[temeculaguy]

Thank you jp, now i feel vindicated. If OX’s world were to crumble and I found him lying in the gutter drenched I his own urine I’d feel responsible, now I can defer blame. Plus it makes sense, god i hope it works.

[temeculaguy]

Thank you jp, now i feel vindicated. If OX’s world were to crumble and I found him lying in the gutter drenched I his own urine I’d feel responsible, now I can defer blame. Plus it makes sense, god i hope it works.

[temeculaguy]

Thank you jp, now i feel vindicated. If OX’s world were to crumble and I found him lying in the gutter drenched I his own urine I’d feel responsible, now I can defer blame. Plus it makes sense, god i hope it works.

[temeculaguy]

Thank you jp, now i feel vindicated. If OX’s world were to crumble and I found him lying in the gutter drenched I his own urine I’d feel responsible, now I can defer blame. Plus it makes sense, god i hope it works.

[temeculaguy]

It’s not my fault, oc posted the comps, how was I supposed to know they weren’t in that tract? While we are on the topic, 2000 pricing is a little optimistic, what would 2003 pricing be? or 2001? I have an itchy trigger finger, i say anything sub 2003 is good, the closer to 2001 the better but sub 03 is where I think it lands. Regardless of how nice it is, it was nice then too, if some areas never get below or to 2003 pricing during cycles but enjoy the same upward percentage, over time they get too far out of whack. If home x is worth double home y in 1985 and 1995 and 2003, it will end up worth double in 2010, not triple and not the same, the market ripples will put it at it’s percentage higher eventually.

[temeculaguy]

It’s not my fault, oc posted the comps, how was I supposed to know they weren’t in that tract? While we are on the topic, 2000 pricing is a little optimistic, what would 2003 pricing be? or 2001? I have an itchy trigger finger, i say anything sub 2003 is good, the closer to 2001 the better but sub 03 is where I think it lands. Regardless of how nice it is, it was nice then too, if some areas never get below or to 2003 pricing during cycles but enjoy the same upward percentage, over time they get too far out of whack. If home x is worth double home y in 1985 and 1995 and 2003, it will end up worth double in 2010, not triple and not the same, the market ripples will put it at it’s percentage higher eventually.

[temeculaguy]

It’s not my fault, oc posted the comps, how was I supposed to know they weren’t in that tract? While we are on the topic, 2000 pricing is a little optimistic, what would 2003 pricing be? or 2001? I have an itchy trigger finger, i say anything sub 2003 is good, the closer to 2001 the better but sub 03 is where I think it lands. Regardless of how nice it is, it was nice then too, if some areas never get below or to 2003 pricing during cycles but enjoy the same upward percentage, over time they get too far out of whack. If home x is worth double home y in 1985 and 1995 and 2003, it will end up worth double in 2010, not triple and not the same, the market ripples will put it at it’s percentage higher eventually.

[temeculaguy]

It’s not my fault, oc posted the comps, how was I supposed to know they weren’t in that tract? While we are on the topic, 2000 pricing is a little optimistic, what would 2003 pricing be? or 2001? I have an itchy trigger finger, i say anything sub 2003 is good, the closer to 2001 the better but sub 03 is where I think it lands. Regardless of how nice it is, it was nice then too, if some areas never get below or to 2003 pricing during cycles but enjoy the same upward percentage, over time they get too far out of whack. If home x is worth double home y in 1985 and 1995 and 2003, it will end up worth double in 2010, not triple and not the same, the market ripples will put it at it’s percentage higher eventually.

[temeculaguy]

It’s not my fault, oc posted the comps, how was I supposed to know they weren’t in that tract? While we are on the topic, 2000 pricing is a little optimistic, what would 2003 pricing be? or 2001? I have an itchy trigger finger, i say anything sub 2003 is good, the closer to 2001 the better but sub 03 is where I think it lands. Regardless of how nice it is, it was nice then too, if some areas never get below or to 2003 pricing during cycles but enjoy the same upward percentage, over time they get too far out of whack. If home x is worth double home y in 1985 and 1995 and 2003, it will end up worth double in 2010, not triple and not the same, the market ripples will put it at it’s percentage higher eventually.

[temeculaguy]

http://www.nctimes.com/californian/article_84317f3e-aadd-580b-b64a-a3096ddeedbd.html?mode=story

So that will be the fate of the half built complex, after reading it, I’m good with it.

[temeculaguy]

http://www.nctimes.com/californian/article_84317f3e-aadd-580b-b64a-a3096ddeedbd.html?mode=story

So that will be the fate of the half built complex, after reading it, I’m good with it.

[temeculaguy]

http://www.nctimes.com/californian/article_84317f3e-aadd-580b-b64a-a3096ddeedbd.html?mode=story

So that will be the fate of the half built complex, after reading it, I’m good with it.

[temeculaguy]

http://www.nctimes.com/californian/article_84317f3e-aadd-580b-b64a-a3096ddeedbd.html?mode=story

So that will be the fate of the half built complex, after reading it, I’m good with it.

[temeculaguy]

http://www.nctimes.com/californian/article_84317f3e-aadd-580b-b64a-a3096ddeedbd.html?mode=story

So that will be the fate of the half built complex, after reading it, I’m good with it.

[temeculaguy]

I’d say it’s there, can I bottom call with you now or do i have to wait till winter, 2000 pricing is there, maybe it gets a little better but maybe it doesn’t and then you gotta think about the rates.

oc, speaking of Eugene, he freaking nailed like three predictions from two years ago that I found on some old threads, I was gonna bump them for fun. Then he nails the stock bottom, and as you pointed out, 2000 pricing, Eugene, you are the new BUGS, “you are my boy, blue.”

[Author]

Posts