McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool

[surveyor]

figures

You know, it’s so typical. I actually get some decent work done this morning and afternoon, and then check into piggington, and I miss the smackdown of marion. =sigh=

I need a piggington tivo.

[surveyor]

figures

You know, it’s so typical. I actually get some decent work done this morning and afternoon, and then check into piggington, and I miss the smackdown of marion. =sigh=

I need a piggington tivo.

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=jficquette]

I am not trying to start a fight. I am sharing information that most people here never see because they get their news from the MSM.

If you will take the time to read my posts you will find that the people who disagree with me are the ones who do the name calling and use the vulgar language.

[/quote]

Your last post linked to the WSJ opinion page — how is that not MSM? Anyone who wants to read the WSJ is capable of doing so on their own. (And btw the post before that one, the global warming one, was a link to a hoax as far as I can tell).

I didn’t accuse you of calling people names, but of stirring the pot and trying to get people riled. I find it hard to believe that you come here to a housing (not political) site and post the stuff you do, with the frequency you do, if you aren’t looking for a fight.

On that note, you are arguing with me right now, and I’m really not interested. Like I said, the “don’t abuse the policy” policy is subjective in nature, and right or wrong the above represents my subjective opinion. As such I’m requesting that you tone it down in the future.

Thanks,
Rich

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=jficquette]

I am not trying to start a fight. I am sharing information that most people here never see because they get their news from the MSM.

If you will take the time to read my posts you will find that the people who disagree with me are the ones who do the name calling and use the vulgar language.

[/quote]

Your last post linked to the WSJ opinion page — how is that not MSM? Anyone who wants to read the WSJ is capable of doing so on their own. (And btw the post before that one, the global warming one, was a link to a hoax as far as I can tell).

I didn’t accuse you of calling people names, but of stirring the pot and trying to get people riled. I find it hard to believe that you come here to a housing (not political) site and post the stuff you do, with the frequency you do, if you aren’t looking for a fight.

On that note, you are arguing with me right now, and I’m really not interested. Like I said, the “don’t abuse the policy” policy is subjective in nature, and right or wrong the above represents my subjective opinion. As such I’m requesting that you tone it down in the future.

Thanks,
Rich

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=jficquette]

I am not trying to start a fight. I am sharing information that most people here never see because they get their news from the MSM.

If you will take the time to read my posts you will find that the people who disagree with me are the ones who do the name calling and use the vulgar language.

[/quote]

Your last post linked to the WSJ opinion page — how is that not MSM? Anyone who wants to read the WSJ is capable of doing so on their own. (And btw the post before that one, the global warming one, was a link to a hoax as far as I can tell).

I didn’t accuse you of calling people names, but of stirring the pot and trying to get people riled. I find it hard to believe that you come here to a housing (not political) site and post the stuff you do, with the frequency you do, if you aren’t looking for a fight.

On that note, you are arguing with me right now, and I’m really not interested. Like I said, the “don’t abuse the policy” policy is subjective in nature, and right or wrong the above represents my subjective opinion. As such I’m requesting that you tone it down in the future.

Thanks,
Rich

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=jficquette]

I am not trying to start a fight. I am sharing information that most people here never see because they get their news from the MSM.

If you will take the time to read my posts you will find that the people who disagree with me are the ones who do the name calling and use the vulgar language.

[/quote]

Your last post linked to the WSJ opinion page — how is that not MSM? Anyone who wants to read the WSJ is capable of doing so on their own. (And btw the post before that one, the global warming one, was a link to a hoax as far as I can tell).

I didn’t accuse you of calling people names, but of stirring the pot and trying to get people riled. I find it hard to believe that you come here to a housing (not political) site and post the stuff you do, with the frequency you do, if you aren’t looking for a fight.

On that note, you are arguing with me right now, and I’m really not interested. Like I said, the “don’t abuse the policy” policy is subjective in nature, and right or wrong the above represents my subjective opinion. As such I’m requesting that you tone it down in the future.

Thanks,
Rich

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=jficquette]

I am not trying to start a fight. I am sharing information that most people here never see because they get their news from the MSM.

If you will take the time to read my posts you will find that the people who disagree with me are the ones who do the name calling and use the vulgar language.

[/quote]

Your last post linked to the WSJ opinion page — how is that not MSM? Anyone who wants to read the WSJ is capable of doing so on their own. (And btw the post before that one, the global warming one, was a link to a hoax as far as I can tell).

I didn’t accuse you of calling people names, but of stirring the pot and trying to get people riled. I find it hard to believe that you come here to a housing (not political) site and post the stuff you do, with the frequency you do, if you aren’t looking for a fight.

On that note, you are arguing with me right now, and I’m really not interested. Like I said, the “don’t abuse the policy” policy is subjective in nature, and right or wrong the above represents my subjective opinion. As such I’m requesting that you tone it down in the future.

Thanks,
Rich

[Author]

Posts