- This topic has 50 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 22, 2009 at 3:39 PM #386417April 22, 2009 at 3:54 PM #385771
Aecetia
ParticipantIt must be going around again.
April 22, 2009 at 3:54 PM #386038ParticipantIt must be going around again.
April 22, 2009 at 3:54 PM #386235ParticipantIt must be going around again.
April 22, 2009 at 3:54 PM #386284ParticipantIt must be going around again.
April 22, 2009 at 3:54 PM #386421ParticipantIt must be going around again.
April 22, 2009 at 11:05 PM #385981(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantThe suicide rate in the US is currently 11 per 100,000.
From 1950 through 1980 it averaged 13.2 per 100,00 population.
One might conclude that the sensationalism of these events has increased, but the inderlying events have not. So, I’d say yes, this could be a conicidece.
April 22, 2009 at 11:05 PM #386247ParticipantThe suicide rate in the US is currently 11 per 100,000.
From 1950 through 1980 it averaged 13.2 per 100,00 population.
One might conclude that the sensationalism of these events has increased, but the inderlying events have not. So, I’d say yes, this could be a conicidece.
April 22, 2009 at 11:05 PM #386444ParticipantThe suicide rate in the US is currently 11 per 100,000.
From 1950 through 1980 it averaged 13.2 per 100,00 population.
One might conclude that the sensationalism of these events has increased, but the inderlying events have not. So, I’d say yes, this could be a conicidece.
April 22, 2009 at 11:05 PM #386492ParticipantThe suicide rate in the US is currently 11 per 100,000.
From 1950 through 1980 it averaged 13.2 per 100,00 population.
One might conclude that the sensationalism of these events has increased, but the inderlying events have not. So, I’d say yes, this could be a conicidece.
April 22, 2009 at 11:05 PM #386630ParticipantThe suicide rate in the US is currently 11 per 100,000.
From 1950 through 1980 it averaged 13.2 per 100,00 population.
One might conclude that the sensationalism of these events has increased, but the inderlying events have not. So, I’d say yes, this could be a conicidece.
April 23, 2009 at 12:06 AM #386041poorsaver
ParticipantI found out my broker committed suicide after the tech crash in 2000. She was a young Indian woman who evidently held herself to high standards in managing people’s money. Well, she lost over $200K of mine, but I was shocked to learn of her demise.
April 23, 2009 at 12:06 AM #386307ParticipantI found out my broker committed suicide after the tech crash in 2000. She was a young Indian woman who evidently held herself to high standards in managing people’s money. Well, she lost over $200K of mine, but I was shocked to learn of her demise.
April 23, 2009 at 12:06 AM #386503ParticipantI found out my broker committed suicide after the tech crash in 2000. She was a young Indian woman who evidently held herself to high standards in managing people’s money. Well, she lost over $200K of mine, but I was shocked to learn of her demise.
April 23, 2009 at 12:06 AM #386552ParticipantI found out my broker committed suicide after the tech crash in 2000. She was a young Indian woman who evidently held herself to high standards in managing people’s money. Well, she lost over $200K of mine, but I was shocked to learn of her demise.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.