- This topic has 65 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 2 months ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 31, 2007 at 11:44 AM #127105December 31, 2007 at 12:01 PM #127134
lendingbubblecontinues
Participant“Dont know what the final tally will be, but red it is very likely the number will exceed 25,000.”
If you (sdr) miss the mark by a wide margin with this prediction, are you prepared to eat some, errr, crow?
December 31, 2007 at 12:01 PM #127110lendingbubblecontinues
Participant“Dont know what the final tally will be, but red it is very likely the number will exceed 25,000.”
If you (sdr) miss the mark by a wide margin with this prediction, are you prepared to eat some, errr, crow?
December 31, 2007 at 12:01 PM #126872lendingbubblecontinues
Participant“Dont know what the final tally will be, but red it is very likely the number will exceed 25,000.”
If you (sdr) miss the mark by a wide margin with this prediction, are you prepared to eat some, errr, crow?
December 31, 2007 at 12:01 PM #127033lendingbubblecontinues
Participant“Dont know what the final tally will be, but red it is very likely the number will exceed 25,000.”
If you (sdr) miss the mark by a wide margin with this prediction, are you prepared to eat some, errr, crow?
December 31, 2007 at 12:01 PM #127042lendingbubblecontinues
Participant“Dont know what the final tally will be, but red it is very likely the number will exceed 25,000.”
If you (sdr) miss the mark by a wide margin with this prediction, are you prepared to eat some, errr, crow?
December 31, 2007 at 12:27 PM #127144SD Realtor
Participant“Other than that there is just as much stupid, sad, stuff here,in the forums and informative, helpful, stuff, there.”
Rus don’t forget the top notch football analysis of course as well as some of the previous titans of wwf.
******
sdr if Bugs uses the same source of data as the provider then I guess the non captured sales won’t matter would they? I mean, those non captured sales would have not been captured in 1996 either right? As for the non reported sales I guess we will see how many non reporters come in.
Personally it does not surprise me at all that 07 has some of the lowest volume we have seen in a long time.
******
SD Realtor
December 31, 2007 at 12:27 PM #127120SD Realtor
Participant“Other than that there is just as much stupid, sad, stuff here,in the forums and informative, helpful, stuff, there.”
Rus don’t forget the top notch football analysis of course as well as some of the previous titans of wwf.
******
sdr if Bugs uses the same source of data as the provider then I guess the non captured sales won’t matter would they? I mean, those non captured sales would have not been captured in 1996 either right? As for the non reported sales I guess we will see how many non reporters come in.
Personally it does not surprise me at all that 07 has some of the lowest volume we have seen in a long time.
******
SD Realtor
December 31, 2007 at 12:27 PM #126881SD Realtor
Participant“Other than that there is just as much stupid, sad, stuff here,in the forums and informative, helpful, stuff, there.”
Rus don’t forget the top notch football analysis of course as well as some of the previous titans of wwf.
******
sdr if Bugs uses the same source of data as the provider then I guess the non captured sales won’t matter would they? I mean, those non captured sales would have not been captured in 1996 either right? As for the non reported sales I guess we will see how many non reporters come in.
Personally it does not surprise me at all that 07 has some of the lowest volume we have seen in a long time.
******
SD Realtor
December 31, 2007 at 12:27 PM #127051SD Realtor
Participant“Other than that there is just as much stupid, sad, stuff here,in the forums and informative, helpful, stuff, there.”
Rus don’t forget the top notch football analysis of course as well as some of the previous titans of wwf.
******
sdr if Bugs uses the same source of data as the provider then I guess the non captured sales won’t matter would they? I mean, those non captured sales would have not been captured in 1996 either right? As for the non reported sales I guess we will see how many non reporters come in.
Personally it does not surprise me at all that 07 has some of the lowest volume we have seen in a long time.
******
SD Realtor
December 31, 2007 at 12:27 PM #127043SD Realtor
Participant“Other than that there is just as much stupid, sad, stuff here,in the forums and informative, helpful, stuff, there.”
Rus don’t forget the top notch football analysis of course as well as some of the previous titans of wwf.
******
sdr if Bugs uses the same source of data as the provider then I guess the non captured sales won’t matter would they? I mean, those non captured sales would have not been captured in 1996 either right? As for the non reported sales I guess we will see how many non reporters come in.
Personally it does not surprise me at all that 07 has some of the lowest volume we have seen in a long time.
******
SD Realtor
December 31, 2007 at 12:47 PM #127056Bugs
ParticipantSo far this year the late reporters have been adding another 10% or so onto the totals after the last day of the month. If we had ~1150 sales on December 31, 2007 that tells me that adding another 170 sales on top of that – which is what I did – is giving the opposing viewpoint the benefit of the doubt.
I’m operating off the assumption that the percentage of sales transactions that didn’t go through the MLS in 1996 is similar to that of 2007. Perhaps that assumption isn’t entirely valid but it’s not completely invalid, either.
As for patting myself on the back, that’s not true at all. I was wrong about how bad this year would be. As it turns out, I was a too optimistic by a fair bit.
December 31, 2007 at 12:47 PM #127149Bugs
ParticipantSo far this year the late reporters have been adding another 10% or so onto the totals after the last day of the month. If we had ~1150 sales on December 31, 2007 that tells me that adding another 170 sales on top of that – which is what I did – is giving the opposing viewpoint the benefit of the doubt.
I’m operating off the assumption that the percentage of sales transactions that didn’t go through the MLS in 1996 is similar to that of 2007. Perhaps that assumption isn’t entirely valid but it’s not completely invalid, either.
As for patting myself on the back, that’s not true at all. I was wrong about how bad this year would be. As it turns out, I was a too optimistic by a fair bit.
December 31, 2007 at 12:47 PM #126886Bugs
ParticipantSo far this year the late reporters have been adding another 10% or so onto the totals after the last day of the month. If we had ~1150 sales on December 31, 2007 that tells me that adding another 170 sales on top of that – which is what I did – is giving the opposing viewpoint the benefit of the doubt.
I’m operating off the assumption that the percentage of sales transactions that didn’t go through the MLS in 1996 is similar to that of 2007. Perhaps that assumption isn’t entirely valid but it’s not completely invalid, either.
As for patting myself on the back, that’s not true at all. I was wrong about how bad this year would be. As it turns out, I was a too optimistic by a fair bit.
December 31, 2007 at 12:47 PM #127125Bugs
ParticipantSo far this year the late reporters have been adding another 10% or so onto the totals after the last day of the month. If we had ~1150 sales on December 31, 2007 that tells me that adding another 170 sales on top of that – which is what I did – is giving the opposing viewpoint the benefit of the doubt.
I’m operating off the assumption that the percentage of sales transactions that didn’t go through the MLS in 1996 is similar to that of 2007. Perhaps that assumption isn’t entirely valid but it’s not completely invalid, either.
As for patting myself on the back, that’s not true at all. I was wrong about how bad this year would be. As it turns out, I was a too optimistic by a fair bit.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.