- This topic has 370 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by Ricechex.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 24, 2010 at 9:57 PM #572201June 24, 2010 at 10:48 PM #571202stockstradrParticipant
I think this thread’s been ‘jacked.
Which is OK because now I have the urge to do some squatting.
I need to assume the position and see if an idea for a new Piggington.com thread comes out of me.
June 24, 2010 at 10:48 PM #571299stockstradrParticipantI think this thread’s been ‘jacked.
Which is OK because now I have the urge to do some squatting.
I need to assume the position and see if an idea for a new Piggington.com thread comes out of me.
June 24, 2010 at 10:48 PM #571817stockstradrParticipantI think this thread’s been ‘jacked.
Which is OK because now I have the urge to do some squatting.
I need to assume the position and see if an idea for a new Piggington.com thread comes out of me.
June 24, 2010 at 10:48 PM #571925stockstradrParticipantI think this thread’s been ‘jacked.
Which is OK because now I have the urge to do some squatting.
I need to assume the position and see if an idea for a new Piggington.com thread comes out of me.
June 24, 2010 at 10:48 PM #572216stockstradrParticipantI think this thread’s been ‘jacked.
Which is OK because now I have the urge to do some squatting.
I need to assume the position and see if an idea for a new Piggington.com thread comes out of me.
June 24, 2010 at 11:20 PM #571217garysearsParticipantNot many serious threads make it to page 3 without getting jacked. Intentional default is OK but it is soooo 2008. You added credit card default to your plan, but unsecured default is a separate issue. If the losses were really going to the banks with intentional default I would be in favor of it. Force the banks to make wise risk decisions when making secured loans. Unfortunately, it will just mean losses to the GSEs who will be bailed out with further government debt (and ultimate “quantitative easing”).
It is not as critical in SoCal as say Florida, but properties need to be lived in or they quickly degrade. Responsible squatters who keep the place clean and even do minor maintenance and yard upkeep provide a valuable service to the banks. Squatting in homes banks refuse to take back harms no one except the unidentifiable rentier who will not getting your rent check. I think it is a net benefit to society and should be encouraged.
June 24, 2010 at 11:20 PM #571314garysearsParticipantNot many serious threads make it to page 3 without getting jacked. Intentional default is OK but it is soooo 2008. You added credit card default to your plan, but unsecured default is a separate issue. If the losses were really going to the banks with intentional default I would be in favor of it. Force the banks to make wise risk decisions when making secured loans. Unfortunately, it will just mean losses to the GSEs who will be bailed out with further government debt (and ultimate “quantitative easing”).
It is not as critical in SoCal as say Florida, but properties need to be lived in or they quickly degrade. Responsible squatters who keep the place clean and even do minor maintenance and yard upkeep provide a valuable service to the banks. Squatting in homes banks refuse to take back harms no one except the unidentifiable rentier who will not getting your rent check. I think it is a net benefit to society and should be encouraged.
June 24, 2010 at 11:20 PM #571832garysearsParticipantNot many serious threads make it to page 3 without getting jacked. Intentional default is OK but it is soooo 2008. You added credit card default to your plan, but unsecured default is a separate issue. If the losses were really going to the banks with intentional default I would be in favor of it. Force the banks to make wise risk decisions when making secured loans. Unfortunately, it will just mean losses to the GSEs who will be bailed out with further government debt (and ultimate “quantitative easing”).
It is not as critical in SoCal as say Florida, but properties need to be lived in or they quickly degrade. Responsible squatters who keep the place clean and even do minor maintenance and yard upkeep provide a valuable service to the banks. Squatting in homes banks refuse to take back harms no one except the unidentifiable rentier who will not getting your rent check. I think it is a net benefit to society and should be encouraged.
June 24, 2010 at 11:20 PM #571940garysearsParticipantNot many serious threads make it to page 3 without getting jacked. Intentional default is OK but it is soooo 2008. You added credit card default to your plan, but unsecured default is a separate issue. If the losses were really going to the banks with intentional default I would be in favor of it. Force the banks to make wise risk decisions when making secured loans. Unfortunately, it will just mean losses to the GSEs who will be bailed out with further government debt (and ultimate “quantitative easing”).
It is not as critical in SoCal as say Florida, but properties need to be lived in or they quickly degrade. Responsible squatters who keep the place clean and even do minor maintenance and yard upkeep provide a valuable service to the banks. Squatting in homes banks refuse to take back harms no one except the unidentifiable rentier who will not getting your rent check. I think it is a net benefit to society and should be encouraged.
June 24, 2010 at 11:20 PM #572230garysearsParticipantNot many serious threads make it to page 3 without getting jacked. Intentional default is OK but it is soooo 2008. You added credit card default to your plan, but unsecured default is a separate issue. If the losses were really going to the banks with intentional default I would be in favor of it. Force the banks to make wise risk decisions when making secured loans. Unfortunately, it will just mean losses to the GSEs who will be bailed out with further government debt (and ultimate “quantitative easing”).
It is not as critical in SoCal as say Florida, but properties need to be lived in or they quickly degrade. Responsible squatters who keep the place clean and even do minor maintenance and yard upkeep provide a valuable service to the banks. Squatting in homes banks refuse to take back harms no one except the unidentifiable rentier who will not getting your rent check. I think it is a net benefit to society and should be encouraged.
June 26, 2010 at 8:01 AM #571729scaredyclassicParticipantBuying a house while your neighbors are squatting could in retrospect look as crazy and dumb as buying a house at the peak of the bubble. The bubble felt Qing to me; this feels equally wrong as a harbinger of bad things.
June 26, 2010 at 8:01 AM #571826scaredyclassicParticipantBuying a house while your neighbors are squatting could in retrospect look as crazy and dumb as buying a house at the peak of the bubble. The bubble felt Qing to me; this feels equally wrong as a harbinger of bad things.
June 26, 2010 at 8:01 AM #572345scaredyclassicParticipantBuying a house while your neighbors are squatting could in retrospect look as crazy and dumb as buying a house at the peak of the bubble. The bubble felt Qing to me; this feels equally wrong as a harbinger of bad things.
June 26, 2010 at 8:01 AM #572450scaredyclassicParticipantBuying a house while your neighbors are squatting could in retrospect look as crazy and dumb as buying a house at the peak of the bubble. The bubble felt Qing to me; this feels equally wrong as a harbinger of bad things.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.