Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
NeetaT
ParticipantNo one wants to piss away an extra 5.4% of their income. The good news is people who pay it can justifiably say it is their charitable contribution to the broken health care reform. I can some it up in three words, “It’s a tragedy.”
ParticipantNo one wants to piss away an extra 5.4% of their income. The good news is people who pay it can justifiably say it is their charitable contribution to the broken health care reform. I can some it up in three words, “It’s a tragedy.”
Participant[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=NeetaT]”Specifically, individuals with annual incomes more than $500,000 — as well as families earning more than $1 million — would face a 5.4 percent income tax surcharge.”
I can now commiserate with people who try to hide income. Let’s punish initiative. This is truly socialism in its most profound form.[/quote]
Yeah.
I because 5.4 percent will destroy American initiative.
I seem to remember it doing pretty well during the Clinton years at those levels.Since socialism necessarily involves government ownership of the means of production (and because the things you cite do not), you comment is as inaccurate as it is vacuously retarded.
Perhaps next you will tell me you are suffering under taxation without representation?
Really.[/quote]
Participant[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=NeetaT]”Specifically, individuals with annual incomes more than $500,000 — as well as families earning more than $1 million — would face a 5.4 percent income tax surcharge.”
I can now commiserate with people who try to hide income. Let’s punish initiative. This is truly socialism in its most profound form.[/quote]
Yeah.
I because 5.4 percent will destroy American initiative.
I seem to remember it doing pretty well during the Clinton years at those levels.Since socialism necessarily involves government ownership of the means of production (and because the things you cite do not), you comment is as inaccurate as it is vacuously retarded.
Perhaps next you will tell me you are suffering under taxation without representation?
Really.[/quote]
Participant[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=NeetaT]”Specifically, individuals with annual incomes more than $500,000 — as well as families earning more than $1 million — would face a 5.4 percent income tax surcharge.”
I can now commiserate with people who try to hide income. Let’s punish initiative. This is truly socialism in its most profound form.[/quote]
Yeah.
I because 5.4 percent will destroy American initiative.
I seem to remember it doing pretty well during the Clinton years at those levels.Since socialism necessarily involves government ownership of the means of production (and because the things you cite do not), you comment is as inaccurate as it is vacuously retarded.
Perhaps next you will tell me you are suffering under taxation without representation?
Really.[/quote]
Participant[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=NeetaT]”Specifically, individuals with annual incomes more than $500,000 — as well as families earning more than $1 million — would face a 5.4 percent income tax surcharge.”
I can now commiserate with people who try to hide income. Let’s punish initiative. This is truly socialism in its most profound form.[/quote]
Yeah.
I because 5.4 percent will destroy American initiative.
I seem to remember it doing pretty well during the Clinton years at those levels.Since socialism necessarily involves government ownership of the means of production (and because the things you cite do not), you comment is as inaccurate as it is vacuously retarded.
Perhaps next you will tell me you are suffering under taxation without representation?
Really.[/quote]
Participant[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=NeetaT]”Specifically, individuals with annual incomes more than $500,000 — as well as families earning more than $1 million — would face a 5.4 percent income tax surcharge.”
I can now commiserate with people who try to hide income. Let’s punish initiative. This is truly socialism in its most profound form.[/quote]
Yeah.
I because 5.4 percent will destroy American initiative.
I seem to remember it doing pretty well during the Clinton years at those levels.Since socialism necessarily involves government ownership of the means of production (and because the things you cite do not), you comment is as inaccurate as it is vacuously retarded.
Perhaps next you will tell me you are suffering under taxation without representation?
Really.[/quote]
Participant“Yeah.
I because 5.4 percent will destroy American initiative.
I seem to remember it doing pretty well during the Clinton years at those levels.Since socialism necessarily involves government ownership of the means of production (and because the things you cite do not), you comment is as inaccurate as it is vacuously retarded.
Perhaps next you will tell me you are suffering under taxation without representation?
Really.”
No one wants to piss away an extra 5.4% of their income. The good news is people who pay it can justifiably say it is their charitable contribution to the broken health care reform. I can some it up in three words, “It’s a tragedy.”
Participant“Yeah.
I because 5.4 percent will destroy American initiative.
I seem to remember it doing pretty well during the Clinton years at those levels.Since socialism necessarily involves government ownership of the means of production (and because the things you cite do not), you comment is as inaccurate as it is vacuously retarded.
Perhaps next you will tell me you are suffering under taxation without representation?
Really.”
No one wants to piss away an extra 5.4% of their income. The good news is people who pay it can justifiably say it is their charitable contribution to the broken health care reform. I can some it up in three words, “It’s a tragedy.”
Participant“Yeah.
I because 5.4 percent will destroy American initiative.
I seem to remember it doing pretty well during the Clinton years at those levels.Since socialism necessarily involves government ownership of the means of production (and because the things you cite do not), you comment is as inaccurate as it is vacuously retarded.
Perhaps next you will tell me you are suffering under taxation without representation?
Really.”
No one wants to piss away an extra 5.4% of their income. The good news is people who pay it can justifiably say it is their charitable contribution to the broken health care reform. I can some it up in three words, “It’s a tragedy.”
Participant“Yeah.
I because 5.4 percent will destroy American initiative.
I seem to remember it doing pretty well during the Clinton years at those levels.Since socialism necessarily involves government ownership of the means of production (and because the things you cite do not), you comment is as inaccurate as it is vacuously retarded.
Perhaps next you will tell me you are suffering under taxation without representation?
Really.”
No one wants to piss away an extra 5.4% of their income. The good news is people who pay it can justifiably say it is their charitable contribution to the broken health care reform. I can some it up in three words, “It’s a tragedy.”
Participant“Yeah.
I because 5.4 percent will destroy American initiative.
I seem to remember it doing pretty well during the Clinton years at those levels.Since socialism necessarily involves government ownership of the means of production (and because the things you cite do not), you comment is as inaccurate as it is vacuously retarded.
Perhaps next you will tell me you are suffering under taxation without representation?
Really.”
No one wants to piss away an extra 5.4% of their income. The good news is people who pay it can justifiably say it is their charitable contribution to the broken health care reform. I can some it up in three words, “It’s a tragedy.”
Participant“Specifically, individuals with annual incomes more than $500,000 — as well as families earning more than $1 million — would face a 5.4 percent income tax surcharge.”
I can now commiserate with people who try to hide income. Let’s punish initiative. This is truly socialism in its most profound form.
Participant“Specifically, individuals with annual incomes more than $500,000 — as well as families earning more than $1 million — would face a 5.4 percent income tax surcharge.”
I can now commiserate with people who try to hide income. Let’s punish initiative. This is truly socialism in its most profound form.
-
AuthorPosts
