[eavesdropper]

[quote=SD Transplant]Thanks for posting the details and video. I’ve caught some of the interview in my hotel room and wanted a review to read/view the details again. Funny that Greenspan sounded a little more geniune as he is trying to redeem his reputation after the game is over (way late in my book but interesting chatter)[/quote]

What I find interesting is that it seemed to take Greenspan a couple years to realize that, in the eyes of many people, he was a significant player in the events that led to the financial meltdown. For quite a while, you’d see photos of him at some social event or the other, with this Alfred E. Newman “What, me worry?” grin plastered on his face.

Speaking of clueless “experts”: I saw an interesting documentary on NOVA recently, “Mind Over Money”. It asks the question of why so many of the world’s leading economists failed to foresee disastrous fallout from the boom markets of the early and mid-oughts, and explored the role of human behavior in these events.

The causes of the meltdown are numerous and complex, and some, I believe, remain unexplored. It is important to view this film as an exploration of one small facet of an incredibly complex occurrence, not as an explanation of all that went wrong. The documentary raises intriguing questions about how we teach, learn, and approach economics.

The film is available for instant viewing from Netflix, and also can be viewed on the PBS website.

[eavesdropper]

[quote=SD Transplant]Thanks for posting the details and video. I’ve caught some of the interview in my hotel room and wanted a review to read/view the details again. Funny that Greenspan sounded a little more geniune as he is trying to redeem his reputation after the game is over (way late in my book but interesting chatter)[/quote]

What I find interesting is that it seemed to take Greenspan a couple years to realize that, in the eyes of many people, he was a significant player in the events that led to the financial meltdown. For quite a while, you’d see photos of him at some social event or the other, with this Alfred E. Newman “What, me worry?” grin plastered on his face.

Speaking of clueless “experts”: I saw an interesting documentary on NOVA recently, “Mind Over Money”. It asks the question of why so many of the world’s leading economists failed to foresee disastrous fallout from the boom markets of the early and mid-oughts, and explored the role of human behavior in these events.

The causes of the meltdown are numerous and complex, and some, I believe, remain unexplored. It is important to view this film as an exploration of one small facet of an incredibly complex occurrence, not as an explanation of all that went wrong. The documentary raises intriguing questions about how we teach, learn, and approach economics.

The film is available for instant viewing from Netflix, and also can be viewed on the PBS website.

[eavesdropper]

[quote=NewtoSanDiego] The NSD-nation (NSD like-minded folks who are the silent majority) is gonna be running the local, state and god-willing national government. While we’re out organizing, raising funds, running for school board, city council, state representative, you will be perfectly happy just typing away frivilious thoughts on blogs, we will govern you. You will look up one day and say, “what happened?”. We will be smiling. [/quote]

“The NSD-nation”? Okay, I know I’ll regret this, but I’ll bite. WTF is the “NSD-nation”? Geez, Newt, you can’t spell “frivolous”, but can you spell “DELUSIONAL”?

Once again, in a total exercise in futility, I’ll ask: Who is the “silent majority” to whom you refer, and would you please provide proof that they are indeed worthy of the term “majority”?

I confess to being mystified. Exactly what is it that you want the readers of this board to do? Are you asking them to join your “silent majority” (oh, if you would only live up to the adjective you’ve employed!)? Or are you asking them to rise up against you?

But, to get to the point, what the hell do you know about the activities the other members of this board engage in when they’re not engaged in discussion on Piggs? Not a damn thing! And if anyone wanted you to know, they’d contact you directly.

As for the frivolous thoughts to which you disparagingly refer, I’m not sure that posting messages to let people know what kind of dog you own, or model of car you lease doesn’t qualify. Your recent on-the-scene color commentary on the Newt vs HOA smackdown had me all a-tremble thinking about what a badass you must be. Seriously, I’m not sure that a loser who has to ask for help on how to handle problems with his HOA from the frivolous message posters on this board is capable of action that will result in major change in Washington.

But seriously, Newt, you have a shitload of nerve originating a thread like this one, and even more for bringing it up again after a couple years. Not only is it a direct violation of Piggs policy, which was recently reviewed in a highly vocal discussion in which you were fingered as a major offender. But you’re too scared to engage in any sort of discussion on this board. I suspect that your activities as part of “participating in our democracy” consist of exactly what you do here: hit and run. You spread innuendo, half-truths, and outright lies in an attempt to fire people up over nonexistent issues, and then disappear before anyone can corner you and force an explanation.

[quote=NewtoSanDiego] Some of you on this board want to muzzle the truth. Perhaps you can’t handle the truth. NSD[/quote]

Newt, you flatter yourself. No one wants to muzzle the truth. I mean, what TRUTH are you talking about?? You don’t ever say anything worthwhile. You make outlandish statements that appear to have been written by a 14 year-old, and for which there is no evidence.

The only one trying to “muzzle the truth” is YOU. You have repeatedly been asked to provide information or evidence supporting your statements, and you choose not to. It’s more than obvious that you are only too willing to blindly and unquestioningly follow anyone whose rhetoric mirrors your own opinions and biases. That’s your choice. It’s not mine, and it’s not that of many of the posters on this board. And as long as we continue to live in a democracy, I’ll work to ensure that we all have that choice, despite the best efforts of the “NSD-nation” to the contrary.

[quote=NewtoSanDiego] The NSD-nation (NSD like-minded folks who are the silent majority) is gonna be running the local, state and god-willing national government……..you will be perfectly happy just typing away frivilious thoughts on blogs, we will govern you. You will look up one day and say, “what happened?”. We will be smiling. [/quote]

Dude, I read this again, and all I can say is……ignore the voices, and have a Thorazine salt lick installed in your bedroom. It’s not that I disagree with the basic premise. It’s just the elaborately detailed “real life” scenario that’s giving me a major creep vibe.

Exactly how much of your daily routine is devoted to planning NSD-nation’s gleaming-eye moment of triumph?

[eavesdropper]

[quote=NewtoSanDiego] The NSD-nation (NSD like-minded folks who are the silent majority) is gonna be running the local, state and god-willing national government. While we’re out organizing, raising funds, running for school board, city council, state representative, you will be perfectly happy just typing away frivilious thoughts on blogs, we will govern you. You will look up one day and say, “what happened?”. We will be smiling. [/quote]

“The NSD-nation”? Okay, I know I’ll regret this, but I’ll bite. WTF is the “NSD-nation”? Geez, Newt, you can’t spell “frivolous”, but can you spell “DELUSIONAL”?

Once again, in a total exercise in futility, I’ll ask: Who is the “silent majority” to whom you refer, and would you please provide proof that they are indeed worthy of the term “majority”?

I confess to being mystified. Exactly what is it that you want the readers of this board to do? Are you asking them to join your “silent majority” (oh, if you would only live up to the adjective you’ve employed!)? Or are you asking them to rise up against you?

But, to get to the point, what the hell do you know about the activities the other members of this board engage in when they’re not engaged in discussion on Piggs? Not a damn thing! And if anyone wanted you to know, they’d contact you directly.

As for the frivolous thoughts to which you disparagingly refer, I’m not sure that posting messages to let people know what kind of dog you own, or model of car you lease doesn’t qualify. Your recent on-the-scene color commentary on the Newt vs HOA smackdown had me all a-tremble thinking about what a badass you must be. Seriously, I’m not sure that a loser who has to ask for help on how to handle problems with his HOA from the frivolous message posters on this board is capable of action that will result in major change in Washington.

But seriously, Newt, you have a shitload of nerve originating a thread like this one, and even more for bringing it up again after a couple years. Not only is it a direct violation of Piggs policy, which was recently reviewed in a highly vocal discussion in which you were fingered as a major offender. But you’re too scared to engage in any sort of discussion on this board. I suspect that your activities as part of “participating in our democracy” consist of exactly what you do here: hit and run. You spread innuendo, half-truths, and outright lies in an attempt to fire people up over nonexistent issues, and then disappear before anyone can corner you and force an explanation.

[quote=NewtoSanDiego] Some of you on this board want to muzzle the truth. Perhaps you can’t handle the truth. NSD[/quote]

Newt, you flatter yourself. No one wants to muzzle the truth. I mean, what TRUTH are you talking about?? You don’t ever say anything worthwhile. You make outlandish statements that appear to have been written by a 14 year-old, and for which there is no evidence.

The only one trying to “muzzle the truth” is YOU. You have repeatedly been asked to provide information or evidence supporting your statements, and you choose not to. It’s more than obvious that you are only too willing to blindly and unquestioningly follow anyone whose rhetoric mirrors your own opinions and biases. That’s your choice. It’s not mine, and it’s not that of many of the posters on this board. And as long as we continue to live in a democracy, I’ll work to ensure that we all have that choice, despite the best efforts of the “NSD-nation” to the contrary.

[quote=NewtoSanDiego] The NSD-nation (NSD like-minded folks who are the silent majority) is gonna be running the local, state and god-willing national government……..you will be perfectly happy just typing away frivilious thoughts on blogs, we will govern you. You will look up one day and say, “what happened?”. We will be smiling. [/quote]

Dude, I read this again, and all I can say is……ignore the voices, and have a Thorazine salt lick installed in your bedroom. It’s not that I disagree with the basic premise. It’s just the elaborately detailed “real life” scenario that’s giving me a major creep vibe.

Exactly how much of your daily routine is devoted to planning NSD-nation’s gleaming-eye moment of triumph?

[eavesdropper]

[quote=NewtoSanDiego] The NSD-nation (NSD like-minded folks who are the silent majority) is gonna be running the local, state and god-willing national government. While we’re out organizing, raising funds, running for school board, city council, state representative, you will be perfectly happy just typing away frivilious thoughts on blogs, we will govern you. You will look up one day and say, “what happened?”. We will be smiling. [/quote]

“The NSD-nation”? Okay, I know I’ll regret this, but I’ll bite. WTF is the “NSD-nation”? Geez, Newt, you can’t spell “frivolous”, but can you spell “DELUSIONAL”?

Once again, in a total exercise in futility, I’ll ask: Who is the “silent majority” to whom you refer, and would you please provide proof that they are indeed worthy of the term “majority”?

I confess to being mystified. Exactly what is it that you want the readers of this board to do? Are you asking them to join your “silent majority” (oh, if you would only live up to the adjective you’ve employed!)? Or are you asking them to rise up against you?

But, to get to the point, what the hell do you know about the activities the other members of this board engage in when they’re not engaged in discussion on Piggs? Not a damn thing! And if anyone wanted you to know, they’d contact you directly.

As for the frivolous thoughts to which you disparagingly refer, I’m not sure that posting messages to let people know what kind of dog you own, or model of car you lease doesn’t qualify. Your recent on-the-scene color commentary on the Newt vs HOA smackdown had me all a-tremble thinking about what a badass you must be. Seriously, I’m not sure that a loser who has to ask for help on how to handle problems with his HOA from the frivolous message posters on this board is capable of action that will result in major change in Washington.

But seriously, Newt, you have a shitload of nerve originating a thread like this one, and even more for bringing it up again after a couple years. Not only is it a direct violation of Piggs policy, which was recently reviewed in a highly vocal discussion in which you were fingered as a major offender. But you’re too scared to engage in any sort of discussion on this board. I suspect that your activities as part of “participating in our democracy” consist of exactly what you do here: hit and run. You spread innuendo, half-truths, and outright lies in an attempt to fire people up over nonexistent issues, and then disappear before anyone can corner you and force an explanation.

[quote=NewtoSanDiego] Some of you on this board want to muzzle the truth. Perhaps you can’t handle the truth. NSD[/quote]

Newt, you flatter yourself. No one wants to muzzle the truth. I mean, what TRUTH are you talking about?? You don’t ever say anything worthwhile. You make outlandish statements that appear to have been written by a 14 year-old, and for which there is no evidence.

The only one trying to “muzzle the truth” is YOU. You have repeatedly been asked to provide information or evidence supporting your statements, and you choose not to. It’s more than obvious that you are only too willing to blindly and unquestioningly follow anyone whose rhetoric mirrors your own opinions and biases. That’s your choice. It’s not mine, and it’s not that of many of the posters on this board. And as long as we continue to live in a democracy, I’ll work to ensure that we all have that choice, despite the best efforts of the “NSD-nation” to the contrary.

[quote=NewtoSanDiego] The NSD-nation (NSD like-minded folks who are the silent majority) is gonna be running the local, state and god-willing national government……..you will be perfectly happy just typing away frivilious thoughts on blogs, we will govern you. You will look up one day and say, “what happened?”. We will be smiling. [/quote]

Dude, I read this again, and all I can say is……ignore the voices, and have a Thorazine salt lick installed in your bedroom. It’s not that I disagree with the basic premise. It’s just the elaborately detailed “real life” scenario that’s giving me a major creep vibe.

Exactly how much of your daily routine is devoted to planning NSD-nation’s gleaming-eye moment of triumph?

[eavesdropper]

[quote=NewtoSanDiego] The NSD-nation (NSD like-minded folks who are the silent majority) is gonna be running the local, state and god-willing national government. While we’re out organizing, raising funds, running for school board, city council, state representative, you will be perfectly happy just typing away frivilious thoughts on blogs, we will govern you. You will look up one day and say, “what happened?”. We will be smiling. [/quote]

“The NSD-nation”? Okay, I know I’ll regret this, but I’ll bite. WTF is the “NSD-nation”? Geez, Newt, you can’t spell “frivolous”, but can you spell “DELUSIONAL”?

Once again, in a total exercise in futility, I’ll ask: Who is the “silent majority” to whom you refer, and would you please provide proof that they are indeed worthy of the term “majority”?

I confess to being mystified. Exactly what is it that you want the readers of this board to do? Are you asking them to join your “silent majority” (oh, if you would only live up to the adjective you’ve employed!)? Or are you asking them to rise up against you?

But, to get to the point, what the hell do you know about the activities the other members of this board engage in when they’re not engaged in discussion on Piggs? Not a damn thing! And if anyone wanted you to know, they’d contact you directly.

As for the frivolous thoughts to which you disparagingly refer, I’m not sure that posting messages to let people know what kind of dog you own, or model of car you lease doesn’t qualify. Your recent on-the-scene color commentary on the Newt vs HOA smackdown had me all a-tremble thinking about what a badass you must be. Seriously, I’m not sure that a loser who has to ask for help on how to handle problems with his HOA from the frivolous message posters on this board is capable of action that will result in major change in Washington.

But seriously, Newt, you have a shitload of nerve originating a thread like this one, and even more for bringing it up again after a couple years. Not only is it a direct violation of Piggs policy, which was recently reviewed in a highly vocal discussion in which you were fingered as a major offender. But you’re too scared to engage in any sort of discussion on this board. I suspect that your activities as part of “participating in our democracy” consist of exactly what you do here: hit and run. You spread innuendo, half-truths, and outright lies in an attempt to fire people up over nonexistent issues, and then disappear before anyone can corner you and force an explanation.

[quote=NewtoSanDiego] Some of you on this board want to muzzle the truth. Perhaps you can’t handle the truth. NSD[/quote]

Newt, you flatter yourself. No one wants to muzzle the truth. I mean, what TRUTH are you talking about?? You don’t ever say anything worthwhile. You make outlandish statements that appear to have been written by a 14 year-old, and for which there is no evidence.

The only one trying to “muzzle the truth” is YOU. You have repeatedly been asked to provide information or evidence supporting your statements, and you choose not to. It’s more than obvious that you are only too willing to blindly and unquestioningly follow anyone whose rhetoric mirrors your own opinions and biases. That’s your choice. It’s not mine, and it’s not that of many of the posters on this board. And as long as we continue to live in a democracy, I’ll work to ensure that we all have that choice, despite the best efforts of the “NSD-nation” to the contrary.

[quote=NewtoSanDiego] The NSD-nation (NSD like-minded folks who are the silent majority) is gonna be running the local, state and god-willing national government……..you will be perfectly happy just typing away frivilious thoughts on blogs, we will govern you. You will look up one day and say, “what happened?”. We will be smiling. [/quote]

Dude, I read this again, and all I can say is……ignore the voices, and have a Thorazine salt lick installed in your bedroom. It’s not that I disagree with the basic premise. It’s just the elaborately detailed “real life” scenario that’s giving me a major creep vibe.

Exactly how much of your daily routine is devoted to planning NSD-nation’s gleaming-eye moment of triumph?

[eavesdropper]

[quote=NewtoSanDiego] The NSD-nation (NSD like-minded folks who are the silent majority) is gonna be running the local, state and god-willing national government. While we’re out organizing, raising funds, running for school board, city council, state representative, you will be perfectly happy just typing away frivilious thoughts on blogs, we will govern you. You will look up one day and say, “what happened?”. We will be smiling. [/quote]

“The NSD-nation”? Okay, I know I’ll regret this, but I’ll bite. WTF is the “NSD-nation”? Geez, Newt, you can’t spell “frivolous”, but can you spell “DELUSIONAL”?

Once again, in a total exercise in futility, I’ll ask: Who is the “silent majority” to whom you refer, and would you please provide proof that they are indeed worthy of the term “majority”?

I confess to being mystified. Exactly what is it that you want the readers of this board to do? Are you asking them to join your “silent majority” (oh, if you would only live up to the adjective you’ve employed!)? Or are you asking them to rise up against you?

But, to get to the point, what the hell do you know about the activities the other members of this board engage in when they’re not engaged in discussion on Piggs? Not a damn thing! And if anyone wanted you to know, they’d contact you directly.

As for the frivolous thoughts to which you disparagingly refer, I’m not sure that posting messages to let people know what kind of dog you own, or model of car you lease doesn’t qualify. Your recent on-the-scene color commentary on the Newt vs HOA smackdown had me all a-tremble thinking about what a badass you must be. Seriously, I’m not sure that a loser who has to ask for help on how to handle problems with his HOA from the frivolous message posters on this board is capable of action that will result in major change in Washington.

But seriously, Newt, you have a shitload of nerve originating a thread like this one, and even more for bringing it up again after a couple years. Not only is it a direct violation of Piggs policy, which was recently reviewed in a highly vocal discussion in which you were fingered as a major offender. But you’re too scared to engage in any sort of discussion on this board. I suspect that your activities as part of “participating in our democracy” consist of exactly what you do here: hit and run. You spread innuendo, half-truths, and outright lies in an attempt to fire people up over nonexistent issues, and then disappear before anyone can corner you and force an explanation.

[quote=NewtoSanDiego] Some of you on this board want to muzzle the truth. Perhaps you can’t handle the truth. NSD[/quote]

Newt, you flatter yourself. No one wants to muzzle the truth. I mean, what TRUTH are you talking about?? You don’t ever say anything worthwhile. You make outlandish statements that appear to have been written by a 14 year-old, and for which there is no evidence.

The only one trying to “muzzle the truth” is YOU. You have repeatedly been asked to provide information or evidence supporting your statements, and you choose not to. It’s more than obvious that you are only too willing to blindly and unquestioningly follow anyone whose rhetoric mirrors your own opinions and biases. That’s your choice. It’s not mine, and it’s not that of many of the posters on this board. And as long as we continue to live in a democracy, I’ll work to ensure that we all have that choice, despite the best efforts of the “NSD-nation” to the contrary.

[quote=NewtoSanDiego] The NSD-nation (NSD like-minded folks who are the silent majority) is gonna be running the local, state and god-willing national government……..you will be perfectly happy just typing away frivilious thoughts on blogs, we will govern you. You will look up one day and say, “what happened?”. We will be smiling. [/quote]

Dude, I read this again, and all I can say is……ignore the voices, and have a Thorazine salt lick installed in your bedroom. It’s not that I disagree with the basic premise. It’s just the elaborately detailed “real life” scenario that’s giving me a major creep vibe.

Exactly how much of your daily routine is devoted to planning NSD-nation’s gleaming-eye moment of triumph?

[eavesdropper]

I don’t know, flu. Newt’s such an all-out complete loser that I almost feel bad about voting to have him banned.

The only thing he’s really skilled at is being a chickenshit. He lacks the balls to defend any of his views or opinions. While I realize that he has a latex pair attached to the exhaust of his BMW 7 Series, somebody (perhaps from the Tea Party) needs to tell him that they’re not a substitute for the real thing, and that he needs to grow a pair. (Owning a pitbull does not make him a badass, and is not a substitute for the aforementioned pair.)

I’m all for freedom of speech, even Newt’s. But he needs to say something. Spewing out indistinguishably different versions of the same lame statements, insults, and unsupported “evidence” over and over again doesn’t qualify. I don’t think it’s Newt’s speech that Piggs don’t like; they pretty much see it for what it is. It’s just Newt we don’t like.

Why? Not because he’s nasty, or mean, or ill-mannered. It’s because he’s an obsequious, prevaricating, vituperative syncophant. I’d say that he is intellectually pretentious, but that term would imply intellect on Newt’s part, with no correlate evidence.

I say let him stay. Just ignore him if he doesn’t have a big enough nutsack to back up the crap he posts.

[eavesdropper]

I don’t know, flu. Newt’s such an all-out complete loser that I almost feel bad about voting to have him banned.

The only thing he’s really skilled at is being a chickenshit. He lacks the balls to defend any of his views or opinions. While I realize that he has a latex pair attached to the exhaust of his BMW 7 Series, somebody (perhaps from the Tea Party) needs to tell him that they’re not a substitute for the real thing, and that he needs to grow a pair. (Owning a pitbull does not make him a badass, and is not a substitute for the aforementioned pair.)

I’m all for freedom of speech, even Newt’s. But he needs to say something. Spewing out indistinguishably different versions of the same lame statements, insults, and unsupported “evidence” over and over again doesn’t qualify. I don’t think it’s Newt’s speech that Piggs don’t like; they pretty much see it for what it is. It’s just Newt we don’t like.

Why? Not because he’s nasty, or mean, or ill-mannered. It’s because he’s an obsequious, prevaricating, vituperative syncophant. I’d say that he is intellectually pretentious, but that term would imply intellect on Newt’s part, with no correlate evidence.

I say let him stay. Just ignore him if he doesn’t have a big enough nutsack to back up the crap he posts.

[eavesdropper]

I don’t know, flu. Newt’s such an all-out complete loser that I almost feel bad about voting to have him banned.

The only thing he’s really skilled at is being a chickenshit. He lacks the balls to defend any of his views or opinions. While I realize that he has a latex pair attached to the exhaust of his BMW 7 Series, somebody (perhaps from the Tea Party) needs to tell him that they’re not a substitute for the real thing, and that he needs to grow a pair. (Owning a pitbull does not make him a badass, and is not a substitute for the aforementioned pair.)

I’m all for freedom of speech, even Newt’s. But he needs to say something. Spewing out indistinguishably different versions of the same lame statements, insults, and unsupported “evidence” over and over again doesn’t qualify. I don’t think it’s Newt’s speech that Piggs don’t like; they pretty much see it for what it is. It’s just Newt we don’t like.

Why? Not because he’s nasty, or mean, or ill-mannered. It’s because he’s an obsequious, prevaricating, vituperative syncophant. I’d say that he is intellectually pretentious, but that term would imply intellect on Newt’s part, with no correlate evidence.

I say let him stay. Just ignore him if he doesn’t have a big enough nutsack to back up the crap he posts.

[eavesdropper]

I don’t know, flu. Newt’s such an all-out complete loser that I almost feel bad about voting to have him banned.

The only thing he’s really skilled at is being a chickenshit. He lacks the balls to defend any of his views or opinions. While I realize that he has a latex pair attached to the exhaust of his BMW 7 Series, somebody (perhaps from the Tea Party) needs to tell him that they’re not a substitute for the real thing, and that he needs to grow a pair. (Owning a pitbull does not make him a badass, and is not a substitute for the aforementioned pair.)

I’m all for freedom of speech, even Newt’s. But he needs to say something. Spewing out indistinguishably different versions of the same lame statements, insults, and unsupported “evidence” over and over again doesn’t qualify. I don’t think it’s Newt’s speech that Piggs don’t like; they pretty much see it for what it is. It’s just Newt we don’t like.

Why? Not because he’s nasty, or mean, or ill-mannered. It’s because he’s an obsequious, prevaricating, vituperative syncophant. I’d say that he is intellectually pretentious, but that term would imply intellect on Newt’s part, with no correlate evidence.

I say let him stay. Just ignore him if he doesn’t have a big enough nutsack to back up the crap he posts.

[eavesdropper]

I don’t know, flu. Newt’s such an all-out complete loser that I almost feel bad about voting to have him banned.

The only thing he’s really skilled at is being a chickenshit. He lacks the balls to defend any of his views or opinions. While I realize that he has a latex pair attached to the exhaust of his BMW 7 Series, somebody (perhaps from the Tea Party) needs to tell him that they’re not a substitute for the real thing, and that he needs to grow a pair. (Owning a pitbull does not make him a badass, and is not a substitute for the aforementioned pair.)

I’m all for freedom of speech, even Newt’s. But he needs to say something. Spewing out indistinguishably different versions of the same lame statements, insults, and unsupported “evidence” over and over again doesn’t qualify. I don’t think it’s Newt’s speech that Piggs don’t like; they pretty much see it for what it is. It’s just Newt we don’t like.

Why? Not because he’s nasty, or mean, or ill-mannered. It’s because he’s an obsequious, prevaricating, vituperative syncophant. I’d say that he is intellectually pretentious, but that term would imply intellect on Newt’s part, with no correlate evidence.

I say let him stay. Just ignore him if he doesn’t have a big enough nutsack to back up the crap he posts.

[eavesdropper]

[quote=afx114] We had general pre-approval, but nothing specific to the property. Interesting.. wonder if our lender pulled some shenanigans, he knew we were putting in the offer.[/quote]

A lender pulling shenanigans? Shocking to think about, and, fortunately, highly unlikely…..

[eavesdropper]

[quote=afx114] We had general pre-approval, but nothing specific to the property. Interesting.. wonder if our lender pulled some shenanigans, he knew we were putting in the offer.[/quote]

A lender pulling shenanigans? Shocking to think about, and, fortunately, highly unlikely…..

[eavesdropper]

[quote=afx114] We had general pre-approval, but nothing specific to the property. Interesting.. wonder if our lender pulled some shenanigans, he knew we were putting in the offer.[/quote]

A lender pulling shenanigans? Shocking to think about, and, fortunately, highly unlikely…..

[Author]

Posts