- This topic has 75 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by patientlywaiting.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM #326814January 9, 2009 at 12:21 PM #326374PadreBrianParticipant
Technically it is a “buyer’s market” and not a “seller’s market”. It’s easier to buy for a price lower than the asking price. That’s the definition.
January 9, 2009 at 12:21 PM #326713PadreBrianParticipantTechnically it is a “buyer’s market” and not a “seller’s market”. It’s easier to buy for a price lower than the asking price. That’s the definition.
January 9, 2009 at 12:21 PM #326782PadreBrianParticipantTechnically it is a “buyer’s market” and not a “seller’s market”. It’s easier to buy for a price lower than the asking price. That’s the definition.
January 9, 2009 at 12:21 PM #326800PadreBrianParticipantTechnically it is a “buyer’s market” and not a “seller’s market”. It’s easier to buy for a price lower than the asking price. That’s the definition.
January 9, 2009 at 12:21 PM #326884PadreBrianParticipantTechnically it is a “buyer’s market” and not a “seller’s market”. It’s easier to buy for a price lower than the asking price. That’s the definition.
January 9, 2009 at 1:17 PM #326384patientlywaitingParticipantSD realtor, no, I don’t think that we have the same data as McAllister and Smith.
1) They see the information in advance to they should be AHEAD of the curve, not blindsided.
2) When times are tough, people wait ’til the last minute to pay their taxes. The rate at which taxes are collected throughout the year is not reported to citizens.
These guys need to be voted out of office for siding with the real estate industry and allowing their names to be used for sales promotions.
As Condi Rice would say, we cannot accept the status quo ante.
January 9, 2009 at 1:17 PM #326723patientlywaitingParticipantSD realtor, no, I don’t think that we have the same data as McAllister and Smith.
1) They see the information in advance to they should be AHEAD of the curve, not blindsided.
2) When times are tough, people wait ’til the last minute to pay their taxes. The rate at which taxes are collected throughout the year is not reported to citizens.
These guys need to be voted out of office for siding with the real estate industry and allowing their names to be used for sales promotions.
As Condi Rice would say, we cannot accept the status quo ante.
January 9, 2009 at 1:17 PM #326792patientlywaitingParticipantSD realtor, no, I don’t think that we have the same data as McAllister and Smith.
1) They see the information in advance to they should be AHEAD of the curve, not blindsided.
2) When times are tough, people wait ’til the last minute to pay their taxes. The rate at which taxes are collected throughout the year is not reported to citizens.
These guys need to be voted out of office for siding with the real estate industry and allowing their names to be used for sales promotions.
As Condi Rice would say, we cannot accept the status quo ante.
January 9, 2009 at 1:17 PM #326810patientlywaitingParticipantSD realtor, no, I don’t think that we have the same data as McAllister and Smith.
1) They see the information in advance to they should be AHEAD of the curve, not blindsided.
2) When times are tough, people wait ’til the last minute to pay their taxes. The rate at which taxes are collected throughout the year is not reported to citizens.
These guys need to be voted out of office for siding with the real estate industry and allowing their names to be used for sales promotions.
As Condi Rice would say, we cannot accept the status quo ante.
January 9, 2009 at 1:17 PM #326894patientlywaitingParticipantSD realtor, no, I don’t think that we have the same data as McAllister and Smith.
1) They see the information in advance to they should be AHEAD of the curve, not blindsided.
2) When times are tough, people wait ’til the last minute to pay their taxes. The rate at which taxes are collected throughout the year is not reported to citizens.
These guys need to be voted out of office for siding with the real estate industry and allowing their names to be used for sales promotions.
As Condi Rice would say, we cannot accept the status quo ante.
January 9, 2009 at 1:55 PM #326423(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=4plexowner]”By any definition I could find”
seems like a complete definition would address the ability of the buyers to actually buy the item in question
let’s see, no more:
– zero down loans
– stated income (liars) loans
– cheap jumbo loans
– inflated appraisalsyep, sounds like a buyer’s market to me too[/quote]
“… ability of buyers to actually buy the item in question …”
BY definition if they are buyers they have the ability to buy. Otherwise they are onlookers.
As to whether one should buy currently ? Well that is another question altogether, and should not be confused with the term “buyer’s market”
But as to whether it’s a buyer’s market in economic terms. Of this there is no doubt.
January 9, 2009 at 1:55 PM #326762(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=4plexowner]”By any definition I could find”
seems like a complete definition would address the ability of the buyers to actually buy the item in question
let’s see, no more:
– zero down loans
– stated income (liars) loans
– cheap jumbo loans
– inflated appraisalsyep, sounds like a buyer’s market to me too[/quote]
“… ability of buyers to actually buy the item in question …”
BY definition if they are buyers they have the ability to buy. Otherwise they are onlookers.
As to whether one should buy currently ? Well that is another question altogether, and should not be confused with the term “buyer’s market”
But as to whether it’s a buyer’s market in economic terms. Of this there is no doubt.
January 9, 2009 at 1:55 PM #326832(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=4plexowner]”By any definition I could find”
seems like a complete definition would address the ability of the buyers to actually buy the item in question
let’s see, no more:
– zero down loans
– stated income (liars) loans
– cheap jumbo loans
– inflated appraisalsyep, sounds like a buyer’s market to me too[/quote]
“… ability of buyers to actually buy the item in question …”
BY definition if they are buyers they have the ability to buy. Otherwise they are onlookers.
As to whether one should buy currently ? Well that is another question altogether, and should not be confused with the term “buyer’s market”
But as to whether it’s a buyer’s market in economic terms. Of this there is no doubt.
January 9, 2009 at 1:55 PM #326850(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=4plexowner]”By any definition I could find”
seems like a complete definition would address the ability of the buyers to actually buy the item in question
let’s see, no more:
– zero down loans
– stated income (liars) loans
– cheap jumbo loans
– inflated appraisalsyep, sounds like a buyer’s market to me too[/quote]
“… ability of buyers to actually buy the item in question …”
BY definition if they are buyers they have the ability to buy. Otherwise they are onlookers.
As to whether one should buy currently ? Well that is another question altogether, and should not be confused with the term “buyer’s market”
But as to whether it’s a buyer’s market in economic terms. Of this there is no doubt.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.