- This topic has 840 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by
justme.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 27, 2009 at 2:23 PM #450434August 27, 2009 at 3:14 PM #449687
justme
Participant[quote=zzz]
I certainly am not validating or excusing insecurity as a basis for cheating and I NEVER said its only allowed for woman, nor am I saying its the reason why cheating occurs. Simply that I see a correlation. Umm, I think you are mad libbing here because those things were never stated.
[/quote]That’s great, but you seem not to understand that none of my comments before this one ARE ABOUT YOU! I was talking about a concept (the “insecurity defense”) that happened to be highlighted by something you said.
I repeat, this time, and only this time, the posting IS about you, and what I am saying is IT WAS NOT ABOUT YOU!
Do you get it?
August 27, 2009 at 3:14 PM #449879Participant[quote=zzz]
I certainly am not validating or excusing insecurity as a basis for cheating and I NEVER said its only allowed for woman, nor am I saying its the reason why cheating occurs. Simply that I see a correlation. Umm, I think you are mad libbing here because those things were never stated.
[/quote]That’s great, but you seem not to understand that none of my comments before this one ARE ABOUT YOU! I was talking about a concept (the “insecurity defense”) that happened to be highlighted by something you said.
I repeat, this time, and only this time, the posting IS about you, and what I am saying is IT WAS NOT ABOUT YOU!
Do you get it?
August 27, 2009 at 3:14 PM #450217Participant[quote=zzz]
I certainly am not validating or excusing insecurity as a basis for cheating and I NEVER said its only allowed for woman, nor am I saying its the reason why cheating occurs. Simply that I see a correlation. Umm, I think you are mad libbing here because those things were never stated.
[/quote]That’s great, but you seem not to understand that none of my comments before this one ARE ABOUT YOU! I was talking about a concept (the “insecurity defense”) that happened to be highlighted by something you said.
I repeat, this time, and only this time, the posting IS about you, and what I am saying is IT WAS NOT ABOUT YOU!
Do you get it?
August 27, 2009 at 3:14 PM #450288Participant[quote=zzz]
I certainly am not validating or excusing insecurity as a basis for cheating and I NEVER said its only allowed for woman, nor am I saying its the reason why cheating occurs. Simply that I see a correlation. Umm, I think you are mad libbing here because those things were never stated.
[/quote]That’s great, but you seem not to understand that none of my comments before this one ARE ABOUT YOU! I was talking about a concept (the “insecurity defense”) that happened to be highlighted by something you said.
I repeat, this time, and only this time, the posting IS about you, and what I am saying is IT WAS NOT ABOUT YOU!
Do you get it?
August 27, 2009 at 3:14 PM #450474Participant[quote=zzz]
I certainly am not validating or excusing insecurity as a basis for cheating and I NEVER said its only allowed for woman, nor am I saying its the reason why cheating occurs. Simply that I see a correlation. Umm, I think you are mad libbing here because those things were never stated.
[/quote]That’s great, but you seem not to understand that none of my comments before this one ARE ABOUT YOU! I was talking about a concept (the “insecurity defense”) that happened to be highlighted by something you said.
I repeat, this time, and only this time, the posting IS about you, and what I am saying is IT WAS NOT ABOUT YOU!
Do you get it?
August 27, 2009 at 3:56 PM #449727scaredyclassic
Participantno, it will never be possible for any form of communication to occur between the sexes.
August 27, 2009 at 3:56 PM #449919Participantno, it will never be possible for any form of communication to occur between the sexes.
August 27, 2009 at 3:56 PM #450257Participantno, it will never be possible for any form of communication to occur between the sexes.
August 27, 2009 at 3:56 PM #450328Participantno, it will never be possible for any form of communication to occur between the sexes.
August 27, 2009 at 3:56 PM #450514Participantno, it will never be possible for any form of communication to occur between the sexes.
August 27, 2009 at 5:30 PM #449782ParticipantScaredycat, yes, we may just have proven that conclusively :-).
August 27, 2009 at 5:30 PM #449974ParticipantScaredycat, yes, we may just have proven that conclusively :-).
August 27, 2009 at 5:30 PM #450311ParticipantScaredycat, yes, we may just have proven that conclusively :-).
August 27, 2009 at 5:30 PM #450383ParticipantScaredycat, yes, we may just have proven that conclusively :-).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.