Hysteria versus Reality: The Secular Left has killed over 100 Million People

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_hysteria

Female hysteria was a once-common medical diagnosis, made exclusively in women, which is no longer recognized by modern medical authorities. It was a popular diagnosis in Western nations, during the Victorian era, for women who exhibited a wide array of symptoms including faintness, nervousness, insomnia, fluid retention, heaviness in abdomen, muscle spasm, shortness of breath, irritability, loss of appetite for food or sex, and a “tendency to cause trouble”.[1]
Patients diagnosed with female hysteria would sometimes undergo “pelvic massage” — manual stimulation of the woman’s genitals by the doctor to “hysterical paroxysm”, which is now recognized as orgasm.[1][/quote]

Curing female hysteria seems like it would be a fun business to get into.

John

[luchabee]

Concering the asshole response above, either “Gandy” has very poor reading comprehension skills or was crying when he/she typed it out.

[luchabee]

Concering the asshole response above, either “Gandy” has very poor reading comprehension skills or was crying when he/she typed it out.

[luchabee]

Concering the asshole response above, either “Gandy” has very poor reading comprehension skills or was crying when he/she typed it out.

[luchabee]

Concering the asshole response above, either “Gandy” has very poor reading comprehension skills or was crying when he/she typed it out.

[luchabee]

Concering the asshole response above, either “Gandy” has very poor reading comprehension skills or was crying when he/she typed it out.

[luchabee]

[quote=arraya]

There many different interpretations of what the founding fathers would want. You just happen to site one of many. That still is irrelevant. Religion is used as a mechanism of control and manipulation by the ruling class. [/quote]

Yes, the original intent of the founders is now irrelevant . . . what?

Don’t really care to put my religion in your “face.” As an American, you can take it or leave it. However, like many current Supreme Court Justices, I believe there should be a reasonble accomdation for the expressions of faith connected with government which was the historical arrangement brought to us by the founders.

More important, the teaching of values should not be dismissed because they have a Biblical center. This type of relativistic reaction is what has destryoed American inner cities and the rot is spreading.

Mostly, just pointing out the consequences of an increasingly secular society.

If history shows us anything, when modern nations remove Judeo-Christian values and dismiss religion, they become killing machines.

Alternatively, as in Europe, they may become so weak, secular, concerned with self(that’s all there is really if there is no God) and unable to reproduce that they will be over run by radical elements in the Mideast through revolution and population. [/quote]

[luchabee]

[quote=arraya]

There many different interpretations of what the founding fathers would want. You just happen to site one of many. That still is irrelevant. Religion is used as a mechanism of control and manipulation by the ruling class. [/quote]

Yes, the original intent of the founders is now irrelevant . . . what?

Don’t really care to put my religion in your “face.” As an American, you can take it or leave it. However, like many current Supreme Court Justices, I believe there should be a reasonble accomdation for the expressions of faith connected with government which was the historical arrangement brought to us by the founders.

More important, the teaching of values should not be dismissed because they have a Biblical center. This type of relativistic reaction is what has destryoed American inner cities and the rot is spreading.

Mostly, just pointing out the consequences of an increasingly secular society.

If history shows us anything, when modern nations remove Judeo-Christian values and dismiss religion, they become killing machines.

Alternatively, as in Europe, they may become so weak, secular, concerned with self(that’s all there is really if there is no God) and unable to reproduce that they will be over run by radical elements in the Mideast through revolution and population. [/quote]

[luchabee]

[quote=arraya]

There many different interpretations of what the founding fathers would want. You just happen to site one of many. That still is irrelevant. Religion is used as a mechanism of control and manipulation by the ruling class. [/quote]

Yes, the original intent of the founders is now irrelevant . . . what?

Don’t really care to put my religion in your “face.” As an American, you can take it or leave it. However, like many current Supreme Court Justices, I believe there should be a reasonble accomdation for the expressions of faith connected with government which was the historical arrangement brought to us by the founders.

More important, the teaching of values should not be dismissed because they have a Biblical center. This type of relativistic reaction is what has destryoed American inner cities and the rot is spreading.

Mostly, just pointing out the consequences of an increasingly secular society.

If history shows us anything, when modern nations remove Judeo-Christian values and dismiss religion, they become killing machines.

Alternatively, as in Europe, they may become so weak, secular, concerned with self(that’s all there is really if there is no God) and unable to reproduce that they will be over run by radical elements in the Mideast through revolution and population. [/quote]

[luchabee]

[quote=arraya]

There many different interpretations of what the founding fathers would want. You just happen to site one of many. That still is irrelevant. Religion is used as a mechanism of control and manipulation by the ruling class. [/quote]

Yes, the original intent of the founders is now irrelevant . . . what?

Don’t really care to put my religion in your “face.” As an American, you can take it or leave it. However, like many current Supreme Court Justices, I believe there should be a reasonble accomdation for the expressions of faith connected with government which was the historical arrangement brought to us by the founders.

More important, the teaching of values should not be dismissed because they have a Biblical center. This type of relativistic reaction is what has destryoed American inner cities and the rot is spreading.

Mostly, just pointing out the consequences of an increasingly secular society.

If history shows us anything, when modern nations remove Judeo-Christian values and dismiss religion, they become killing machines.

Alternatively, as in Europe, they may become so weak, secular, concerned with self(that’s all there is really if there is no God) and unable to reproduce that they will be over run by radical elements in the Mideast through revolution and population. [/quote]

[luchabee]

[quote=arraya]

There many different interpretations of what the founding fathers would want. You just happen to site one of many. That still is irrelevant. Religion is used as a mechanism of control and manipulation by the ruling class. [/quote]

Yes, the original intent of the founders is now irrelevant . . . what?

Don’t really care to put my religion in your “face.” As an American, you can take it or leave it. However, like many current Supreme Court Justices, I believe there should be a reasonble accomdation for the expressions of faith connected with government which was the historical arrangement brought to us by the founders.

More important, the teaching of values should not be dismissed because they have a Biblical center. This type of relativistic reaction is what has destryoed American inner cities and the rot is spreading.

Mostly, just pointing out the consequences of an increasingly secular society.

If history shows us anything, when modern nations remove Judeo-Christian values and dismiss religion, they become killing machines.

Alternatively, as in Europe, they may become so weak, secular, concerned with self(that’s all there is really if there is no God) and unable to reproduce that they will be over run by radical elements in the Mideast through revolution and population. [/quote]

[afx114]

[quote=luchabee]More important, the teaching of values should not be dismissed because they have a Biblical center.[/quote]

I asked this in the creationism thread, but it seems as though the creationists were afraid to answer, so I’ll ask it again here:

I wouldn’t mind the teaching of the history of Christianity in school as long as they also taught the history of Buddhism, Taoism, Hindu, Confucianism, and Islam. So luchabee, I ask you, would you be OK with this?

[afx114]

[quote=luchabee]More important, the teaching of values should not be dismissed because they have a Biblical center.[/quote]

I asked this in the creationism thread, but it seems as though the creationists were afraid to answer, so I’ll ask it again here:

I wouldn’t mind the teaching of the history of Christianity in school as long as they also taught the history of Buddhism, Taoism, Hindu, Confucianism, and Islam. So luchabee, I ask you, would you be OK with this?

[afx114]

[quote=luchabee]More important, the teaching of values should not be dismissed because they have a Biblical center.[/quote]

I asked this in the creationism thread, but it seems as though the creationists were afraid to answer, so I’ll ask it again here:

I wouldn’t mind the teaching of the history of Christianity in school as long as they also taught the history of Buddhism, Taoism, Hindu, Confucianism, and Islam. So luchabee, I ask you, would you be OK with this?

[afx114]

[quote=luchabee]More important, the teaching of values should not be dismissed because they have a Biblical center.[/quote]

I asked this in the creationism thread, but it seems as though the creationists were afraid to answer, so I’ll ask it again here:

I wouldn’t mind the teaching of the history of Christianity in school as long as they also taught the history of Buddhism, Taoism, Hindu, Confucianism, and Islam. So luchabee, I ask you, would you be OK with this?

[Author]

Posts