- This topic has 360 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 11 months ago by OwnerOfCalifornia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 2, 2009 at 8:43 AM #440964August 2, 2009 at 8:35 PM #440333AnonymousGuest
Re “flipping clunkers”:
If you trade in a clunker, you have to provide documentation that it has been continuously registered under your name for at least a year, and continuously insured.
I’m thinking of doing a clunker deal myself.
So, my clunker needs renewed registration—and for that I need to pass a ‘test only’ smog test—just so it can be later scrapped. Brilliant!
August 2, 2009 at 8:35 PM #440534AnonymousGuestRe “flipping clunkers”:
If you trade in a clunker, you have to provide documentation that it has been continuously registered under your name for at least a year, and continuously insured.
I’m thinking of doing a clunker deal myself.
So, my clunker needs renewed registration—and for that I need to pass a ‘test only’ smog test—just so it can be later scrapped. Brilliant!
August 2, 2009 at 8:35 PM #440865AnonymousGuestRe “flipping clunkers”:
If you trade in a clunker, you have to provide documentation that it has been continuously registered under your name for at least a year, and continuously insured.
I’m thinking of doing a clunker deal myself.
So, my clunker needs renewed registration—and for that I need to pass a ‘test only’ smog test—just so it can be later scrapped. Brilliant!
August 2, 2009 at 8:35 PM #440936AnonymousGuestRe “flipping clunkers”:
If you trade in a clunker, you have to provide documentation that it has been continuously registered under your name for at least a year, and continuously insured.
I’m thinking of doing a clunker deal myself.
So, my clunker needs renewed registration—and for that I need to pass a ‘test only’ smog test—just so it can be later scrapped. Brilliant!
August 2, 2009 at 8:35 PM #441109AnonymousGuestRe “flipping clunkers”:
If you trade in a clunker, you have to provide documentation that it has been continuously registered under your name for at least a year, and continuously insured.
I’m thinking of doing a clunker deal myself.
So, my clunker needs renewed registration—and for that I need to pass a ‘test only’ smog test—just so it can be later scrapped. Brilliant!
August 2, 2009 at 8:51 PM #440338Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]I used to have a bad impression of American cars as far as reliablity but since about 2003, I’ve changed my tune. I’ve owned about 20 cars in my time and honda, toyota and infiniti were my favorite for reliability until my recent experiences with a few domestics, now it’s an all domestic garage at casa de TG. It’s anectdotal but my current and recent domestics have gone further with fewer repairs than my german or japanese cars.
People sell cars for a variety of reasons, those for sale are not a good indicator of which vehicles are problems. I’ve owned almost all makes and my old Ford Expedition was the most dependable car I’ve ever had, I miss her, I regret getting rid of her.[/quote]
TG: Tell me about it! We had two Ford Expeditions prior to “upgrading” to the Lincoln Navigator. Boy, what a mistake that was! Both Expeditions were totally reliable, with nary a problem.
The Lincoln, on the other hand, has been a dog. Fit and finish are really poor for a Lincoln-Mercury vehicle (worse than our latest Expedition, which was a really well put together vehicle) and it’s been constant nickel and dime when it comes to minor, non-warranty fixes. I’m really disappointed because it’s a good looking vehicle, but it doesn’t perform like it looks.
I drive a black Ford 500 and I’ve really come to love this car. Only issue is a electrical “gremlin” in my dash, but, other than that, it’s been 100% reliable. It handles surprisingly well in spite of it’s “AARP Approved” rating!
August 2, 2009 at 8:51 PM #440539Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]I used to have a bad impression of American cars as far as reliablity but since about 2003, I’ve changed my tune. I’ve owned about 20 cars in my time and honda, toyota and infiniti were my favorite for reliability until my recent experiences with a few domestics, now it’s an all domestic garage at casa de TG. It’s anectdotal but my current and recent domestics have gone further with fewer repairs than my german or japanese cars.
People sell cars for a variety of reasons, those for sale are not a good indicator of which vehicles are problems. I’ve owned almost all makes and my old Ford Expedition was the most dependable car I’ve ever had, I miss her, I regret getting rid of her.[/quote]
TG: Tell me about it! We had two Ford Expeditions prior to “upgrading” to the Lincoln Navigator. Boy, what a mistake that was! Both Expeditions were totally reliable, with nary a problem.
The Lincoln, on the other hand, has been a dog. Fit and finish are really poor for a Lincoln-Mercury vehicle (worse than our latest Expedition, which was a really well put together vehicle) and it’s been constant nickel and dime when it comes to minor, non-warranty fixes. I’m really disappointed because it’s a good looking vehicle, but it doesn’t perform like it looks.
I drive a black Ford 500 and I’ve really come to love this car. Only issue is a electrical “gremlin” in my dash, but, other than that, it’s been 100% reliable. It handles surprisingly well in spite of it’s “AARP Approved” rating!
August 2, 2009 at 8:51 PM #440870Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]I used to have a bad impression of American cars as far as reliablity but since about 2003, I’ve changed my tune. I’ve owned about 20 cars in my time and honda, toyota and infiniti were my favorite for reliability until my recent experiences with a few domestics, now it’s an all domestic garage at casa de TG. It’s anectdotal but my current and recent domestics have gone further with fewer repairs than my german or japanese cars.
People sell cars for a variety of reasons, those for sale are not a good indicator of which vehicles are problems. I’ve owned almost all makes and my old Ford Expedition was the most dependable car I’ve ever had, I miss her, I regret getting rid of her.[/quote]
TG: Tell me about it! We had two Ford Expeditions prior to “upgrading” to the Lincoln Navigator. Boy, what a mistake that was! Both Expeditions were totally reliable, with nary a problem.
The Lincoln, on the other hand, has been a dog. Fit and finish are really poor for a Lincoln-Mercury vehicle (worse than our latest Expedition, which was a really well put together vehicle) and it’s been constant nickel and dime when it comes to minor, non-warranty fixes. I’m really disappointed because it’s a good looking vehicle, but it doesn’t perform like it looks.
I drive a black Ford 500 and I’ve really come to love this car. Only issue is a electrical “gremlin” in my dash, but, other than that, it’s been 100% reliable. It handles surprisingly well in spite of it’s “AARP Approved” rating!
August 2, 2009 at 8:51 PM #440941Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]I used to have a bad impression of American cars as far as reliablity but since about 2003, I’ve changed my tune. I’ve owned about 20 cars in my time and honda, toyota and infiniti were my favorite for reliability until my recent experiences with a few domestics, now it’s an all domestic garage at casa de TG. It’s anectdotal but my current and recent domestics have gone further with fewer repairs than my german or japanese cars.
People sell cars for a variety of reasons, those for sale are not a good indicator of which vehicles are problems. I’ve owned almost all makes and my old Ford Expedition was the most dependable car I’ve ever had, I miss her, I regret getting rid of her.[/quote]
TG: Tell me about it! We had two Ford Expeditions prior to “upgrading” to the Lincoln Navigator. Boy, what a mistake that was! Both Expeditions were totally reliable, with nary a problem.
The Lincoln, on the other hand, has been a dog. Fit and finish are really poor for a Lincoln-Mercury vehicle (worse than our latest Expedition, which was a really well put together vehicle) and it’s been constant nickel and dime when it comes to minor, non-warranty fixes. I’m really disappointed because it’s a good looking vehicle, but it doesn’t perform like it looks.
I drive a black Ford 500 and I’ve really come to love this car. Only issue is a electrical “gremlin” in my dash, but, other than that, it’s been 100% reliable. It handles surprisingly well in spite of it’s “AARP Approved” rating!
August 2, 2009 at 8:51 PM #441114Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]I used to have a bad impression of American cars as far as reliablity but since about 2003, I’ve changed my tune. I’ve owned about 20 cars in my time and honda, toyota and infiniti were my favorite for reliability until my recent experiences with a few domestics, now it’s an all domestic garage at casa de TG. It’s anectdotal but my current and recent domestics have gone further with fewer repairs than my german or japanese cars.
People sell cars for a variety of reasons, those for sale are not a good indicator of which vehicles are problems. I’ve owned almost all makes and my old Ford Expedition was the most dependable car I’ve ever had, I miss her, I regret getting rid of her.[/quote]
TG: Tell me about it! We had two Ford Expeditions prior to “upgrading” to the Lincoln Navigator. Boy, what a mistake that was! Both Expeditions were totally reliable, with nary a problem.
The Lincoln, on the other hand, has been a dog. Fit and finish are really poor for a Lincoln-Mercury vehicle (worse than our latest Expedition, which was a really well put together vehicle) and it’s been constant nickel and dime when it comes to minor, non-warranty fixes. I’m really disappointed because it’s a good looking vehicle, but it doesn’t perform like it looks.
I drive a black Ford 500 and I’ve really come to love this car. Only issue is a electrical “gremlin” in my dash, but, other than that, it’s been 100% reliable. It handles surprisingly well in spite of it’s “AARP Approved” rating!
August 4, 2009 at 4:44 PM #440738ZeitgeistParticipantObama’s “Pimp my ride” is this century’s version of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, where livestock and crops were destroyed with impunity to shore up the governments failing policies. Every day in every way the government is just becoming better and better. The only thing that will save them is WWIII.
August 4, 2009 at 4:44 PM #440937ZeitgeistParticipantObama’s “Pimp my ride” is this century’s version of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, where livestock and crops were destroyed with impunity to shore up the governments failing policies. Every day in every way the government is just becoming better and better. The only thing that will save them is WWIII.
August 4, 2009 at 4:44 PM #441270ZeitgeistParticipantObama’s “Pimp my ride” is this century’s version of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, where livestock and crops were destroyed with impunity to shore up the governments failing policies. Every day in every way the government is just becoming better and better. The only thing that will save them is WWIII.
August 4, 2009 at 4:44 PM #441341ZeitgeistParticipantObama’s “Pimp my ride” is this century’s version of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, where livestock and crops were destroyed with impunity to shore up the governments failing policies. Every day in every way the government is just becoming better and better. The only thing that will save them is WWIII.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.