- This topic has 75 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by patientlywaiting.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 8, 2009 at 8:20 PM #326654January 8, 2009 at 9:32 PM #326158rankandfileParticipant
[quote=DWCAP]”I always wonder how reasonable economic expectations and standard accounting became ‘doom and gloom.” [/quote]
You are not a doom-and-gloomer if things truly are as crappy as you state in your argument…you are a realist. The “optimists/delusionists” like Greg Smith are so much worse than their counterparts who said that we were in a RE bubble back in 2004, before the peak had come and gone.
Greg Smith has displayed gross impropriety and conflict of interest by whoring out his stature as a “respected public official” for the benefit of the RE industry. He is the epitome of our corrupt system of government and should be removed from office and brought up on charges. Who am I fooling? That would only occur in a system where the people think critically and actually give a crap about what goes on outside of the headlines from E! News.
January 8, 2009 at 9:32 PM #326499rankandfileParticipant[quote=DWCAP]”I always wonder how reasonable economic expectations and standard accounting became ‘doom and gloom.” [/quote]
You are not a doom-and-gloomer if things truly are as crappy as you state in your argument…you are a realist. The “optimists/delusionists” like Greg Smith are so much worse than their counterparts who said that we were in a RE bubble back in 2004, before the peak had come and gone.
Greg Smith has displayed gross impropriety and conflict of interest by whoring out his stature as a “respected public official” for the benefit of the RE industry. He is the epitome of our corrupt system of government and should be removed from office and brought up on charges. Who am I fooling? That would only occur in a system where the people think critically and actually give a crap about what goes on outside of the headlines from E! News.
January 8, 2009 at 9:32 PM #326566rankandfileParticipant[quote=DWCAP]”I always wonder how reasonable economic expectations and standard accounting became ‘doom and gloom.” [/quote]
You are not a doom-and-gloomer if things truly are as crappy as you state in your argument…you are a realist. The “optimists/delusionists” like Greg Smith are so much worse than their counterparts who said that we were in a RE bubble back in 2004, before the peak had come and gone.
Greg Smith has displayed gross impropriety and conflict of interest by whoring out his stature as a “respected public official” for the benefit of the RE industry. He is the epitome of our corrupt system of government and should be removed from office and brought up on charges. Who am I fooling? That would only occur in a system where the people think critically and actually give a crap about what goes on outside of the headlines from E! News.
January 8, 2009 at 9:32 PM #326585rankandfileParticipant[quote=DWCAP]”I always wonder how reasonable economic expectations and standard accounting became ‘doom and gloom.” [/quote]
You are not a doom-and-gloomer if things truly are as crappy as you state in your argument…you are a realist. The “optimists/delusionists” like Greg Smith are so much worse than their counterparts who said that we were in a RE bubble back in 2004, before the peak had come and gone.
Greg Smith has displayed gross impropriety and conflict of interest by whoring out his stature as a “respected public official” for the benefit of the RE industry. He is the epitome of our corrupt system of government and should be removed from office and brought up on charges. Who am I fooling? That would only occur in a system where the people think critically and actually give a crap about what goes on outside of the headlines from E! News.
January 8, 2009 at 9:32 PM #326669rankandfileParticipant[quote=DWCAP]”I always wonder how reasonable economic expectations and standard accounting became ‘doom and gloom.” [/quote]
You are not a doom-and-gloomer if things truly are as crappy as you state in your argument…you are a realist. The “optimists/delusionists” like Greg Smith are so much worse than their counterparts who said that we were in a RE bubble back in 2004, before the peak had come and gone.
Greg Smith has displayed gross impropriety and conflict of interest by whoring out his stature as a “respected public official” for the benefit of the RE industry. He is the epitome of our corrupt system of government and should be removed from office and brought up on charges. Who am I fooling? That would only occur in a system where the people think critically and actually give a crap about what goes on outside of the headlines from E! News.
January 8, 2009 at 9:38 PM #326168SD RealtorParticipantCome on guys really. We have discussed this alot.
The raw data is at
http://www.foreclosureforum.com/stats.html
Actually we have pretty much just as much information as McAllister does. Of course defaults and trustee sales have declined over the past few months. In fact they have declined DRASTICALLY, approximately 60% due to the legislation passed last July.
There is nothing surprising nor shocking.
What will be kind of interesting though is now that the lenders are basically being forced to let people live in homes for free will those same people who default on property taxes be allowed to stay as well?
January 8, 2009 at 9:38 PM #326509SD RealtorParticipantCome on guys really. We have discussed this alot.
The raw data is at
http://www.foreclosureforum.com/stats.html
Actually we have pretty much just as much information as McAllister does. Of course defaults and trustee sales have declined over the past few months. In fact they have declined DRASTICALLY, approximately 60% due to the legislation passed last July.
There is nothing surprising nor shocking.
What will be kind of interesting though is now that the lenders are basically being forced to let people live in homes for free will those same people who default on property taxes be allowed to stay as well?
January 8, 2009 at 9:38 PM #326577SD RealtorParticipantCome on guys really. We have discussed this alot.
The raw data is at
http://www.foreclosureforum.com/stats.html
Actually we have pretty much just as much information as McAllister does. Of course defaults and trustee sales have declined over the past few months. In fact they have declined DRASTICALLY, approximately 60% due to the legislation passed last July.
There is nothing surprising nor shocking.
What will be kind of interesting though is now that the lenders are basically being forced to let people live in homes for free will those same people who default on property taxes be allowed to stay as well?
January 8, 2009 at 9:38 PM #326595SD RealtorParticipantCome on guys really. We have discussed this alot.
The raw data is at
http://www.foreclosureforum.com/stats.html
Actually we have pretty much just as much information as McAllister does. Of course defaults and trustee sales have declined over the past few months. In fact they have declined DRASTICALLY, approximately 60% due to the legislation passed last July.
There is nothing surprising nor shocking.
What will be kind of interesting though is now that the lenders are basically being forced to let people live in homes for free will those same people who default on property taxes be allowed to stay as well?
January 8, 2009 at 9:38 PM #326679SD RealtorParticipantCome on guys really. We have discussed this alot.
The raw data is at
http://www.foreclosureforum.com/stats.html
Actually we have pretty much just as much information as McAllister does. Of course defaults and trustee sales have declined over the past few months. In fact they have declined DRASTICALLY, approximately 60% due to the legislation passed last July.
There is nothing surprising nor shocking.
What will be kind of interesting though is now that the lenders are basically being forced to let people live in homes for free will those same people who default on property taxes be allowed to stay as well?
January 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM #326304donaldduckmooreParticipantHe must have some raw data to back up his statement. As a government official, he should not have taken any sides because he is supposed to be neutral. Therefore, I believe what he said. But SD realtor makes a good point. A new policy might have significantly reduce the number of foreclosure.
January 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM #326642donaldduckmooreParticipantHe must have some raw data to back up his statement. As a government official, he should not have taken any sides because he is supposed to be neutral. Therefore, I believe what he said. But SD realtor makes a good point. A new policy might have significantly reduce the number of foreclosure.
January 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM #326711donaldduckmooreParticipantHe must have some raw data to back up his statement. As a government official, he should not have taken any sides because he is supposed to be neutral. Therefore, I believe what he said. But SD realtor makes a good point. A new policy might have significantly reduce the number of foreclosure.
January 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM #326730donaldduckmooreParticipantHe must have some raw data to back up his statement. As a government official, he should not have taken any sides because he is supposed to be neutral. Therefore, I believe what he said. But SD realtor makes a good point. A new policy might have significantly reduce the number of foreclosure.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.