housing already in 2001 prices considering inflation, how low can it go? and why?

[Wrangler]

Many houses, especially new houses (size 3000+ sqft) in Northern Inland are about $220 per square feet while many houses sold in 2001 in the same communities were about $170 per square feet. Assume 4% annual inflation rate, that is about 27% increase in price in 6 years, Salary should have also increased about 27% since 2001. Thus today’s $220 per square feet price looks to be reasonable? Of course it assume if we think 2001 is reasonable. The the question is, how low it can go? Any point going down is overcorrecting in a down market? Thanks for sharing your opinions.

[cashman]

I’m finding prices way below what your stating, but probably not in the same area. Around Temecula, Murrieta and Elsinore, I’m finding new houses priced as low as $105 a foot. I, too am wondering how much lower can it go, as I don’t see how a builder can actually build for any less.

[Jumby]

“I, too am wondering how much lower can it go, as I don’t see how a builder can actually build for any less”

Cost of materials are dropping also…

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119578061831901674.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

[Wrangler]

i was referring to Ranch Bernardo/4S ranch areas

[patientlywaiting]

2000 nominal prices. And that will still be too expensive for a good 75% of households in San Diego.

[Wrangler]

Is San Diego going to become the next super star city (as SF/NY.. described in a paper from UPen some one posted here a while ago which describes how nationally rich people come to the super star cities and drive up the price and income and drive out low income families) and that we have to accept that maybe the lower half of households in SD will not be able to afford a house ?

[Wrangler]

Is San Diego going to become the next super star city (as SF/NY.. described in a paper from UPen some one posted here a while ago which describes how nationally rich people come to the super star cities and drive up the price and income and drive out low income families) and that we have to accept that maybe the lower half of households in SD will not be able to afford a house ?

[Wrangler]

Is San Diego going to become the next super star city (as SF/NY.. described in a paper from UPen some one posted here a while ago which describes how nationally rich people come to the super star cities and drive up the price and income and drive out low income families) and that we have to accept that maybe the lower half of households in SD will not be able to afford a house ?

[Wrangler]

Is San Diego going to become the next super star city (as SF/NY.. described in a paper from UPen some one posted here a while ago which describes how nationally rich people come to the super star cities and drive up the price and income and drive out low income families) and that we have to accept that maybe the lower half of households in SD will not be able to afford a house ?

[Wrangler]

Is San Diego going to become the next super star city (as SF/NY.. described in a paper from UPen some one posted here a while ago which describes how nationally rich people come to the super star cities and drive up the price and income and drive out low income families) and that we have to accept that maybe the lower half of households in SD will not be able to afford a house ?

[patientlywaiting]

2000 nominal prices. And that will still be too expensive for a good 75% of households in San Diego.

[patientlywaiting]

2000 nominal prices. And that will still be too expensive for a good 75% of households in San Diego.

[patientlywaiting]

2000 nominal prices. And that will still be too expensive for a good 75% of households in San Diego.

[patientlywaiting]

2000 nominal prices. And that will still be too expensive for a good 75% of households in San Diego.

[Wrangler]

i was referring to Ranch Bernardo/4S ranch areas

[Wrangler]

i was referring to Ranch Bernardo/4S ranch areas

[Wrangler]

i was referring to Ranch Bernardo/4S ranch areas

[Wrangler]

i was referring to Ranch Bernardo/4S ranch areas

[Jumby]

“I, too am wondering how much lower can it go, as I don’t see how a builder can actually build for any less”

Cost of materials are dropping also…

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119578061831901674.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

[Jumby]

“I, too am wondering how much lower can it go, as I don’t see how a builder can actually build for any less”

Cost of materials are dropping also…

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119578061831901674.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

[Jumby]

“I, too am wondering how much lower can it go, as I don’t see how a builder can actually build for any less”

Cost of materials are dropping also…

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119578061831901674.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

[Jumby]

“I, too am wondering how much lower can it go, as I don’t see how a builder can actually build for any less”

Cost of materials are dropping also…

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119578061831901674.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

[cashman]

I’m finding prices way below what your stating, but probably not in the same area. Around Temecula, Murrieta and Elsinore, I’m finding new houses priced as low as $105 a foot. I, too am wondering how much lower can it go, as I don’t see how a builder can actually build for any less.

[cashman]

I’m finding prices way below what your stating, but probably not in the same area. Around Temecula, Murrieta and Elsinore, I’m finding new houses priced as low as $105 a foot. I, too am wondering how much lower can it go, as I don’t see how a builder can actually build for any less.

[cashman]

I’m finding prices way below what your stating, but probably not in the same area. Around Temecula, Murrieta and Elsinore, I’m finding new houses priced as low as $105 a foot. I, too am wondering how much lower can it go, as I don’t see how a builder can actually build for any less.

[cashman]

I’m finding prices way below what your stating, but probably not in the same area. Around Temecula, Murrieta and Elsinore, I’m finding new houses priced as low as $105 a foot. I, too am wondering how much lower can it go, as I don’t see how a builder can actually build for any less.

[scaredyclassic]

well, the fact that builders cannot replace buildings as inexpensively as the sale price doesn’t mean much. If there are lots of houses, and no one can afford them, the price of building new houses won’t impact the housing prices. Housing prices should be able to go much lower than replacement cost. Consider the bear market in gold. Gold went lower than replacement cost in terms of mining. That just meant miners stopped mining. It didn’t mean the price of gold increased.

To me, the thing to keep in mind, is that these numbers and dates and prices are meaningless. “impossible” numbers which cannot be exceeded, or gone beneath, don’t really exist. A piece of land can be worth far less than zero (for instance,a Superfund site) and can be irrationally high for a loooong time.

The singlemost important factor which is a bit of a wildcard that makes housing valuable or not valuable is something more fundamental than a “good” neighborhood or a “bad” neiighborhood. It’s political stability, social unrest, the sense that things are not going to go nuts. we may be running into trouble in this area gradually in the coming years. I don’t beleive “crime rates” mean anything.

This is different. This is normal people being financially screwed. You might not want to own anything. You might now want to be tied down anywhere. The freedom attached to renting is not just the freedom to wait out markets. the freedom to take off quickly is actually a very valuable and highly undervalued asset. It is my opinion that people will begin to revalue that intangible asset tand that houses will soon sell for less than it costs to rent them. And you still might reasonably want to avoid buying it. Because freedom to leave is worth something, particularly in an unstable and crazy society. This is my first post and I gotta say, i enjoy reading what you people ahve to say. I myself am extremely bearish on all things financial. cannot help it, it’s my nature, and it’s also the way i see it. I say hold gold and avoid all debt. i would like to own a home ina more stable society, but right now, don’t see the upside in being tied down. just my 2 cents and skewed worldview…

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

well, the fact that builders cannot replace buildings as inexpensively as the sale price doesn’t mean much. If there are lots of houses, and no one can afford them, the price of building new houses won’t impact the housing prices. Housing prices should be able to go much lower than replacement cost. Consider the bear market in gold. Gold went lower than replacement cost in terms of mining. That just meant miners stopped mining. It didn’t mean the price of gold increased.

To me, the thing to keep in mind, is that these numbers and dates and prices are meaningless. “impossible” numbers which cannot be exceeded, or gone beneath, don’t really exist. A piece of land can be worth far less than zero (for instance,a Superfund site) and can be irrationally high for a loooong time.

The singlemost important factor which is a bit of a wildcard that makes housing valuable or not valuable is something more fundamental than a “good” neighborhood or a “bad” neiighborhood. It’s political stability, social unrest, the sense that things are not going to go nuts. we may be running into trouble in this area gradually in the coming years. I don’t beleive “crime rates” mean anything.

This is different. This is normal people being financially screwed. You might not want to own anything. You might now want to be tied down anywhere. The freedom attached to renting is not just the freedom to wait out markets. the freedom to take off quickly is actually a very valuable and highly undervalued asset. It is my opinion that people will begin to revalue that intangible asset tand that houses will soon sell for less than it costs to rent them. And you still might reasonably want to avoid buying it. Because freedom to leave is worth something, particularly in an unstable and crazy society. This is my first post and I gotta say, i enjoy reading what you people ahve to say. I myself am extremely bearish on all things financial. cannot help it, it’s my nature, and it’s also the way i see it. I say hold gold and avoid all debt. i would like to own a home ina more stable society, but right now, don’t see the upside in being tied down. just my 2 cents and skewed worldview…

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

well, the fact that builders cannot replace buildings as inexpensively as the sale price doesn’t mean much. If there are lots of houses, and no one can afford them, the price of building new houses won’t impact the housing prices. Housing prices should be able to go much lower than replacement cost. Consider the bear market in gold. Gold went lower than replacement cost in terms of mining. That just meant miners stopped mining. It didn’t mean the price of gold increased.

To me, the thing to keep in mind, is that these numbers and dates and prices are meaningless. “impossible” numbers which cannot be exceeded, or gone beneath, don’t really exist. A piece of land can be worth far less than zero (for instance,a Superfund site) and can be irrationally high for a loooong time.

The singlemost important factor which is a bit of a wildcard that makes housing valuable or not valuable is something more fundamental than a “good” neighborhood or a “bad” neiighborhood. It’s political stability, social unrest, the sense that things are not going to go nuts. we may be running into trouble in this area gradually in the coming years. I don’t beleive “crime rates” mean anything.

This is different. This is normal people being financially screwed. You might not want to own anything. You might now want to be tied down anywhere. The freedom attached to renting is not just the freedom to wait out markets. the freedom to take off quickly is actually a very valuable and highly undervalued asset. It is my opinion that people will begin to revalue that intangible asset tand that houses will soon sell for less than it costs to rent them. And you still might reasonably want to avoid buying it. Because freedom to leave is worth something, particularly in an unstable and crazy society. This is my first post and I gotta say, i enjoy reading what you people ahve to say. I myself am extremely bearish on all things financial. cannot help it, it’s my nature, and it’s also the way i see it. I say hold gold and avoid all debt. i would like to own a home ina more stable society, but right now, don’t see the upside in being tied down. just my 2 cents and skewed worldview…

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

well, the fact that builders cannot replace buildings as inexpensively as the sale price doesn’t mean much. If there are lots of houses, and no one can afford them, the price of building new houses won’t impact the housing prices. Housing prices should be able to go much lower than replacement cost. Consider the bear market in gold. Gold went lower than replacement cost in terms of mining. That just meant miners stopped mining. It didn’t mean the price of gold increased.

To me, the thing to keep in mind, is that these numbers and dates and prices are meaningless. “impossible” numbers which cannot be exceeded, or gone beneath, don’t really exist. A piece of land can be worth far less than zero (for instance,a Superfund site) and can be irrationally high for a loooong time.

The singlemost important factor which is a bit of a wildcard that makes housing valuable or not valuable is something more fundamental than a “good” neighborhood or a “bad” neiighborhood. It’s political stability, social unrest, the sense that things are not going to go nuts. we may be running into trouble in this area gradually in the coming years. I don’t beleive “crime rates” mean anything.

This is different. This is normal people being financially screwed. You might not want to own anything. You might now want to be tied down anywhere. The freedom attached to renting is not just the freedom to wait out markets. the freedom to take off quickly is actually a very valuable and highly undervalued asset. It is my opinion that people will begin to revalue that intangible asset tand that houses will soon sell for less than it costs to rent them. And you still might reasonably want to avoid buying it. Because freedom to leave is worth something, particularly in an unstable and crazy society. This is my first post and I gotta say, i enjoy reading what you people ahve to say. I myself am extremely bearish on all things financial. cannot help it, it’s my nature, and it’s also the way i see it. I say hold gold and avoid all debt. i would like to own a home ina more stable society, but right now, don’t see the upside in being tied down. just my 2 cents and skewed worldview…

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

well, the fact that builders cannot replace buildings as inexpensively as the sale price doesn’t mean much. If there are lots of houses, and no one can afford them, the price of building new houses won’t impact the housing prices. Housing prices should be able to go much lower than replacement cost. Consider the bear market in gold. Gold went lower than replacement cost in terms of mining. That just meant miners stopped mining. It didn’t mean the price of gold increased.

To me, the thing to keep in mind, is that these numbers and dates and prices are meaningless. “impossible” numbers which cannot be exceeded, or gone beneath, don’t really exist. A piece of land can be worth far less than zero (for instance,a Superfund site) and can be irrationally high for a loooong time.

The singlemost important factor which is a bit of a wildcard that makes housing valuable or not valuable is something more fundamental than a “good” neighborhood or a “bad” neiighborhood. It’s political stability, social unrest, the sense that things are not going to go nuts. we may be running into trouble in this area gradually in the coming years. I don’t beleive “crime rates” mean anything.

This is different. This is normal people being financially screwed. You might not want to own anything. You might now want to be tied down anywhere. The freedom attached to renting is not just the freedom to wait out markets. the freedom to take off quickly is actually a very valuable and highly undervalued asset. It is my opinion that people will begin to revalue that intangible asset tand that houses will soon sell for less than it costs to rent them. And you still might reasonably want to avoid buying it. Because freedom to leave is worth something, particularly in an unstable and crazy society. This is my first post and I gotta say, i enjoy reading what you people ahve to say. I myself am extremely bearish on all things financial. cannot help it, it’s my nature, and it’s also the way i see it. I say hold gold and avoid all debt. i would like to own a home ina more stable society, but right now, don’t see the upside in being tied down. just my 2 cents and skewed worldview…

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

well, the fact that builders cannot replace buildings as inexpensively as the sale price doesn’t mean much. If there are lots of houses, and no one can afford them, the price of building new houses won’t impact the housing prices. Housing prices should be able to go much lower than replacement cost. Consider the bear market in gold. Gold went lower than replacement cost in terms of mining. That just meant miners stopped mining. It didn’t mean the price of gold increased.

To me, the thing to keep in mind, is that these numbers and dates and prices are meaningless. “impossible” numbers which cannot be exceeded, or gone beneath, don’t really exist. A piece of land can be worth far less than zero (for instance,a Superfund site) and can be irrationally high for a loooong time.

The singlemost important factor which is a bit of a wildcard that makes housing valuable or not valuable is something more fundamental than a “good” neighborhood or a “bad” neiighborhood. It’s political stability, social unrest, the sense that things are not going to go nuts. we may be running into trouble in this area gradually in the coming years. I don’t beleive “crime rates” mean anything.

This is different. This is normal people being financially screwed. You might not want to own anything. You might now want to be tied down anywhere. The freedom attached to renting is not just the freedom to wait out markets. the freedom to take off quickly is actually a very valuable and highly undervalued asset. It is my opinion that people will begin to revalue that intangible asset tand that houses will soon sell for less than it costs to rent them. And you still might reasonably want to avoid buying it. Because freedom to leave is worth something, particularly in an unstable and crazy society. This is my first post and I gotta say, i enjoy reading what you people ahve to say. I myself am extremely bearish on all things financial. cannot help it, it’s my nature, and it’s also the way i see it. I say hold gold and avoid all debt. i would like to own a home ina more stable society, but right now, don’t see the upside in being tied down. just my 2 cents and skewed worldview…

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

well, the fact that builders cannot replace buildings as inexpensively as the sale price doesn’t mean much. If there are lots of houses, and no one can afford them, the price of building new houses won’t impact the housing prices. Housing prices should be able to go much lower than replacement cost. Consider the bear market in gold. Gold went lower than replacement cost in terms of mining. That just meant miners stopped mining. It didn’t mean the price of gold increased.

To me, the thing to keep in mind, is that these numbers and dates and prices are meaningless. “impossible” numbers which cannot be exceeded, or gone beneath, don’t really exist. A piece of land can be worth far less than zero (for instance,a Superfund site) and can be irrationally high for a loooong time.

The singlemost important factor which is a bit of a wildcard that makes housing valuable or not valuable is something more fundamental than a “good” neighborhood or a “bad” neiighborhood. It’s political stability, social unrest, the sense that things are not going to go nuts. we may be running into trouble in this area gradually in the coming years. I don’t beleive “crime rates” mean anything.

This is different. This is normal people being financially screwed. You might not want to own anything. You might now want to be tied down anywhere. The freedom attached to renting is not just the freedom to wait out markets. the freedom to take off quickly is actually a very valuable and highly undervalued asset. It is my opinion that people will begin to revalue that intangible asset tand that houses will soon sell for less than it costs to rent them. And you still might reasonably want to avoid buying it. Because freedom to leave is worth something, particularly in an unstable and crazy society. This is my first post and I gotta say, i enjoy reading what you people ahve to say. I myself am extremely bearish on all things financial. cannot help it, it’s my nature, and it’s also the way i see it. I say hold gold and avoid all debt. i would like to own a home ina more stable society, but right now, don’t see the upside in being tied down. just my 2 cents and skewed worldview…

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

well, the fact that builders cannot replace buildings as inexpensively as the sale price doesn’t mean much. If there are lots of houses, and no one can afford them, the price of building new houses won’t impact the housing prices. Housing prices should be able to go much lower than replacement cost. Consider the bear market in gold. Gold went lower than replacement cost in terms of mining. That just meant miners stopped mining. It didn’t mean the price of gold increased.

To me, the thing to keep in mind, is that these numbers and dates and prices are meaningless. “impossible” numbers which cannot be exceeded, or gone beneath, don’t really exist. A piece of land can be worth far less than zero (for instance,a Superfund site) and can be irrationally high for a loooong time.

The singlemost important factor which is a bit of a wildcard that makes housing valuable or not valuable is something more fundamental than a “good” neighborhood or a “bad” neiighborhood. It’s political stability, social unrest, the sense that things are not going to go nuts. we may be running into trouble in this area gradually in the coming years. I don’t beleive “crime rates” mean anything.

This is different. This is normal people being financially screwed. You might not want to own anything. You might now want to be tied down anywhere. The freedom attached to renting is not just the freedom to wait out markets. the freedom to take off quickly is actually a very valuable and highly undervalued asset. It is my opinion that people will begin to revalue that intangible asset tand that houses will soon sell for less than it costs to rent them. And you still might reasonably want to avoid buying it. Because freedom to leave is worth something, particularly in an unstable and crazy society. This is my first post and I gotta say, i enjoy reading what you people ahve to say. I myself am extremely bearish on all things financial. cannot help it, it’s my nature, and it’s also the way i see it. I say hold gold and avoid all debt. i would like to own a home ina more stable society, but right now, don’t see the upside in being tied down. just my 2 cents and skewed worldview…

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

well, the fact that builders cannot replace buildings as inexpensively as the sale price doesn’t mean much. If there are lots of houses, and no one can afford them, the price of building new houses won’t impact the housing prices. Housing prices should be able to go much lower than replacement cost. Consider the bear market in gold. Gold went lower than replacement cost in terms of mining. That just meant miners stopped mining. It didn’t mean the price of gold increased.

To me, the thing to keep in mind, is that these numbers and dates and prices are meaningless. “impossible” numbers which cannot be exceeded, or gone beneath, don’t really exist. A piece of land can be worth far less than zero (for instance,a Superfund site) and can be irrationally high for a loooong time.

The singlemost important factor which is a bit of a wildcard that makes housing valuable or not valuable is something more fundamental than a “good” neighborhood or a “bad” neiighborhood. It’s political stability, social unrest, the sense that things are not going to go nuts. we may be running into trouble in this area gradually in the coming years. I don’t beleive “crime rates” mean anything.

This is different. This is normal people being financially screwed. You might not want to own anything. You might now want to be tied down anywhere. The freedom attached to renting is not just the freedom to wait out markets. the freedom to take off quickly is actually a very valuable and highly undervalued asset. It is my opinion that people will begin to revalue that intangible asset tand that houses will soon sell for less than it costs to rent them. And you still might reasonably want to avoid buying it. Because freedom to leave is worth something, particularly in an unstable and crazy society. This is my first post and I gotta say, i enjoy reading what you people ahve to say. I myself am extremely bearish on all things financial. cannot help it, it’s my nature, and it’s also the way i see it. I say hold gold and avoid all debt. i would like to own a home ina more stable society, but right now, don’t see the upside in being tied down. just my 2 cents and skewed worldview…

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

well, the fact that builders cannot replace buildings as inexpensively as the sale price doesn’t mean much. If there are lots of houses, and no one can afford them, the price of building new houses won’t impact the housing prices. Housing prices should be able to go much lower than replacement cost. Consider the bear market in gold. Gold went lower than replacement cost in terms of mining. That just meant miners stopped mining. It didn’t mean the price of gold increased.

To me, the thing to keep in mind, is that these numbers and dates and prices are meaningless. “impossible” numbers which cannot be exceeded, or gone beneath, don’t really exist. A piece of land can be worth far less than zero (for instance,a Superfund site) and can be irrationally high for a loooong time.

The singlemost important factor which is a bit of a wildcard that makes housing valuable or not valuable is something more fundamental than a “good” neighborhood or a “bad” neiighborhood. It’s political stability, social unrest, the sense that things are not going to go nuts. we may be running into trouble in this area gradually in the coming years. I don’t beleive “crime rates” mean anything.

This is different. This is normal people being financially screwed. You might not want to own anything. You might now want to be tied down anywhere. The freedom attached to renting is not just the freedom to wait out markets. the freedom to take off quickly is actually a very valuable and highly undervalued asset. It is my opinion that people will begin to revalue that intangible asset tand that houses will soon sell for less than it costs to rent them. And you still might reasonably want to avoid buying it. Because freedom to leave is worth something, particularly in an unstable and crazy society. This is my first post and I gotta say, i enjoy reading what you people ahve to say. I myself am extremely bearish on all things financial. cannot help it, it’s my nature, and it’s also the way i see it. I say hold gold and avoid all debt. i would like to own a home ina more stable society, but right now, don’t see the upside in being tied down. just my 2 cents and skewed worldview…

Drink Heavily.

[niy38]

where u can find $220 per square foot in Ranch Bernardo/4S ranch areas?

[Wrangler]

just check out ziprealty, communities like Evergreen, silihoutte are all about the same price range, including the upgrades, incentives and also commission rebate none of which was available in 2001.

[Eugene]

just check out ziprealty, communities like Evergreen, silihoutte are all about the same price range, including the upgrades, incentives and also commission rebate none of which was available in 2001.

http://www.4sranch.com/home_search.aspx

Evergreen is $240-250/sf, no word about any incentives. Silhouette has one floor plan that starts at $220/sf.

Neither one existed in 2001 so it’s hard to make a direct comparison, but here’s a 5br in the general area that sold for $133/sf in 2002

http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=54908308

[Wrangler]

Those are posted prices, the actual prices are quite lower.

[Eugene]

How much is quite?

[hipmatt]

It can go a lot lower.

[hipmatt]

It can go a lot lower.

[hipmatt]

It can go a lot lower.

[hipmatt]

It can go a lot lower.

[hipmatt]

It can go a lot lower.

[Eugene]

How much is quite?

[Eugene]

How much is quite?

[Eugene]

How much is quite?

[Eugene]

How much is quite?

[Wrangler]

Those are posted prices, the actual prices are quite lower.

[Wrangler]

Those are posted prices, the actual prices are quite lower.

[Wrangler]

Those are posted prices, the actual prices are quite lower.

[Wrangler]

Those are posted prices, the actual prices are quite lower.

[Eugene]

just check out ziprealty, communities like Evergreen, silihoutte are all about the same price range, including the upgrades, incentives and also commission rebate none of which was available in 2001.

http://www.4sranch.com/home_search.aspx

Evergreen is $240-250/sf, no word about any incentives. Silhouette has one floor plan that starts at $220/sf.

Neither one existed in 2001 so it’s hard to make a direct comparison, but here’s a 5br in the general area that sold for $133/sf in 2002

http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=54908308

[Eugene]

just check out ziprealty, communities like Evergreen, silihoutte are all about the same price range, including the upgrades, incentives and also commission rebate none of which was available in 2001.

http://www.4sranch.com/home_search.aspx

Evergreen is $240-250/sf, no word about any incentives. Silhouette has one floor plan that starts at $220/sf.

Neither one existed in 2001 so it’s hard to make a direct comparison, but here’s a 5br in the general area that sold for $133/sf in 2002

http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=54908308

[Eugene]

just check out ziprealty, communities like Evergreen, silihoutte are all about the same price range, including the upgrades, incentives and also commission rebate none of which was available in 2001.

http://www.4sranch.com/home_search.aspx

Evergreen is $240-250/sf, no word about any incentives. Silhouette has one floor plan that starts at $220/sf.

Neither one existed in 2001 so it’s hard to make a direct comparison, but here’s a 5br in the general area that sold for $133/sf in 2002

http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=54908308

[Eugene]

just check out ziprealty, communities like Evergreen, silihoutte are all about the same price range, including the upgrades, incentives and also commission rebate none of which was available in 2001.

http://www.4sranch.com/home_search.aspx

Evergreen is $240-250/sf, no word about any incentives. Silhouette has one floor plan that starts at $220/sf.

Neither one existed in 2001 so it’s hard to make a direct comparison, but here’s a 5br in the general area that sold for $133/sf in 2002

http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=54908308

[Wrangler]

just check out ziprealty, communities like Evergreen, silihoutte are all about the same price range, including the upgrades, incentives and also commission rebate none of which was available in 2001.

[Wrangler]

just check out ziprealty, communities like Evergreen, silihoutte are all about the same price range, including the upgrades, incentives and also commission rebate none of which was available in 2001.

[Wrangler]

just check out ziprealty, communities like Evergreen, silihoutte are all about the same price range, including the upgrades, incentives and also commission rebate none of which was available in 2001.

[Wrangler]

just check out ziprealty, communities like Evergreen, silihoutte are all about the same price range, including the upgrades, incentives and also commission rebate none of which was available in 2001.

[niy38]

where u can find $220 per square foot in Ranch Bernardo/4S ranch areas?

[niy38]

where u can find $220 per square foot in Ranch Bernardo/4S ranch areas?

[niy38]

where u can find $220 per square foot in Ranch Bernardo/4S ranch areas?

[niy38]

where u can find $220 per square foot in Ranch Bernardo/4S ranch areas?

[Eugene]

Many houses, especially new houses (size 3000+ sqft) in Northern Inland are about $220 per square feet while many houses sold in 2001 in the same communities were about $170 per square feet.

In 4S Ranch and the such, $220 per square foot is an exception rather than the rule. Even those sold much cheaper than 170 per sq.ft. in 2001.

These are some of the cheapest (in terms of ppsf) relatively new homes for sale in North County.

http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-0FE9FC83-10707_El_Caballo_Ave_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $145/sf in 2001, asking $232/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-594D70C1-10212_Lone_Dove_St_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $174/sf in 2003, asking $242/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9613223B-15011_Palomino_Mesa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $160/sf in 2003, asking $234/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-071055333-7056_Santa_Fe_Canyon_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $258/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9E235A33-7024_Chapala_Canyon_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $233/sf

I might consider paying 25% over 2001 price for such a house, but unfortunately we’re not there yet.

[Wrangler]

Builders are selling much less than resale homes.

[Wrangler]

Builders are selling much less than resale homes.

[Wrangler]

Builders are selling much less than resale homes.

[Wrangler]

Builders are selling much less than resale homes.

[Wrangler]

Builders are selling much less than resale homes.

[Eugene]

Many houses, especially new houses (size 3000+ sqft) in Northern Inland are about $220 per square feet while many houses sold in 2001 in the same communities were about $170 per square feet.

In 4S Ranch and the such, $220 per square foot is an exception rather than the rule. Even those sold much cheaper than 170 per sq.ft. in 2001.

These are some of the cheapest (in terms of ppsf) relatively new homes for sale in North County.

http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-0FE9FC83-10707_El_Caballo_Ave_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $145/sf in 2001, asking $232/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-594D70C1-10212_Lone_Dove_St_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $174/sf in 2003, asking $242/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9613223B-15011_Palomino_Mesa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $160/sf in 2003, asking $234/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-071055333-7056_Santa_Fe_Canyon_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $258/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9E235A33-7024_Chapala_Canyon_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $233/sf

I might consider paying 25% over 2001 price for such a house, but unfortunately we’re not there yet.

[Eugene]

Many houses, especially new houses (size 3000+ sqft) in Northern Inland are about $220 per square feet while many houses sold in 2001 in the same communities were about $170 per square feet.

In 4S Ranch and the such, $220 per square foot is an exception rather than the rule. Even those sold much cheaper than 170 per sq.ft. in 2001.

These are some of the cheapest (in terms of ppsf) relatively new homes for sale in North County.

http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-0FE9FC83-10707_El_Caballo_Ave_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $145/sf in 2001, asking $232/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-594D70C1-10212_Lone_Dove_St_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $174/sf in 2003, asking $242/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9613223B-15011_Palomino_Mesa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $160/sf in 2003, asking $234/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-071055333-7056_Santa_Fe_Canyon_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $258/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9E235A33-7024_Chapala_Canyon_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $233/sf

I might consider paying 25% over 2001 price for such a house, but unfortunately we’re not there yet.

[Eugene]

Many houses, especially new houses (size 3000+ sqft) in Northern Inland are about $220 per square feet while many houses sold in 2001 in the same communities were about $170 per square feet.

In 4S Ranch and the such, $220 per square foot is an exception rather than the rule. Even those sold much cheaper than 170 per sq.ft. in 2001.

These are some of the cheapest (in terms of ppsf) relatively new homes for sale in North County.

http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-0FE9FC83-10707_El_Caballo_Ave_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $145/sf in 2001, asking $232/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-594D70C1-10212_Lone_Dove_St_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $174/sf in 2003, asking $242/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9613223B-15011_Palomino_Mesa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $160/sf in 2003, asking $234/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-071055333-7056_Santa_Fe_Canyon_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $258/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9E235A33-7024_Chapala_Canyon_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $233/sf

I might consider paying 25% over 2001 price for such a house, but unfortunately we’re not there yet.

[Eugene]

Many houses, especially new houses (size 3000+ sqft) in Northern Inland are about $220 per square feet while many houses sold in 2001 in the same communities were about $170 per square feet.

In 4S Ranch and the such, $220 per square foot is an exception rather than the rule. Even those sold much cheaper than 170 per sq.ft. in 2001.

These are some of the cheapest (in terms of ppsf) relatively new homes for sale in North County.

http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-0FE9FC83-10707_El_Caballo_Ave_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $145/sf in 2001, asking $232/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-594D70C1-10212_Lone_Dove_St_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $174/sf in 2003, asking $242/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9613223B-15011_Palomino_Mesa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92127
Sold for $160/sf in 2003, asking $234/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-071055333-7056_Santa_Fe_Canyon_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $258/sf
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-9E235A33-7024_Chapala_Canyon_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92129
Sold for $157/sf in 2002, asking $233/sf

I might consider paying 25% over 2001 price for such a house, but unfortunately we’re not there yet.

[niy38]

those are big home SFH, for sure per square foot is cheaper.

[niy38]

those are big home SFH, for sure per square foot is cheaper.

[niy38]

those are big home SFH, for sure per square foot is cheaper.

[niy38]

those are big home SFH, for sure per square foot is cheaper.

[niy38]

those are big home SFH, for sure per square foot is cheaper.

[Author]

Posts