[SK in CV]

[quote=swdad] It would be fair for all if that 43.2% was used as a voucher so that folks can send their children to a school of their choice.[/quote]

Why the hell should tax dollars go to pay for your bigotry? (Your own words belie your claims to the contrary.)

[SK in CV]

[quote=swdad] It would be fair for all if that 43.2% was used as a voucher so that folks can send their children to a school of their choice.[/quote]

Why the hell should tax dollars go to pay for your bigotry? (Your own words belie your claims to the contrary.)

[SK in CV]

[quote=swdad] It would be fair for all if that 43.2% was used as a voucher so that folks can send their children to a school of their choice.[/quote]

Why the hell should tax dollars go to pay for your bigotry? (Your own words belie your claims to the contrary.)

[SK in CV]

[quote=swdad] It would be fair for all if that 43.2% was used as a voucher so that folks can send their children to a school of their choice.[/quote]

Why the hell should tax dollars go to pay for your bigotry? (Your own words belie your claims to the contrary.)

[SK in CV]

[quote=jstoesz]you guys are killing me…

Do you think for one second that the aggregate republicans are any dumber than the aggregate democrats?

You hold up the ignorant conspiracy birthers on the right as some shining example of stupidity, but what about the 911 truthers (or whatever they are called)?

What about the inner city welfare queens, the white trash dole subsister? The fact is much of the american populace is not too impressively intelligent.

This onesided narcissism is killing me. If we realize that most people are not too intelligent about politics, isn’t that a powerful example of the need for limited government? After all I do not want some know nothing democrat or republican affecting my life…[/quote]

I’ve only noticed one poster making references to republicans being dumber than democrats, so the “you guys” is a gross generalization.

And the false equivilence you’ve made between the birthers and 911truthers is simply not credible. This morning’s news brought polling results showing only 38% of Republicans believe Obama was born in the US. The 911truthers never had ANY traction, among democrats or others. Not a single elected federal politician gave it the time of day, unless they were assailing it. The press barely did. The 911truth thing was seen by most as unquestionable stupidity. The birther thing, not so much among Republicans.

They do it too fails miserably.

[SK in CV]

[quote=jstoesz]you guys are killing me…

Do you think for one second that the aggregate republicans are any dumber than the aggregate democrats?

You hold up the ignorant conspiracy birthers on the right as some shining example of stupidity, but what about the 911 truthers (or whatever they are called)?

What about the inner city welfare queens, the white trash dole subsister? The fact is much of the american populace is not too impressively intelligent.

This onesided narcissism is killing me. If we realize that most people are not too intelligent about politics, isn’t that a powerful example of the need for limited government? After all I do not want some know nothing democrat or republican affecting my life…[/quote]

I’ve only noticed one poster making references to republicans being dumber than democrats, so the “you guys” is a gross generalization.

And the false equivilence you’ve made between the birthers and 911truthers is simply not credible. This morning’s news brought polling results showing only 38% of Republicans believe Obama was born in the US. The 911truthers never had ANY traction, among democrats or others. Not a single elected federal politician gave it the time of day, unless they were assailing it. The press barely did. The 911truth thing was seen by most as unquestionable stupidity. The birther thing, not so much among Republicans.

They do it too fails miserably.

[SK in CV]

[quote=jstoesz]you guys are killing me…

Do you think for one second that the aggregate republicans are any dumber than the aggregate democrats?

You hold up the ignorant conspiracy birthers on the right as some shining example of stupidity, but what about the 911 truthers (or whatever they are called)?

What about the inner city welfare queens, the white trash dole subsister? The fact is much of the american populace is not too impressively intelligent.

This onesided narcissism is killing me. If we realize that most people are not too intelligent about politics, isn’t that a powerful example of the need for limited government? After all I do not want some know nothing democrat or republican affecting my life…[/quote]

I’ve only noticed one poster making references to republicans being dumber than democrats, so the “you guys” is a gross generalization.

And the false equivilence you’ve made between the birthers and 911truthers is simply not credible. This morning’s news brought polling results showing only 38% of Republicans believe Obama was born in the US. The 911truthers never had ANY traction, among democrats or others. Not a single elected federal politician gave it the time of day, unless they were assailing it. The press barely did. The 911truth thing was seen by most as unquestionable stupidity. The birther thing, not so much among Republicans.

They do it too fails miserably.

[SK in CV]

[quote=jstoesz]you guys are killing me…

Do you think for one second that the aggregate republicans are any dumber than the aggregate democrats?

You hold up the ignorant conspiracy birthers on the right as some shining example of stupidity, but what about the 911 truthers (or whatever they are called)?

What about the inner city welfare queens, the white trash dole subsister? The fact is much of the american populace is not too impressively intelligent.

This onesided narcissism is killing me. If we realize that most people are not too intelligent about politics, isn’t that a powerful example of the need for limited government? After all I do not want some know nothing democrat or republican affecting my life…[/quote]

I’ve only noticed one poster making references to republicans being dumber than democrats, so the “you guys” is a gross generalization.

And the false equivilence you’ve made between the birthers and 911truthers is simply not credible. This morning’s news brought polling results showing only 38% of Republicans believe Obama was born in the US. The 911truthers never had ANY traction, among democrats or others. Not a single elected federal politician gave it the time of day, unless they were assailing it. The press barely did. The 911truth thing was seen by most as unquestionable stupidity. The birther thing, not so much among Republicans.

They do it too fails miserably.

[SK in CV]

[quote=jstoesz]you guys are killing me…

Do you think for one second that the aggregate republicans are any dumber than the aggregate democrats?

You hold up the ignorant conspiracy birthers on the right as some shining example of stupidity, but what about the 911 truthers (or whatever they are called)?

What about the inner city welfare queens, the white trash dole subsister? The fact is much of the american populace is not too impressively intelligent.

This onesided narcissism is killing me. If we realize that most people are not too intelligent about politics, isn’t that a powerful example of the need for limited government? After all I do not want some know nothing democrat or republican affecting my life…[/quote]

I’ve only noticed one poster making references to republicans being dumber than democrats, so the “you guys” is a gross generalization.

And the false equivilence you’ve made between the birthers and 911truthers is simply not credible. This morning’s news brought polling results showing only 38% of Republicans believe Obama was born in the US. The 911truthers never had ANY traction, among democrats or others. Not a single elected federal politician gave it the time of day, unless they were assailing it. The press barely did. The 911truth thing was seen by most as unquestionable stupidity. The birther thing, not so much among Republicans.

They do it too fails miserably.

[SK in CV]

And in related news.

Donald Trump Unable to Produce Certificate Proving He’s Not a Festering Pile of Shit

http://www.theonion.com/articles/trump-unable-to-produce-certificate-proving-hes-no,20250/

[SK in CV]

And in related news.

Donald Trump Unable to Produce Certificate Proving He’s Not a Festering Pile of Shit

http://www.theonion.com/articles/trump-unable-to-produce-certificate-proving-hes-no,20250/

[SK in CV]

And in related news.

Donald Trump Unable to Produce Certificate Proving He’s Not a Festering Pile of Shit

http://www.theonion.com/articles/trump-unable-to-produce-certificate-proving-hes-no,20250/

[SK in CV]

And in related news.

Donald Trump Unable to Produce Certificate Proving He’s Not a Festering Pile of Shit

http://www.theonion.com/articles/trump-unable-to-produce-certificate-proving-hes-no,20250/

[SK in CV]

And in related news.

Donald Trump Unable to Produce Certificate Proving He’s Not a Festering Pile of Shit

http://www.theonion.com/articles/trump-unable-to-produce-certificate-proving-hes-no,20250/

[SK in CV]

[quote=paramount]
Sounds like the issue is a double standard: I should respect others views (and I do), but others don’t need to respect mine? I would guess that less than 10% of the population is gay, by definition that means being gay is not normal IMO.

Nothing wrong with being gay IMO – your life your business. I just don’t think it’s normal and I don’t want my kids taught that it is.

I want to opt out, period.[/quote]

My daughter has green eyes. As do about 12% of the population. Not normal?

Nevermind. I just hope for your kids sake, they were born straight.

[Author]

Posts