[temeculaguy]

Ok, I read the whole article and the graphs below it, and there is a contraditction between the headline and the data. Look at the data by county near the bottom and the comparisons with last month and last year, almost all of the major counties in so cal are down. The only counties with monthly or YOY increases are Mono, Plumas, San Luis Obispo, Kings, Siskyou, and San Francisco. The narrative also mentioned flat NODS, increased NOTs but decreased Sales back to the bank, which makes me think that loan mods and short sales are taking a bite, that is the real story. None of it supported the headline and it read more like a commercial for the website than a news article.

Just Break it down, an inflamitory headline, little supportive documentation and the phrase “Foreclosureradar, the only website that tracks every California foreclosure and provides daily auction updates” in the first sentence.

Seriously, the owner of the website has posted here before, Sean needs to respond to my mild and friendly accusation that this is more of an advertisement than a news story.

[temeculaguy]

Ok, I read the whole article and the graphs below it, and there is a contraditction between the headline and the data. Look at the data by county near the bottom and the comparisons with last month and last year, almost all of the major counties in so cal are down. The only counties with monthly or YOY increases are Mono, Plumas, San Luis Obispo, Kings, Siskyou, and San Francisco. The narrative also mentioned flat NODS, increased NOTs but decreased Sales back to the bank, which makes me think that loan mods and short sales are taking a bite, that is the real story. None of it supported the headline and it read more like a commercial for the website than a news article.

Just Break it down, an inflamitory headline, little supportive documentation and the phrase “Foreclosureradar, the only website that tracks every California foreclosure and provides daily auction updates” in the first sentence.

Seriously, the owner of the website has posted here before, Sean needs to respond to my mild and friendly accusation that this is more of an advertisement than a news story.

[temeculaguy]

Ok, I read the whole article and the graphs below it, and there is a contraditction between the headline and the data. Look at the data by county near the bottom and the comparisons with last month and last year, almost all of the major counties in so cal are down. The only counties with monthly or YOY increases are Mono, Plumas, San Luis Obispo, Kings, Siskyou, and San Francisco. The narrative also mentioned flat NODS, increased NOTs but decreased Sales back to the bank, which makes me think that loan mods and short sales are taking a bite, that is the real story. None of it supported the headline and it read more like a commercial for the website than a news article.

Just Break it down, an inflamitory headline, little supportive documentation and the phrase “Foreclosureradar, the only website that tracks every California foreclosure and provides daily auction updates” in the first sentence.

Seriously, the owner of the website has posted here before, Sean needs to respond to my mild and friendly accusation that this is more of an advertisement than a news story.

[temeculaguy]

Ok, I read the whole article and the graphs below it, and there is a contraditction between the headline and the data. Look at the data by county near the bottom and the comparisons with last month and last year, almost all of the major counties in so cal are down. The only counties with monthly or YOY increases are Mono, Plumas, San Luis Obispo, Kings, Siskyou, and San Francisco. The narrative also mentioned flat NODS, increased NOTs but decreased Sales back to the bank, which makes me think that loan mods and short sales are taking a bite, that is the real story. None of it supported the headline and it read more like a commercial for the website than a news article.

Just Break it down, an inflamitory headline, little supportive documentation and the phrase “Foreclosureradar, the only website that tracks every California foreclosure and provides daily auction updates” in the first sentence.

Seriously, the owner of the website has posted here before, Sean needs to respond to my mild and friendly accusation that this is more of an advertisement than a news story.

[temeculaguy]

I haven’t seen anyone mention the price of the various units, just the rent. In the OP’s case, how much are they going for? There are rents quoted for various units ranging from 900 to 1500 but no menion of cost, for those of us keeping score at home, it would be nice to know the purchase price in formulating advice.

[temeculaguy]

I haven’t seen anyone mention the price of the various units, just the rent. In the OP’s case, how much are they going for? There are rents quoted for various units ranging from 900 to 1500 but no menion of cost, for those of us keeping score at home, it would be nice to know the purchase price in formulating advice.

[temeculaguy]

I haven’t seen anyone mention the price of the various units, just the rent. In the OP’s case, how much are they going for? There are rents quoted for various units ranging from 900 to 1500 but no menion of cost, for those of us keeping score at home, it would be nice to know the purchase price in formulating advice.

[temeculaguy]

I haven’t seen anyone mention the price of the various units, just the rent. In the OP’s case, how much are they going for? There are rents quoted for various units ranging from 900 to 1500 but no menion of cost, for those of us keeping score at home, it would be nice to know the purchase price in formulating advice.

[temeculaguy]

I haven’t seen anyone mention the price of the various units, just the rent. In the OP’s case, how much are they going for? There are rents quoted for various units ranging from 900 to 1500 but no menion of cost, for those of us keeping score at home, it would be nice to know the purchase price in formulating advice.

[temeculaguy]

[quote=Eugene][quote=temeculaguy]
oc, speaking of Eugene, he freaking nailed like three predictions from two years ago that I found on some old threads, I was gonna bump them for fun. Then he nails the stock bottom, and as you pointed out, 2000 pricing, Eugene, you are the new BUGS, “you are my boy, blue.”[/quote]

Ha ha, thanks, but I wasn’t even here two years ago, you must be confusing me with someone else. Also, I missed the stock bottom, but it seems that I was correct when I was telling people to buy in January rather than wait for S&P to hit 600.[/quote]

Okay, I may have gotten the time frame wrong, they were more recent, but still a ways back and I can’t find them all now. BTW you are just a few weeks short of 2 years on here, don’t kid yourself, hobby becomes obsession after one year, I was rounding off.

Your prediction for 2009 of $3 gas, check.
S&P 1200, looking good.
Unemployment peaking Q2 then declining, so far so good.
Real estate recovery in areas with medians below 500k, looks that way

http://piggington.com/now_start_predictions_for_2009#comment-101917

And even though this one was recent

http://piggington.com/time_to_rebuy_sampp500#comment-123420

I probably dwelled on it because you were one of the only ones who thought homebuilders would rise in value. I wake up in the middle of the night screaming since I pussied out on buying some homebuilder stocks I knew would pop. My HOV prediction is now over 800% up, but I don’t own it, if it keeps going up I’m gonna have to switch from Cabernet to Ambien to get through the night.

[temeculaguy]

[quote=Eugene][quote=temeculaguy]
oc, speaking of Eugene, he freaking nailed like three predictions from two years ago that I found on some old threads, I was gonna bump them for fun. Then he nails the stock bottom, and as you pointed out, 2000 pricing, Eugene, you are the new BUGS, “you are my boy, blue.”[/quote]

Ha ha, thanks, but I wasn’t even here two years ago, you must be confusing me with someone else. Also, I missed the stock bottom, but it seems that I was correct when I was telling people to buy in January rather than wait for S&P to hit 600.[/quote]

Okay, I may have gotten the time frame wrong, they were more recent, but still a ways back and I can’t find them all now. BTW you are just a few weeks short of 2 years on here, don’t kid yourself, hobby becomes obsession after one year, I was rounding off.

Your prediction for 2009 of $3 gas, check.
S&P 1200, looking good.
Unemployment peaking Q2 then declining, so far so good.
Real estate recovery in areas with medians below 500k, looks that way

http://piggington.com/now_start_predictions_for_2009#comment-101917

And even though this one was recent

http://piggington.com/time_to_rebuy_sampp500#comment-123420

I probably dwelled on it because you were one of the only ones who thought homebuilders would rise in value. I wake up in the middle of the night screaming since I pussied out on buying some homebuilder stocks I knew would pop. My HOV prediction is now over 800% up, but I don’t own it, if it keeps going up I’m gonna have to switch from Cabernet to Ambien to get through the night.

[temeculaguy]

[quote=Eugene][quote=temeculaguy]
oc, speaking of Eugene, he freaking nailed like three predictions from two years ago that I found on some old threads, I was gonna bump them for fun. Then he nails the stock bottom, and as you pointed out, 2000 pricing, Eugene, you are the new BUGS, “you are my boy, blue.”[/quote]

Ha ha, thanks, but I wasn’t even here two years ago, you must be confusing me with someone else. Also, I missed the stock bottom, but it seems that I was correct when I was telling people to buy in January rather than wait for S&P to hit 600.[/quote]

Okay, I may have gotten the time frame wrong, they were more recent, but still a ways back and I can’t find them all now. BTW you are just a few weeks short of 2 years on here, don’t kid yourself, hobby becomes obsession after one year, I was rounding off.

Your prediction for 2009 of $3 gas, check.
S&P 1200, looking good.
Unemployment peaking Q2 then declining, so far so good.
Real estate recovery in areas with medians below 500k, looks that way

http://piggington.com/now_start_predictions_for_2009#comment-101917

And even though this one was recent

http://piggington.com/time_to_rebuy_sampp500#comment-123420

I probably dwelled on it because you were one of the only ones who thought homebuilders would rise in value. I wake up in the middle of the night screaming since I pussied out on buying some homebuilder stocks I knew would pop. My HOV prediction is now over 800% up, but I don’t own it, if it keeps going up I’m gonna have to switch from Cabernet to Ambien to get through the night.

[temeculaguy]

[quote=Eugene][quote=temeculaguy]
oc, speaking of Eugene, he freaking nailed like three predictions from two years ago that I found on some old threads, I was gonna bump them for fun. Then he nails the stock bottom, and as you pointed out, 2000 pricing, Eugene, you are the new BUGS, “you are my boy, blue.”[/quote]

Ha ha, thanks, but I wasn’t even here two years ago, you must be confusing me with someone else. Also, I missed the stock bottom, but it seems that I was correct when I was telling people to buy in January rather than wait for S&P to hit 600.[/quote]

Okay, I may have gotten the time frame wrong, they were more recent, but still a ways back and I can’t find them all now. BTW you are just a few weeks short of 2 years on here, don’t kid yourself, hobby becomes obsession after one year, I was rounding off.

Your prediction for 2009 of $3 gas, check.
S&P 1200, looking good.
Unemployment peaking Q2 then declining, so far so good.
Real estate recovery in areas with medians below 500k, looks that way

http://piggington.com/now_start_predictions_for_2009#comment-101917

And even though this one was recent

http://piggington.com/time_to_rebuy_sampp500#comment-123420

I probably dwelled on it because you were one of the only ones who thought homebuilders would rise in value. I wake up in the middle of the night screaming since I pussied out on buying some homebuilder stocks I knew would pop. My HOV prediction is now over 800% up, but I don’t own it, if it keeps going up I’m gonna have to switch from Cabernet to Ambien to get through the night.

[temeculaguy]

[quote=Eugene][quote=temeculaguy]
oc, speaking of Eugene, he freaking nailed like three predictions from two years ago that I found on some old threads, I was gonna bump them for fun. Then he nails the stock bottom, and as you pointed out, 2000 pricing, Eugene, you are the new BUGS, “you are my boy, blue.”[/quote]

Ha ha, thanks, but I wasn’t even here two years ago, you must be confusing me with someone else. Also, I missed the stock bottom, but it seems that I was correct when I was telling people to buy in January rather than wait for S&P to hit 600.[/quote]

Okay, I may have gotten the time frame wrong, they were more recent, but still a ways back and I can’t find them all now. BTW you are just a few weeks short of 2 years on here, don’t kid yourself, hobby becomes obsession after one year, I was rounding off.

Your prediction for 2009 of $3 gas, check.
S&P 1200, looking good.
Unemployment peaking Q2 then declining, so far so good.
Real estate recovery in areas with medians below 500k, looks that way

http://piggington.com/now_start_predictions_for_2009#comment-101917

And even though this one was recent

http://piggington.com/time_to_rebuy_sampp500#comment-123420

I probably dwelled on it because you were one of the only ones who thought homebuilders would rise in value. I wake up in the middle of the night screaming since I pussied out on buying some homebuilder stocks I knew would pop. My HOV prediction is now over 800% up, but I don’t own it, if it keeps going up I’m gonna have to switch from Cabernet to Ambien to get through the night.

[temeculaguy]

You are probably right AN, either that or I’ll just switch to porn and then go to bed, check the score tomorrow. I usually stick it out to see the flop, but not this time, I’m unarmed and Alfred took the flame suit to the cleaners.

[Author]

Posts