[Aecetia]

I found this on the Econbrowser, apparently oil was on $66. a barrel then…. something for the politicos to ponder.

“September 27, 2005
Oil shale report
A number of observers have been pointing to oil shale as the solution to all our energy problems. If oil shale does turn out to be the resource of the future, then our problems are only beginning.

Instapundit sees a ‘plan to put Middle East oil producers out of business’ in this story from the Rocky Mountain News:

[W]ith crude oil above $66 a barrel at the close of trading [on Sept. 20], oil shale is a promising alternative to crude. The Green River shale deposits in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming are estimated to contain 1.5 trillion to 1.8 trillion barrels of oil, and while not all of it can be recovered, half that amount is nearly triple the proven oil reserves of Saudi Arabia.”

[Aecetia]

I found this on the Econbrowser, apparently oil was on $66. a barrel then…. something for the politicos to ponder.

“September 27, 2005
Oil shale report
A number of observers have been pointing to oil shale as the solution to all our energy problems. If oil shale does turn out to be the resource of the future, then our problems are only beginning.

Instapundit sees a ‘plan to put Middle East oil producers out of business’ in this story from the Rocky Mountain News:

[W]ith crude oil above $66 a barrel at the close of trading [on Sept. 20], oil shale is a promising alternative to crude. The Green River shale deposits in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming are estimated to contain 1.5 trillion to 1.8 trillion barrels of oil, and while not all of it can be recovered, half that amount is nearly triple the proven oil reserves of Saudi Arabia.”

[Aecetia]

I found this on the Econbrowser, apparently oil was on $66. a barrel then…. something for the politicos to ponder.

“September 27, 2005
Oil shale report
A number of observers have been pointing to oil shale as the solution to all our energy problems. If oil shale does turn out to be the resource of the future, then our problems are only beginning.

Instapundit sees a ‘plan to put Middle East oil producers out of business’ in this story from the Rocky Mountain News:

[W]ith crude oil above $66 a barrel at the close of trading [on Sept. 20], oil shale is a promising alternative to crude. The Green River shale deposits in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming are estimated to contain 1.5 trillion to 1.8 trillion barrels of oil, and while not all of it can be recovered, half that amount is nearly triple the proven oil reserves of Saudi Arabia.”

[Aecetia]

Perhaps Congress should sponsor shale oil development, now that it is more affordable (at the current cost of oil). That should limit the oil hegemony.

[Aecetia]

Perhaps Congress should sponsor shale oil development, now that it is more affordable (at the current cost of oil). That should limit the oil hegemony.

[Aecetia]

Perhaps Congress should sponsor shale oil development, now that it is more affordable (at the current cost of oil). That should limit the oil hegemony.

[Aecetia]

Perhaps Congress should sponsor shale oil development, now that it is more affordable (at the current cost of oil). That should limit the oil hegemony.

[Aecetia]

Perhaps Congress should sponsor shale oil development, now that it is more affordable (at the current cost of oil). That should limit the oil hegemony.

[Aecetia]

Not my thread, I just had some opinions about 4S. I live in another fire prone area and will evacuate if the next fire gets close enough. I think most of the County is vulnerable and the areas that are next to national forest or brush that has not burned in several years will eventually burn during the next round of fires. It is just the law of probability.

[Aecetia]

Not my thread, I just had some opinions about 4S. I live in another fire prone area and will evacuate if the next fire gets close enough. I think most of the County is vulnerable and the areas that are next to national forest or brush that has not burned in several years will eventually burn during the next round of fires. It is just the law of probability.

[Aecetia]

Not my thread, I just had some opinions about 4S. I live in another fire prone area and will evacuate if the next fire gets close enough. I think most of the County is vulnerable and the areas that are next to national forest or brush that has not burned in several years will eventually burn during the next round of fires. It is just the law of probability.

[Aecetia]

Not my thread, I just had some opinions about 4S. I live in another fire prone area and will evacuate if the next fire gets close enough. I think most of the County is vulnerable and the areas that are next to national forest or brush that has not burned in several years will eventually burn during the next round of fires. It is just the law of probability.

[Aecetia]

Not my thread, I just had some opinions about 4S. I live in another fire prone area and will evacuate if the next fire gets close enough. I think most of the County is vulnerable and the areas that are next to national forest or brush that has not burned in several years will eventually burn during the next round of fires. It is just the law of probability.

[Aecetia]

I think Temecula Guy is really one of the main characters from Office Space: “The thing is, Bob, it’s not that I’m lazy, it’s that I just don’t care.” The way things are going, someone will just donate their house to him because he is so darn funny.

Wake up Felix, the bubble has popped, the ship has sailed.

[Aecetia]

I think Temecula Guy is really one of the main characters from Office Space: “The thing is, Bob, it’s not that I’m lazy, it’s that I just don’t care.” The way things are going, someone will just donate their house to him because he is so darn funny.

Wake up Felix, the bubble has popped, the ship has sailed.

[Author]

Posts