Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
larrylujack
Participant“The race thing will backfire which will be a good thing for Blacks because they will be free to support the party who has their best interests at heart which now is the Republican Party.”
What caught my attention about this statement was that “Blacks…will be free to support…the Republican party.”
I think not all folks in the US of Amnesia forget, particularly African Americans. LBJ and Robert Kennedy following Brown vs Board of Education advanced civil rights legislation while the Republicans and southern Dems dug their heals and resisted it. Yes, I do remember George Wallace too. And the successful southern strategy Nixon employed, too.
I remember the Vietnam War era as well and how peculiar it was that I would observe my uncle diving in the bushes when the 4th of July fireworks went off (He died of bladder cancer at 40, leaving two children 5 and 2, my dear cousins, perhaps dioxin in the agent orange used as a defoliant, but I digress, after all I would never doubt that the US government is looking out for us or would do anything to harm its own soldiers).
Bottom line is that because of LBJ and Kennedy African Americans vote Democrat by huge margins and will continue doing so. Please consider reading a history book to understand that your fantasy of republicans having african american’s best interest at heart is laughable.
best
LLlarrylujack
Participant“The race thing will backfire which will be a good thing for Blacks because they will be free to support the party who has their best interests at heart which now is the Republican Party.”
What caught my attention about this statement was that “Blacks…will be free to support…the Republican party.”
I think not all folks in the US of Amnesia forget, particularly African Americans. LBJ and Robert Kennedy following Brown vs Board of Education advanced civil rights legislation while the Republicans and southern Dems dug their heals and resisted it. Yes, I do remember George Wallace too. And the successful southern strategy Nixon employed, too.
I remember the Vietnam War era as well and how peculiar it was that I would observe my uncle diving in the bushes when the 4th of July fireworks went off (He died of bladder cancer at 40, leaving two children 5 and 2, my dear cousins, perhaps dioxin in the agent orange used as a defoliant, but I digress, after all I would never doubt that the US government is looking out for us or would do anything to harm its own soldiers).
Bottom line is that because of LBJ and Kennedy African Americans vote Democrat by huge margins and will continue doing so. Please consider reading a history book to understand that your fantasy of republicans having african american’s best interest at heart is laughable.
best
LLlarrylujack
Participant“The race thing will backfire which will be a good thing for Blacks because they will be free to support the party who has their best interests at heart which now is the Republican Party.”
What caught my attention about this statement was that “Blacks…will be free to support…the Republican party.”
I think not all folks in the US of Amnesia forget, particularly African Americans. LBJ and Robert Kennedy following Brown vs Board of Education advanced civil rights legislation while the Republicans and southern Dems dug their heals and resisted it. Yes, I do remember George Wallace too. And the successful southern strategy Nixon employed, too.
I remember the Vietnam War era as well and how peculiar it was that I would observe my uncle diving in the bushes when the 4th of July fireworks went off (He died of bladder cancer at 40, leaving two children 5 and 2, my dear cousins, perhaps dioxin in the agent orange used as a defoliant, but I digress, after all I would never doubt that the US government is looking out for us or would do anything to harm its own soldiers).
Bottom line is that because of LBJ and Kennedy African Americans vote Democrat by huge margins and will continue doing so. Please consider reading a history book to understand that your fantasy of republicans having african american’s best interest at heart is laughable.
best
LLlarrylujack
Participant“The race thing will backfire which will be a good thing for Blacks because they will be free to support the party who has their best interests at heart which now is the Republican Party.”
What caught my attention about this statement was that “Blacks…will be free to support…the Republican party.”
I think not all folks in the US of Amnesia forget, particularly African Americans. LBJ and Robert Kennedy following Brown vs Board of Education advanced civil rights legislation while the Republicans and southern Dems dug their heals and resisted it. Yes, I do remember George Wallace too. And the successful southern strategy Nixon employed, too.
I remember the Vietnam War era as well and how peculiar it was that I would observe my uncle diving in the bushes when the 4th of July fireworks went off (He died of bladder cancer at 40, leaving two children 5 and 2, my dear cousins, perhaps dioxin in the agent orange used as a defoliant, but I digress, after all I would never doubt that the US government is looking out for us or would do anything to harm its own soldiers).
Bottom line is that because of LBJ and Kennedy African Americans vote Democrat by huge margins and will continue doing so. Please consider reading a history book to understand that your fantasy of republicans having african american’s best interest at heart is laughable.
best
LLlarrylujack
Participant“The race thing will backfire which will be a good thing for Blacks because they will be free to support the party who has their best interests at heart which now is the Republican Party.”
What caught my attention about this statement was that “Blacks…will be free to support…the Republican party.”
I think not all folks in the US of Amnesia forget, particularly African Americans. LBJ and Robert Kennedy following Brown vs Board of Education advanced civil rights legislation while the Republicans and southern Dems dug their heals and resisted it. Yes, I do remember George Wallace too. And the successful southern strategy Nixon employed, too.
I remember the Vietnam War era as well and how peculiar it was that I would observe my uncle diving in the bushes when the 4th of July fireworks went off (He died of bladder cancer at 40, leaving two children 5 and 2, my dear cousins, perhaps dioxin in the agent orange used as a defoliant, but I digress, after all I would never doubt that the US government is looking out for us or would do anything to harm its own soldiers).
Bottom line is that because of LBJ and Kennedy African Americans vote Democrat by huge margins and will continue doing so. Please consider reading a history book to understand that your fantasy of republicans having african american’s best interest at heart is laughable.
best
LLMarch 28, 2008 at 9:21 AM in reply to: Vote for McCain to stop a massive bailout of the irresponsible! #177563larrylujack
ParticipantMcCain = More of the same
Neocon Bush/Cheney foreign policy. If your in favor of continued neocon foreign policy, well, McCain’s your man.
Personally, I like the majority of other Americans have had enough of the wasted lives and squandered billions in Iraq.
Consequently, to consider a short tempered war lover as commander in chief that promises to give us more of the same, particularly in view of what an abject failure neocon foreign policy has been for the past 8 years, is sheer folly.LL
March 28, 2008 at 9:21 AM in reply to: Vote for McCain to stop a massive bailout of the irresponsible! #177916larrylujack
ParticipantMcCain = More of the same
Neocon Bush/Cheney foreign policy. If your in favor of continued neocon foreign policy, well, McCain’s your man.
Personally, I like the majority of other Americans have had enough of the wasted lives and squandered billions in Iraq.
Consequently, to consider a short tempered war lover as commander in chief that promises to give us more of the same, particularly in view of what an abject failure neocon foreign policy has been for the past 8 years, is sheer folly.LL
March 28, 2008 at 9:21 AM in reply to: Vote for McCain to stop a massive bailout of the irresponsible! #177923larrylujack
ParticipantMcCain = More of the same
Neocon Bush/Cheney foreign policy. If your in favor of continued neocon foreign policy, well, McCain’s your man.
Personally, I like the majority of other Americans have had enough of the wasted lives and squandered billions in Iraq.
Consequently, to consider a short tempered war lover as commander in chief that promises to give us more of the same, particularly in view of what an abject failure neocon foreign policy has been for the past 8 years, is sheer folly.LL
March 28, 2008 at 9:21 AM in reply to: Vote for McCain to stop a massive bailout of the irresponsible! #177930larrylujack
ParticipantMcCain = More of the same
Neocon Bush/Cheney foreign policy. If your in favor of continued neocon foreign policy, well, McCain’s your man.
Personally, I like the majority of other Americans have had enough of the wasted lives and squandered billions in Iraq.
Consequently, to consider a short tempered war lover as commander in chief that promises to give us more of the same, particularly in view of what an abject failure neocon foreign policy has been for the past 8 years, is sheer folly.LL
March 28, 2008 at 9:21 AM in reply to: Vote for McCain to stop a massive bailout of the irresponsible! #178019larrylujack
ParticipantMcCain = More of the same
Neocon Bush/Cheney foreign policy. If your in favor of continued neocon foreign policy, well, McCain’s your man.
Personally, I like the majority of other Americans have had enough of the wasted lives and squandered billions in Iraq.
Consequently, to consider a short tempered war lover as commander in chief that promises to give us more of the same, particularly in view of what an abject failure neocon foreign policy has been for the past 8 years, is sheer folly.LL
larrylujack
Participant. Unless you want to buckle down and get an engineering or science degree before heading off to law school, don’t expect to make a lot of money right away. Still, it might be a good option but you will have a lot of competition…
I agree with the above since I am in the business. You don’t need to go to Harvard or Stanford for your JD to get a position with a good firm if you have a Biotech PhD or an egineering MS or BS. On the other hand, if you don’t have a technical degree, you do need to do well at a top tier law school or forget getting an associate position at a top firm, that’s just the plain facts- JDs who graduate from average law schools or do average in law school with econ or polisci majors are a dime a dozen.
However, the nice thing about being an attorney is that what you have learned can be used for many other professions, such as running a business, etc. You will find that a JD will expand your professional options tremendously. You will also use what you learned in law school in everyday life, for example, dealing with contracts. Thus, I really don’t think you can go wrong with a JD because it will provide you with skills you can use for the practice of law, as well as outside the traditional practice of law and in everyday life. I am glad I did.
Good luck,
LLlarrylujack
Participant. Unless you want to buckle down and get an engineering or science degree before heading off to law school, don’t expect to make a lot of money right away. Still, it might be a good option but you will have a lot of competition…
I agree with the above since I am in the business. You don’t need to go to Harvard or Stanford for your JD to get a position with a good firm if you have a Biotech PhD or an egineering MS or BS. On the other hand, if you don’t have a technical degree, you do need to do well at a top tier law school or forget getting an associate position at a top firm, that’s just the plain facts- JDs who graduate from average law schools or do average in law school with econ or polisci majors are a dime a dozen.
However, the nice thing about being an attorney is that what you have learned can be used for many other professions, such as running a business, etc. You will find that a JD will expand your professional options tremendously. You will also use what you learned in law school in everyday life, for example, dealing with contracts. Thus, I really don’t think you can go wrong with a JD because it will provide you with skills you can use for the practice of law, as well as outside the traditional practice of law and in everyday life. I am glad I did.
Good luck,
LLlarrylujack
Participant. Unless you want to buckle down and get an engineering or science degree before heading off to law school, don’t expect to make a lot of money right away. Still, it might be a good option but you will have a lot of competition…
I agree with the above since I am in the business. You don’t need to go to Harvard or Stanford for your JD to get a position with a good firm if you have a Biotech PhD or an egineering MS or BS. On the other hand, if you don’t have a technical degree, you do need to do well at a top tier law school or forget getting an associate position at a top firm, that’s just the plain facts- JDs who graduate from average law schools or do average in law school with econ or polisci majors are a dime a dozen.
However, the nice thing about being an attorney is that what you have learned can be used for many other professions, such as running a business, etc. You will find that a JD will expand your professional options tremendously. You will also use what you learned in law school in everyday life, for example, dealing with contracts. Thus, I really don’t think you can go wrong with a JD because it will provide you with skills you can use for the practice of law, as well as outside the traditional practice of law and in everyday life. I am glad I did.
Good luck,
LLlarrylujack
Participant. Unless you want to buckle down and get an engineering or science degree before heading off to law school, don’t expect to make a lot of money right away. Still, it might be a good option but you will have a lot of competition…
I agree with the above since I am in the business. You don’t need to go to Harvard or Stanford for your JD to get a position with a good firm if you have a Biotech PhD or an egineering MS or BS. On the other hand, if you don’t have a technical degree, you do need to do well at a top tier law school or forget getting an associate position at a top firm, that’s just the plain facts- JDs who graduate from average law schools or do average in law school with econ or polisci majors are a dime a dozen.
However, the nice thing about being an attorney is that what you have learned can be used for many other professions, such as running a business, etc. You will find that a JD will expand your professional options tremendously. You will also use what you learned in law school in everyday life, for example, dealing with contracts. Thus, I really don’t think you can go wrong with a JD because it will provide you with skills you can use for the practice of law, as well as outside the traditional practice of law and in everyday life. I am glad I did.
Good luck,
LL -
AuthorPosts
