[peterb]

MSM is pervasive and takes virtually zero effort to pay attention to them since one is bombarded with their viewpoints on a daily basis. That’s why it’s called “main stream media”. They are always way late with a call on investments and talk the book of their sponsors. Hardly what I would call “alternative”. I would define “alternative” as that which is not commonly available.

MSM offers the same story which ever one you would chose to listen to. Rogers differs with Mish on many investments. If you had done your homework you’d know how there’s often many disagreements between these blogs. But that would take some effort and thought.

[peterb]

MSM is pervasive and takes virtually zero effort to pay attention to them since one is bombarded with their viewpoints on a daily basis. That’s why it’s called “main stream media”. They are always way late with a call on investments and talk the book of their sponsors. Hardly what I would call “alternative”. I would define “alternative” as that which is not commonly available.

MSM offers the same story which ever one you would chose to listen to. Rogers differs with Mish on many investments. If you had done your homework you’d know how there’s often many disagreements between these blogs. But that would take some effort and thought.

[peterb]

MSM is pervasive and takes virtually zero effort to pay attention to them since one is bombarded with their viewpoints on a daily basis. That’s why it’s called “main stream media”. They are always way late with a call on investments and talk the book of their sponsors. Hardly what I would call “alternative”. I would define “alternative” as that which is not commonly available.

MSM offers the same story which ever one you would chose to listen to. Rogers differs with Mish on many investments. If you had done your homework you’d know how there’s often many disagreements between these blogs. But that would take some effort and thought.

[peterb]

MSM is pervasive and takes virtually zero effort to pay attention to them since one is bombarded with their viewpoints on a daily basis. That’s why it’s called “main stream media”. They are always way late with a call on investments and talk the book of their sponsors. Hardly what I would call “alternative”. I would define “alternative” as that which is not commonly available.

MSM offers the same story which ever one you would chose to listen to. Rogers differs with Mish on many investments. If you had done your homework you’d know how there’s often many disagreements between these blogs. But that would take some effort and thought.

[peterb]

These are all worth reading if for no other reason than you can get alternative points of view. Then decide for yourself which are more logical. I’ve followed Mish for a while and the guy not only thinks outside the box, but his logic and data are excellent. Mr Mortgage can be a bit one-sided, but he give data and insight that’s really hard to get anywhere else!! Jim Rogers is way over rated, IMO.
Naked is interesting. Have you checked out Jesse? He’s got some thinking that’s not mainstream and he’s not tin foily.

[peterb]

These are all worth reading if for no other reason than you can get alternative points of view. Then decide for yourself which are more logical. I’ve followed Mish for a while and the guy not only thinks outside the box, but his logic and data are excellent. Mr Mortgage can be a bit one-sided, but he give data and insight that’s really hard to get anywhere else!! Jim Rogers is way over rated, IMO.
Naked is interesting. Have you checked out Jesse? He’s got some thinking that’s not mainstream and he’s not tin foily.

[peterb]

These are all worth reading if for no other reason than you can get alternative points of view. Then decide for yourself which are more logical. I’ve followed Mish for a while and the guy not only thinks outside the box, but his logic and data are excellent. Mr Mortgage can be a bit one-sided, but he give data and insight that’s really hard to get anywhere else!! Jim Rogers is way over rated, IMO.
Naked is interesting. Have you checked out Jesse? He’s got some thinking that’s not mainstream and he’s not tin foily.

[peterb]

These are all worth reading if for no other reason than you can get alternative points of view. Then decide for yourself which are more logical. I’ve followed Mish for a while and the guy not only thinks outside the box, but his logic and data are excellent. Mr Mortgage can be a bit one-sided, but he give data and insight that’s really hard to get anywhere else!! Jim Rogers is way over rated, IMO.
Naked is interesting. Have you checked out Jesse? He’s got some thinking that’s not mainstream and he’s not tin foily.

[peterb]

These are all worth reading if for no other reason than you can get alternative points of view. Then decide for yourself which are more logical. I’ve followed Mish for a while and the guy not only thinks outside the box, but his logic and data are excellent. Mr Mortgage can be a bit one-sided, but he give data and insight that’s really hard to get anywhere else!! Jim Rogers is way over rated, IMO.
Naked is interesting. Have you checked out Jesse? He’s got some thinking that’s not mainstream and he’s not tin foily.

[peterb]

I’ve read all Jim Roger’s books and followed his calls pretty closely. He’s outta his league here. He hates the US$ and loves the CRB. If you’d have stuck with this call, you’d be hating live right now. He’s probably right, but in 5 years maybe, not now. And timing is just about everything in investing.

[peterb]

I’ve read all Jim Roger’s books and followed his calls pretty closely. He’s outta his league here. He hates the US$ and loves the CRB. If you’d have stuck with this call, you’d be hating live right now. He’s probably right, but in 5 years maybe, not now. And timing is just about everything in investing.

[peterb]

I’ve read all Jim Roger’s books and followed his calls pretty closely. He’s outta his league here. He hates the US$ and loves the CRB. If you’d have stuck with this call, you’d be hating live right now. He’s probably right, but in 5 years maybe, not now. And timing is just about everything in investing.

[peterb]

I’ve read all Jim Roger’s books and followed his calls pretty closely. He’s outta his league here. He hates the US$ and loves the CRB. If you’d have stuck with this call, you’d be hating live right now. He’s probably right, but in 5 years maybe, not now. And timing is just about everything in investing.

[peterb]

I’ve read all Jim Roger’s books and followed his calls pretty closely. He’s outta his league here. He hates the US$ and loves the CRB. If you’d have stuck with this call, you’d be hating live right now. He’s probably right, but in 5 years maybe, not now. And timing is just about everything in investing.

[peterb]

Interesting to notice the basic sentiment on this thread. Looks to be about 50% negative, 30% positive and maybe 20% nuetral. Not unlike how the stock market is behaving right now.
C’mon, it’s Christmas, get out there and buy!!!!

[Author]

Posts