Home › Forums › Housing › CNN — Rate freeze plan for ARMs gains traction. How will this affect the market if this goes thru?
- This topic has 110 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by NeetaT.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 1, 2007 at 5:01 PM #106966December 1, 2007 at 5:18 PM #106825pnileshParticipant
Here is the link for the rate cut. This one came in today.
http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/30/real_estate/ARM_rate_freeze/index.htm?postversion=2007113016
From the news I gathered the following:
1. Judging from other lenders’ plans, a reset freeze would be available only to those borrowers judged unable to make payments at the reset rates.
2. Borrowers for whom loans are unaffordable even at the initial rates would likely not qualify
3. And borrowers with enough income to pay the higher reset rates may also not qualify for a freeze. Many of these good payers, however, have the option of refinancing.
December 1, 2007 at 5:18 PM #106920pnileshParticipantHere is the link for the rate cut. This one came in today.
http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/30/real_estate/ARM_rate_freeze/index.htm?postversion=2007113016
From the news I gathered the following:
1. Judging from other lenders’ plans, a reset freeze would be available only to those borrowers judged unable to make payments at the reset rates.
2. Borrowers for whom loans are unaffordable even at the initial rates would likely not qualify
3. And borrowers with enough income to pay the higher reset rates may also not qualify for a freeze. Many of these good payers, however, have the option of refinancing.
December 1, 2007 at 5:18 PM #106954pnileshParticipantHere is the link for the rate cut. This one came in today.
http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/30/real_estate/ARM_rate_freeze/index.htm?postversion=2007113016
From the news I gathered the following:
1. Judging from other lenders’ plans, a reset freeze would be available only to those borrowers judged unable to make payments at the reset rates.
2. Borrowers for whom loans are unaffordable even at the initial rates would likely not qualify
3. And borrowers with enough income to pay the higher reset rates may also not qualify for a freeze. Many of these good payers, however, have the option of refinancing.
December 1, 2007 at 5:18 PM #106962pnileshParticipantHere is the link for the rate cut. This one came in today.
http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/30/real_estate/ARM_rate_freeze/index.htm?postversion=2007113016
From the news I gathered the following:
1. Judging from other lenders’ plans, a reset freeze would be available only to those borrowers judged unable to make payments at the reset rates.
2. Borrowers for whom loans are unaffordable even at the initial rates would likely not qualify
3. And borrowers with enough income to pay the higher reset rates may also not qualify for a freeze. Many of these good payers, however, have the option of refinancing.
December 1, 2007 at 5:18 PM #106982pnileshParticipantHere is the link for the rate cut. This one came in today.
http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/30/real_estate/ARM_rate_freeze/index.htm?postversion=2007113016
From the news I gathered the following:
1. Judging from other lenders’ plans, a reset freeze would be available only to those borrowers judged unable to make payments at the reset rates.
2. Borrowers for whom loans are unaffordable even at the initial rates would likely not qualify
3. And borrowers with enough income to pay the higher reset rates may also not qualify for a freeze. Many of these good payers, however, have the option of refinancing.
December 1, 2007 at 5:19 PM #106832bsrsharmaParticipantOne thing that may happen is, without sufficient demand for mortgage backed securities (frozen ARM = less value for MBS), mortgages will become difficult to get. Only those with a sizable down payment will be able to buy homes. That should crimp demand quite a bit causing slow erosion of home values & prices.
December 1, 2007 at 5:19 PM #106926bsrsharmaParticipantOne thing that may happen is, without sufficient demand for mortgage backed securities (frozen ARM = less value for MBS), mortgages will become difficult to get. Only those with a sizable down payment will be able to buy homes. That should crimp demand quite a bit causing slow erosion of home values & prices.
December 1, 2007 at 5:19 PM #106959bsrsharmaParticipantOne thing that may happen is, without sufficient demand for mortgage backed securities (frozen ARM = less value for MBS), mortgages will become difficult to get. Only those with a sizable down payment will be able to buy homes. That should crimp demand quite a bit causing slow erosion of home values & prices.
December 1, 2007 at 5:19 PM #106967bsrsharmaParticipantOne thing that may happen is, without sufficient demand for mortgage backed securities (frozen ARM = less value for MBS), mortgages will become difficult to get. Only those with a sizable down payment will be able to buy homes. That should crimp demand quite a bit causing slow erosion of home values & prices.
December 1, 2007 at 5:19 PM #106987bsrsharmaParticipantOne thing that may happen is, without sufficient demand for mortgage backed securities (frozen ARM = less value for MBS), mortgages will become difficult to get. Only those with a sizable down payment will be able to buy homes. That should crimp demand quite a bit causing slow erosion of home values & prices.
December 1, 2007 at 6:35 PM #106880HereWeGoParticipantThat’s going to happen anyway, bsr. Locking the rates might be the best of many bad alternatives for the current investors. It’s tricky to analyze, though.
If Congress passes the recent bill that gave borrowers the ablity to sue investors, that would have a far more profound impact on the cost and availability of credit than this proposed rate freeze.
December 1, 2007 at 6:35 PM #106978HereWeGoParticipantThat’s going to happen anyway, bsr. Locking the rates might be the best of many bad alternatives for the current investors. It’s tricky to analyze, though.
If Congress passes the recent bill that gave borrowers the ablity to sue investors, that would have a far more profound impact on the cost and availability of credit than this proposed rate freeze.
December 1, 2007 at 6:35 PM #107009HereWeGoParticipantThat’s going to happen anyway, bsr. Locking the rates might be the best of many bad alternatives for the current investors. It’s tricky to analyze, though.
If Congress passes the recent bill that gave borrowers the ablity to sue investors, that would have a far more profound impact on the cost and availability of credit than this proposed rate freeze.
December 1, 2007 at 6:35 PM #107017HereWeGoParticipantThat’s going to happen anyway, bsr. Locking the rates might be the best of many bad alternatives for the current investors. It’s tricky to analyze, though.
If Congress passes the recent bill that gave borrowers the ablity to sue investors, that would have a far more profound impact on the cost and availability of credit than this proposed rate freeze.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.