- This topic has 1,015 replies, 36 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 12 months ago by
KSMountain.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 19, 2009 at 8:31 PM #496497December 19, 2009 at 8:51 PM #495635
no_such_reality
Participant[quote=mike92104]I wonder if we should go the opposite route. Basic health care is the individuals responsibility. No insurance, just straight out of pocket. That way everybody has to consider the cost of everything. If you should get some awful disease that couldn’t be directly linked to poor lifestyle choices, and couldn’t afford the treatment, the the govt plan could cover you.[/quote]
Everything can be thought of as a poor lifestyle choice, especially living basically anyplace in SoCal where you have frequent unhealthy air, unhealthy commutes, and too much stress.
December 19, 2009 at 8:51 PM #495791no_such_reality
Participant[quote=mike92104]I wonder if we should go the opposite route. Basic health care is the individuals responsibility. No insurance, just straight out of pocket. That way everybody has to consider the cost of everything. If you should get some awful disease that couldn’t be directly linked to poor lifestyle choices, and couldn’t afford the treatment, the the govt plan could cover you.[/quote]
Everything can be thought of as a poor lifestyle choice, especially living basically anyplace in SoCal where you have frequent unhealthy air, unhealthy commutes, and too much stress.
December 19, 2009 at 8:51 PM #496177no_such_reality
Participant[quote=mike92104]I wonder if we should go the opposite route. Basic health care is the individuals responsibility. No insurance, just straight out of pocket. That way everybody has to consider the cost of everything. If you should get some awful disease that couldn’t be directly linked to poor lifestyle choices, and couldn’t afford the treatment, the the govt plan could cover you.[/quote]
Everything can be thought of as a poor lifestyle choice, especially living basically anyplace in SoCal where you have frequent unhealthy air, unhealthy commutes, and too much stress.
December 19, 2009 at 8:51 PM #496264no_such_reality
Participant[quote=mike92104]I wonder if we should go the opposite route. Basic health care is the individuals responsibility. No insurance, just straight out of pocket. That way everybody has to consider the cost of everything. If you should get some awful disease that couldn’t be directly linked to poor lifestyle choices, and couldn’t afford the treatment, the the govt plan could cover you.[/quote]
Everything can be thought of as a poor lifestyle choice, especially living basically anyplace in SoCal where you have frequent unhealthy air, unhealthy commutes, and too much stress.
December 19, 2009 at 8:51 PM #496502no_such_reality
Participant[quote=mike92104]I wonder if we should go the opposite route. Basic health care is the individuals responsibility. No insurance, just straight out of pocket. That way everybody has to consider the cost of everything. If you should get some awful disease that couldn’t be directly linked to poor lifestyle choices, and couldn’t afford the treatment, the the govt plan could cover you.[/quote]
Everything can be thought of as a poor lifestyle choice, especially living basically anyplace in SoCal where you have frequent unhealthy air, unhealthy commutes, and too much stress.
December 19, 2009 at 8:54 PM #495640sdduuuude
ParticipantThe problem is this – when you say that something is a “right” when that right requires someone else to adminster it, you are, by logic, depriving those who must administer it of their freedom.
You must, logically, force someone to provide healthcare – a prospect I believe is unethical.
I don’t believe we are born with any “positive” rights – or rights that require depriving someone else of their freedom.
December 19, 2009 at 8:54 PM #495796sdduuuude
ParticipantThe problem is this – when you say that something is a “right” when that right requires someone else to adminster it, you are, by logic, depriving those who must administer it of their freedom.
You must, logically, force someone to provide healthcare – a prospect I believe is unethical.
I don’t believe we are born with any “positive” rights – or rights that require depriving someone else of their freedom.
December 19, 2009 at 8:54 PM #496182sdduuuude
ParticipantThe problem is this – when you say that something is a “right” when that right requires someone else to adminster it, you are, by logic, depriving those who must administer it of their freedom.
You must, logically, force someone to provide healthcare – a prospect I believe is unethical.
I don’t believe we are born with any “positive” rights – or rights that require depriving someone else of their freedom.
December 19, 2009 at 8:54 PM #496269sdduuuude
ParticipantThe problem is this – when you say that something is a “right” when that right requires someone else to adminster it, you are, by logic, depriving those who must administer it of their freedom.
You must, logically, force someone to provide healthcare – a prospect I believe is unethical.
I don’t believe we are born with any “positive” rights – or rights that require depriving someone else of their freedom.
December 19, 2009 at 8:54 PM #496507sdduuuude
ParticipantThe problem is this – when you say that something is a “right” when that right requires someone else to adminster it, you are, by logic, depriving those who must administer it of their freedom.
You must, logically, force someone to provide healthcare – a prospect I believe is unethical.
I don’t believe we are born with any “positive” rights – or rights that require depriving someone else of their freedom.
December 19, 2009 at 9:08 PM #495645SK in CV
Participant[quote=NeetaT] Those who claim they can’t afford healthcare costs are the same people who can somehow find a way to buy a new car or go on a lavish vacation. All I can say is please “Kill the Bill” so that I am not fleeced for more taxes. I will gladly pay for my own healthcare thank you.[/quote]
Dude, what world are you living in? 45,000 people die every year in this country because they don’t have medical insurance. 10’s of thousand go bankrupt. Nobody is trading a cruise for their life.
December 19, 2009 at 9:08 PM #495801SK in CV
Participant[quote=NeetaT] Those who claim they can’t afford healthcare costs are the same people who can somehow find a way to buy a new car or go on a lavish vacation. All I can say is please “Kill the Bill” so that I am not fleeced for more taxes. I will gladly pay for my own healthcare thank you.[/quote]
Dude, what world are you living in? 45,000 people die every year in this country because they don’t have medical insurance. 10’s of thousand go bankrupt. Nobody is trading a cruise for their life.
December 19, 2009 at 9:08 PM #496187SK in CV
Participant[quote=NeetaT] Those who claim they can’t afford healthcare costs are the same people who can somehow find a way to buy a new car or go on a lavish vacation. All I can say is please “Kill the Bill” so that I am not fleeced for more taxes. I will gladly pay for my own healthcare thank you.[/quote]
Dude, what world are you living in? 45,000 people die every year in this country because they don’t have medical insurance. 10’s of thousand go bankrupt. Nobody is trading a cruise for their life.
December 19, 2009 at 9:08 PM #496274SK in CV
Participant[quote=NeetaT] Those who claim they can’t afford healthcare costs are the same people who can somehow find a way to buy a new car or go on a lavish vacation. All I can say is please “Kill the Bill” so that I am not fleeced for more taxes. I will gladly pay for my own healthcare thank you.[/quote]
Dude, what world are you living in? 45,000 people die every year in this country because they don’t have medical insurance. 10’s of thousand go bankrupt. Nobody is trading a cruise for their life.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.