- This topic has 90 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by UCGal.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 17, 2009 at 10:39 PM #417736June 18, 2009 at 7:58 AM #4170454plexownerParticipant
“in preparation for thong season”
I hope that won’t be you in the thong!
June 18, 2009 at 7:58 AM #4172824plexownerParticipant“in preparation for thong season”
I hope that won’t be you in the thong!
June 18, 2009 at 7:58 AM #4175444plexownerParticipant“in preparation for thong season”
I hope that won’t be you in the thong!
June 18, 2009 at 7:58 AM #4176104plexownerParticipant“in preparation for thong season”
I hope that won’t be you in the thong!
June 18, 2009 at 7:58 AM #4177714plexownerParticipant“in preparation for thong season”
I hope that won’t be you in the thong!
June 18, 2009 at 10:45 AM #4171005yearwaiterParticipant[quote=Rt.66]TemeculaGuy is saying that Cramer is soooo aweful that he’d like to recant his (TVG’s) previous prediction as to not be allied with a dumbass Cramer call.
I think he’s calling Cramer the opposite of an “expert”.[/quote]
I understood what TG is saying. What I am asking is better to delete this entire Cramer’s thread and don’t even publish whatever Cramer express hereafter – so that from now folks wouldn’t even think about Cramer’s voice as an expert voice. Just aksing IGNORE to publish even this kind of cramer’s Weather Cock slogans π
June 18, 2009 at 10:45 AM #4173375yearwaiterParticipant[quote=Rt.66]TemeculaGuy is saying that Cramer is soooo aweful that he’d like to recant his (TVG’s) previous prediction as to not be allied with a dumbass Cramer call.
I think he’s calling Cramer the opposite of an “expert”.[/quote]
I understood what TG is saying. What I am asking is better to delete this entire Cramer’s thread and don’t even publish whatever Cramer express hereafter – so that from now folks wouldn’t even think about Cramer’s voice as an expert voice. Just aksing IGNORE to publish even this kind of cramer’s Weather Cock slogans π
June 18, 2009 at 10:45 AM #4175995yearwaiterParticipant[quote=Rt.66]TemeculaGuy is saying that Cramer is soooo aweful that he’d like to recant his (TVG’s) previous prediction as to not be allied with a dumbass Cramer call.
I think he’s calling Cramer the opposite of an “expert”.[/quote]
I understood what TG is saying. What I am asking is better to delete this entire Cramer’s thread and don’t even publish whatever Cramer express hereafter – so that from now folks wouldn’t even think about Cramer’s voice as an expert voice. Just aksing IGNORE to publish even this kind of cramer’s Weather Cock slogans π
June 18, 2009 at 10:45 AM #4176655yearwaiterParticipant[quote=Rt.66]TemeculaGuy is saying that Cramer is soooo aweful that he’d like to recant his (TVG’s) previous prediction as to not be allied with a dumbass Cramer call.
I think he’s calling Cramer the opposite of an “expert”.[/quote]
I understood what TG is saying. What I am asking is better to delete this entire Cramer’s thread and don’t even publish whatever Cramer express hereafter – so that from now folks wouldn’t even think about Cramer’s voice as an expert voice. Just aksing IGNORE to publish even this kind of cramer’s Weather Cock slogans π
June 18, 2009 at 10:45 AM #4178265yearwaiterParticipant[quote=Rt.66]TemeculaGuy is saying that Cramer is soooo aweful that he’d like to recant his (TVG’s) previous prediction as to not be allied with a dumbass Cramer call.
I think he’s calling Cramer the opposite of an “expert”.[/quote]
I understood what TG is saying. What I am asking is better to delete this entire Cramer’s thread and don’t even publish whatever Cramer express hereafter – so that from now folks wouldn’t even think about Cramer’s voice as an expert voice. Just aksing IGNORE to publish even this kind of cramer’s Weather Cock slogans π
June 18, 2009 at 11:08 AM #417115UCGalParticipant[quote=5yearwaiter][quote=Rt.66]TemeculaGuy is saying that Cramer is soooo aweful that he’d like to recant his (TVG’s) previous prediction as to not be allied with a dumbass Cramer call.
I think he’s calling Cramer the opposite of an “expert”.[/quote]
I understood what TG is saying. What I am asking is better to delete this entire Cramer’s thread and don’t even publish whatever Cramer express hereafter – so that from now folks wouldn’t even think about Cramer’s voice as an expert voice. Just aksing IGNORE to publish even this kind of cramer’s Weather Cock slogans :-)[/quote]
But where would be the fun in MOCKING Cramer, then?
June 18, 2009 at 11:08 AM #417351UCGalParticipant[quote=5yearwaiter][quote=Rt.66]TemeculaGuy is saying that Cramer is soooo aweful that he’d like to recant his (TVG’s) previous prediction as to not be allied with a dumbass Cramer call.
I think he’s calling Cramer the opposite of an “expert”.[/quote]
I understood what TG is saying. What I am asking is better to delete this entire Cramer’s thread and don’t even publish whatever Cramer express hereafter – so that from now folks wouldn’t even think about Cramer’s voice as an expert voice. Just aksing IGNORE to publish even this kind of cramer’s Weather Cock slogans :-)[/quote]
But where would be the fun in MOCKING Cramer, then?
June 18, 2009 at 11:08 AM #417614UCGalParticipant[quote=5yearwaiter][quote=Rt.66]TemeculaGuy is saying that Cramer is soooo aweful that he’d like to recant his (TVG’s) previous prediction as to not be allied with a dumbass Cramer call.
I think he’s calling Cramer the opposite of an “expert”.[/quote]
I understood what TG is saying. What I am asking is better to delete this entire Cramer’s thread and don’t even publish whatever Cramer express hereafter – so that from now folks wouldn’t even think about Cramer’s voice as an expert voice. Just aksing IGNORE to publish even this kind of cramer’s Weather Cock slogans :-)[/quote]
But where would be the fun in MOCKING Cramer, then?
June 18, 2009 at 11:08 AM #417680UCGalParticipant[quote=5yearwaiter][quote=Rt.66]TemeculaGuy is saying that Cramer is soooo aweful that he’d like to recant his (TVG’s) previous prediction as to not be allied with a dumbass Cramer call.
I think he’s calling Cramer the opposite of an “expert”.[/quote]
I understood what TG is saying. What I am asking is better to delete this entire Cramer’s thread and don’t even publish whatever Cramer express hereafter – so that from now folks wouldn’t even think about Cramer’s voice as an expert voice. Just aksing IGNORE to publish even this kind of cramer’s Weather Cock slogans :-)[/quote]
But where would be the fun in MOCKING Cramer, then?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.