- This topic has 370 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 10 months ago by Ricechex.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 24, 2010 at 5:20 PM #572013June 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM #571013urbanrealtorParticipant
[quote=CA renter][quote=Scarlett]CA R, you and I should get together for a drink… I totally feel and share your frustrations.[/quote]
jpinpb and I were saying this on another thread…it’s time for another get-together!
At least there’s one good thing to come of this mess — meeting great people from these blogs. :)[/quote]
I like JP.
She is smart and purty.Anyhoo, I have had this conversation with like 10 of my short sale clients.
Most just opt to rent the place out and be up front with the tenants (there is no real downside for the tenants) and put the deposit in a broker trust (usually mine).
The tenants are stoked at usually a cheap rent (without the deposit at risk) and the landlords are stoked at getting money without paying mortgage.And in case you are wondering, this does not qualify as skimming as long as the landlord has title and has had title for at least one year.
In all fairness, it kinda sucks for the banks but they put themselves in this position.
They are the only ones acting irrationally as they delay short sales.
June 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM #571108urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=CA renter][quote=Scarlett]CA R, you and I should get together for a drink… I totally feel and share your frustrations.[/quote]
jpinpb and I were saying this on another thread…it’s time for another get-together!
At least there’s one good thing to come of this mess — meeting great people from these blogs. :)[/quote]
I like JP.
She is smart and purty.Anyhoo, I have had this conversation with like 10 of my short sale clients.
Most just opt to rent the place out and be up front with the tenants (there is no real downside for the tenants) and put the deposit in a broker trust (usually mine).
The tenants are stoked at usually a cheap rent (without the deposit at risk) and the landlords are stoked at getting money without paying mortgage.And in case you are wondering, this does not qualify as skimming as long as the landlord has title and has had title for at least one year.
In all fairness, it kinda sucks for the banks but they put themselves in this position.
They are the only ones acting irrationally as they delay short sales.
June 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM #571627urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=CA renter][quote=Scarlett]CA R, you and I should get together for a drink… I totally feel and share your frustrations.[/quote]
jpinpb and I were saying this on another thread…it’s time for another get-together!
At least there’s one good thing to come of this mess — meeting great people from these blogs. :)[/quote]
I like JP.
She is smart and purty.Anyhoo, I have had this conversation with like 10 of my short sale clients.
Most just opt to rent the place out and be up front with the tenants (there is no real downside for the tenants) and put the deposit in a broker trust (usually mine).
The tenants are stoked at usually a cheap rent (without the deposit at risk) and the landlords are stoked at getting money without paying mortgage.And in case you are wondering, this does not qualify as skimming as long as the landlord has title and has had title for at least one year.
In all fairness, it kinda sucks for the banks but they put themselves in this position.
They are the only ones acting irrationally as they delay short sales.
June 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM #571733urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=CA renter][quote=Scarlett]CA R, you and I should get together for a drink… I totally feel and share your frustrations.[/quote]
jpinpb and I were saying this on another thread…it’s time for another get-together!
At least there’s one good thing to come of this mess — meeting great people from these blogs. :)[/quote]
I like JP.
She is smart and purty.Anyhoo, I have had this conversation with like 10 of my short sale clients.
Most just opt to rent the place out and be up front with the tenants (there is no real downside for the tenants) and put the deposit in a broker trust (usually mine).
The tenants are stoked at usually a cheap rent (without the deposit at risk) and the landlords are stoked at getting money without paying mortgage.And in case you are wondering, this does not qualify as skimming as long as the landlord has title and has had title for at least one year.
In all fairness, it kinda sucks for the banks but they put themselves in this position.
They are the only ones acting irrationally as they delay short sales.
June 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM #572028urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=CA renter][quote=Scarlett]CA R, you and I should get together for a drink… I totally feel and share your frustrations.[/quote]
jpinpb and I were saying this on another thread…it’s time for another get-together!
At least there’s one good thing to come of this mess — meeting great people from these blogs. :)[/quote]
I like JP.
She is smart and purty.Anyhoo, I have had this conversation with like 10 of my short sale clients.
Most just opt to rent the place out and be up front with the tenants (there is no real downside for the tenants) and put the deposit in a broker trust (usually mine).
The tenants are stoked at usually a cheap rent (without the deposit at risk) and the landlords are stoked at getting money without paying mortgage.And in case you are wondering, this does not qualify as skimming as long as the landlord has title and has had title for at least one year.
In all fairness, it kinda sucks for the banks but they put themselves in this position.
They are the only ones acting irrationally as they delay short sales.
June 24, 2010 at 5:54 PM #571038jpinpbParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor]
I like JP.
She is smart and purty.
[/quote]I like UR. Funny, too. Still holding open houses in school girl outfits?
[quote=urbanrealtor]They are the only ones acting irrationally as they delay short sales.[/quote]
Agree w/this. They are definitely setting the situation up.
June 24, 2010 at 5:54 PM #571133jpinpbParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor]
I like JP.
She is smart and purty.
[/quote]I like UR. Funny, too. Still holding open houses in school girl outfits?
[quote=urbanrealtor]They are the only ones acting irrationally as they delay short sales.[/quote]
Agree w/this. They are definitely setting the situation up.
June 24, 2010 at 5:54 PM #571652jpinpbParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor]
I like JP.
She is smart and purty.
[/quote]I like UR. Funny, too. Still holding open houses in school girl outfits?
[quote=urbanrealtor]They are the only ones acting irrationally as they delay short sales.[/quote]
Agree w/this. They are definitely setting the situation up.
June 24, 2010 at 5:54 PM #571759jpinpbParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor]
I like JP.
She is smart and purty.
[/quote]I like UR. Funny, too. Still holding open houses in school girl outfits?
[quote=urbanrealtor]They are the only ones acting irrationally as they delay short sales.[/quote]
Agree w/this. They are definitely setting the situation up.
June 24, 2010 at 5:54 PM #572053jpinpbParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor]
I like JP.
She is smart and purty.
[/quote]I like UR. Funny, too. Still holding open houses in school girl outfits?
[quote=urbanrealtor]They are the only ones acting irrationally as they delay short sales.[/quote]
Agree w/this. They are definitely setting the situation up.
June 24, 2010 at 6:28 PM #571063jpinpbParticipant[quote=CA renter]
I used to believe there were “strict appraisals,” but have seen enough flips lately that negate that theory. I’ve seen flippers make $100K-$150K in a couple of months with maybe $20K in “improvements.” If appraisers are valuing the **same house** $100K+ more than the what it sold for just a few months ago, the whole system is broken.
[/quote]Here you go. I just came across this and thought of your post:
3929 TexasSold 05/18/2010 for $385,000
Flip price 590k.
WTF!!!!
Where are my crazy pills?
June 24, 2010 at 6:28 PM #571158jpinpbParticipant[quote=CA renter]
I used to believe there were “strict appraisals,” but have seen enough flips lately that negate that theory. I’ve seen flippers make $100K-$150K in a couple of months with maybe $20K in “improvements.” If appraisers are valuing the **same house** $100K+ more than the what it sold for just a few months ago, the whole system is broken.
[/quote]Here you go. I just came across this and thought of your post:
3929 TexasSold 05/18/2010 for $385,000
Flip price 590k.
WTF!!!!
Where are my crazy pills?
June 24, 2010 at 6:28 PM #571677jpinpbParticipant[quote=CA renter]
I used to believe there were “strict appraisals,” but have seen enough flips lately that negate that theory. I’ve seen flippers make $100K-$150K in a couple of months with maybe $20K in “improvements.” If appraisers are valuing the **same house** $100K+ more than the what it sold for just a few months ago, the whole system is broken.
[/quote]Here you go. I just came across this and thought of your post:
3929 TexasSold 05/18/2010 for $385,000
Flip price 590k.
WTF!!!!
Where are my crazy pills?
June 24, 2010 at 6:28 PM #571784jpinpbParticipant[quote=CA renter]
I used to believe there were “strict appraisals,” but have seen enough flips lately that negate that theory. I’ve seen flippers make $100K-$150K in a couple of months with maybe $20K in “improvements.” If appraisers are valuing the **same house** $100K+ more than the what it sold for just a few months ago, the whole system is broken.
[/quote]Here you go. I just came across this and thought of your post:
3929 TexasSold 05/18/2010 for $385,000
Flip price 590k.
WTF!!!!
Where are my crazy pills?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.