Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
HarryBosch
ParticipantMarion, I differ with your conclusion that a man is sleaze if “…part of his attraction to …” a woman is their “…luscious asses.”
“Another thing about the sleaze factor, I found out he liked dating women with luscious asses, which was part of his attraction to me.”
What if “part” of his attraction to you was a different part of your anatomy? Say your face for instance? Or your breasts – either big, medium, or small?
So if it is your face that attracts a man then why is that less “sleaze” then if it is your behind that attracts a man? I like to look at my wife’s ass. Her behind attracts me. It gets me turned on. I’ve been married for 20+ years. And my wife’s ass still turns me on.
That is a big part of attraction for me as a man to a woman. What’s wrong with that?
One more thing – men are visual. They get turned on by the visual. Women get turned on by the emotional. You might find some exceptions here and there on both sides but on average I think those are true statements. That’s just the way we’re built. It’s in our genes.
ParticipantMarion, I differ with your conclusion that a man is sleaze if “…part of his attraction to …” a woman is their “…luscious asses.”
“Another thing about the sleaze factor, I found out he liked dating women with luscious asses, which was part of his attraction to me.”
What if “part” of his attraction to you was a different part of your anatomy? Say your face for instance? Or your breasts – either big, medium, or small?
So if it is your face that attracts a man then why is that less “sleaze” then if it is your behind that attracts a man? I like to look at my wife’s ass. Her behind attracts me. It gets me turned on. I’ve been married for 20+ years. And my wife’s ass still turns me on.
That is a big part of attraction for me as a man to a woman. What’s wrong with that?
One more thing – men are visual. They get turned on by the visual. Women get turned on by the emotional. You might find some exceptions here and there on both sides but on average I think those are true statements. That’s just the way we’re built. It’s in our genes.
ParticipantMarion, I differ with your conclusion that a man is sleaze if “…part of his attraction to …” a woman is their “…luscious asses.”
“Another thing about the sleaze factor, I found out he liked dating women with luscious asses, which was part of his attraction to me.”
What if “part” of his attraction to you was a different part of your anatomy? Say your face for instance? Or your breasts – either big, medium, or small?
So if it is your face that attracts a man then why is that less “sleaze” then if it is your behind that attracts a man? I like to look at my wife’s ass. Her behind attracts me. It gets me turned on. I’ve been married for 20+ years. And my wife’s ass still turns me on.
That is a big part of attraction for me as a man to a woman. What’s wrong with that?
One more thing – men are visual. They get turned on by the visual. Women get turned on by the emotional. You might find some exceptions here and there on both sides but on average I think those are true statements. That’s just the way we’re built. It’s in our genes.
ParticipantMarion, I differ with your conclusion that a man is sleaze if “…part of his attraction to …” a woman is their “…luscious asses.”
“Another thing about the sleaze factor, I found out he liked dating women with luscious asses, which was part of his attraction to me.”
What if “part” of his attraction to you was a different part of your anatomy? Say your face for instance? Or your breasts – either big, medium, or small?
So if it is your face that attracts a man then why is that less “sleaze” then if it is your behind that attracts a man? I like to look at my wife’s ass. Her behind attracts me. It gets me turned on. I’ve been married for 20+ years. And my wife’s ass still turns me on.
That is a big part of attraction for me as a man to a woman. What’s wrong with that?
One more thing – men are visual. They get turned on by the visual. Women get turned on by the emotional. You might find some exceptions here and there on both sides but on average I think those are true statements. That’s just the way we’re built. It’s in our genes.
ParticipantMarion, I differ with your conclusion that a man is sleaze if “…part of his attraction to …” a woman is their “…luscious asses.”
“Another thing about the sleaze factor, I found out he liked dating women with luscious asses, which was part of his attraction to me.”
What if “part” of his attraction to you was a different part of your anatomy? Say your face for instance? Or your breasts – either big, medium, or small?
So if it is your face that attracts a man then why is that less “sleaze” then if it is your behind that attracts a man? I like to look at my wife’s ass. Her behind attracts me. It gets me turned on. I’ve been married for 20+ years. And my wife’s ass still turns me on.
That is a big part of attraction for me as a man to a woman. What’s wrong with that?
One more thing – men are visual. They get turned on by the visual. Women get turned on by the emotional. You might find some exceptions here and there on both sides but on average I think those are true statements. That’s just the way we’re built. It’s in our genes.
ParticipantCorrection – that’s circa February 11, 2006
ParticipantCorrection – that’s circa February 11, 2006
ParticipantCorrection – that’s circa February 11, 2006
ParticipantCorrection – that’s circa February 11, 2006
ParticipantCorrection – that’s circa February 11, 2006
ParticipantFDIC adds staff for bank failures
http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20080326/BUSINESS/560174054/1006
Federal bank regulators plan to increase staffing 60 percent in their bank-failure division in coming months to handle an anticipated surge in troubled financial institutions.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. wants to add 140 workers to bring staff levels to 360 in the division that handles bank failures, John Bovenzi, the agency’s chief operating officer, said yesterday.
“We want to make sure that we’re prepared,” Mr. Bovenzi said, adding that most of the hires will be temporary and based in Dallas.
(Another sign of our worsening economy.)
ParticipantFDIC adds staff for bank failures
http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20080326/BUSINESS/560174054/1006
Federal bank regulators plan to increase staffing 60 percent in their bank-failure division in coming months to handle an anticipated surge in troubled financial institutions.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. wants to add 140 workers to bring staff levels to 360 in the division that handles bank failures, John Bovenzi, the agency’s chief operating officer, said yesterday.
“We want to make sure that we’re prepared,” Mr. Bovenzi said, adding that most of the hires will be temporary and based in Dallas.
(Another sign of our worsening economy.)
ParticipantFDIC adds staff for bank failures
http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20080326/BUSINESS/560174054/1006
Federal bank regulators plan to increase staffing 60 percent in their bank-failure division in coming months to handle an anticipated surge in troubled financial institutions.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. wants to add 140 workers to bring staff levels to 360 in the division that handles bank failures, John Bovenzi, the agency’s chief operating officer, said yesterday.
“We want to make sure that we’re prepared,” Mr. Bovenzi said, adding that most of the hires will be temporary and based in Dallas.
(Another sign of our worsening economy.)
ParticipantFDIC adds staff for bank failures
http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20080326/BUSINESS/560174054/1006
Federal bank regulators plan to increase staffing 60 percent in their bank-failure division in coming months to handle an anticipated surge in troubled financial institutions.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. wants to add 140 workers to bring staff levels to 360 in the division that handles bank failures, John Bovenzi, the agency’s chief operating officer, said yesterday.
“We want to make sure that we’re prepared,” Mr. Bovenzi said, adding that most of the hires will be temporary and based in Dallas.
(Another sign of our worsening economy.)
-
AuthorPosts