Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 29, 2008 at 11:18 AM in reply to: Sarah Palin is a brilliant pick as next VP of the US #263086August 29, 2008 at 11:18 AM in reply to: Sarah Palin is a brilliant pick as next VP of the US #263294
peterb
ParticipantIt’s the ecomony,…..
August 29, 2008 at 11:18 AM in reply to: Sarah Palin is a brilliant pick as next VP of the US #263297peterb
ParticipantIt’s the ecomony,…..
August 29, 2008 at 11:18 AM in reply to: Sarah Palin is a brilliant pick as next VP of the US #263351peterb
ParticipantIt’s the ecomony,…..
August 29, 2008 at 11:18 AM in reply to: Sarah Palin is a brilliant pick as next VP of the US #263387peterb
ParticipantIt’s the ecomony,…..
peterb
ParticipantSure it’s illegal, that’s not the valid question. The issue is “Is the LL committing an act of ‘rent skimming'” ?
For more accurate definition of ‘rent skimming’.So, have they owned it less than a year? If in fact they did take ownership in 11/07, then, yes, it is ‘rent skimming’.
————————————————Civil Code 890
890. (a)(1) “Rent skimming” means using revenue received from the rental of a parcel of residential real property at any time during the first year period after acquiring that property without first applying the revenue or an equivalent amount to the payments due on all mortgages and deeds of trust encumbering that property.
(2) For purposes of this section, “rent skimming” also means receiving revenue from the rental of a parcel of residential real property where the person receiving that revenue, without the consent of the owner or owner’s agent, asserted possession or ownership of the residential property, whether under a false claim of title, by trespass, or any other unauthorized means, rented the property to another, and collected rents from the other person for the rental of the property. This paragraph does not apply to any tenant, subtenant, lessee, sublessee, or assignee, nor to any other hirer having a lawful occupancy interest in the residential dwelling.
peterb
ParticipantSure it’s illegal, that’s not the valid question. The issue is “Is the LL committing an act of ‘rent skimming'” ?
For more accurate definition of ‘rent skimming’.So, have they owned it less than a year? If in fact they did take ownership in 11/07, then, yes, it is ‘rent skimming’.
————————————————Civil Code 890
890. (a)(1) “Rent skimming” means using revenue received from the rental of a parcel of residential real property at any time during the first year period after acquiring that property without first applying the revenue or an equivalent amount to the payments due on all mortgages and deeds of trust encumbering that property.
(2) For purposes of this section, “rent skimming” also means receiving revenue from the rental of a parcel of residential real property where the person receiving that revenue, without the consent of the owner or owner’s agent, asserted possession or ownership of the residential property, whether under a false claim of title, by trespass, or any other unauthorized means, rented the property to another, and collected rents from the other person for the rental of the property. This paragraph does not apply to any tenant, subtenant, lessee, sublessee, or assignee, nor to any other hirer having a lawful occupancy interest in the residential dwelling.
peterb
ParticipantSure it’s illegal, that’s not the valid question. The issue is “Is the LL committing an act of ‘rent skimming'” ?
For more accurate definition of ‘rent skimming’.So, have they owned it less than a year? If in fact they did take ownership in 11/07, then, yes, it is ‘rent skimming’.
————————————————Civil Code 890
890. (a)(1) “Rent skimming” means using revenue received from the rental of a parcel of residential real property at any time during the first year period after acquiring that property without first applying the revenue or an equivalent amount to the payments due on all mortgages and deeds of trust encumbering that property.
(2) For purposes of this section, “rent skimming” also means receiving revenue from the rental of a parcel of residential real property where the person receiving that revenue, without the consent of the owner or owner’s agent, asserted possession or ownership of the residential property, whether under a false claim of title, by trespass, or any other unauthorized means, rented the property to another, and collected rents from the other person for the rental of the property. This paragraph does not apply to any tenant, subtenant, lessee, sublessee, or assignee, nor to any other hirer having a lawful occupancy interest in the residential dwelling.
peterb
ParticipantSure it’s illegal, that’s not the valid question. The issue is “Is the LL committing an act of ‘rent skimming'” ?
For more accurate definition of ‘rent skimming’.So, have they owned it less than a year? If in fact they did take ownership in 11/07, then, yes, it is ‘rent skimming’.
————————————————Civil Code 890
890. (a)(1) “Rent skimming” means using revenue received from the rental of a parcel of residential real property at any time during the first year period after acquiring that property without first applying the revenue or an equivalent amount to the payments due on all mortgages and deeds of trust encumbering that property.
(2) For purposes of this section, “rent skimming” also means receiving revenue from the rental of a parcel of residential real property where the person receiving that revenue, without the consent of the owner or owner’s agent, asserted possession or ownership of the residential property, whether under a false claim of title, by trespass, or any other unauthorized means, rented the property to another, and collected rents from the other person for the rental of the property. This paragraph does not apply to any tenant, subtenant, lessee, sublessee, or assignee, nor to any other hirer having a lawful occupancy interest in the residential dwelling.
peterb
ParticipantSure it’s illegal, that’s not the valid question. The issue is “Is the LL committing an act of ‘rent skimming'” ?
For more accurate definition of ‘rent skimming’.So, have they owned it less than a year? If in fact they did take ownership in 11/07, then, yes, it is ‘rent skimming’.
————————————————Civil Code 890
890. (a)(1) “Rent skimming” means using revenue received from the rental of a parcel of residential real property at any time during the first year period after acquiring that property without first applying the revenue or an equivalent amount to the payments due on all mortgages and deeds of trust encumbering that property.
(2) For purposes of this section, “rent skimming” also means receiving revenue from the rental of a parcel of residential real property where the person receiving that revenue, without the consent of the owner or owner’s agent, asserted possession or ownership of the residential property, whether under a false claim of title, by trespass, or any other unauthorized means, rented the property to another, and collected rents from the other person for the rental of the property. This paragraph does not apply to any tenant, subtenant, lessee, sublessee, or assignee, nor to any other hirer having a lawful occupancy interest in the residential dwelling.
peterb
ParticipantYour houses original lay out is in county records and any permits that were issued as well.
peterb
ParticipantYour houses original lay out is in county records and any permits that were issued as well.
peterb
ParticipantYour houses original lay out is in county records and any permits that were issued as well.
peterb
ParticipantYour houses original lay out is in county records and any permits that were issued as well.
peterb
ParticipantYour houses original lay out is in county records and any permits that were issued as well.
-
AuthorPosts
