Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
pepsiParticipant
Agreed with Diego Mamani.
When you go to Costco, it is easier to see that the employees seem to be smarter, young and good looking.
Costco didn't pay extra money for nothing and Walmart couldn't cut their price if they don't use those people.
Rejecting Walmart just deprives low wage people from their working chance. Also lower tax revenue for the city.
The end result will be higher tax, more people on unemployment aid and a bi-polar society.
pepsiParticipantAgreed with Diego Mamani.
When you go to Costco, it is easier to see that the employees seem to be smarter, young and good looking.
Costco didn't pay extra money for nothing and Walmart couldn't cut their price if they don't use those people.
Rejecting Walmart just deprives low wage people from their working chance. Also lower tax revenue for the city.
The end result will be higher tax, more people on unemployment aid and a bi-polar society.
pepsiParticipantAgreed with Diego Mamani.
When you go to Costco, it is easier to see that the employees seem to be smarter, young and good looking.
Costco didn't pay extra money for nothing and Walmart couldn't cut their price if they don't use those people.
Rejecting Walmart just deprives low wage people from their working chance. Also lower tax revenue for the city.
The end result will be higher tax, more people on unemployment aid and a bi-polar society.
pepsiParticipantAgreed with Diego Mamani.
When you go to Costco, it is easier to see that the employees seem to be smarter, young and good looking.
Costco didn't pay extra money for nothing and Walmart couldn't cut their price if they don't use those people.
Rejecting Walmart just deprives low wage people from their working chance. Also lower tax revenue for the city.
The end result will be higher tax, more people on unemployment aid and a bi-polar society.
pepsiParticipantAnd water will cost you $1K per yard. Hard to believe, but to meet all the environment standards of putting a pipe under ground, you better believe it….
pepsiParticipantAnd water will cost you $1K per yard. Hard to believe, but to meet all the environment standards of putting a pipe under ground, you better believe it….
pepsiParticipantAnd water will cost you $1K per yard. Hard to believe, but to meet all the environment standards of putting a pipe under ground, you better believe it….
pepsiParticipantAnd water will cost you $1K per yard. Hard to believe, but to meet all the environment standards of putting a pipe under ground, you better believe it….
pepsiParticipantAnd water will cost you $1K per yard. Hard to believe, but to meet all the environment standards of putting a pipe under ground, you better believe it….
pepsiParticipantJust some numbers for CV (signle family resell):
Medium price (2001 – 2006):
2001: $610K
2002: $670K
2003: $750K
2004: $969K
2005: $1.04M
2006: $1.028M
Medium Price for Nov, 2007: $875K (That is less than 5% annual appreciation from 2001 medium price)
pepsiParticipantJust some numbers for CV (signle family resell):
Medium price (2001 – 2006):
2001: $610K
2002: $670K
2003: $750K
2004: $969K
2005: $1.04M
2006: $1.028M
Medium Price for Nov, 2007: $875K (That is less than 5% annual appreciation from 2001 medium price)
pepsiParticipantJust some numbers for CV (signle family resell):
Medium price (2001 – 2006):
2001: $610K
2002: $670K
2003: $750K
2004: $969K
2005: $1.04M
2006: $1.028M
Medium Price for Nov, 2007: $875K (That is less than 5% annual appreciation from 2001 medium price)
pepsiParticipantJust some numbers for CV (signle family resell):
Medium price (2001 – 2006):
2001: $610K
2002: $670K
2003: $750K
2004: $969K
2005: $1.04M
2006: $1.028M
Medium Price for Nov, 2007: $875K (That is less than 5% annual appreciation from 2001 medium price)
pepsiParticipantJust some numbers for CV (signle family resell):
Medium price (2001 – 2006):
2001: $610K
2002: $670K
2003: $750K
2004: $969K
2005: $1.04M
2006: $1.028M
Medium Price for Nov, 2007: $875K (That is less than 5% annual appreciation from 2001 medium price)
-
AuthorPosts