- This topic has 150 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 28, 2009 at 1:13 PM #498346December 28, 2009 at 1:38 PM #497467sdduuuudeParticipant
This probably isn’t a good place to discuss the cost of owning vs. renting … π
Assuming similar costs, I think the difference comes down to control.
You have much more control over a house that you own than over one you rent.
When you rent, however, you have more control over where you live, as it is easier to move to a new place you like better. So, there is some sense of control and flexibility in renting as well – though on a macro scale, not a micro scale.
You lose some control with renting, also, as you don’t have any guarantee that you can stay in a place you like for a long time.
The question is – do you want alot of control over the walls, color, landscaping, design, etc. of 1 property or the freedom to change properties ? Simple as that. I prefer the former.
For many, Carmel Valley is Nirvana. I don’t get it either, but I have come to accept that others love it.
December 28, 2009 at 1:38 PM #497620sdduuuudeParticipantThis probably isn’t a good place to discuss the cost of owning vs. renting … π
Assuming similar costs, I think the difference comes down to control.
You have much more control over a house that you own than over one you rent.
When you rent, however, you have more control over where you live, as it is easier to move to a new place you like better. So, there is some sense of control and flexibility in renting as well – though on a macro scale, not a micro scale.
You lose some control with renting, also, as you don’t have any guarantee that you can stay in a place you like for a long time.
The question is – do you want alot of control over the walls, color, landscaping, design, etc. of 1 property or the freedom to change properties ? Simple as that. I prefer the former.
For many, Carmel Valley is Nirvana. I don’t get it either, but I have come to accept that others love it.
December 28, 2009 at 1:38 PM #498011sdduuuudeParticipantThis probably isn’t a good place to discuss the cost of owning vs. renting … π
Assuming similar costs, I think the difference comes down to control.
You have much more control over a house that you own than over one you rent.
When you rent, however, you have more control over where you live, as it is easier to move to a new place you like better. So, there is some sense of control and flexibility in renting as well – though on a macro scale, not a micro scale.
You lose some control with renting, also, as you don’t have any guarantee that you can stay in a place you like for a long time.
The question is – do you want alot of control over the walls, color, landscaping, design, etc. of 1 property or the freedom to change properties ? Simple as that. I prefer the former.
For many, Carmel Valley is Nirvana. I don’t get it either, but I have come to accept that others love it.
December 28, 2009 at 1:38 PM #498104sdduuuudeParticipantThis probably isn’t a good place to discuss the cost of owning vs. renting … π
Assuming similar costs, I think the difference comes down to control.
You have much more control over a house that you own than over one you rent.
When you rent, however, you have more control over where you live, as it is easier to move to a new place you like better. So, there is some sense of control and flexibility in renting as well – though on a macro scale, not a micro scale.
You lose some control with renting, also, as you don’t have any guarantee that you can stay in a place you like for a long time.
The question is – do you want alot of control over the walls, color, landscaping, design, etc. of 1 property or the freedom to change properties ? Simple as that. I prefer the former.
For many, Carmel Valley is Nirvana. I don’t get it either, but I have come to accept that others love it.
December 28, 2009 at 1:38 PM #498351sdduuuudeParticipantThis probably isn’t a good place to discuss the cost of owning vs. renting … π
Assuming similar costs, I think the difference comes down to control.
You have much more control over a house that you own than over one you rent.
When you rent, however, you have more control over where you live, as it is easier to move to a new place you like better. So, there is some sense of control and flexibility in renting as well – though on a macro scale, not a micro scale.
You lose some control with renting, also, as you don’t have any guarantee that you can stay in a place you like for a long time.
The question is – do you want alot of control over the walls, color, landscaping, design, etc. of 1 property or the freedom to change properties ? Simple as that. I prefer the former.
For many, Carmel Valley is Nirvana. I don’t get it either, but I have come to accept that others love it.
December 28, 2009 at 2:08 PM #497492CBadParticipant[quote=briansd1]That’s because there’s nothing else to do in the suburbs. You look at each other, and even if you hate one another, you just do it.
The quality of the sex is bad.[/quote]
Does that sound like an open-minded person to you? You’re not married so WTF? How do you know? More anecdotal evidence from unhappily married family/friends? Do married people have better quality sex in cities? Do single people have worse quality sex in suburbs? What kind of sex quality grading system do you use by the way? I just want to know if I get an A so I can hang it on the fridge.
December 28, 2009 at 2:08 PM #497646CBadParticipant[quote=briansd1]That’s because there’s nothing else to do in the suburbs. You look at each other, and even if you hate one another, you just do it.
The quality of the sex is bad.[/quote]
Does that sound like an open-minded person to you? You’re not married so WTF? How do you know? More anecdotal evidence from unhappily married family/friends? Do married people have better quality sex in cities? Do single people have worse quality sex in suburbs? What kind of sex quality grading system do you use by the way? I just want to know if I get an A so I can hang it on the fridge.
December 28, 2009 at 2:08 PM #498036CBadParticipant[quote=briansd1]That’s because there’s nothing else to do in the suburbs. You look at each other, and even if you hate one another, you just do it.
The quality of the sex is bad.[/quote]
Does that sound like an open-minded person to you? You’re not married so WTF? How do you know? More anecdotal evidence from unhappily married family/friends? Do married people have better quality sex in cities? Do single people have worse quality sex in suburbs? What kind of sex quality grading system do you use by the way? I just want to know if I get an A so I can hang it on the fridge.
December 28, 2009 at 2:08 PM #498129CBadParticipant[quote=briansd1]That’s because there’s nothing else to do in the suburbs. You look at each other, and even if you hate one another, you just do it.
The quality of the sex is bad.[/quote]
Does that sound like an open-minded person to you? You’re not married so WTF? How do you know? More anecdotal evidence from unhappily married family/friends? Do married people have better quality sex in cities? Do single people have worse quality sex in suburbs? What kind of sex quality grading system do you use by the way? I just want to know if I get an A so I can hang it on the fridge.
December 28, 2009 at 2:08 PM #498376CBadParticipant[quote=briansd1]That’s because there’s nothing else to do in the suburbs. You look at each other, and even if you hate one another, you just do it.
The quality of the sex is bad.[/quote]
Does that sound like an open-minded person to you? You’re not married so WTF? How do you know? More anecdotal evidence from unhappily married family/friends? Do married people have better quality sex in cities? Do single people have worse quality sex in suburbs? What kind of sex quality grading system do you use by the way? I just want to know if I get an A so I can hang it on the fridge.
December 29, 2009 at 10:47 AM #497586briansd1GuestCBad, don’t take it so seriously. I was just responding in jest to Russell over his comment that homeowners have more sex. I assume he said that as an incentive for buying. π
My comment is no different than a homeowner claiming to have more pleasure in a house he owns. To such homeowner, the quality of the decorating is better. To him, in a rental, you made do with what’s there staring at you.
December 29, 2009 at 10:47 AM #497738briansd1GuestCBad, don’t take it so seriously. I was just responding in jest to Russell over his comment that homeowners have more sex. I assume he said that as an incentive for buying. π
My comment is no different than a homeowner claiming to have more pleasure in a house he owns. To such homeowner, the quality of the decorating is better. To him, in a rental, you made do with what’s there staring at you.
December 29, 2009 at 10:47 AM #498130briansd1GuestCBad, don’t take it so seriously. I was just responding in jest to Russell over his comment that homeowners have more sex. I assume he said that as an incentive for buying. π
My comment is no different than a homeowner claiming to have more pleasure in a house he owns. To such homeowner, the quality of the decorating is better. To him, in a rental, you made do with what’s there staring at you.
December 29, 2009 at 10:47 AM #498223briansd1GuestCBad, don’t take it so seriously. I was just responding in jest to Russell over his comment that homeowners have more sex. I assume he said that as an incentive for buying. π
My comment is no different than a homeowner claiming to have more pleasure in a house he owns. To such homeowner, the quality of the decorating is better. To him, in a rental, you made do with what’s there staring at you.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.