Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
sdduuuude
Participant[quote=EconProf]The article is hard to plod through because it is a grab-bag of unrelated statistics, faulty reasoning, and jumping to conclusions with inadequate evidence.[/quote]
I agree. A fairly worthless article, all told.
sdduuuude
ParticipantWe pay $90 per visit for a maid to do two 1700 sq. ft. houses. That’s for about 6 or 7 hours of cleaning. I think we are getting a good deal.
sdduuuude
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]… I don’t think boats getting lifted in La Jolla helps homeowners in Lemon Grove one iota …[/quote]
You took the phrase “a rising tide lifts all boats” and twisted it to suggest the original poster was saying “anything that lifts one boat lifts all others”
Please think a bit before you embark on one of your endless posts.
June 26, 2013 at 10:57 PM in reply to: Calif. utility to retire troubled San Onofre nuclear power plant #763260sdduuuude
Participant[quote=CDMA ENG]Damnit!
Now I am going to have to pee in my wetsuit to stay warm! Surfing Old Man’s at San O was great with the 10 degree warmer water coming out of the heat exchangers…
😛
Building the last mile of Cellular since 0’10.
CE[/quote]
It’s taken you three years to go a mile ?
sdduuuude
Participant… or horizontal Mombo, in this case
sdduuuude
ParticipantI’d summarize this the same way I summarize whether or not bankers or borrowers were to blame for all the bad loans: It takes two to Tango.
sdduuuude
ParticipantThe cost of the goods is not the only cost of selling them. Consumers have to cover marketing costs, packaging costs, profit for manufacturer, distributor, and retailer. Plus, cereal brands have to pay the retailer for shelf space.
sdduuuude
ParticipantMay 7 CVMS: 65 for sale
14 under $1M
51 over $1Msdduuuude
Participant[quote=Happs]My bathroom currently has no can lights. [/quote]
So, when you are on the can, it is dark ?
April 15, 2013 at 7:14 PM in reply to: Does anybody pay attention to the beta value for stocks? #761330sdduuuude
ParticipantPersonally, I don’t like the word “volatility” at all.
It is really a correlation to how the stock moves with respect to the market. The .66 may be a result of the fact that lately, Apple has been moving downward while the market moves up so it appears somewhat disassociated with the market.
Look at how it is derived. Calculate the beta for a couple of stocks and you’ll understand better what it means.
A correlation of 0 means you can’t infer what the stock might have done by looking at the market index. I believe you could have two different securities, each with a beta of zero, each with very different volatility.
April 14, 2013 at 8:41 PM in reply to: Does anybody pay attention to the beta value for stocks? #761285sdduuuude
ParticipantNo. It does not indicate that apple is not volatile.
April 14, 2013 at 8:03 PM in reply to: Does anybody pay attention to the beta value for stocks? #761283sdduuuude
ParticipantNot volatility, but relative or correlated volatility, or correlation to the general market. Some call it a measure of risk, or an indication of whether or not you can hedged away the risk of that stock by diversifying in the rest of the market.
That is – if you buy 10 stocks all with a beta of 1, you aren’t really diversified at all.
To answer your question – not many people pay attention to it. Professionals do.
sdduuuude
ParticipantI’m assuming you are looking at San Augustine.
Keep in mind, a home like that sat on the market for many months, got as low as $799K and was pulled off the market before it sold. Aim low on your first offer and be patient.
sdduuuude
ParticipantTo simultaneously mis-quote Fat Bastard and Buzz Lightyear …
Into the shitter, and beyond !
-
AuthorPosts
