Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 31, 2007 at 3:46 PM in reply to: Sales Voumes for 2007 vs. 1996: Missed it by THIS much – 2.2% #127250December 31, 2007 at 1:50 PM in reply to: Sales Voumes for 2007 vs. 1996: Missed it by THIS much – 2.2% #126918
NotCranky
ParticipantRus don’t forget the top notch football analysis of course as well as some of the previous titans of wwf.
Congrats on your Chargers. Interesting how Allan knew the Raiders would be out of the game as quickly as they got back in it. I guess it was obvious they were playing to lose? You never did say if you crossed cultural boundaries with the wrestling stuff. Surely you remember Mil Mascaras? At least they include him in wrestling trivia posts on SDCIA.
December 31, 2007 at 1:50 PM in reply to: Sales Voumes for 2007 vs. 1996: Missed it by THIS much – 2.2% #127076ParticipantRus don’t forget the top notch football analysis of course as well as some of the previous titans of wwf.
Congrats on your Chargers. Interesting how Allan knew the Raiders would be out of the game as quickly as they got back in it. I guess it was obvious they were playing to lose? You never did say if you crossed cultural boundaries with the wrestling stuff. Surely you remember Mil Mascaras? At least they include him in wrestling trivia posts on SDCIA.
December 31, 2007 at 1:50 PM in reply to: Sales Voumes for 2007 vs. 1996: Missed it by THIS much – 2.2% #127087ParticipantRus don’t forget the top notch football analysis of course as well as some of the previous titans of wwf.
Congrats on your Chargers. Interesting how Allan knew the Raiders would be out of the game as quickly as they got back in it. I guess it was obvious they were playing to lose? You never did say if you crossed cultural boundaries with the wrestling stuff. Surely you remember Mil Mascaras? At least they include him in wrestling trivia posts on SDCIA.
December 31, 2007 at 1:50 PM in reply to: Sales Voumes for 2007 vs. 1996: Missed it by THIS much – 2.2% #127155ParticipantRus don’t forget the top notch football analysis of course as well as some of the previous titans of wwf.
Congrats on your Chargers. Interesting how Allan knew the Raiders would be out of the game as quickly as they got back in it. I guess it was obvious they were playing to lose? You never did say if you crossed cultural boundaries with the wrestling stuff. Surely you remember Mil Mascaras? At least they include him in wrestling trivia posts on SDCIA.
December 31, 2007 at 1:50 PM in reply to: Sales Voumes for 2007 vs. 1996: Missed it by THIS much – 2.2% #127180ParticipantRus don’t forget the top notch football analysis of course as well as some of the previous titans of wwf.
Congrats on your Chargers. Interesting how Allan knew the Raiders would be out of the game as quickly as they got back in it. I guess it was obvious they were playing to lose? You never did say if you crossed cultural boundaries with the wrestling stuff. Surely you remember Mil Mascaras? At least they include him in wrestling trivia posts on SDCIA.
December 31, 2007 at 11:44 AM in reply to: Sales Voumes for 2007 vs. 1996: Missed it by THIS much – 2.2% #126867Participant“I forsee a 2008 that go on to live in infamy over at the San Diego Real Estate Investment Club.”
I don’t see what makes this forum or that as being superior in anyway,with the exception of Rich’s presentations being tops. Sure the emphasis is a little different. There is actually a lot of valuable crossover. That will be more true as prices drop.
Other than that there is just as much stupid, sad, stuff here,in the forums and informative, helpful, stuff, there.
December 31, 2007 at 11:44 AM in reply to: Sales Voumes for 2007 vs. 1996: Missed it by THIS much – 2.2% #127028Participant“I forsee a 2008 that go on to live in infamy over at the San Diego Real Estate Investment Club.”
I don’t see what makes this forum or that as being superior in anyway,with the exception of Rich’s presentations being tops. Sure the emphasis is a little different. There is actually a lot of valuable crossover. That will be more true as prices drop.
Other than that there is just as much stupid, sad, stuff here,in the forums and informative, helpful, stuff, there.
December 31, 2007 at 11:44 AM in reply to: Sales Voumes for 2007 vs. 1996: Missed it by THIS much – 2.2% #127037Participant“I forsee a 2008 that go on to live in infamy over at the San Diego Real Estate Investment Club.”
I don’t see what makes this forum or that as being superior in anyway,with the exception of Rich’s presentations being tops. Sure the emphasis is a little different. There is actually a lot of valuable crossover. That will be more true as prices drop.
Other than that there is just as much stupid, sad, stuff here,in the forums and informative, helpful, stuff, there.
December 31, 2007 at 11:44 AM in reply to: Sales Voumes for 2007 vs. 1996: Missed it by THIS much – 2.2% #127105Participant“I forsee a 2008 that go on to live in infamy over at the San Diego Real Estate Investment Club.”
I don’t see what makes this forum or that as being superior in anyway,with the exception of Rich’s presentations being tops. Sure the emphasis is a little different. There is actually a lot of valuable crossover. That will be more true as prices drop.
Other than that there is just as much stupid, sad, stuff here,in the forums and informative, helpful, stuff, there.
December 31, 2007 at 11:44 AM in reply to: Sales Voumes for 2007 vs. 1996: Missed it by THIS much – 2.2% #127129Participant“I forsee a 2008 that go on to live in infamy over at the San Diego Real Estate Investment Club.”
I don’t see what makes this forum or that as being superior in anyway,with the exception of Rich’s presentations being tops. Sure the emphasis is a little different. There is actually a lot of valuable crossover. That will be more true as prices drop.
Other than that there is just as much stupid, sad, stuff here,in the forums and informative, helpful, stuff, there.
ParticipantIt seems impossible to figure out who is in bed with who , but now that you mention it Allan, I am sure the Pope has his turn. JK
ParticipantIt seems impossible to figure out who is in bed with who , but now that you mention it Allan, I am sure the Pope has his turn. JK
ParticipantIt seems impossible to figure out who is in bed with who , but now that you mention it Allan, I am sure the Pope has his turn. JK
ParticipantIt seems impossible to figure out who is in bed with who , but now that you mention it Allan, I am sure the Pope has his turn. JK
-
AuthorPosts
