[Ricechex]

[quote=Diego Mamani]And, don’t worry, as usual, the california courts will overturn the prop

Guess what, the courts shot it down! Something similar passed in the 1990s with the “anti-immigrant” Prop 187 (really a racist initiative) that would have required Nazi style round ups of children in public schools and teachers demanding to see proof of citizenship before admitting kids to class. The courts shot this one down too!

[/quote]

Wow, I remember 187! I voted against it, but only with about 20% of the other voters. Everyone I knew voted for it….they just saw it as a prop to stop illegal immigration and were grabbing at straws. Many failed to think it out. It proposed to have teachers determine who and who was not an illegal student. I voted against because the teacher’s job is to teach, not to police.

As with Prop 8, I received an email from someone I knew, and he went on and on about it, how he was for rights, but should vote against it because the schools will be mandated to make this a part of their curriculum, and he felt that was too much government interference.

Yes, Prop 8 will be overturned. What are they supposed to do with the gay couple that have already married? Do those marriages become invalid?

[Ricechex]

June is not the sharpest tool in the shed.

[Ricechex]

June is not the sharpest tool in the shed.

[Ricechex]

June is not the sharpest tool in the shed.

[Ricechex]

June is not the sharpest tool in the shed.

[Ricechex]

June is not the sharpest tool in the shed.

[Ricechex]

Oh, I just can’t stand her. She is entitled, which is what got her into trouble in the first place. I suspect she is fairly narcissistic too.

[Ricechex]

Oh, I just can’t stand her. She is entitled, which is what got her into trouble in the first place. I suspect she is fairly narcissistic too.

[Ricechex]

Oh, I just can’t stand her. She is entitled, which is what got her into trouble in the first place. I suspect she is fairly narcissistic too.

[Ricechex]

Oh, I just can’t stand her. She is entitled, which is what got her into trouble in the first place. I suspect she is fairly narcissistic too.

[Ricechex]

Oh, I just can’t stand her. She is entitled, which is what got her into trouble in the first place. I suspect she is fairly narcissistic too.

[Ricechex]

[quote=barnaby33]
You can argue whether any one issue is important enough to justify her firing, but for me its not one issue. There are many issues involved but it was all distilled with crystal clarity, at least for me, when she voted yes.

I’m now going to have to pay to directly bailout the assholes who’ve made housing unaffordable and the even bigger assholes who made the whole thing possible and some posters here have the chutzpah to say that alone shouldn’t be enough to vote her out. “What the fuck,” is all I can say.

PS I’m a life long Democrat so this isn’t a matter of me just voting against the other party.
Josh[/quote]

I am with you Josh. Lifelong Democrat here too. Voted since age 18, and I have never missed an election, even the smaller ones.

Many times I have considered voting a third party, and have not ever done it. But, I am through. This time I am going to vote Nader, and as far as the 53rd District is concerned, I will vote for the Libertarian on the ballot. It seems especially clear now that we must have a 3rd party.

I was at Henry’s today, and when leaving, someone working for the Democrat party wanted to chat with me. I told her I was tired of the Democrats and mentioned Susan Davis’ and her vote for the bailout. The lady just gave me a disgruntled look.

[Ricechex]

[quote=barnaby33]
You can argue whether any one issue is important enough to justify her firing, but for me its not one issue. There are many issues involved but it was all distilled with crystal clarity, at least for me, when she voted yes.

I’m now going to have to pay to directly bailout the assholes who’ve made housing unaffordable and the even bigger assholes who made the whole thing possible and some posters here have the chutzpah to say that alone shouldn’t be enough to vote her out. “What the fuck,” is all I can say.

PS I’m a life long Democrat so this isn’t a matter of me just voting against the other party.
Josh[/quote]

I am with you Josh. Lifelong Democrat here too. Voted since age 18, and I have never missed an election, even the smaller ones.

Many times I have considered voting a third party, and have not ever done it. But, I am through. This time I am going to vote Nader, and as far as the 53rd District is concerned, I will vote for the Libertarian on the ballot. It seems especially clear now that we must have a 3rd party.

I was at Henry’s today, and when leaving, someone working for the Democrat party wanted to chat with me. I told her I was tired of the Democrats and mentioned Susan Davis’ and her vote for the bailout. The lady just gave me a disgruntled look.

[Ricechex]

[quote=barnaby33]
You can argue whether any one issue is important enough to justify her firing, but for me its not one issue. There are many issues involved but it was all distilled with crystal clarity, at least for me, when she voted yes.

I’m now going to have to pay to directly bailout the assholes who’ve made housing unaffordable and the even bigger assholes who made the whole thing possible and some posters here have the chutzpah to say that alone shouldn’t be enough to vote her out. “What the fuck,” is all I can say.

PS I’m a life long Democrat so this isn’t a matter of me just voting against the other party.
Josh[/quote]

I am with you Josh. Lifelong Democrat here too. Voted since age 18, and I have never missed an election, even the smaller ones.

Many times I have considered voting a third party, and have not ever done it. But, I am through. This time I am going to vote Nader, and as far as the 53rd District is concerned, I will vote for the Libertarian on the ballot. It seems especially clear now that we must have a 3rd party.

I was at Henry’s today, and when leaving, someone working for the Democrat party wanted to chat with me. I told her I was tired of the Democrats and mentioned Susan Davis’ and her vote for the bailout. The lady just gave me a disgruntled look.

[Ricechex]

[quote=barnaby33]
You can argue whether any one issue is important enough to justify her firing, but for me its not one issue. There are many issues involved but it was all distilled with crystal clarity, at least for me, when she voted yes.

I’m now going to have to pay to directly bailout the assholes who’ve made housing unaffordable and the even bigger assholes who made the whole thing possible and some posters here have the chutzpah to say that alone shouldn’t be enough to vote her out. “What the fuck,” is all I can say.

PS I’m a life long Democrat so this isn’t a matter of me just voting against the other party.
Josh[/quote]

I am with you Josh. Lifelong Democrat here too. Voted since age 18, and I have never missed an election, even the smaller ones.

Many times I have considered voting a third party, and have not ever done it. But, I am through. This time I am going to vote Nader, and as far as the 53rd District is concerned, I will vote for the Libertarian on the ballot. It seems especially clear now that we must have a 3rd party.

I was at Henry’s today, and when leaving, someone working for the Democrat party wanted to chat with me. I told her I was tired of the Democrats and mentioned Susan Davis’ and her vote for the bailout. The lady just gave me a disgruntled look.

[Author]

Posts