Home › Forums › Other › Hysteria versus Reality: The Secular Left has killed over 100 Million People
- This topic has 505 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by
jficquette.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 31, 2008 at 1:44 PM #264354August 31, 2008 at 1:47 PM #264055
afx114
ParticipantYeah, and 25,000 children die per day around the world because of poverty. Where’s the outrage over that? Jesus was a savior of the poor, but anti-abortionists conveniently look over that fact. The anti-abortionists are all about the rights of a fetus, but what about the rights of a child? Not so much. Once you’re out of the womb, you’re on your own. Now that is ironic and hypocritical.
August 31, 2008 at 1:47 PM #264264ParticipantYeah, and 25,000 children die per day around the world because of poverty. Where’s the outrage over that? Jesus was a savior of the poor, but anti-abortionists conveniently look over that fact. The anti-abortionists are all about the rights of a fetus, but what about the rights of a child? Not so much. Once you’re out of the womb, you’re on your own. Now that is ironic and hypocritical.
August 31, 2008 at 1:47 PM #264268ParticipantYeah, and 25,000 children die per day around the world because of poverty. Where’s the outrage over that? Jesus was a savior of the poor, but anti-abortionists conveniently look over that fact. The anti-abortionists are all about the rights of a fetus, but what about the rights of a child? Not so much. Once you’re out of the womb, you’re on your own. Now that is ironic and hypocritical.
August 31, 2008 at 1:47 PM #264321ParticipantYeah, and 25,000 children die per day around the world because of poverty. Where’s the outrage over that? Jesus was a savior of the poor, but anti-abortionists conveniently look over that fact. The anti-abortionists are all about the rights of a fetus, but what about the rights of a child? Not so much. Once you’re out of the womb, you’re on your own. Now that is ironic and hypocritical.
August 31, 2008 at 1:47 PM #264359ParticipantYeah, and 25,000 children die per day around the world because of poverty. Where’s the outrage over that? Jesus was a savior of the poor, but anti-abortionists conveniently look over that fact. The anti-abortionists are all about the rights of a fetus, but what about the rights of a child? Not so much. Once you’re out of the womb, you’re on your own. Now that is ironic and hypocritical.
August 31, 2008 at 2:05 PM #264060Arraya
ParticipantSpeaking of rolling eyes….
“The Founding Fathers, en masse, would have been outraged to see the purported arguments for removing all religion from government bodies and activities”
There many different interpretations of what the founding fathers would want. You just happen to site one of many. That still is irrelevant. Religion is used as a mechanism of control and manipulation by the ruling class. I’m not an Atheist, I still cringe when a politician invokes God.
As I said in another thread religion is used for secular rule.
“As evidence, here is a book documenting that over 100 million people have been killed by secular communist and socialists governments:”
So this is how we measure the “goodness” of a government. I bet religious governments have a little blood on their hands as well, don’t ya think.
“and we’ll make the dollar worthless, reduce our economic edge internationally, and many of our citizens will live a life that is nasty, brutal, and short”
To late we are there all ready. The funny thing is GWB really put the last nail in the coffin of America and he did so on a religious platform by starting a religious war. Well the religion aspect really garnered a lot of support his ridiculous oil-world domination adventure.
I think Bertrand Russell pointed out something very valuable. He said that, as a point of logic, not all religions could be true because they contradict each other. They can, however, all be wrong.
The religion any particular person believes is statistically a function of the network of conversations the person was born into, not whether it is “true” or even that the person carefully studied his options and picked the religion he thought was most useful to him.
So bottom line, keep YOUR religion out of my face….
August 31, 2008 at 2:05 PM #264269ParticipantSpeaking of rolling eyes….
“The Founding Fathers, en masse, would have been outraged to see the purported arguments for removing all religion from government bodies and activities”
There many different interpretations of what the founding fathers would want. You just happen to site one of many. That still is irrelevant. Religion is used as a mechanism of control and manipulation by the ruling class. I’m not an Atheist, I still cringe when a politician invokes God.
As I said in another thread religion is used for secular rule.
“As evidence, here is a book documenting that over 100 million people have been killed by secular communist and socialists governments:”
So this is how we measure the “goodness” of a government. I bet religious governments have a little blood on their hands as well, don’t ya think.
“and we’ll make the dollar worthless, reduce our economic edge internationally, and many of our citizens will live a life that is nasty, brutal, and short”
To late we are there all ready. The funny thing is GWB really put the last nail in the coffin of America and he did so on a religious platform by starting a religious war. Well the religion aspect really garnered a lot of support his ridiculous oil-world domination adventure.
I think Bertrand Russell pointed out something very valuable. He said that, as a point of logic, not all religions could be true because they contradict each other. They can, however, all be wrong.
The religion any particular person believes is statistically a function of the network of conversations the person was born into, not whether it is “true” or even that the person carefully studied his options and picked the religion he thought was most useful to him.
So bottom line, keep YOUR religion out of my face….
August 31, 2008 at 2:05 PM #264273ParticipantSpeaking of rolling eyes….
“The Founding Fathers, en masse, would have been outraged to see the purported arguments for removing all religion from government bodies and activities”
There many different interpretations of what the founding fathers would want. You just happen to site one of many. That still is irrelevant. Religion is used as a mechanism of control and manipulation by the ruling class. I’m not an Atheist, I still cringe when a politician invokes God.
As I said in another thread religion is used for secular rule.
“As evidence, here is a book documenting that over 100 million people have been killed by secular communist and socialists governments:”
So this is how we measure the “goodness” of a government. I bet religious governments have a little blood on their hands as well, don’t ya think.
“and we’ll make the dollar worthless, reduce our economic edge internationally, and many of our citizens will live a life that is nasty, brutal, and short”
To late we are there all ready. The funny thing is GWB really put the last nail in the coffin of America and he did so on a religious platform by starting a religious war. Well the religion aspect really garnered a lot of support his ridiculous oil-world domination adventure.
I think Bertrand Russell pointed out something very valuable. He said that, as a point of logic, not all religions could be true because they contradict each other. They can, however, all be wrong.
The religion any particular person believes is statistically a function of the network of conversations the person was born into, not whether it is “true” or even that the person carefully studied his options and picked the religion he thought was most useful to him.
So bottom line, keep YOUR religion out of my face….
August 31, 2008 at 2:05 PM #264326ParticipantSpeaking of rolling eyes….
“The Founding Fathers, en masse, would have been outraged to see the purported arguments for removing all religion from government bodies and activities”
There many different interpretations of what the founding fathers would want. You just happen to site one of many. That still is irrelevant. Religion is used as a mechanism of control and manipulation by the ruling class. I’m not an Atheist, I still cringe when a politician invokes God.
As I said in another thread religion is used for secular rule.
“As evidence, here is a book documenting that over 100 million people have been killed by secular communist and socialists governments:”
So this is how we measure the “goodness” of a government. I bet religious governments have a little blood on their hands as well, don’t ya think.
“and we’ll make the dollar worthless, reduce our economic edge internationally, and many of our citizens will live a life that is nasty, brutal, and short”
To late we are there all ready. The funny thing is GWB really put the last nail in the coffin of America and he did so on a religious platform by starting a religious war. Well the religion aspect really garnered a lot of support his ridiculous oil-world domination adventure.
I think Bertrand Russell pointed out something very valuable. He said that, as a point of logic, not all religions could be true because they contradict each other. They can, however, all be wrong.
The religion any particular person believes is statistically a function of the network of conversations the person was born into, not whether it is “true” or even that the person carefully studied his options and picked the religion he thought was most useful to him.
So bottom line, keep YOUR religion out of my face….
August 31, 2008 at 2:05 PM #264364ParticipantSpeaking of rolling eyes….
“The Founding Fathers, en masse, would have been outraged to see the purported arguments for removing all religion from government bodies and activities”
There many different interpretations of what the founding fathers would want. You just happen to site one of many. That still is irrelevant. Religion is used as a mechanism of control and manipulation by the ruling class. I’m not an Atheist, I still cringe when a politician invokes God.
As I said in another thread religion is used for secular rule.
“As evidence, here is a book documenting that over 100 million people have been killed by secular communist and socialists governments:”
So this is how we measure the “goodness” of a government. I bet religious governments have a little blood on their hands as well, don’t ya think.
“and we’ll make the dollar worthless, reduce our economic edge internationally, and many of our citizens will live a life that is nasty, brutal, and short”
To late we are there all ready. The funny thing is GWB really put the last nail in the coffin of America and he did so on a religious platform by starting a religious war. Well the religion aspect really garnered a lot of support his ridiculous oil-world domination adventure.
I think Bertrand Russell pointed out something very valuable. He said that, as a point of logic, not all religions could be true because they contradict each other. They can, however, all be wrong.
The religion any particular person believes is statistically a function of the network of conversations the person was born into, not whether it is “true” or even that the person carefully studied his options and picked the religion he thought was most useful to him.
So bottom line, keep YOUR religion out of my face….
August 31, 2008 at 2:10 PM #264065ParticipantI also find your thread title interesting. “Hysteria” was historically used to describe a disturbance of the uterus in women. Hence the word “hysterectomy.” Did you chose that word on purpose? If so, props to you… that’s brilliant in the context of this thread!
August 31, 2008 at 2:10 PM #264274ParticipantI also find your thread title interesting. “Hysteria” was historically used to describe a disturbance of the uterus in women. Hence the word “hysterectomy.” Did you chose that word on purpose? If so, props to you… that’s brilliant in the context of this thread!
August 31, 2008 at 2:10 PM #264278ParticipantI also find your thread title interesting. “Hysteria” was historically used to describe a disturbance of the uterus in women. Hence the word “hysterectomy.” Did you chose that word on purpose? If so, props to you… that’s brilliant in the context of this thread!
August 31, 2008 at 2:10 PM #264331ParticipantI also find your thread title interesting. “Hysteria” was historically used to describe a disturbance of the uterus in women. Hence the word “hysterectomy.” Did you chose that word on purpose? If so, props to you… that’s brilliant in the context of this thread!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.