Vote against Susan A. Davis

[barnaby33]

For some people the bailout and the message it sends were so important that voting against her was fait accompli when she voted for it.

I am one of those people. We are headed down a monstrously bad path and she helped put us there through her vote, she should be run out of town, let alone lose her job.

You can argue whether any one issue is important enough to justify her firing, but for me its not one issue. There are many issues involved but it was all distilled with crystal clarity, at least for me, when she voted yes.

I’m now going to have to pay to directly bailout the assholes who’ve made housing unaffordable and the even bigger assholes who made the whole thing possible and some posters here have the chutzpah to say that alone shouldn’t be enough to vote her out. “What the fuck,” is all I can say.

PS I’m a life long Democrat so this isn’t a matter of me just voting against the other party.
Josh

[peterb]

Someone should list all the traitors that voted for the failout so we know who to go after at the elections!!!

[peterb]

Someone should list all the traitors that voted for the failout so we know who to go after at the elections!!!

[peterb]

Someone should list all the traitors that voted for the failout so we know who to go after at the elections!!!

[peterb]

Someone should list all the traitors that voted for the failout so we know who to go after at the elections!!!

[peterb]

Someone should list all the traitors that voted for the failout so we know who to go after at the elections!!!

[Ricechex]

[quote=barnaby33]
You can argue whether any one issue is important enough to justify her firing, but for me its not one issue. There are many issues involved but it was all distilled with crystal clarity, at least for me, when she voted yes.

I’m now going to have to pay to directly bailout the assholes who’ve made housing unaffordable and the even bigger assholes who made the whole thing possible and some posters here have the chutzpah to say that alone shouldn’t be enough to vote her out. “What the fuck,” is all I can say.

PS I’m a life long Democrat so this isn’t a matter of me just voting against the other party.
Josh[/quote]

I am with you Josh. Lifelong Democrat here too. Voted since age 18, and I have never missed an election, even the smaller ones.

Many times I have considered voting a third party, and have not ever done it. But, I am through. This time I am going to vote Nader, and as far as the 53rd District is concerned, I will vote for the Libertarian on the ballot. It seems especially clear now that we must have a 3rd party.

I was at Henry’s today, and when leaving, someone working for the Democrat party wanted to chat with me. I told her I was tired of the Democrats and mentioned Susan Davis’ and her vote for the bailout. The lady just gave me a disgruntled look.

[Ricechex]

[quote=barnaby33]
You can argue whether any one issue is important enough to justify her firing, but for me its not one issue. There are many issues involved but it was all distilled with crystal clarity, at least for me, when she voted yes.

I’m now going to have to pay to directly bailout the assholes who’ve made housing unaffordable and the even bigger assholes who made the whole thing possible and some posters here have the chutzpah to say that alone shouldn’t be enough to vote her out. “What the fuck,” is all I can say.

PS I’m a life long Democrat so this isn’t a matter of me just voting against the other party.
Josh[/quote]

I am with you Josh. Lifelong Democrat here too. Voted since age 18, and I have never missed an election, even the smaller ones.

Many times I have considered voting a third party, and have not ever done it. But, I am through. This time I am going to vote Nader, and as far as the 53rd District is concerned, I will vote for the Libertarian on the ballot. It seems especially clear now that we must have a 3rd party.

I was at Henry’s today, and when leaving, someone working for the Democrat party wanted to chat with me. I told her I was tired of the Democrats and mentioned Susan Davis’ and her vote for the bailout. The lady just gave me a disgruntled look.

[Ricechex]

[quote=barnaby33]
You can argue whether any one issue is important enough to justify her firing, but for me its not one issue. There are many issues involved but it was all distilled with crystal clarity, at least for me, when she voted yes.

I’m now going to have to pay to directly bailout the assholes who’ve made housing unaffordable and the even bigger assholes who made the whole thing possible and some posters here have the chutzpah to say that alone shouldn’t be enough to vote her out. “What the fuck,” is all I can say.

PS I’m a life long Democrat so this isn’t a matter of me just voting against the other party.
Josh[/quote]

I am with you Josh. Lifelong Democrat here too. Voted since age 18, and I have never missed an election, even the smaller ones.

Many times I have considered voting a third party, and have not ever done it. But, I am through. This time I am going to vote Nader, and as far as the 53rd District is concerned, I will vote for the Libertarian on the ballot. It seems especially clear now that we must have a 3rd party.

I was at Henry’s today, and when leaving, someone working for the Democrat party wanted to chat with me. I told her I was tired of the Democrats and mentioned Susan Davis’ and her vote for the bailout. The lady just gave me a disgruntled look.

[Ricechex]

[quote=barnaby33]
You can argue whether any one issue is important enough to justify her firing, but for me its not one issue. There are many issues involved but it was all distilled with crystal clarity, at least for me, when she voted yes.

I’m now going to have to pay to directly bailout the assholes who’ve made housing unaffordable and the even bigger assholes who made the whole thing possible and some posters here have the chutzpah to say that alone shouldn’t be enough to vote her out. “What the fuck,” is all I can say.

PS I’m a life long Democrat so this isn’t a matter of me just voting against the other party.
Josh[/quote]

I am with you Josh. Lifelong Democrat here too. Voted since age 18, and I have never missed an election, even the smaller ones.

Many times I have considered voting a third party, and have not ever done it. But, I am through. This time I am going to vote Nader, and as far as the 53rd District is concerned, I will vote for the Libertarian on the ballot. It seems especially clear now that we must have a 3rd party.

I was at Henry’s today, and when leaving, someone working for the Democrat party wanted to chat with me. I told her I was tired of the Democrats and mentioned Susan Davis’ and her vote for the bailout. The lady just gave me a disgruntled look.

[Ricechex]

[quote=barnaby33]
You can argue whether any one issue is important enough to justify her firing, but for me its not one issue. There are many issues involved but it was all distilled with crystal clarity, at least for me, when she voted yes.

I’m now going to have to pay to directly bailout the assholes who’ve made housing unaffordable and the even bigger assholes who made the whole thing possible and some posters here have the chutzpah to say that alone shouldn’t be enough to vote her out. “What the fuck,” is all I can say.

PS I’m a life long Democrat so this isn’t a matter of me just voting against the other party.
Josh[/quote]

I am with you Josh. Lifelong Democrat here too. Voted since age 18, and I have never missed an election, even the smaller ones.

Many times I have considered voting a third party, and have not ever done it. But, I am through. This time I am going to vote Nader, and as far as the 53rd District is concerned, I will vote for the Libertarian on the ballot. It seems especially clear now that we must have a 3rd party.

I was at Henry’s today, and when leaving, someone working for the Democrat party wanted to chat with me. I told her I was tired of the Democrats and mentioned Susan Davis’ and her vote for the bailout. The lady just gave me a disgruntled look.

[yojimbo]

Didn’t both McCain and Obama vote for the bailout?

It will be interesting to see if the number of disgruntled voters here on this board is also reflected in Susan Davis’ constituency. I am not in her district so have no say.

Her district is about 2 to 1 democrat so there would have to be a high level of discontent for her to lose her position.

It is somewhat humorous that the poll on her own website is 84 to 7 against the bailout yet she voted for it. I guess she believes she understands the issue better than her constituents. I guess most politicians fall into that category.

Well, we shall she what happens on election day. I’ll put my money on her keeping her job. Michael Crimmins on the Republican side and Edward Teyssier on the Libertarian side don’t look too formidable so I think you are all stuck with Davis for the time being.

[yojimbo]

Didn’t both McCain and Obama vote for the bailout?

It will be interesting to see if the number of disgruntled voters here on this board is also reflected in Susan Davis’ constituency. I am not in her district so have no say.

Her district is about 2 to 1 democrat so there would have to be a high level of discontent for her to lose her position.

It is somewhat humorous that the poll on her own website is 84 to 7 against the bailout yet she voted for it. I guess she believes she understands the issue better than her constituents. I guess most politicians fall into that category.

Well, we shall she what happens on election day. I’ll put my money on her keeping her job. Michael Crimmins on the Republican side and Edward Teyssier on the Libertarian side don’t look too formidable so I think you are all stuck with Davis for the time being.

[yojimbo]

Didn’t both McCain and Obama vote for the bailout?

It will be interesting to see if the number of disgruntled voters here on this board is also reflected in Susan Davis’ constituency. I am not in her district so have no say.

Her district is about 2 to 1 democrat so there would have to be a high level of discontent for her to lose her position.

It is somewhat humorous that the poll on her own website is 84 to 7 against the bailout yet she voted for it. I guess she believes she understands the issue better than her constituents. I guess most politicians fall into that category.

Well, we shall she what happens on election day. I’ll put my money on her keeping her job. Michael Crimmins on the Republican side and Edward Teyssier on the Libertarian side don’t look too formidable so I think you are all stuck with Davis for the time being.

[yojimbo]

Didn’t both McCain and Obama vote for the bailout?

It will be interesting to see if the number of disgruntled voters here on this board is also reflected in Susan Davis’ constituency. I am not in her district so have no say.

Her district is about 2 to 1 democrat so there would have to be a high level of discontent for her to lose her position.

It is somewhat humorous that the poll on her own website is 84 to 7 against the bailout yet she voted for it. I guess she believes she understands the issue better than her constituents. I guess most politicians fall into that category.

Well, we shall she what happens on election day. I’ll put my money on her keeping her job. Michael Crimmins on the Republican side and Edward Teyssier on the Libertarian side don’t look too formidable so I think you are all stuck with Davis for the time being.

[Author]

Posts