[gn]

[quote=NewtoSanDiego]Lexus – Realtor dream car

[/quote]

The main reason many realtors like Lexus because they want a luxury car that can hold up to the amount of driving that they do. They want a luxury car that will perform well even if the odometer is above 100k miles.

Imagine a realtor that drives a lot with a BMW. He/She will spend most of his time at the shop.

[gn]

[quote=NewtoSanDiego]Lexus – Realtor dream car

[/quote]

The main reason many realtors like Lexus because they want a luxury car that can hold up to the amount of driving that they do. They want a luxury car that will perform well even if the odometer is above 100k miles.

Imagine a realtor that drives a lot with a BMW. He/She will spend most of his time at the shop.

[gn]

[quote=NewtoSanDiego]Lexus – Realtor dream car

[/quote]

The main reason many realtors like Lexus because they want a luxury car that can hold up to the amount of driving that they do. They want a luxury car that will perform well even if the odometer is above 100k miles.

Imagine a realtor that drives a lot with a BMW. He/She will spend most of his time at the shop.

[gn]

[quote=NewtoSanDiego]Lexus – Realtor dream car

[/quote]

The main reason many realtors like Lexus because they want a luxury car that can hold up to the amount of driving that they do. They want a luxury car that will perform well even if the odometer is above 100k miles.

Imagine a realtor that drives a lot with a BMW. He/She will spend most of his time at the shop.

[gn]

[quote=NewtoSanDiego]Lexus – Realtor dream car

[/quote]

The main reason many realtors like Lexus because they want a luxury car that can hold up to the amount of driving that they do. They want a luxury car that will perform well even if the odometer is above 100k miles.

Imagine a realtor that drives a lot with a BMW. He/She will spend most of his time at the shop.

[gn]

You need to ask your realtor what the houses of similar size/floor plan in that neighborhood that are not close to the school go for.

Let’s say that those houses go for $1.4M, then maybe, you should consider it because:

– The discount that you get might be worth the hassles of living next to a school.
– When you sell, you’ll have to sell for less, but that’s OK because you bought it for less.

[gn]

You need to ask your realtor what the houses of similar size/floor plan in that neighborhood that are not close to the school go for.

Let’s say that those houses go for $1.4M, then maybe, you should consider it because:

– The discount that you get might be worth the hassles of living next to a school.
– When you sell, you’ll have to sell for less, but that’s OK because you bought it for less.

[gn]

You need to ask your realtor what the houses of similar size/floor plan in that neighborhood that are not close to the school go for.

Let’s say that those houses go for $1.4M, then maybe, you should consider it because:

– The discount that you get might be worth the hassles of living next to a school.
– When you sell, you’ll have to sell for less, but that’s OK because you bought it for less.

[gn]

You need to ask your realtor what the houses of similar size/floor plan in that neighborhood that are not close to the school go for.

Let’s say that those houses go for $1.4M, then maybe, you should consider it because:

– The discount that you get might be worth the hassles of living next to a school.
– When you sell, you’ll have to sell for less, but that’s OK because you bought it for less.

[gn]

You need to ask your realtor what the houses of similar size/floor plan in that neighborhood that are not close to the school go for.

Let’s say that those houses go for $1.4M, then maybe, you should consider it because:

– The discount that you get might be worth the hassles of living next to a school.
– When you sell, you’ll have to sell for less, but that’s OK because you bought it for less.

[gn]

[quote=Bristol Chicken]Take a hard look at Tiger. Take away the money, the fame, The pro athlete aura and your left with Eldrick Tont Woods, plumber.

Take a look at his wife, model, stone cold fox, could attract and conquer most any man.

You do the math. It always was the money. They might have been breifly blinded by love, family, children and now more than ever the molded public perception …….but it was always about the money.[/quote]

I disagree. Tiger is a very talented athlete. And that’s pretty rare. On the other hand, there are a large number of models who are as beautiful as his wife.

So, if you are talking about strictly “trading his assets with her assets”, I would argue that it would be easier for Tiger to find somebody “equivalent” to his wife than for his wife to find somebody “equivalent” to him.

This is the main reason why rich men can have their picks of beautiful women. The number of beautiful women far exceed the number of rich men. It’s about supply & demand.

Regarding the prenup, when they got married, I suspect it was something like this:

His view: He comes into their marriage with a lot of money. And nobody knows what the future hold, so he has to protect his assets.

Her view: That’s fair. But what if, in the future, when she’s no longer beautiful, he decides to dump her for someone younger.

Their agreement: After a certain number of years, she gets a certain amount of money if he divorces her.

Post-scandal, I suspect it’s something like this:

Her view: He has proven to be untrustworthy (in the area of marriage fidelity), so she needs more financial security to compensate for the higher risk she takes by staying with him.

His view: He needs to maintain/repair his image as a family man for the corporate sponsors. So he’s willing to “pay for his mistakes”.

Their agreement: re-write the prenup.

[gn]

[quote=Bristol Chicken]Take a hard look at Tiger. Take away the money, the fame, The pro athlete aura and your left with Eldrick Tont Woods, plumber.

Take a look at his wife, model, stone cold fox, could attract and conquer most any man.

You do the math. It always was the money. They might have been breifly blinded by love, family, children and now more than ever the molded public perception …….but it was always about the money.[/quote]

I disagree. Tiger is a very talented athlete. And that’s pretty rare. On the other hand, there are a large number of models who are as beautiful as his wife.

So, if you are talking about strictly “trading his assets with her assets”, I would argue that it would be easier for Tiger to find somebody “equivalent” to his wife than for his wife to find somebody “equivalent” to him.

This is the main reason why rich men can have their picks of beautiful women. The number of beautiful women far exceed the number of rich men. It’s about supply & demand.

Regarding the prenup, when they got married, I suspect it was something like this:

His view: He comes into their marriage with a lot of money. And nobody knows what the future hold, so he has to protect his assets.

Her view: That’s fair. But what if, in the future, when she’s no longer beautiful, he decides to dump her for someone younger.

Their agreement: After a certain number of years, she gets a certain amount of money if he divorces her.

Post-scandal, I suspect it’s something like this:

Her view: He has proven to be untrustworthy (in the area of marriage fidelity), so she needs more financial security to compensate for the higher risk she takes by staying with him.

His view: He needs to maintain/repair his image as a family man for the corporate sponsors. So he’s willing to “pay for his mistakes”.

Their agreement: re-write the prenup.

[gn]

[quote=Bristol Chicken]Take a hard look at Tiger. Take away the money, the fame, The pro athlete aura and your left with Eldrick Tont Woods, plumber.

Take a look at his wife, model, stone cold fox, could attract and conquer most any man.

You do the math. It always was the money. They might have been breifly blinded by love, family, children and now more than ever the molded public perception …….but it was always about the money.[/quote]

I disagree. Tiger is a very talented athlete. And that’s pretty rare. On the other hand, there are a large number of models who are as beautiful as his wife.

So, if you are talking about strictly “trading his assets with her assets”, I would argue that it would be easier for Tiger to find somebody “equivalent” to his wife than for his wife to find somebody “equivalent” to him.

This is the main reason why rich men can have their picks of beautiful women. The number of beautiful women far exceed the number of rich men. It’s about supply & demand.

Regarding the prenup, when they got married, I suspect it was something like this:

His view: He comes into their marriage with a lot of money. And nobody knows what the future hold, so he has to protect his assets.

Her view: That’s fair. But what if, in the future, when she’s no longer beautiful, he decides to dump her for someone younger.

Their agreement: After a certain number of years, she gets a certain amount of money if he divorces her.

Post-scandal, I suspect it’s something like this:

Her view: He has proven to be untrustworthy (in the area of marriage fidelity), so she needs more financial security to compensate for the higher risk she takes by staying with him.

His view: He needs to maintain/repair his image as a family man for the corporate sponsors. So he’s willing to “pay for his mistakes”.

Their agreement: re-write the prenup.

[gn]

[quote=Bristol Chicken]Take a hard look at Tiger. Take away the money, the fame, The pro athlete aura and your left with Eldrick Tont Woods, plumber.

Take a look at his wife, model, stone cold fox, could attract and conquer most any man.

You do the math. It always was the money. They might have been breifly blinded by love, family, children and now more than ever the molded public perception …….but it was always about the money.[/quote]

I disagree. Tiger is a very talented athlete. And that’s pretty rare. On the other hand, there are a large number of models who are as beautiful as his wife.

So, if you are talking about strictly “trading his assets with her assets”, I would argue that it would be easier for Tiger to find somebody “equivalent” to his wife than for his wife to find somebody “equivalent” to him.

This is the main reason why rich men can have their picks of beautiful women. The number of beautiful women far exceed the number of rich men. It’s about supply & demand.

Regarding the prenup, when they got married, I suspect it was something like this:

His view: He comes into their marriage with a lot of money. And nobody knows what the future hold, so he has to protect his assets.

Her view: That’s fair. But what if, in the future, when she’s no longer beautiful, he decides to dump her for someone younger.

Their agreement: After a certain number of years, she gets a certain amount of money if he divorces her.

Post-scandal, I suspect it’s something like this:

Her view: He has proven to be untrustworthy (in the area of marriage fidelity), so she needs more financial security to compensate for the higher risk she takes by staying with him.

His view: He needs to maintain/repair his image as a family man for the corporate sponsors. So he’s willing to “pay for his mistakes”.

Their agreement: re-write the prenup.

[gn]

[quote=Bristol Chicken]Take a hard look at Tiger. Take away the money, the fame, The pro athlete aura and your left with Eldrick Tont Woods, plumber.

Take a look at his wife, model, stone cold fox, could attract and conquer most any man.

You do the math. It always was the money. They might have been breifly blinded by love, family, children and now more than ever the molded public perception …….but it was always about the money.[/quote]

I disagree. Tiger is a very talented athlete. And that’s pretty rare. On the other hand, there are a large number of models who are as beautiful as his wife.

So, if you are talking about strictly “trading his assets with her assets”, I would argue that it would be easier for Tiger to find somebody “equivalent” to his wife than for his wife to find somebody “equivalent” to him.

This is the main reason why rich men can have their picks of beautiful women. The number of beautiful women far exceed the number of rich men. It’s about supply & demand.

Regarding the prenup, when they got married, I suspect it was something like this:

His view: He comes into their marriage with a lot of money. And nobody knows what the future hold, so he has to protect his assets.

Her view: That’s fair. But what if, in the future, when she’s no longer beautiful, he decides to dump her for someone younger.

Their agreement: After a certain number of years, she gets a certain amount of money if he divorces her.

Post-scandal, I suspect it’s something like this:

Her view: He has proven to be untrustworthy (in the area of marriage fidelity), so she needs more financial security to compensate for the higher risk she takes by staying with him.

His view: He needs to maintain/repair his image as a family man for the corporate sponsors. So he’s willing to “pay for his mistakes”.

Their agreement: re-write the prenup.

[Author]

Posts