- This topic has 153 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by 4Sbuyer2002.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 25, 2007 at 1:34 PM #91819October 25, 2007 at 2:03 PM #91795hpiParticipant
several factors that make this fire less destructive in 4s, Santa Luz area
1. I-15 is a very important obstacle to the fire that significantly reduce the risk
2. the mountain between the Westwood area and 4s ranch. The mountain is quite high with less vegetation, which is a nature fence … without the maintain, 4s will be caught and hit hard this time
3. business park between the redicential area along I-15 and 4s. The business part has large open ground, and less prone to big fire
October 25, 2007 at 2:03 PM #91820hpiParticipantseveral factors that make this fire less destructive in 4s, Santa Luz area
1. I-15 is a very important obstacle to the fire that significantly reduce the risk
2. the mountain between the Westwood area and 4s ranch. The mountain is quite high with less vegetation, which is a nature fence … without the maintain, 4s will be caught and hit hard this time
3. business park between the redicential area along I-15 and 4s. The business part has large open ground, and less prone to big fire
October 25, 2007 at 2:03 PM #91831hpiParticipantseveral factors that make this fire less destructive in 4s, Santa Luz area
1. I-15 is a very important obstacle to the fire that significantly reduce the risk
2. the mountain between the Westwood area and 4s ranch. The mountain is quite high with less vegetation, which is a nature fence … without the maintain, 4s will be caught and hit hard this time
3. business park between the redicential area along I-15 and 4s. The business part has large open ground, and less prone to big fire
October 25, 2007 at 2:29 PM #91809edna_modeParticipantTo add fuel to the fire of speculation about the fate of 4S Ranch, this article appeared today in the UT:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20071025/news_1n25stay.html#
October 25, 2007 at 2:29 PM #91834edna_modeParticipantTo add fuel to the fire of speculation about the fate of 4S Ranch, this article appeared today in the UT:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20071025/news_1n25stay.html#
October 25, 2007 at 2:29 PM #91847edna_modeParticipantTo add fuel to the fire of speculation about the fate of 4S Ranch, this article appeared today in the UT:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20071025/news_1n25stay.html#
October 25, 2007 at 2:36 PM #91815lindismithParticipantThat’s interesting. I’m glad they are imposing those building guidelines. The fact is though, in a strong Santa Ana, with burning embers flying through the air, no one is really fire-proof. All it takes is one little dried out palm frond floating through the air, landing in someone else’s yard or roof, and away it goes! I think these guidelines can help, but no community is immune. It’s kind of silly to think one’s home could be immune to a fire.
October 25, 2007 at 2:36 PM #91840lindismithParticipantThat’s interesting. I’m glad they are imposing those building guidelines. The fact is though, in a strong Santa Ana, with burning embers flying through the air, no one is really fire-proof. All it takes is one little dried out palm frond floating through the air, landing in someone else’s yard or roof, and away it goes! I think these guidelines can help, but no community is immune. It’s kind of silly to think one’s home could be immune to a fire.
October 25, 2007 at 2:36 PM #91853lindismithParticipantThat’s interesting. I’m glad they are imposing those building guidelines. The fact is though, in a strong Santa Ana, with burning embers flying through the air, no one is really fire-proof. All it takes is one little dried out palm frond floating through the air, landing in someone else’s yard or roof, and away it goes! I think these guidelines can help, but no community is immune. It’s kind of silly to think one’s home could be immune to a fire.
October 25, 2007 at 2:45 PM #918184plexownerParticipantMs 4S is desperately hoping that 4S Ranch will remain above the 2002 prices which she paid – she likes to reassure herself from time to time by posting miscellaneous BS about 4S Ranch
Obviously she feels that being fire-proof (what an idiot!) enhances the value of 4S Ranch
October 25, 2007 at 2:45 PM #918434plexownerParticipantMs 4S is desperately hoping that 4S Ranch will remain above the 2002 prices which she paid – she likes to reassure herself from time to time by posting miscellaneous BS about 4S Ranch
Obviously she feels that being fire-proof (what an idiot!) enhances the value of 4S Ranch
October 25, 2007 at 2:45 PM #918564plexownerParticipantMs 4S is desperately hoping that 4S Ranch will remain above the 2002 prices which she paid – she likes to reassure herself from time to time by posting miscellaneous BS about 4S Ranch
Obviously she feels that being fire-proof (what an idiot!) enhances the value of 4S Ranch
October 25, 2007 at 5:23 PM #918784Sbuyer2002ParticipantUhh . . . yea in 4S Ranch some homes over time will burn down from fire due to arson, carelessness, gas leak, etc. Just like homes in ANY neighborhood. My only point is that 4S, in comparison to the rest of San Diego county bar coastline communities (w/in 2 miles of ocean) is well protected from “Santa Ana wind driven fire” which is the most destructive type. Dumb dumba$$ and his cigarette butt is not going to burn 300 homes like the Santa Ana fire did in RB. I said not a single home in 4S burned, north or south. I then stated that the south portion was particularly well protected. I know its a complicated discussion to follow but if you really try, r e a d s l o w, and read it twice I’m sure you’ll understand it. The correction to straw, which it was, was for the lead in to the “strawman” comment.
grateful owner . . . .
October 25, 2007 at 5:23 PM #919044Sbuyer2002ParticipantUhh . . . yea in 4S Ranch some homes over time will burn down from fire due to arson, carelessness, gas leak, etc. Just like homes in ANY neighborhood. My only point is that 4S, in comparison to the rest of San Diego county bar coastline communities (w/in 2 miles of ocean) is well protected from “Santa Ana wind driven fire” which is the most destructive type. Dumb dumba$$ and his cigarette butt is not going to burn 300 homes like the Santa Ana fire did in RB. I said not a single home in 4S burned, north or south. I then stated that the south portion was particularly well protected. I know its a complicated discussion to follow but if you really try, r e a d s l o w, and read it twice I’m sure you’ll understand it. The correction to straw, which it was, was for the lead in to the “strawman” comment.
grateful owner . . . .
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.