- This topic has 91 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by little lady.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 19, 2008 at 1:13 PM #173631March 19, 2008 at 1:33 PM #173202EugeneParticipant
Not true. It’s not that cheap. You need lawyer on retainer to file an unlawful detainer in Superior Court. You can’t file yourself.
If these are wannabe landlords, they probably don’t have an attorney. It’ll cost them about $3000 to get a lawyer on retainer. Plus they have to pay the filing fees.
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/other/landtenqna16.htm
Q. Do I need a lawyer to file or defend against an unlawful detainer lawsuit?
A. Almost everyone has the right to sue, or to defend him- or herself if sued, without hiring an attorney.http://www.expressevictions.com/index.php
Uncontested eviction for $499
$150 – $400 attorney/contested feesOne week of recovered back-rent will pay for that.
March 19, 2008 at 1:33 PM #173542EugeneParticipantNot true. It’s not that cheap. You need lawyer on retainer to file an unlawful detainer in Superior Court. You can’t file yourself.
If these are wannabe landlords, they probably don’t have an attorney. It’ll cost them about $3000 to get a lawyer on retainer. Plus they have to pay the filing fees.
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/other/landtenqna16.htm
Q. Do I need a lawyer to file or defend against an unlawful detainer lawsuit?
A. Almost everyone has the right to sue, or to defend him- or herself if sued, without hiring an attorney.http://www.expressevictions.com/index.php
Uncontested eviction for $499
$150 – $400 attorney/contested feesOne week of recovered back-rent will pay for that.
March 19, 2008 at 1:33 PM #173545EugeneParticipantNot true. It’s not that cheap. You need lawyer on retainer to file an unlawful detainer in Superior Court. You can’t file yourself.
If these are wannabe landlords, they probably don’t have an attorney. It’ll cost them about $3000 to get a lawyer on retainer. Plus they have to pay the filing fees.
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/other/landtenqna16.htm
Q. Do I need a lawyer to file or defend against an unlawful detainer lawsuit?
A. Almost everyone has the right to sue, or to defend him- or herself if sued, without hiring an attorney.http://www.expressevictions.com/index.php
Uncontested eviction for $499
$150 – $400 attorney/contested feesOne week of recovered back-rent will pay for that.
March 19, 2008 at 1:33 PM #173565EugeneParticipantNot true. It’s not that cheap. You need lawyer on retainer to file an unlawful detainer in Superior Court. You can’t file yourself.
If these are wannabe landlords, they probably don’t have an attorney. It’ll cost them about $3000 to get a lawyer on retainer. Plus they have to pay the filing fees.
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/other/landtenqna16.htm
Q. Do I need a lawyer to file or defend against an unlawful detainer lawsuit?
A. Almost everyone has the right to sue, or to defend him- or herself if sued, without hiring an attorney.http://www.expressevictions.com/index.php
Uncontested eviction for $499
$150 – $400 attorney/contested feesOne week of recovered back-rent will pay for that.
March 19, 2008 at 1:33 PM #173646EugeneParticipantNot true. It’s not that cheap. You need lawyer on retainer to file an unlawful detainer in Superior Court. You can’t file yourself.
If these are wannabe landlords, they probably don’t have an attorney. It’ll cost them about $3000 to get a lawyer on retainer. Plus they have to pay the filing fees.
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/other/landtenqna16.htm
Q. Do I need a lawyer to file or defend against an unlawful detainer lawsuit?
A. Almost everyone has the right to sue, or to defend him- or herself if sued, without hiring an attorney.http://www.expressevictions.com/index.php
Uncontested eviction for $499
$150 – $400 attorney/contested feesOne week of recovered back-rent will pay for that.
March 19, 2008 at 1:48 PM #173207patientlywaitingParticipantesmith, it’s pretty obvious that you’re not a landlord. The process is much more onerous than you might think. Some renters have the process pat down and know how to milk the system for many months.
I not suggesting not paying the rent…. I’m saying that in foreclosure situations, the negative repercussions to the renter are almost nil.
Although I know that they are two separate issues, I personally don’t see anything wrong with a tenant not paying rent when the landlord is not paying the mortgage. Once the NOD is filed, the landlord has exhausted all his funds and is practically gone.
March 19, 2008 at 1:48 PM #173547patientlywaitingParticipantesmith, it’s pretty obvious that you’re not a landlord. The process is much more onerous than you might think. Some renters have the process pat down and know how to milk the system for many months.
I not suggesting not paying the rent…. I’m saying that in foreclosure situations, the negative repercussions to the renter are almost nil.
Although I know that they are two separate issues, I personally don’t see anything wrong with a tenant not paying rent when the landlord is not paying the mortgage. Once the NOD is filed, the landlord has exhausted all his funds and is practically gone.
March 19, 2008 at 1:48 PM #173550patientlywaitingParticipantesmith, it’s pretty obvious that you’re not a landlord. The process is much more onerous than you might think. Some renters have the process pat down and know how to milk the system for many months.
I not suggesting not paying the rent…. I’m saying that in foreclosure situations, the negative repercussions to the renter are almost nil.
Although I know that they are two separate issues, I personally don’t see anything wrong with a tenant not paying rent when the landlord is not paying the mortgage. Once the NOD is filed, the landlord has exhausted all his funds and is practically gone.
March 19, 2008 at 1:48 PM #173569patientlywaitingParticipantesmith, it’s pretty obvious that you’re not a landlord. The process is much more onerous than you might think. Some renters have the process pat down and know how to milk the system for many months.
I not suggesting not paying the rent…. I’m saying that in foreclosure situations, the negative repercussions to the renter are almost nil.
Although I know that they are two separate issues, I personally don’t see anything wrong with a tenant not paying rent when the landlord is not paying the mortgage. Once the NOD is filed, the landlord has exhausted all his funds and is practically gone.
March 19, 2008 at 1:48 PM #173651patientlywaitingParticipantesmith, it’s pretty obvious that you’re not a landlord. The process is much more onerous than you might think. Some renters have the process pat down and know how to milk the system for many months.
I not suggesting not paying the rent…. I’m saying that in foreclosure situations, the negative repercussions to the renter are almost nil.
Although I know that they are two separate issues, I personally don’t see anything wrong with a tenant not paying rent when the landlord is not paying the mortgage. Once the NOD is filed, the landlord has exhausted all his funds and is practically gone.
March 19, 2008 at 1:54 PM #173213AnonymousGuestesmith… if the tenant is smart, they won’t allow the eviction to go “uncontested”. In that event, the eviction will cost the landlord/owner a lot more than $499, that would be upfront money before any back rent is ever collected.
You’re smart enough to know the $499 price advertised on that lawyer’s website is a sales tactic.
Lawyers don’t work for free, you should know better than that.
March 19, 2008 at 1:54 PM #173552AnonymousGuestesmith… if the tenant is smart, they won’t allow the eviction to go “uncontested”. In that event, the eviction will cost the landlord/owner a lot more than $499, that would be upfront money before any back rent is ever collected.
You’re smart enough to know the $499 price advertised on that lawyer’s website is a sales tactic.
Lawyers don’t work for free, you should know better than that.
March 19, 2008 at 1:54 PM #173555AnonymousGuestesmith… if the tenant is smart, they won’t allow the eviction to go “uncontested”. In that event, the eviction will cost the landlord/owner a lot more than $499, that would be upfront money before any back rent is ever collected.
You’re smart enough to know the $499 price advertised on that lawyer’s website is a sales tactic.
Lawyers don’t work for free, you should know better than that.
March 19, 2008 at 1:54 PM #173574AnonymousGuestesmith… if the tenant is smart, they won’t allow the eviction to go “uncontested”. In that event, the eviction will cost the landlord/owner a lot more than $499, that would be upfront money before any back rent is ever collected.
You’re smart enough to know the $499 price advertised on that lawyer’s website is a sales tactic.
Lawyers don’t work for free, you should know better than that.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.