ok: can someone tell me what good is left for the health care reform

[jpinpb]

[quote=CA renter]
This bill had nothing to do with healthcare; it was all about enriching the insurance companies.[/quote]

X2

[briansd1]

I think I need to refine my statement.

Obama Cares, at first, is a give-away to the insurance companies.

But overall, it’s a net positive.

Yes, the insurance companies will take in more money, but over the years, as health care becomes universal, the population will become healthier and cost per capita will decrease.

There will be opportunities to reform and refine the system to provide universal care.

It’s like saying that Medicare is a give-away to doctors. Yes, it certainly was at first when Medicare reimbursement rates were good. But over the years, Medicare has been able to manage costs for seniors.

A public option was not part of HCR, but who’s to say that it could not be added later.

I believe that once voters see the benefits of universal healthcare, they will support the necessary reforms to improve HCR.

30 years for now, we’ll look back at Obama Cares as an important social achievement. The big picture goal to lower the cost of health care per capita, while expanding health care access to a great proportion of the population.

[briansd1]

I think I need to refine my statement.

Obama Cares, at first, is a give-away to the insurance companies.

But overall, it’s a net positive.

Yes, the insurance companies will take in more money, but over the years, as health care becomes universal, the population will become healthier and cost per capita will decrease.

There will be opportunities to reform and refine the system to provide universal care.

It’s like saying that Medicare is a give-away to doctors. Yes, it certainly was at first when Medicare reimbursement rates were good. But over the years, Medicare has been able to manage costs for seniors.

A public option was not part of HCR, but who’s to say that it could not be added later.

I believe that once voters see the benefits of universal healthcare, they will support the necessary reforms to improve HCR.

30 years for now, we’ll look back at Obama Cares as an important social achievement. The big picture goal to lower the cost of health care per capita, while expanding health care access to a great proportion of the population.

[briansd1]

I think I need to refine my statement.

Obama Cares, at first, is a give-away to the insurance companies.

But overall, it’s a net positive.

Yes, the insurance companies will take in more money, but over the years, as health care becomes universal, the population will become healthier and cost per capita will decrease.

There will be opportunities to reform and refine the system to provide universal care.

It’s like saying that Medicare is a give-away to doctors. Yes, it certainly was at first when Medicare reimbursement rates were good. But over the years, Medicare has been able to manage costs for seniors.

A public option was not part of HCR, but who’s to say that it could not be added later.

I believe that once voters see the benefits of universal healthcare, they will support the necessary reforms to improve HCR.

30 years for now, we’ll look back at Obama Cares as an important social achievement. The big picture goal to lower the cost of health care per capita, while expanding health care access to a great proportion of the population.

[briansd1]

I think I need to refine my statement.

Obama Cares, at first, is a give-away to the insurance companies.

But overall, it’s a net positive.

Yes, the insurance companies will take in more money, but over the years, as health care becomes universal, the population will become healthier and cost per capita will decrease.

There will be opportunities to reform and refine the system to provide universal care.

It’s like saying that Medicare is a give-away to doctors. Yes, it certainly was at first when Medicare reimbursement rates were good. But over the years, Medicare has been able to manage costs for seniors.

A public option was not part of HCR, but who’s to say that it could not be added later.

I believe that once voters see the benefits of universal healthcare, they will support the necessary reforms to improve HCR.

30 years for now, we’ll look back at Obama Cares as an important social achievement. The big picture goal to lower the cost of health care per capita, while expanding health care access to a great proportion of the population.

[briansd1]

I think I need to refine my statement.

Obama Cares, at first, is a give-away to the insurance companies.

But overall, it’s a net positive.

Yes, the insurance companies will take in more money, but over the years, as health care becomes universal, the population will become healthier and cost per capita will decrease.

There will be opportunities to reform and refine the system to provide universal care.

It’s like saying that Medicare is a give-away to doctors. Yes, it certainly was at first when Medicare reimbursement rates were good. But over the years, Medicare has been able to manage costs for seniors.

A public option was not part of HCR, but who’s to say that it could not be added later.

I believe that once voters see the benefits of universal healthcare, they will support the necessary reforms to improve HCR.

30 years for now, we’ll look back at Obama Cares as an important social achievement. The big picture goal to lower the cost of health care per capita, while expanding health care access to a great proportion of the population.

[Author]

Posts