Menu

Home › Forums › Other › Ignore Ron Paul are the new marching orders?

Viewing 15 posts - 856 through 870 (of 1,077 total)
1 2 3 … 57 58 59 … 70 71 72
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 23, 2011 at 11:02 AM #724250
    briansd1
    Guest

    [quote=Arraya] So it stings that quite possibly these are systemic problems and not individual “management” ones. [/quote]

    I agree that these are systemic problems. Groups of humans can be influenced to behave in certain ways.

    But some individuals, through strength of character, can definitely transcend societal influences.

    I personally think that we should limit and ban advertizing. I don’t see how product advertizing is a free speech issue.

    August 23, 2011 at 1:50 PM #723109
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    SK and all, although not about “Ron Paul,” thanks for your comments on the issues Warren brought up in her speech at Berkeley. This is a very interesting topic. I was not referring to the “poor” in particular but instead the “spending habits” of those “middle class” families who bid up properties in order to “win” a house in a “coveted” school attendance area. Warren even talks about this phenomenon in SD County! If you read the Amazon book reviews by Susie Q Public and Joe 6P, you will see that I am not alone in my opinions.

    see: http://www.amazon.com/Two-Income-Trap-Middle-Class-Parents-Going/product-reviews/0465090907/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

    I just checked into Pigg but am very busy right now so will reply to SK’s comments in a couple of days.

    August 23, 2011 at 1:50 PM #723197
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    SK and all, although not about “Ron Paul,” thanks for your comments on the issues Warren brought up in her speech at Berkeley. This is a very interesting topic. I was not referring to the “poor” in particular but instead the “spending habits” of those “middle class” families who bid up properties in order to “win” a house in a “coveted” school attendance area. Warren even talks about this phenomenon in SD County! If you read the Amazon book reviews by Susie Q Public and Joe 6P, you will see that I am not alone in my opinions.

    see: http://www.amazon.com/Two-Income-Trap-Middle-Class-Parents-Going/product-reviews/0465090907/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

    I just checked into Pigg but am very busy right now so will reply to SK’s comments in a couple of days.

    August 23, 2011 at 1:50 PM #723791
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    SK and all, although not about “Ron Paul,” thanks for your comments on the issues Warren brought up in her speech at Berkeley. This is a very interesting topic. I was not referring to the “poor” in particular but instead the “spending habits” of those “middle class” families who bid up properties in order to “win” a house in a “coveted” school attendance area. Warren even talks about this phenomenon in SD County! If you read the Amazon book reviews by Susie Q Public and Joe 6P, you will see that I am not alone in my opinions.

    see: http://www.amazon.com/Two-Income-Trap-Middle-Class-Parents-Going/product-reviews/0465090907/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

    I just checked into Pigg but am very busy right now so will reply to SK’s comments in a couple of days.

    August 23, 2011 at 1:50 PM #723945
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    SK and all, although not about “Ron Paul,” thanks for your comments on the issues Warren brought up in her speech at Berkeley. This is a very interesting topic. I was not referring to the “poor” in particular but instead the “spending habits” of those “middle class” families who bid up properties in order to “win” a house in a “coveted” school attendance area. Warren even talks about this phenomenon in SD County! If you read the Amazon book reviews by Susie Q Public and Joe 6P, you will see that I am not alone in my opinions.

    see: http://www.amazon.com/Two-Income-Trap-Middle-Class-Parents-Going/product-reviews/0465090907/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

    I just checked into Pigg but am very busy right now so will reply to SK’s comments in a couple of days.

    August 23, 2011 at 1:50 PM #724304
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    SK and all, although not about “Ron Paul,” thanks for your comments on the issues Warren brought up in her speech at Berkeley. This is a very interesting topic. I was not referring to the “poor” in particular but instead the “spending habits” of those “middle class” families who bid up properties in order to “win” a house in a “coveted” school attendance area. Warren even talks about this phenomenon in SD County! If you read the Amazon book reviews by Susie Q Public and Joe 6P, you will see that I am not alone in my opinions.

    see: http://www.amazon.com/Two-Income-Trap-Middle-Class-Parents-Going/product-reviews/0465090907/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

    I just checked into Pigg but am very busy right now so will reply to SK’s comments in a couple of days.

    August 23, 2011 at 1:52 PM #723114
    curiousmind
    Participant

    Plus he just doesn’t have media appeal. Although some of his ideas may make sense, he just comes across as another also-ran oddball.

    That’s your opinion, and you are very disconnected if you think that Paul is just a random “also-ran” candidate. Wake up.

    August 23, 2011 at 1:52 PM #723202
    curiousmind
    Participant

    Plus he just doesn’t have media appeal. Although some of his ideas may make sense, he just comes across as another also-ran oddball.

    That’s your opinion, and you are very disconnected if you think that Paul is just a random “also-ran” candidate. Wake up.

    August 23, 2011 at 1:52 PM #723796
    curiousmind
    Participant

    Plus he just doesn’t have media appeal. Although some of his ideas may make sense, he just comes across as another also-ran oddball.

    That’s your opinion, and you are very disconnected if you think that Paul is just a random “also-ran” candidate. Wake up.

    August 23, 2011 at 1:52 PM #723950
    curiousmind
    Participant

    Plus he just doesn’t have media appeal. Although some of his ideas may make sense, he just comes across as another also-ran oddball.

    That’s your opinion, and you are very disconnected if you think that Paul is just a random “also-ran” candidate. Wake up.

    August 23, 2011 at 1:52 PM #724309
    curiousmind
    Participant

    Plus he just doesn’t have media appeal. Although some of his ideas may make sense, he just comes across as another also-ran oddball.

    That’s your opinion, and you are very disconnected if you think that Paul is just a random “also-ran” candidate. Wake up.

    August 23, 2011 at 1:57 PM #723128
    curiousmind
    Participant

    Ron Paul is the only candidate running who has walked the walk. He is the only candidate who’s views are based on principles(constitutional ones)- not fame, money or status quo. He is also the only candidate who implements any form of critical thinking.

    August 23, 2011 at 1:57 PM #723217
    curiousmind
    Participant

    Ron Paul is the only candidate running who has walked the walk. He is the only candidate who’s views are based on principles(constitutional ones)- not fame, money or status quo. He is also the only candidate who implements any form of critical thinking.

    August 23, 2011 at 1:57 PM #723811
    curiousmind
    Participant

    Ron Paul is the only candidate running who has walked the walk. He is the only candidate who’s views are based on principles(constitutional ones)- not fame, money or status quo. He is also the only candidate who implements any form of critical thinking.

    August 23, 2011 at 1:57 PM #723965
    curiousmind
    Participant

    Ron Paul is the only candidate running who has walked the walk. He is the only candidate who’s views are based on principles(constitutional ones)- not fame, money or status quo. He is also the only candidate who implements any form of critical thinking.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 856 through 870 (of 1,077 total)
1 2 3 … 57 58 59 … 70 71 72
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.