Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
spdrun
ParticipantToo transparent — if you want to mess with them, I suspect you have lead them on.
spdrun
ParticipantMore like a Wall Street pimp.
This being said — end game today. Dow +15, NASDAQ -36, everything else negative. Flu’s beloved FB down to 45…
spdrun
ParticipantThere doesn’t appear to be any mechanism to easily report PM spam — can you set that up like you did for public posts?
spdrun
ParticipantDepends where — in suburban NY, prices are probably down since 2010, owing to the rush of foreclosures being kicked into the pipeline recently.
November 17, 2013 at 6:07 PM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768091spdrun
ParticipantFirst of all, i wasnt refering to homosexuality, just your consistent anti-having kids viewpoint.
I’m not anti-kid, I’m anti having more than two kids.
November 17, 2013 at 5:19 PM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768088spdrun
ParticipantYou miss my point — in primitive, tribal societies, people not procreating could make or break a clan. Nowadays, we have enough people to go around, so the 10% of homosexuals that happen to exist (and not breed “naturally”) aren’t a huge survival risk.
And actually, recessive traits that don’t permit procreation don’t disappear … think of Tay-Sachs Disease or anything that causes children to die young. I do realize that homosexuality is more complicated than that, but it’s not as simple as you make out either.
November 17, 2013 at 7:39 AM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768059spdrun
ParticipantJust because it’s “innate” doesn’t make it good or useful in industrialized society ca. 2013. Homophobia seems like a dumb thing to waste one’s energy on.
November 17, 2013 at 7:35 AM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768057spdrun
ParticipantWhy — the world is overpopulated as it is. Fewer breeders would be a good thing.
(OK, maybe not for the R.E. market, but places like CA will always be desirable.)
November 17, 2013 at 6:54 AM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768055spdrun
ParticipantParamount… Come on, it’s a hell of a jump from “consenting adults of the same gender sometimes get married” to condoning child abuse.
If you’re going to argue, don’t weaken your position with irrational arguments like that.
spdrun
ParticipantI wouldn’t say ANY level — look at Detroit, Stockton, Camden, or Harrisburg.
November 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768002spdrun
Participant^^^
Exactly. The buck stops at the decision-makers, or should anyway.November 16, 2013 at 10:28 AM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768000spdrun
ParticipantYou can still buy cheaply if you buy in a neighborhood that’s “changing.” And foreclosures have actually gone up 50-75% since the sequester began, so prices aren’t really going up anymore for the time being.
“Following the gheys” isn’t always profitable — there’s a little city on the NJ coast, Asbury Park, which is sort of a ghetto. Think Oceanside with an even less nice downtown. About 10 years ago, everyone said, “buy there, the gays are moving in” — well 10 years later, it’s still improving but hasn’t improved much apart from one tiny area 🙂
DC is more of a case of following the govno-mint workers. Much of the rise actually happened under Dubya Bush, who massively scaled up the size of government.
spdrun
ParticipantNo different than trading on a bear market, except that the bearishness is local.
November 15, 2013 at 12:47 PM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #767979spdrun
ParticipantLast year they were giving kids military rankings based on how they were progressing with state test milestones. Of course, there was a strong socio-ecomnomic relationship. I put a stop to it.
I’ve never heard of anything like that out here — do they do it as a cute way to relate to the kids, since there are probably a lot more kids from military families in SD than in NJ (where I grew up)? I personally don’t think that the military ranking system is inappropriate in itself, but the fact that test results were made “public” is a bit inappropriate.
Out of curiosity, do they “track” in SD-area public schools? i.e. are there tests for admission to “honors”, AP, or IB classes?
-
AuthorPosts
