Home › Forums › Housing › housing already in 2001 prices considering inflation, how low can it go? and why?
- This topic has 80 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by
hipmatt.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 2, 2007 at 10:49 PM #107905December 2, 2007 at 10:51 PM #107755
Eugene
ParticipantMany houses, especially new houses (size 3000+ sqft) in Northern Inland are about $220 per square feet while many houses sold in 2001 in the same communities were about $170 per square feet.
In 4S Ranch and the such, $220 per square foot is an exception rather than the rule. Even those sold much cheaper than 170 per sq.ft. in 2001.
These are some of the cheapest (in terms of ppsf) relatively new homes for sale in North County.
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-0FE9FC83-10707_El_Caballo_Ave_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $145/sf in 2001, asking $232/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-594D70C1-10212_Lone_Dove_St_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $174/sf in 2003, asking $242/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9613223B-15011_Palomino_Mesa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $160/sf in 2003, asking $234/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-071055333-7056_Santa_Fe_Canyon_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $258/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9E235A33-7024_Chapala_Canyon_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $233/sfI might consider paying 25% over 2001 price for such a house, but unfortunately we’re not there yet.
December 2, 2007 at 10:51 PM #107856ParticipantMany houses, especially new houses (size 3000+ sqft) in Northern Inland are about $220 per square feet while many houses sold in 2001 in the same communities were about $170 per square feet.
In 4S Ranch and the such, $220 per square foot is an exception rather than the rule. Even those sold much cheaper than 170 per sq.ft. in 2001.
These are some of the cheapest (in terms of ppsf) relatively new homes for sale in North County.
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-0FE9FC83-10707_El_Caballo_Ave_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $145/sf in 2001, asking $232/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-594D70C1-10212_Lone_Dove_St_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $174/sf in 2003, asking $242/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9613223B-15011_Palomino_Mesa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $160/sf in 2003, asking $234/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-071055333-7056_Santa_Fe_Canyon_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $258/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9E235A33-7024_Chapala_Canyon_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $233/sfI might consider paying 25% over 2001 price for such a house, but unfortunately we’re not there yet.
December 2, 2007 at 10:51 PM #107888ParticipantMany houses, especially new houses (size 3000+ sqft) in Northern Inland are about $220 per square feet while many houses sold in 2001 in the same communities were about $170 per square feet.
In 4S Ranch and the such, $220 per square foot is an exception rather than the rule. Even those sold much cheaper than 170 per sq.ft. in 2001.
These are some of the cheapest (in terms of ppsf) relatively new homes for sale in North County.
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-0FE9FC83-10707_El_Caballo_Ave_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $145/sf in 2001, asking $232/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-594D70C1-10212_Lone_Dove_St_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $174/sf in 2003, asking $242/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9613223B-15011_Palomino_Mesa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $160/sf in 2003, asking $234/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-071055333-7056_Santa_Fe_Canyon_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $258/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9E235A33-7024_Chapala_Canyon_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $233/sfI might consider paying 25% over 2001 price for such a house, but unfortunately we’re not there yet.
December 2, 2007 at 10:51 PM #107897ParticipantMany houses, especially new houses (size 3000+ sqft) in Northern Inland are about $220 per square feet while many houses sold in 2001 in the same communities were about $170 per square feet.
In 4S Ranch and the such, $220 per square foot is an exception rather than the rule. Even those sold much cheaper than 170 per sq.ft. in 2001.
These are some of the cheapest (in terms of ppsf) relatively new homes for sale in North County.
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-0FE9FC83-10707_El_Caballo_Ave_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $145/sf in 2001, asking $232/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-594D70C1-10212_Lone_Dove_St_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $174/sf in 2003, asking $242/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9613223B-15011_Palomino_Mesa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $160/sf in 2003, asking $234/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-071055333-7056_Santa_Fe_Canyon_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $258/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9E235A33-7024_Chapala_Canyon_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $233/sfI might consider paying 25% over 2001 price for such a house, but unfortunately we’re not there yet.
December 2, 2007 at 10:51 PM #107910ParticipantMany houses, especially new houses (size 3000+ sqft) in Northern Inland are about $220 per square feet while many houses sold in 2001 in the same communities were about $170 per square feet.
In 4S Ranch and the such, $220 per square foot is an exception rather than the rule. Even those sold much cheaper than 170 per sq.ft. in 2001.
These are some of the cheapest (in terms of ppsf) relatively new homes for sale in North County.
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-0FE9FC83-10707_El_Caballo_Ave_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $145/sf in 2001, asking $232/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-594D70C1-10212_Lone_Dove_St_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $174/sf in 2003, asking $242/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9613223B-15011_Palomino_Mesa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $160/sf in 2003, asking $234/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-071055333-7056_Santa_Fe_Canyon_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $258/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9E235A33-7024_Chapala_Canyon_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $233/sfI might consider paying 25% over 2001 price for such a house, but unfortunately we’re not there yet.
December 2, 2007 at 10:57 PM #107766niy38
Participantthose are big home SFH, for sure per square foot is cheaper.
December 2, 2007 at 10:57 PM #107865Participantthose are big home SFH, for sure per square foot is cheaper.
December 2, 2007 at 10:57 PM #107898Participantthose are big home SFH, for sure per square foot is cheaper.
December 2, 2007 at 10:57 PM #107907Participantthose are big home SFH, for sure per square foot is cheaper.
December 2, 2007 at 10:57 PM #107920Participantthose are big home SFH, for sure per square foot is cheaper.
December 2, 2007 at 11:13 PM #107776Wrangler
ParticipantBuilders are selling much less than resale homes.
December 2, 2007 at 11:13 PM #107875ParticipantBuilders are selling much less than resale homes.
December 2, 2007 at 11:13 PM #107908ParticipantBuilders are selling much less than resale homes.
December 2, 2007 at 11:13 PM #107917ParticipantBuilders are selling much less than resale homes.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.