nor-LA-SD-guy
Participanttemeculaguy ,
To be fair the 619K home looks to have about 100K more invested in the back yard, (not much of a pool man myself though – That’s why God made the beach and power boats).
Will be interesting to see what this closes at.Too late for me, already pulled the trigger .
Not gonig anywhere for 15 years if ever (like where I am at).
Not really interested in becomming a land lord either.
Maybe I should stop comming here, but it seems I am hooked somehow watching this thing.
happy home hunting everyone.
-
March 14, 2008 at 11:32 AM #169865
Nor-LA-SD-guy
Participanttemeculaguy ,
To be fair the 619K home looks to have about 100K more invested in the back yard, (not much of a pool man myself though – That’s why God made the beach and power boats).
Will be interesting to see what this closes at.Too late for me, already pulled the trigger .
Not gonig anywhere for 15 years if ever (like where I am at).
Not really interested in becomming a land lord either.
Maybe I should stop comming here, but it seems I am hooked somehow watching this thing.
happy home hunting everyone.
-
March 14, 2008 at 11:32 AM #169943
Nor-LA-SD-guy
Participanttemeculaguy ,
To be fair the 619K home looks to have about 100K more invested in the back yard, (not much of a pool man myself though – That’s why God made the beach and power boats).
Will be interesting to see what this closes at.Too late for me, already pulled the trigger .
Not gonig anywhere for 15 years if ever (like where I am at).
Not really interested in becomming a land lord either.
Maybe I should stop comming here, but it seems I am hooked somehow watching this thing.
happy home hunting everyone.
-
March 14, 2008 at 11:36 AM #169518
patientlywaiting
Participanttemeculaguy, that latest example you showed is a nice corner lot too.
If I’m not mistaken, those are the same prices as 1989 prices (about $100/sf).
I bet you’re having a lot of fun looking at listings. You’re saving money everyday you’re not buying. 😉
-
March 14, 2008 at 12:20 PM #169557
hipmatt
ParticipantMy wife went to look at that 269k pool home the day it came on the market, but we aren’t in much of a hurry. I want a single story if possible. I think the best is yet to come. I completely agree with you about the amount of rentals and likely reduction in rental prices.
-
March 14, 2008 at 12:20 PM #169889
hipmatt
ParticipantMy wife went to look at that 269k pool home the day it came on the market, but we aren’t in much of a hurry. I want a single story if possible. I think the best is yet to come. I completely agree with you about the amount of rentals and likely reduction in rental prices.
-
March 14, 2008 at 12:20 PM #169893
hipmatt
ParticipantMy wife went to look at that 269k pool home the day it came on the market, but we aren’t in much of a hurry. I want a single story if possible. I think the best is yet to come. I completely agree with you about the amount of rentals and likely reduction in rental prices.
-
March 14, 2008 at 12:20 PM #169915
hipmatt
ParticipantMy wife went to look at that 269k pool home the day it came on the market, but we aren’t in much of a hurry. I want a single story if possible. I think the best is yet to come. I completely agree with you about the amount of rentals and likely reduction in rental prices.
-
March 14, 2008 at 12:20 PM #169992
hipmatt
ParticipantMy wife went to look at that 269k pool home the day it came on the market, but we aren’t in much of a hurry. I want a single story if possible. I think the best is yet to come. I completely agree with you about the amount of rentals and likely reduction in rental prices.
-
March 14, 2008 at 11:36 AM #169849
patientlywaiting
Participanttemeculaguy, that latest example you showed is a nice corner lot too.
If I’m not mistaken, those are the same prices as 1989 prices (about $100/sf).
I bet you’re having a lot of fun looking at listings. You’re saving money everyday you’re not buying. 😉
-
March 14, 2008 at 11:36 AM #169853
patientlywaiting
Participanttemeculaguy, that latest example you showed is a nice corner lot too.
If I’m not mistaken, those are the same prices as 1989 prices (about $100/sf).
I bet you’re having a lot of fun looking at listings. You’re saving money everyday you’re not buying. 😉
-
March 14, 2008 at 11:36 AM #169876
patientlywaiting
Participanttemeculaguy, that latest example you showed is a nice corner lot too.
If I’m not mistaken, those are the same prices as 1989 prices (about $100/sf).
I bet you’re having a lot of fun looking at listings. You’re saving money everyday you’re not buying. 😉
-
March 14, 2008 at 11:36 AM #169953
patientlywaiting
Participanttemeculaguy, that latest example you showed is a nice corner lot too.
If I’m not mistaken, those are the same prices as 1989 prices (about $100/sf).
I bet you’re having a lot of fun looking at listings. You’re saving money everyday you’re not buying. 😉
-
March 14, 2008 at 11:05 AM #169789
temeculaguy
ParticipantNor, I can find you as many as you would like, this beauty just lowered it’s price today to 289k for 2800 sq, nice litle 65k drop and almost 100k below it’s original price in 2003.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1331174
Just to prove my point about the spread increasing, same model, same street, same sq feet, 619k, well over twice the price.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1429404
Only recently have I seen such disparity, there are more examples but this one is pretty distinct, 289k or 619k for the same house.
-
March 14, 2008 at 11:05 AM #169793
temeculaguy
ParticipantNor, I can find you as many as you would like, this beauty just lowered it’s price today to 289k for 2800 sq, nice litle 65k drop and almost 100k below it’s original price in 2003.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1331174
Just to prove my point about the spread increasing, same model, same street, same sq feet, 619k, well over twice the price.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1429404
Only recently have I seen such disparity, there are more examples but this one is pretty distinct, 289k or 619k for the same house.
-
March 14, 2008 at 11:05 AM #169815
temeculaguy
ParticipantNor, I can find you as many as you would like, this beauty just lowered it’s price today to 289k for 2800 sq, nice litle 65k drop and almost 100k below it’s original price in 2003.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1331174
Just to prove my point about the spread increasing, same model, same street, same sq feet, 619k, well over twice the price.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1429404
Only recently have I seen such disparity, there are more examples but this one is pretty distinct, 289k or 619k for the same house.
-
March 14, 2008 at 11:05 AM #169892
temeculaguy
ParticipantNor, I can find you as many as you would like, this beauty just lowered it’s price today to 289k for 2800 sq, nice litle 65k drop and almost 100k below it’s original price in 2003.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1331174
Just to prove my point about the spread increasing, same model, same street, same sq feet, 619k, well over twice the price.
http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1429404
Only recently have I seen such disparity, there are more examples but this one is pretty distinct, 289k or 619k for the same house.
-
March 14, 2008 at 6:42 AM #169623
Nor-LA-SD-guy
Participanttemeculaguy,
If you find a few more like these (269K) I will take five, Just kidding, don’t have the finances for that but wish I did,
With prices like these I think you might start seeing Temecula becoming a retirement Mecca again.
I don’t think I would want to be an apartment building owner in the TV or anywhere close for awhile, Seems these homes would be much nicer to rent than a small two bedroom etc.. appartment
-
March 14, 2008 at 6:42 AM #169629
Nor-LA-SD-guy
Participanttemeculaguy,
If you find a few more like these (269K) I will take five, Just kidding, don’t have the finances for that but wish I did,
With prices like these I think you might start seeing Temecula becoming a retirement Mecca again.
I don’t think I would want to be an apartment building owner in the TV or anywhere close for awhile, Seems these homes would be much nicer to rent than a small two bedroom etc.. appartment
-
March 14, 2008 at 6:42 AM #169650
Nor-LA-SD-guy
Participanttemeculaguy,
If you find a few more like these (269K) I will take five, Just kidding, don’t have the finances for that but wish I did,
With prices like these I think you might start seeing Temecula becoming a retirement Mecca again.
I don’t think I would want to be an apartment building owner in the TV or anywhere close for awhile, Seems these homes would be much nicer to rent than a small two bedroom etc.. appartment
-
March 14, 2008 at 6:42 AM #169726
Nor-LA-SD-guy
Participanttemeculaguy,
If you find a few more like these (269K) I will take five, Just kidding, don’t have the finances for that but wish I did,
With prices like these I think you might start seeing Temecula becoming a retirement Mecca again.
I don’t think I would want to be an apartment building owner in the TV or anywhere close for awhile, Seems these homes would be much nicer to rent than a small two bedroom etc.. appartment
-
March 13, 2008 at 7:59 PM #169414
temeculaguy
ParticipantGood for him matt, that is actually a great little enclave and the 324k he paid is a very reasonable price. The second one I referenced dropped their price 60k to 339k two days ago, it will probably sell soon, 20% slashings are starting to work.
If you have another friend, this one was so underpriced it didn’t last a week, the link may not last long but 269k for a nice newer 4/3 2500 sq in one of the better parts of Redhawk and they even replaced the lawn (something the banks are starting to do lately). Only thing they can do is throw out a backup offer at this point, it sold before the pictures were posted.
I’m noticing the spread widening between the repos and the FB’s, sometimes the listing prices are close to double on model matches and only the bargains are selling but they are selling quick. I’ve also noticed that a bunch of the repos I saw last month are on craigslist for rent. Houses for rent on cl in temecula are blowing up, in three days there were one hundred ads, I also saw rents being reduced over a week’s time on the same house being relisted. I think a lot of people are deciding that some of these are penciling out as rentals and are taking the plunge, it’s likely the rental market is going to get more competative and rents will decline, especially as gas prices rise. I think there will be one more leg down this summer as potential landlords are scared away by all the for rent signs that will be coming very soon.
Then Vertigo can wag his/her finger at me, for now I’ll just ponder which BBQ sauce to use on all those carcasses.
-
March 13, 2008 at 7:59 PM #169419
temeculaguy
ParticipantGood for him matt, that is actually a great little enclave and the 324k he paid is a very reasonable price. The second one I referenced dropped their price 60k to 339k two days ago, it will probably sell soon, 20% slashings are starting to work.
If you have another friend, this one was so underpriced it didn’t last a week, the link may not last long but 269k for a nice newer 4/3 2500 sq in one of the better parts of Redhawk and they even replaced the lawn (something the banks are starting to do lately). Only thing they can do is throw out a backup offer at this point, it sold before the pictures were posted.
I’m noticing the spread widening between the repos and the FB’s, sometimes the listing prices are close to double on model matches and only the bargains are selling but they are selling quick. I’ve also noticed that a bunch of the repos I saw last month are on craigslist for rent. Houses for rent on cl in temecula are blowing up, in three days there were one hundred ads, I also saw rents being reduced over a week’s time on the same house being relisted. I think a lot of people are deciding that some of these are penciling out as rentals and are taking the plunge, it’s likely the rental market is going to get more competative and rents will decline, especially as gas prices rise. I think there will be one more leg down this summer as potential landlords are scared away by all the for rent signs that will be coming very soon.
Then Vertigo can wag his/her finger at me, for now I’ll just ponder which BBQ sauce to use on all those carcasses.
-
March 13, 2008 at 7:59 PM #169440
temeculaguy
ParticipantGood for him matt, that is actually a great little enclave and the 324k he paid is a very reasonable price. The second one I referenced dropped their price 60k to 339k two days ago, it will probably sell soon, 20% slashings are starting to work.
If you have another friend, this one was so underpriced it didn’t last a week, the link may not last long but 269k for a nice newer 4/3 2500 sq in one of the better parts of Redhawk and they even replaced the lawn (something the banks are starting to do lately). Only thing they can do is throw out a backup offer at this point, it sold before the pictures were posted.
I’m noticing the spread widening between the repos and the FB’s, sometimes the listing prices are close to double on model matches and only the bargains are selling but they are selling quick. I’ve also noticed that a bunch of the repos I saw last month are on craigslist for rent. Houses for rent on cl in temecula are blowing up, in three days there were one hundred ads, I also saw rents being reduced over a week’s time on the same house being relisted. I think a lot of people are deciding that some of these are penciling out as rentals and are taking the plunge, it’s likely the rental market is going to get more competative and rents will decline, especially as gas prices rise. I think there will be one more leg down this summer as potential landlords are scared away by all the for rent signs that will be coming very soon.
Then Vertigo can wag his/her finger at me, for now I’ll just ponder which BBQ sauce to use on all those carcasses.
-
March 13, 2008 at 7:59 PM #169517
temeculaguy
ParticipantGood for him matt, that is actually a great little enclave and the 324k he paid is a very reasonable price. The second one I referenced dropped their price 60k to 339k two days ago, it will probably sell soon, 20% slashings are starting to work.
If you have another friend, this one was so underpriced it didn’t last a week, the link may not last long but 269k for a nice newer 4/3 2500 sq in one of the better parts of Redhawk and they even replaced the lawn (something the banks are starting to do lately). Only thing they can do is throw out a backup offer at this point, it sold before the pictures were posted.
I’m noticing the spread widening between the repos and the FB’s, sometimes the listing prices are close to double on model matches and only the bargains are selling but they are selling quick. I’ve also noticed that a bunch of the repos I saw last month are on craigslist for rent. Houses for rent on cl in temecula are blowing up, in three days there were one hundred ads, I also saw rents being reduced over a week’s time on the same house being relisted. I think a lot of people are deciding that some of these are penciling out as rentals and are taking the plunge, it’s likely the rental market is going to get more competative and rents will decline, especially as gas prices rise. I think there will be one more leg down this summer as potential landlords are scared away by all the for rent signs that will be coming very soon.
Then Vertigo can wag his/her finger at me, for now I’ll just ponder which BBQ sauce to use on all those carcasses.
-
March 13, 2008 at 7:08 PM #169404
hipmatt
ParticipantI know the guy who bought the first home that TG listed. He is a great guy who can easily afford the home and has a great job, income, and down payment. The second listing is smoking crack.
-
March 13, 2008 at 7:08 PM #169407
hipmatt
ParticipantI know the guy who bought the first home that TG listed. He is a great guy who can easily afford the home and has a great job, income, and down payment. The second listing is smoking crack.
-
March 13, 2008 at 7:08 PM #169430
hipmatt
ParticipantI know the guy who bought the first home that TG listed. He is a great guy who can easily afford the home and has a great job, income, and down payment. The second listing is smoking crack.
-
March 13, 2008 at 7:08 PM #169506
hipmatt
ParticipantI know the guy who bought the first home that TG listed. He is a great guy who can easily afford the home and has a great job, income, and down payment. The second listing is smoking crack.
-
March 13, 2008 at 12:11 PM #169069
ctlmdjb
ParticipantOK here’s a question. I’d love to participate in the next housing price re-bound….where else can I get an asset where the bank will leverage 80% of the money and it generates a cash-flow that covers my investment from day one?
But I don’t want to be a landlord – been there done that, it’s a pain in the a**. Every week something goes wrong, every week hassle of fixing this, doing that.
So who can I buy shares in that professionally manages property and where the value of the company increases with the value of the property owned? I want to buy shares in a property management company that is smartly investing as we hit the low point of the cycle, not buy and manage property myself.
Thoughts?
-
March 13, 2008 at 12:11 PM #169074
ctlmdjb
ParticipantOK here’s a question. I’d love to participate in the next housing price re-bound….where else can I get an asset where the bank will leverage 80% of the money and it generates a cash-flow that covers my investment from day one?
But I don’t want to be a landlord – been there done that, it’s a pain in the a**. Every week something goes wrong, every week hassle of fixing this, doing that.
So who can I buy shares in that professionally manages property and where the value of the company increases with the value of the property owned? I want to buy shares in a property management company that is smartly investing as we hit the low point of the cycle, not buy and manage property myself.
Thoughts?
-
March 13, 2008 at 12:11 PM #169095
ctlmdjb
ParticipantOK here’s a question. I’d love to participate in the next housing price re-bound….where else can I get an asset where the bank will leverage 80% of the money and it generates a cash-flow that covers my investment from day one?
But I don’t want to be a landlord – been there done that, it’s a pain in the a**. Every week something goes wrong, every week hassle of fixing this, doing that.
So who can I buy shares in that professionally manages property and where the value of the company increases with the value of the property owned? I want to buy shares in a property management company that is smartly investing as we hit the low point of the cycle, not buy and manage property myself.
Thoughts?
-
March 13, 2008 at 12:11 PM #169172
ctlmdjb
ParticipantOK here’s a question. I’d love to participate in the next housing price re-bound….where else can I get an asset where the bank will leverage 80% of the money and it generates a cash-flow that covers my investment from day one?
But I don’t want to be a landlord – been there done that, it’s a pain in the a**. Every week something goes wrong, every week hassle of fixing this, doing that.
So who can I buy shares in that professionally manages property and where the value of the company increases with the value of the property owned? I want to buy shares in a property management company that is smartly investing as we hit the low point of the cycle, not buy and manage property myself.
Thoughts?
-
-
March 13, 2008 at 2:36 AM #168784
djc
ParticipantYes, shame on all you people who didn’t buy assets they couldn’t afford like everyone else. How dare you act responsibly!
Your greed disgusts me also. Those poor homeowners losing their house since they couldn’t flip their ‘investment’ properties weren’t greedy, they were looking to get ahead.
shame shame shame
-
March 13, 2008 at 2:36 AM #168786
djc
ParticipantYes, shame on all you people who didn’t buy assets they couldn’t afford like everyone else. How dare you act responsibly!
Your greed disgusts me also. Those poor homeowners losing their house since they couldn’t flip their ‘investment’ properties weren’t greedy, they were looking to get ahead.
shame shame shame
-
March 13, 2008 at 2:36 AM #168814
djc
ParticipantYes, shame on all you people who didn’t buy assets they couldn’t afford like everyone else. How dare you act responsibly!
Your greed disgusts me also. Those poor homeowners losing their house since they couldn’t flip their ‘investment’ properties weren’t greedy, they were looking to get ahead.
shame shame shame
-
March 13, 2008 at 2:36 AM #168889
djc
ParticipantYes, shame on all you people who didn’t buy assets they couldn’t afford like everyone else. How dare you act responsibly!
Your greed disgusts me also. Those poor homeowners losing their house since they couldn’t flip their ‘investment’ properties weren’t greedy, they were looking to get ahead.
shame shame shame
-
-
March 13, 2008 at 1:34 AM #168764
Vertigo
ParticipantYou piggies make me sick. Vultures is more like it. Just circling and circling from above looking for the weak down below. Looking for financial deaths. Cant wait to feed off of poor homeowners can you?
Cant wait to turn homes over to renters.
And how many of you have links to the speculators, brokers, lenders, realtors, appraisers, underwriters and mortgage backed securities that helped create this mess?
Your greed is ugly.
-
March 13, 2008 at 1:34 AM #168765
Vertigo
ParticipantYou piggies make me sick. Vultures is more like it. Just circling and circling from above looking for the weak down below. Looking for financial deaths. Cant wait to feed off of poor homeowners can you?
Cant wait to turn homes over to renters.
And how many of you have links to the speculators, brokers, lenders, realtors, appraisers, underwriters and mortgage backed securities that helped create this mess?
Your greed is ugly.
-
March 13, 2008 at 1:34 AM #168793
Vertigo
ParticipantYou piggies make me sick. Vultures is more like it. Just circling and circling from above looking for the weak down below. Looking for financial deaths. Cant wait to feed off of poor homeowners can you?
Cant wait to turn homes over to renters.
And how many of you have links to the speculators, brokers, lenders, realtors, appraisers, underwriters and mortgage backed securities that helped create this mess?
Your greed is ugly.
-
March 13, 2008 at 1:34 AM #168869
Vertigo
ParticipantYou piggies make me sick. Vultures is more like it. Just circling and circling from above looking for the weak down below. Looking for financial deaths. Cant wait to feed off of poor homeowners can you?
Cant wait to turn homes over to renters.
And how many of you have links to the speculators, brokers, lenders, realtors, appraisers, underwriters and mortgage backed securities that helped create this mess?
Your greed is ugly.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.