[scaredyclassic]

I moved here.

paramount, what about if you look at it from this angle. a nice young Gd fearing boy who is gay goes through conversion therapy and gets cured of his gayosity. he still has residual glimmers inside him that maybe he likes men, because women are not making him hard, but he does have a certificate of cure from his therapist that he is definitely not gay no more, so he figures once he is ina blessed Union with the right girl he’llbe able to get it on..

He is just dying to be a regualr fellow, so he does his duty to his mom and dad and marries a nice girl from the same church, but he’s still not feeling it. however, he really want kids so he jacks off inside his wife once a month or so, while thinking of all the good looking men at church, and thereby is able to reproduce in a standard nuclear family wih his clever strategy.

heck there’s probably some of these families around us here in temecula even!

That’s a “man and a woman” having a child, but is it really what you think is the ultimate criteria for judging the soundness of the family?

Is that really bound to be resulting in superior chidlren, than the same gay guy who is married to a man he loves, jerking off in the privacy of a doctor’s office, which doctor then manually implants the seed in the very same woman and has the exact same genetic children, but raised by a family that at least has the potential for deep, loving relationships? and at least isn’t based on fraud?

seems like pretty much the same process to me, justa different delivery system.

if we are going to ban gay marriage, i propose we limit the ban to marriages between gay men and straight women, or gay women and straight men. Clearly those are effed up.

or maybe not. maybe i’m being intolerant there too…maybe that’s the next edgy lifestyle…weird, wild, wet, wicked and wanton…that’s temecula, baby…living on the edge…

kinda reminds me of roseanne barr’s comedy about life on the edge…

A lot of stuff bugs me about being married and a lot of stuff bugs me about husbands y’know. Like when they all the time wanna talk to ya. I hate that. He comes in and says “Roseanne. Don’t you think we should talk about our sexual problems?” Like I’m gonna turn off Wheel Of Fortune for that. Put it on a gift certificate babe. ….. But you know what I think, I think husbands and the very best of men. There the Cadillacs of men. Cause at least they can make a commitment and deal with life. Not like these young bucks, they young warrior types. “Well Roseanne, I’m not ready to settle down, I’m living life of the edge of the fast lane.” Sure get in a relationship and face the real danger. Look a mortgage in the face for thirty years. You sky-diving wimps. But this bugs me the worst, it’s when the husband thinks the wife knows where everything is huh. Like they think the uterus is a tracking device. Cause he comes in and goes “Hey Roseanne, do we have any Cheetos left?” Like he can’t go over a lift up that sofa cushion himself.

[scaredyclassic]

now that we have analyzed the radical gay agenda, let’s move on to the conservative gay agenda…does it involve closeted sex in bathrooms with random partners? I agree, we definitely should not teach the conservative gay agenda in public schools.

[scaredyclassic]

[quote=paramount][quote=Blogstar]
But yeah, homosexuals can have kids, she could have found a gay man to do the deed. They can make babies for each other and/or adopt. Sperm bank sounds less complicated.[/quote]

Then in that case is the original couple really having the child, or is the gay man and the lesbian woman actually having the child? They gay man IS the father.

Yes, they can adopt, but that is not the same as “having” a baby. Not better or worse, just a different process.

Are we now going to defy biology? we don’t get to make those rules. It is what it is…I can’t change that and neither can you.

But in general I do believe an adopted child is best placed in a home with a mother (female) and father (male).[/quote]

in general, i do believe an adopted child is best placed in a home with a minimum family income of $250,000.

in general, i do believe an adopted child is best placed in a home with parents without substance absue problems and whoa re able to frm clear emotional boundaries.

in general, i do believe an adopted child is best placed in a home with parents with lots of outside social support, involved gradnparents, freinds, social contacts,e tc.

in general, i do believe an adopted child is best placed in a home with people who geneuinely enjoy having children around and arent just adopting from some sense that they “should” have a family…

i don’t know, there are lots of things that could make a home better or worse, and maybe there’s an arguemnt that a man and a woman at the helm is in general “better”, but probably only better int he sense that it is slightly more societally normal and might perhaps submit the kid to maybe less teasing.

maybe. you guys seen the video of the 18 year old engineering student from iowa raised by two moms testifying before iowa lawmakers on his family? it was pretty compelling. i’ll try to dig it up. kinda makes one woder about the “in generals” what may be better are perhaps subsumed by the compellingness of the individuals…

[scaredyclassic]

[quote=flu][quote=6packscaredy]No ones ever asked for my sperm.

:([/quote]

Too many lawyers in this country :)[/quote]

What about the old prelaw days? So much waste. I could’ve created entire gay villages.

[scaredyclassic]

App idea;

Gaydar.

[scaredyclassic]

No ones ever asked for my sperm.

🙁

[scaredyclassic]

Nuclear families are too dangerous. We need more solar families.

[scaredyclassic]

Family income correlates with high sat scores. So if the gay couple raising the little tyke has the bucks API scores will be high.

Paramount would you be so abrasive as to tell an adoptive couple that they don’t really “have” kids?

Some dads are just sperm donors and are far less worthy than the dude who is in it for the long haul.

Having kids is a lot more than just ejaculating in a chick.

[scaredyclassic]

[quote=temeculaguy][quote=no_such_reality]Lots of talk, no books titles…

enough said.[/quote]

Let me try, “Same Love”

-naw that’s already a song

“Elvis’ hip shake leads to sin”

-naw wrong generation

“how fear and perception distorts reality”

now were talking, that’s a good book title. Admittedly, I only read the first and eighth page, but paramount is a Temecula resident, residing in a community with the largest per capita Mormon population in California.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temecula,_California

near the bottom, under religion.

My kids joke that they went to Brigham Young High, because the administrative staff and many of the students were Mormon.

So if the most conservative (and heavily Mormon) school district makes a person sick, is it reality or perception. So I think it’s a book title, because the one community and school district with the least amount of pro gay sentiment happens to sicken a person, then that person would be thrown into a coma in other communities. An analogy would be two Germans in 1940 talking when one says “That Hitler guy has some good ideas but he doesn’t go far enough for me, he’s a bit of a moderate.”

Just following the rule that any thread over 7 pages must digress into Hitler references.

Leave the gays alone, they help the odds for us straight guys and the female gays remain one of our favorite genres of porn. I say its a win win. Mark me down as pro gay.[/quote]

true dat. my kids occasionally reprt a G=d n jesus remark by a teacher in the temecula district. when i offer to litigate they tell me to back off and be cool. i have never done anything, never even been sickened, just been irritated at their audacity, feel like they should be beaten back a bit. but my kids are too low profile. i cant blame them. i would nt want me to advocate for me if i wer ein the lcoa school system. id want to meld.

[scaredyclassic]

i can understand hating pink floyd. but in 1976, it seemed so, crazy weird to me. plus, the early weird acid stuff with syd barrett…it just seemed so insane and bizarre and interesting…

but yeah, they probably do suck.

[scaredyclassic]

[quote=Blogstar]I hate pink floyd.[/quote]

what about pink freud?

http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?id=28452787&color=010&cm_mmc=SEM-_-Google-_-PLA-_-55041999424adwords_labelsM_APP_TEESSHORT&device=c&network=g&matchtype=&gclid=CJC8ooOi9boCFQ3hQgodiHIAOQ

[scaredyclassic]

parenting is I suppose kind of licensed by CPS. when you screw up, you are monitored.

i sort of see gay families as procreating on their own. they have a uterus, or alternately some sperm, they buy or find some sperm, or alternatively rent a uterus, y voila…not much different than the families created by in vitro by heteros.

there is clearly overlap between a lot of hetero formed families who borrow buy or find sperm, or rent uterii, and gay families who hunt down such resources, so the fact that some hetero families can save money by not buying sperm and making their ow n completely homemade family with their own stash doesn’t really prove anything (except maybe sperm ought to be tax deductible?). if adoption is eligible for a tax credit, maybe sperm ought to geyt a 50% credit? Iam not thinking hetero repro is more awesome than gay cobbled together families. just different strategy…

although i will say, it is pretty impressive, when your sperm actually works. Im still kind of cocky about it. frankly I am shocked that my sperm actually grew into anything. it always looked so, well, dead, just lying there on a towel. it never slithered away, or grew a nose or did much of anything besides congeal.

but evidently it actually WAS alive, and found its way into an egg, and did its little mystery two step there, not just once, but multiple times!

still, Im not saying that makes me better than gay couples. Just that Im kind of impressed with my own former viirility. I guess we all are, and thats why selfcontained family production seems more macho…but soemtimes it takes a village to create a baby… hell, i’d sell anyone my sperm if they want some. except i did have that vasectomy, so i guess im sold out.

[scaredyclassic]

I’m tired of pretending to live in the present. I’m going to move my entire operation into the future.

[scaredyclassic]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=paramount][quote=SK in CV] Hence, you’re homophobic. I’m not sure why you won’t just acknowledge it. Your words make it pretty clear.[/quote]

It’s amazing how deeply the gay agenda has brainwashed the masses.

The message is: If you don’t agree with or embrace my view of homosexuality or how it’s being taught, you must be a homophobe and a hater. Or a troll. Or whatever.

Stop imposing your secular progressive religion on others.

Why not learn to exercise some tolerance for the views others might have without the need for personal attacks.[/quote]

I have missed Paramount’s posts soooo much.

Damn.

My thoughts:

1: AFX is gay (his wife told me).

2: Rich is gay (which is why he drives a gay car and has like 2% body fat).

3: Paramount is gayer than anyone else here. But closeted.

4: I mean seriously:
Who cares?
My sons are 2 and 5 years old.
Each has friends with same sex parents.
Kids are always interested in that shit.
One of my agents (who has a kid at the daycare where my younger son goes) describes his 4-year-old’s best friend shouting “but he NEEDS a mommy!!” (cuz my agent is a homo).
The same girl once asked me where my hair had gone.
Kids pay attention to things (including family structure).
It happens.
Last I checked this did not lead either of my sons to don a leather harness or a ball gag.
However, the visual that creates does make me giggle.

Paramount, stay in Temecula and let us decent folk get on with our lives free of ignorant people who think they are moral (when they aren’t).

Your version of morality is nuts and a pretty good example of why having kids should require a license.[/quote]

actually, more than a few of my kids’ public school teachers feel free to occasionally mention G.d n’ Jesus in the classroom. They my kids) wouldn’t let me complain. It is a little different here….

[scaredyclassic]

[quote=Blogstar]Thanks Car,
My sad story really isn’t that off topic.

People basically do and think what they are groomed for with a little variance here and there.

I am in a hurry this morning but was think about your post about soulless jobs and whatnot yesterday.

How many people do we now who were groomed for the machine including it’s academic institutions. conformed wonderfully and now have some nice skills and a life with no stronger attributes than a job for a very mentally strong monkey and conspicuous and invidious consumption to show for it. We have some on piggington’s that nearly fit that mold. Lots of ways to have a sad life. Not aimed at piggs because we are all great parents no matter what..but you probably don’t want to be the child of this kind of person either. At least I was not Dick Cheney’s son , for instance.

I don’t want to expend the energy to relearn trumpet but I am leaning towards guitar for myself with the hopes that one of the kids will at least take it to the level of playing 3 or 4 chord songs and singing nice songs.[/quote]

Songwriter Harlan Howard once said “All you need to write a country song is three chords and the truth.”
Lou Reed said “One chord is fine. Two chords is pushing it. Three chords and you’re into jazz.”[4

[Author]

Posts