Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › How serious is the seller with the bottom of the listing range?
- This topic has 40 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by gverdi.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 5, 2007 at 10:15 PM #96187November 5, 2007 at 10:15 PM #96196sdrealtorParticipant
If i take 290K and compound it by 4% inflation/appreciation per year I get 400k after 8 years. If you beleive your friend paid a fair price in 2000, this one wouldnt seem to be all that far off getting back in line.
November 6, 2007 at 11:40 AM #96286kev374ParticipantIf i take 290K and compound it by 4% inflation/appreciation per year I get 400k after 8 years.
Non-income inflation means nothing for home prices. Infact non-income inflation hurts home prices because it drives down affordability.
Long term averages tie home appreciation to income growth. Income growth in the last 8 yrs has not been anywhere close to 4% compounded. Infact, it has been rather stagnant. In some segments income has been declining whereas inflation in other areas like oil, energy, insurance, healthcare are skyrocketing.
Just to give you an idea…4% compounding in income means that someone earning $75k/yr in 2000, for that exact same job and experience now in 2007 they should be getting $103,000/yr. More than likely that person is getting $80k/yr or so, if that!
November 6, 2007 at 11:40 AM #96349kev374ParticipantIf i take 290K and compound it by 4% inflation/appreciation per year I get 400k after 8 years.
Non-income inflation means nothing for home prices. Infact non-income inflation hurts home prices because it drives down affordability.
Long term averages tie home appreciation to income growth. Income growth in the last 8 yrs has not been anywhere close to 4% compounded. Infact, it has been rather stagnant. In some segments income has been declining whereas inflation in other areas like oil, energy, insurance, healthcare are skyrocketing.
Just to give you an idea…4% compounding in income means that someone earning $75k/yr in 2000, for that exact same job and experience now in 2007 they should be getting $103,000/yr. More than likely that person is getting $80k/yr or so, if that!
November 6, 2007 at 11:40 AM #96355kev374ParticipantIf i take 290K and compound it by 4% inflation/appreciation per year I get 400k after 8 years.
Non-income inflation means nothing for home prices. Infact non-income inflation hurts home prices because it drives down affordability.
Long term averages tie home appreciation to income growth. Income growth in the last 8 yrs has not been anywhere close to 4% compounded. Infact, it has been rather stagnant. In some segments income has been declining whereas inflation in other areas like oil, energy, insurance, healthcare are skyrocketing.
Just to give you an idea…4% compounding in income means that someone earning $75k/yr in 2000, for that exact same job and experience now in 2007 they should be getting $103,000/yr. More than likely that person is getting $80k/yr or so, if that!
November 6, 2007 at 11:40 AM #96364kev374ParticipantIf i take 290K and compound it by 4% inflation/appreciation per year I get 400k after 8 years.
Non-income inflation means nothing for home prices. Infact non-income inflation hurts home prices because it drives down affordability.
Long term averages tie home appreciation to income growth. Income growth in the last 8 yrs has not been anywhere close to 4% compounded. Infact, it has been rather stagnant. In some segments income has been declining whereas inflation in other areas like oil, energy, insurance, healthcare are skyrocketing.
Just to give you an idea…4% compounding in income means that someone earning $75k/yr in 2000, for that exact same job and experience now in 2007 they should be getting $103,000/yr. More than likely that person is getting $80k/yr or so, if that!
November 6, 2007 at 7:01 PM #96418jimmyleParticipantHi SDR,
This house is 1626 sq ft. I think most other homes in this area are around 1450 sq ft. 1626 sq ft is probably the minimum that I would buy for a two stories home. Like you, I also think that the bigger ones will be around $450K and the smaller ones will be around $420K in 2008.
Although I don’t think this house will ever go down to below $300K ever. Actually I like sdrealtor method of calculating the “fair” price based on inflation of 4%.
November 6, 2007 at 7:01 PM #96480jimmyleParticipantHi SDR,
This house is 1626 sq ft. I think most other homes in this area are around 1450 sq ft. 1626 sq ft is probably the minimum that I would buy for a two stories home. Like you, I also think that the bigger ones will be around $450K and the smaller ones will be around $420K in 2008.
Although I don’t think this house will ever go down to below $300K ever. Actually I like sdrealtor method of calculating the “fair” price based on inflation of 4%.
November 6, 2007 at 7:01 PM #96489jimmyleParticipantHi SDR,
This house is 1626 sq ft. I think most other homes in this area are around 1450 sq ft. 1626 sq ft is probably the minimum that I would buy for a two stories home. Like you, I also think that the bigger ones will be around $450K and the smaller ones will be around $420K in 2008.
Although I don’t think this house will ever go down to below $300K ever. Actually I like sdrealtor method of calculating the “fair” price based on inflation of 4%.
November 6, 2007 at 7:01 PM #96495jimmyleParticipantHi SDR,
This house is 1626 sq ft. I think most other homes in this area are around 1450 sq ft. 1626 sq ft is probably the minimum that I would buy for a two stories home. Like you, I also think that the bigger ones will be around $450K and the smaller ones will be around $420K in 2008.
Although I don’t think this house will ever go down to below $300K ever. Actually I like sdrealtor method of calculating the “fair” price based on inflation of 4%.
November 6, 2007 at 8:21 PM #96462The OC ScamParticipantJimmy
You better jump on that sucka! Those reflective blinds are tight…
November 6, 2007 at 8:21 PM #96523The OC ScamParticipantJimmy
You better jump on that sucka! Those reflective blinds are tight…
November 6, 2007 at 8:21 PM #96533The OC ScamParticipantJimmy
You better jump on that sucka! Those reflective blinds are tight…
November 6, 2007 at 8:21 PM #96541The OC ScamParticipantJimmy
You better jump on that sucka! Those reflective blinds are tight…
November 7, 2007 at 1:31 PM #96826ibjamesParticipantThat is exactly something I would buy. Though I would hope to buy it in the 300’s
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.