I chose the last one. I think I chose the last one. I think the media attempts to get people’s attention in any way, shape or form that they can. No matter what happens, they will show you SOMETHING that is related to what is happening, but that something will be spun in such a way to get people to watch it. Sometimes they can be dead-on accurate, but that is just out of chance. Most of the time, they are trying to get viewers. TO do this, they will present whatever bias they think will get viewers, be it liberal, conservative, feel-good, voyeur, or fair. So, the “outcome” they are trying to achieve is not a political outcome. They are just trying to keep their own profit machine rolling.
jpinpb
September 25, 2009 @
10:57 AM
Wow. I just want to know Wow. I just want to know which Pigg was naieve enough to select #1.
34f3f3f
September 25, 2009 @
12:06 PM
jpinpb wrote:Wow. I just [quote=jpinpb]Wow. I just want to know which Pigg was naieve enough to select #1.[/quote]
Just as well your not a journalist then, as naieve [sic] is actually spelled ‘naive’. And just why should journalists be the exception the work ethic of doing a job to the best of their ability? Might it be because they don’t say what you want to hear?
September 25, 2009 @ 7:39 AM
I chose the last one. I think
I chose the last one. I think the media attempts to get people’s attention in any way, shape or form that they can. No matter what happens, they will show you SOMETHING that is related to what is happening, but that something will be spun in such a way to get people to watch it. Sometimes they can be dead-on accurate, but that is just out of chance. Most of the time, they are trying to get viewers. TO do this, they will present whatever bias they think will get viewers, be it liberal, conservative, feel-good, voyeur, or fair. So, the “outcome” they are trying to achieve is not a political outcome. They are just trying to keep their own profit machine rolling.
September 25, 2009 @ 10:57 AM
Wow. I just want to know
Wow. I just want to know which Pigg was naieve enough to select #1.
September 25, 2009 @ 12:06 PM
jpinpb wrote:Wow. I just
[quote=jpinpb]Wow. I just want to know which Pigg was naieve enough to select #1.[/quote]
Just as well your not a journalist then, as naieve [sic] is actually spelled ‘naive’. And just why should journalists be the exception the work ethic of doing a job to the best of their ability? Might it be because they don’t say what you want to hear?