Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
peterb
ParticipantThe macro economic outlook for CA is not very good at this time. The state will be forced to cut and real un/underemployment is well over 20% right now.
If the thought of the house not gaining in price or dropping a bit in the next few years is disturbing to you, then you probably shouldnt buy it.
ParticipantThe macro economic outlook for CA is not very good at this time. The state will be forced to cut and real un/underemployment is well over 20% right now.
If the thought of the house not gaining in price or dropping a bit in the next few years is disturbing to you, then you probably shouldnt buy it.
ParticipantThe macro economic outlook for CA is not very good at this time. The state will be forced to cut and real un/underemployment is well over 20% right now.
If the thought of the house not gaining in price or dropping a bit in the next few years is disturbing to you, then you probably shouldnt buy it.
ParticipantI think that as fewer people enjoy the prop 13 payments, the more likely it could be changed. But I doubt it will effect the housing market too much.
But I’ve noticed that the media in CA seem to frame the discussion about taxes being something that must be changed to get more money rather than how to spend less. This I find annoying.
ParticipantI think that as fewer people enjoy the prop 13 payments, the more likely it could be changed. But I doubt it will effect the housing market too much.
But I’ve noticed that the media in CA seem to frame the discussion about taxes being something that must be changed to get more money rather than how to spend less. This I find annoying.
ParticipantI think that as fewer people enjoy the prop 13 payments, the more likely it could be changed. But I doubt it will effect the housing market too much.
But I’ve noticed that the media in CA seem to frame the discussion about taxes being something that must be changed to get more money rather than how to spend less. This I find annoying.
ParticipantI think that as fewer people enjoy the prop 13 payments, the more likely it could be changed. But I doubt it will effect the housing market too much.
But I’ve noticed that the media in CA seem to frame the discussion about taxes being something that must be changed to get more money rather than how to spend less. This I find annoying.
ParticipantI think that as fewer people enjoy the prop 13 payments, the more likely it could be changed. But I doubt it will effect the housing market too much.
But I’ve noticed that the media in CA seem to frame the discussion about taxes being something that must be changed to get more money rather than how to spend less. This I find annoying.
ParticipantProp 13 is unfair as two homes within feet of eachother can have two vastly different tax payments. The recent buyers carry the tax load, while the people that have been “enjoying” the same govt services for decades pay far less. Govt services are not a capital investment to be enjoyed over the years. They are on-going costs that must be paid every month.
This may put downward pressure on home prices as the threat of rising property taxes may scare home buyers. If the law was structured that way.
ParticipantProp 13 is unfair as two homes within feet of eachother can have two vastly different tax payments. The recent buyers carry the tax load, while the people that have been “enjoying” the same govt services for decades pay far less. Govt services are not a capital investment to be enjoyed over the years. They are on-going costs that must be paid every month.
This may put downward pressure on home prices as the threat of rising property taxes may scare home buyers. If the law was structured that way.
ParticipantProp 13 is unfair as two homes within feet of eachother can have two vastly different tax payments. The recent buyers carry the tax load, while the people that have been “enjoying” the same govt services for decades pay far less. Govt services are not a capital investment to be enjoyed over the years. They are on-going costs that must be paid every month.
This may put downward pressure on home prices as the threat of rising property taxes may scare home buyers. If the law was structured that way.
ParticipantProp 13 is unfair as two homes within feet of eachother can have two vastly different tax payments. The recent buyers carry the tax load, while the people that have been “enjoying” the same govt services for decades pay far less. Govt services are not a capital investment to be enjoyed over the years. They are on-going costs that must be paid every month.
This may put downward pressure on home prices as the threat of rising property taxes may scare home buyers. If the law was structured that way.
ParticipantProp 13 is unfair as two homes within feet of eachother can have two vastly different tax payments. The recent buyers carry the tax load, while the people that have been “enjoying” the same govt services for decades pay far less. Govt services are not a capital investment to be enjoyed over the years. They are on-going costs that must be paid every month.
This may put downward pressure on home prices as the threat of rising property taxes may scare home buyers. If the law was structured that way.
ParticipantLook for Prop 13 to get changed. CA has a mighty hunger and no printing press.
-
AuthorPosts