Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
temeculaguy
ParticipantThe point of driving a porsche is not to drive fast, but to get certain types of women to sleep with you on occassion. Have I taught you nothing, why do I slave over a hot keyboard?
Feeling you have the right to do something isn’t always enough justification when you share that road with others. If you can prove that nobody driving fast in a sports car on an open highway or in the desert has ever killed another person, then I will support your right to selectively follow laws.
temeculaguy
ParticipantThe point of driving a porsche is not to drive fast, but to get certain types of women to sleep with you on occassion. Have I taught you nothing, why do I slave over a hot keyboard?
Feeling you have the right to do something isn’t always enough justification when you share that road with others. If you can prove that nobody driving fast in a sports car on an open highway or in the desert has ever killed another person, then I will support your right to selectively follow laws.
temeculaguy
ParticipantThe point of driving a porsche is not to drive fast, but to get certain types of women to sleep with you on occassion. Have I taught you nothing, why do I slave over a hot keyboard?
Feeling you have the right to do something isn’t always enough justification when you share that road with others. If you can prove that nobody driving fast in a sports car on an open highway or in the desert has ever killed another person, then I will support your right to selectively follow laws.
temeculaguy
Participant[quote=svelte][quote=ibjames]the tenants getting kicked out freaks me out, how can you protect yourself from that?
[/quote]SuperObama to the rescue!!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30891380/
[/quote]I read that article about the new law, the idea is a good one, not sure I agree with how the law is written and I’m sure it will be exploited, I see some serious loopholes. But that aside, the one thing that jumped out at me was the entitlement of the person they chose to use an example. Here is what they said when they found out their rental was being foreclosed on(taken from the article):
“I had a week to be out,” said Brantley, who depends on government aid to help pay the rent. “I don’t want to move to a bad neighborhood.”
This bothered me, was the author of the piece trying to bother me, or is this as clean of a victim as they could find. If people on government rent assistance (translation:welfare) wont live in bad neighborhoods, then who does live there? Just lie to me, everytime I look at the taxes I pay, I am at risk for feeling bad, but I like to feel good, I want to feel that my money is helping people, show me some blind old woman that doesn’t have to eat dog food because my tax money is helping her, why can’t they find her. I really don’t want to hear that my tax money is going to make sure the poor don’t have to suffer the indignity of living in a poor area, that welfare recipients are now discriminating.
temeculaguy
Participant[quote=svelte][quote=ibjames]the tenants getting kicked out freaks me out, how can you protect yourself from that?
[/quote]SuperObama to the rescue!!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30891380/
[/quote]I read that article about the new law, the idea is a good one, not sure I agree with how the law is written and I’m sure it will be exploited, I see some serious loopholes. But that aside, the one thing that jumped out at me was the entitlement of the person they chose to use an example. Here is what they said when they found out their rental was being foreclosed on(taken from the article):
“I had a week to be out,” said Brantley, who depends on government aid to help pay the rent. “I don’t want to move to a bad neighborhood.”
This bothered me, was the author of the piece trying to bother me, or is this as clean of a victim as they could find. If people on government rent assistance (translation:welfare) wont live in bad neighborhoods, then who does live there? Just lie to me, everytime I look at the taxes I pay, I am at risk for feeling bad, but I like to feel good, I want to feel that my money is helping people, show me some blind old woman that doesn’t have to eat dog food because my tax money is helping her, why can’t they find her. I really don’t want to hear that my tax money is going to make sure the poor don’t have to suffer the indignity of living in a poor area, that welfare recipients are now discriminating.
temeculaguy
Participant[quote=svelte][quote=ibjames]the tenants getting kicked out freaks me out, how can you protect yourself from that?
[/quote]SuperObama to the rescue!!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30891380/
[/quote]I read that article about the new law, the idea is a good one, not sure I agree with how the law is written and I’m sure it will be exploited, I see some serious loopholes. But that aside, the one thing that jumped out at me was the entitlement of the person they chose to use an example. Here is what they said when they found out their rental was being foreclosed on(taken from the article):
“I had a week to be out,” said Brantley, who depends on government aid to help pay the rent. “I don’t want to move to a bad neighborhood.”
This bothered me, was the author of the piece trying to bother me, or is this as clean of a victim as they could find. If people on government rent assistance (translation:welfare) wont live in bad neighborhoods, then who does live there? Just lie to me, everytime I look at the taxes I pay, I am at risk for feeling bad, but I like to feel good, I want to feel that my money is helping people, show me some blind old woman that doesn’t have to eat dog food because my tax money is helping her, why can’t they find her. I really don’t want to hear that my tax money is going to make sure the poor don’t have to suffer the indignity of living in a poor area, that welfare recipients are now discriminating.
temeculaguy
Participant[quote=svelte][quote=ibjames]the tenants getting kicked out freaks me out, how can you protect yourself from that?
[/quote]SuperObama to the rescue!!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30891380/
[/quote]I read that article about the new law, the idea is a good one, not sure I agree with how the law is written and I’m sure it will be exploited, I see some serious loopholes. But that aside, the one thing that jumped out at me was the entitlement of the person they chose to use an example. Here is what they said when they found out their rental was being foreclosed on(taken from the article):
“I had a week to be out,” said Brantley, who depends on government aid to help pay the rent. “I don’t want to move to a bad neighborhood.”
This bothered me, was the author of the piece trying to bother me, or is this as clean of a victim as they could find. If people on government rent assistance (translation:welfare) wont live in bad neighborhoods, then who does live there? Just lie to me, everytime I look at the taxes I pay, I am at risk for feeling bad, but I like to feel good, I want to feel that my money is helping people, show me some blind old woman that doesn’t have to eat dog food because my tax money is helping her, why can’t they find her. I really don’t want to hear that my tax money is going to make sure the poor don’t have to suffer the indignity of living in a poor area, that welfare recipients are now discriminating.
temeculaguy
Participant[quote=svelte][quote=ibjames]the tenants getting kicked out freaks me out, how can you protect yourself from that?
[/quote]SuperObama to the rescue!!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30891380/
[/quote]I read that article about the new law, the idea is a good one, not sure I agree with how the law is written and I’m sure it will be exploited, I see some serious loopholes. But that aside, the one thing that jumped out at me was the entitlement of the person they chose to use an example. Here is what they said when they found out their rental was being foreclosed on(taken from the article):
“I had a week to be out,” said Brantley, who depends on government aid to help pay the rent. “I don’t want to move to a bad neighborhood.”
This bothered me, was the author of the piece trying to bother me, or is this as clean of a victim as they could find. If people on government rent assistance (translation:welfare) wont live in bad neighborhoods, then who does live there? Just lie to me, everytime I look at the taxes I pay, I am at risk for feeling bad, but I like to feel good, I want to feel that my money is helping people, show me some blind old woman that doesn’t have to eat dog food because my tax money is helping her, why can’t they find her. I really don’t want to hear that my tax money is going to make sure the poor don’t have to suffer the indignity of living in a poor area, that welfare recipients are now discriminating.
May 27, 2009 at 3:52 PM in reply to: OT: Schwarzenegger proposes the complete elimination of all state welfare programs #406360temeculaguy
ParticipantI can’t believe that people suggest that parents who make more money should pay more towards education and the poor should pay less. We already have that system in place, check your taxes against anyone with 8 kids or someone who is poor, I’ll bet you pay more than them.
I’ve read enough, I’m gonna pull out the big gun and place the blame squarely on the catholic church. The religion of choice for the poor and the immigarants in this state, it just happens to ban birth control.
I wonder how different things would be if they changed that policy.
May 27, 2009 at 3:52 PM in reply to: OT: Schwarzenegger proposes the complete elimination of all state welfare programs #406604temeculaguy
ParticipantI can’t believe that people suggest that parents who make more money should pay more towards education and the poor should pay less. We already have that system in place, check your taxes against anyone with 8 kids or someone who is poor, I’ll bet you pay more than them.
I’ve read enough, I’m gonna pull out the big gun and place the blame squarely on the catholic church. The religion of choice for the poor and the immigarants in this state, it just happens to ban birth control.
I wonder how different things would be if they changed that policy.
May 27, 2009 at 3:52 PM in reply to: OT: Schwarzenegger proposes the complete elimination of all state welfare programs #406847temeculaguy
ParticipantI can’t believe that people suggest that parents who make more money should pay more towards education and the poor should pay less. We already have that system in place, check your taxes against anyone with 8 kids or someone who is poor, I’ll bet you pay more than them.
I’ve read enough, I’m gonna pull out the big gun and place the blame squarely on the catholic church. The religion of choice for the poor and the immigarants in this state, it just happens to ban birth control.
I wonder how different things would be if they changed that policy.
May 27, 2009 at 3:52 PM in reply to: OT: Schwarzenegger proposes the complete elimination of all state welfare programs #406909temeculaguy
ParticipantI can’t believe that people suggest that parents who make more money should pay more towards education and the poor should pay less. We already have that system in place, check your taxes against anyone with 8 kids or someone who is poor, I’ll bet you pay more than them.
I’ve read enough, I’m gonna pull out the big gun and place the blame squarely on the catholic church. The religion of choice for the poor and the immigarants in this state, it just happens to ban birth control.
I wonder how different things would be if they changed that policy.
May 27, 2009 at 3:52 PM in reply to: OT: Schwarzenegger proposes the complete elimination of all state welfare programs #407056temeculaguy
ParticipantI can’t believe that people suggest that parents who make more money should pay more towards education and the poor should pay less. We already have that system in place, check your taxes against anyone with 8 kids or someone who is poor, I’ll bet you pay more than them.
I’ve read enough, I’m gonna pull out the big gun and place the blame squarely on the catholic church. The religion of choice for the poor and the immigarants in this state, it just happens to ban birth control.
I wonder how different things would be if they changed that policy.
temeculaguy
ParticipantCa Renter- I really do appreciate the advice, since we’ve raised a pint together and Mr. Ca renter is the coolest of dudes, I’ll confess. I always expose way to much of my personal life and views because it makes for good reading and fun writing. Truth be told, I found a keeper recently, so there’s no need to waste any pity or advice on me. Of course none of you ever get to meet her because if she ever reads these boards or learns of my alter ego and what I have written over the years, she would certainly not approve, who would, mysogyny is a phase, not a permanent lifestyle. I believe people are a lot like sausage, the end result is pleasing but the process should not be witnessed.
You’ll be happy to know I didn’t use shark bait, however she is too bright to get things past her, after sending her some very written e-mails and one time in a conversation I used way to much jargon regarding r/e, she inquired as to how I know so much about an industry that i am not involved in professionally and where did I learn to write. Obviously I just said that i read a lot. Why do I always fall for the smart ones?
-
AuthorPosts
