Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Ivy Gate massacre
- This topic has 115 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 6 months ago by
kcal09.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
February 27, 2008 at 2:38 AM #11939
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:23 AM #160557
Navydoc
ParticipantI know someone who lives in this community, and we’ve looked at the sample homes. The people I know bought with 100% no-doc financing, and are currenty paying option 1 every month. A couple of times a week I check to see if their house is listed.
There was every bit as much Kool-Aide in this neighborhood as anywhere else, maybe more, as people with real money probably wouldn’t be interested in living in this area.
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:23 AM #160850
Navydoc
ParticipantI know someone who lives in this community, and we’ve looked at the sample homes. The people I know bought with 100% no-doc financing, and are currenty paying option 1 every month. A couple of times a week I check to see if their house is listed.
There was every bit as much Kool-Aide in this neighborhood as anywhere else, maybe more, as people with real money probably wouldn’t be interested in living in this area.
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:23 AM #160865
Navydoc
ParticipantI know someone who lives in this community, and we’ve looked at the sample homes. The people I know bought with 100% no-doc financing, and are currenty paying option 1 every month. A couple of times a week I check to see if their house is listed.
There was every bit as much Kool-Aide in this neighborhood as anywhere else, maybe more, as people with real money probably wouldn’t be interested in living in this area.
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:23 AM #160885
Navydoc
ParticipantI know someone who lives in this community, and we’ve looked at the sample homes. The people I know bought with 100% no-doc financing, and are currenty paying option 1 every month. A couple of times a week I check to see if their house is listed.
There was every bit as much Kool-Aide in this neighborhood as anywhere else, maybe more, as people with real money probably wouldn’t be interested in living in this area.
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:23 AM #160951
Navydoc
ParticipantI know someone who lives in this community, and we’ve looked at the sample homes. The people I know bought with 100% no-doc financing, and are currenty paying option 1 every month. A couple of times a week I check to see if their house is listed.
There was every bit as much Kool-Aide in this neighborhood as anywhere else, maybe more, as people with real money probably wouldn’t be interested in living in this area.
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:43 AM #160562
Coronita
Participantdumb question..
So I am curious if/when prices come down in 4S such that properties actually pencils in as a possible rental (I know, not likely in this particular community and a long way to go in 4s ranc), would folks be adverse to owning a rental in 4s, given the past wildfires in san diego?
I know that it probably isn't worth worrying about too much. But I'm just thinking if I had a rental out there, it would suck if every so often I needed to worry about a brush fire.
I'm leaning more towards MM as possible rental income. (1) being that it seems like pricing is coming down faster (2) it seems more convenient into companies in sorrento valley area (3) less brush fire worries.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
February 27, 2008 at 7:47 AM #160571
Raybyrnes
ParticipantThis raises a second question, Can you insure you loss of income in the event of the fire. If you are using the rensts to cover a portion of the mortgage then I would think that you would not only have to insure the property but would also have to carry a policy that would insure the income for 24 months. Otherwise you would need to carry a reserve equal to 2 years rent to offset this type of risk.
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:18 AM #160616
Bugs
ParticipantAs far as rentals go, it seems to me that you’ll find the most favorable relationship between rents and sale prices in the lower priced neighborhoods. If a 3bd home in 92113 rents for $1,700 and sells for under $280k, why would you bother with a $500k home in 92126 that only rents for a couple hundred bucks more?
The pool of renters at $1700/mo is a lot larger than the pool of renters at $2,000, let alone $2,500.
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:56 AM #160666
SD Realtor
ParticipantActually Bugs we are seeing prices for 3/2 in MM at the 400k and below level now. As bad as people talk about MM it is a step up above 92113.
However people who are serious about generating income from rentals would be well served to listen to your point which is to use as little of your own money as possible.
In terms of my own search for possible rental investments I am sitting on the sidelines for awhile now. IMO San Diego does not pose many viable opportunity for rentals yet but they are slowly getting there. Actually Temec will get their first.
SD Realtor
-
February 27, 2008 at 10:30 AM #160776
EconProf
ParticipantBobS
I bicycle through that neighborhood occassionally, and yes, there are a lot of houses for sale there.
They were all sold at the peak of the bubble, and probably with lots of leverage, so will take the biggest hits now on the downside.
They also strike me as the kind of product that will be shunned in the future…monster houses close together with crowded streetscapes. Recessions always force a healthy downsizing of our appetites, something we Americans can use right now.
Also, they would be terrible rentals…do the numbers on costs vs. rents and they make no sense whatsoever. -
February 27, 2008 at 10:40 AM #160786
Aecetia
ParticipantFYI- Fire issues were discussed at length on this thread:
4 closure Ranch errr scratch that “Fire proof” Ranch = new nickname for 4S Ranch
User Forum Topic
Submitted by 4Sbuyer2002 on October 25, 2007 – 9:36pm.
Looks like, per Rancho Santa Fe fire chief, 4S Ranch is deserving of a new nickname. (it should really read “Fire resistant” Ranch but “Fire Proof” Ranch is more catchy . . . don’t you think???? -
February 27, 2008 at 11:57 AM #160842
Coronita
ParticipantAh yes, I remember that thread that you started awhile ago. I don't care about how fire-resistant a house can be. If it's in a fire zone, it's in a fire zone. period. No house (unless made out of concrete completely) is fireproof. I guess the issue I have is as a rental, financially 4s doesn't make sense it seems.
But even if the dollars do line up in the future, I'm just wondering if there are others that would consider 4s as rental, given the past firestorms we had, and the risk these communities are in this firezone….because I don't think it's the last firestorm we will see.
 I'm wondering how insurance deals with rental income lost from a firestorm. I know that insurance companies were paying homeowners loss of use compensation from the fires, but wondering how rental properties were compensated (if at all).
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
February 27, 2008 at 12:18 PM #160851
patientlywaiting
ParticipantThere’s a condo converter who lives in that neighborhood. He’s not developing much these days.
-
February 27, 2008 at 12:18 PM #161146
patientlywaiting
ParticipantThere’s a condo converter who lives in that neighborhood. He’s not developing much these days.
-
February 27, 2008 at 12:18 PM #161162
patientlywaiting
ParticipantThere’s a condo converter who lives in that neighborhood. He’s not developing much these days.
-
February 27, 2008 at 12:18 PM #161180
patientlywaiting
ParticipantThere’s a condo converter who lives in that neighborhood. He’s not developing much these days.
-
February 27, 2008 at 12:18 PM #161249
patientlywaiting
ParticipantThere’s a condo converter who lives in that neighborhood. He’s not developing much these days.
-
February 27, 2008 at 12:29 PM #160857
LAAFTERHOURS
Participant4s Renter
Ivy gate is part of the 4s master plan. http://www.4sranch.com
As far as insurance companies go, usually part of your insurance policy covers lost income – they set reserves to hedge against this type of claim. I guess it depends on the limits set forth in your policy but usually this should be part of the homeowners, if you in fact run a business or utilize the property for business income.
-
February 27, 2008 at 4:26 PM #161178
gracie
ParticipantI noticed that someone in this community filed for bankruptcy….What does that do? Can you still lose your home? Or by filing bankruptcy does that protect you from losing your home?
-
February 27, 2008 at 5:45 PM #161250
Aecetia
ParticipantNot my thread, I just had some opinions about 4S. I live in another fire prone area and will evacuate if the next fire gets close enough. I think most of the County is vulnerable and the areas that are next to national forest or brush that has not burned in several years will eventually burn during the next round of fires. It is just the law of probability.
-
February 27, 2008 at 5:45 PM #161548
Aecetia
ParticipantNot my thread, I just had some opinions about 4S. I live in another fire prone area and will evacuate if the next fire gets close enough. I think most of the County is vulnerable and the areas that are next to national forest or brush that has not burned in several years will eventually burn during the next round of fires. It is just the law of probability.
-
February 27, 2008 at 5:45 PM #161561
Aecetia
ParticipantNot my thread, I just had some opinions about 4S. I live in another fire prone area and will evacuate if the next fire gets close enough. I think most of the County is vulnerable and the areas that are next to national forest or brush that has not burned in several years will eventually burn during the next round of fires. It is just the law of probability.
-
February 27, 2008 at 5:45 PM #161580
Aecetia
ParticipantNot my thread, I just had some opinions about 4S. I live in another fire prone area and will evacuate if the next fire gets close enough. I think most of the County is vulnerable and the areas that are next to national forest or brush that has not burned in several years will eventually burn during the next round of fires. It is just the law of probability.
-
February 27, 2008 at 5:45 PM #161647
Aecetia
ParticipantNot my thread, I just had some opinions about 4S. I live in another fire prone area and will evacuate if the next fire gets close enough. I think most of the County is vulnerable and the areas that are next to national forest or brush that has not burned in several years will eventually burn during the next round of fires. It is just the law of probability.
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:30 PM #161302
Eugene
ParticipantAs far as I know, filing for bankruptcy temporarily stops the foreclosure process and allows you to get back on track with your mortgage payments. Mortgage debt is not wiped and bankruptcy courts can’t modify loan terms (e.g. reduce the amount owed). All that happens is that you’re not kicked out while your case is decided, and then you get a second chance.. If you’re behind on your payments, you can work out a 3-5 year repayment plan.
Obviously does not do you much good (long-term) if you got yourself in an option ARM or your monthly payment is 60% of your net income. But if you’re a responsible buyer, there’s light at the end of the tunnel.
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:38 PM #161317
jpinpb
ParticipantBut I heard today that they’re talking about BK judge rewriting home loans and banks raising hell about it.
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:58 PM #161387
gracie
ParticipantThat is interesting info on bankruptcies….My question is why isn’t more people doing the same thing? Is there a surge in the bankruptcies? It was noted in an earlier post that only one homeowner in this community filed for bankrupcty….why wouldn’t the rest of the homeowners do the same if they also are in trouble?
-
February 27, 2008 at 10:18 PM #161446
gn
Participantgracie,
Bankruptcy is much more serious (in term of damage to credit) than foreclosure. For a homeowner who knows that he is “underwater” & has no chance of keeping his house, there’s no use in declaring bankruptcy just to delay the foreclosure. It’s better have foreclosure than bankruptcy.
-
February 28, 2008 at 5:47 AM #161599
gracie
ParticipantThanks for the explanation…..I did not realize that bankruptcy was more serious than a foreclosure…I thought they both did similiar damage to your credit.
-
March 6, 2008 at 9:29 AM #164878
jpinpb
ParticipantI think Ivy Gate should be called Poison Ivy Gate.
-
March 6, 2008 at 9:29 AM #165191
jpinpb
ParticipantI think Ivy Gate should be called Poison Ivy Gate.
-
March 6, 2008 at 9:29 AM #165199
jpinpb
ParticipantI think Ivy Gate should be called Poison Ivy Gate.
-
March 6, 2008 at 9:29 AM #165207
jpinpb
ParticipantI think Ivy Gate should be called Poison Ivy Gate.
-
March 6, 2008 at 9:29 AM #165293
jpinpb
ParticipantI think Ivy Gate should be called Poison Ivy Gate.
-
February 28, 2008 at 5:47 AM #161891
gracie
ParticipantThanks for the explanation…..I did not realize that bankruptcy was more serious than a foreclosure…I thought they both did similiar damage to your credit.
-
February 28, 2008 at 5:47 AM #161908
gracie
ParticipantThanks for the explanation…..I did not realize that bankruptcy was more serious than a foreclosure…I thought they both did similiar damage to your credit.
-
February 28, 2008 at 5:47 AM #161925
gracie
ParticipantThanks for the explanation…..I did not realize that bankruptcy was more serious than a foreclosure…I thought they both did similiar damage to your credit.
-
February 28, 2008 at 5:47 AM #161994
gracie
ParticipantThanks for the explanation…..I did not realize that bankruptcy was more serious than a foreclosure…I thought they both did similiar damage to your credit.
-
February 27, 2008 at 10:18 PM #161743
gn
Participantgracie,
Bankruptcy is much more serious (in term of damage to credit) than foreclosure. For a homeowner who knows that he is “underwater” & has no chance of keeping his house, there’s no use in declaring bankruptcy just to delay the foreclosure. It’s better have foreclosure than bankruptcy.
-
February 27, 2008 at 10:18 PM #161757
gn
Participantgracie,
Bankruptcy is much more serious (in term of damage to credit) than foreclosure. For a homeowner who knows that he is “underwater” & has no chance of keeping his house, there’s no use in declaring bankruptcy just to delay the foreclosure. It’s better have foreclosure than bankruptcy.
-
February 27, 2008 at 10:18 PM #161776
gn
Participantgracie,
Bankruptcy is much more serious (in term of damage to credit) than foreclosure. For a homeowner who knows that he is “underwater” & has no chance of keeping his house, there’s no use in declaring bankruptcy just to delay the foreclosure. It’s better have foreclosure than bankruptcy.
-
February 27, 2008 at 10:18 PM #161844
gn
Participantgracie,
Bankruptcy is much more serious (in term of damage to credit) than foreclosure. For a homeowner who knows that he is “underwater” & has no chance of keeping his house, there’s no use in declaring bankruptcy just to delay the foreclosure. It’s better have foreclosure than bankruptcy.
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:58 PM #161683
gracie
ParticipantThat is interesting info on bankruptcies….My question is why isn’t more people doing the same thing? Is there a surge in the bankruptcies? It was noted in an earlier post that only one homeowner in this community filed for bankrupcty….why wouldn’t the rest of the homeowners do the same if they also are in trouble?
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:58 PM #161697
gracie
ParticipantThat is interesting info on bankruptcies….My question is why isn’t more people doing the same thing? Is there a surge in the bankruptcies? It was noted in an earlier post that only one homeowner in this community filed for bankrupcty….why wouldn’t the rest of the homeowners do the same if they also are in trouble?
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:58 PM #161716
gracie
ParticipantThat is interesting info on bankruptcies….My question is why isn’t more people doing the same thing? Is there a surge in the bankruptcies? It was noted in an earlier post that only one homeowner in this community filed for bankrupcty….why wouldn’t the rest of the homeowners do the same if they also are in trouble?
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:58 PM #161784
gracie
ParticipantThat is interesting info on bankruptcies….My question is why isn’t more people doing the same thing? Is there a surge in the bankruptcies? It was noted in an earlier post that only one homeowner in this community filed for bankrupcty….why wouldn’t the rest of the homeowners do the same if they also are in trouble?
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:38 PM #161611
jpinpb
ParticipantBut I heard today that they’re talking about BK judge rewriting home loans and banks raising hell about it.
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:38 PM #161628
jpinpb
ParticipantBut I heard today that they’re talking about BK judge rewriting home loans and banks raising hell about it.
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:38 PM #161645
jpinpb
ParticipantBut I heard today that they’re talking about BK judge rewriting home loans and banks raising hell about it.
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:38 PM #161714
jpinpb
ParticipantBut I heard today that they’re talking about BK judge rewriting home loans and banks raising hell about it.
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:30 PM #161598
Eugene
ParticipantAs far as I know, filing for bankruptcy temporarily stops the foreclosure process and allows you to get back on track with your mortgage payments. Mortgage debt is not wiped and bankruptcy courts can’t modify loan terms (e.g. reduce the amount owed). All that happens is that you’re not kicked out while your case is decided, and then you get a second chance.. If you’re behind on your payments, you can work out a 3-5 year repayment plan.
Obviously does not do you much good (long-term) if you got yourself in an option ARM or your monthly payment is 60% of your net income. But if you’re a responsible buyer, there’s light at the end of the tunnel.
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:30 PM #161612
Eugene
ParticipantAs far as I know, filing for bankruptcy temporarily stops the foreclosure process and allows you to get back on track with your mortgage payments. Mortgage debt is not wiped and bankruptcy courts can’t modify loan terms (e.g. reduce the amount owed). All that happens is that you’re not kicked out while your case is decided, and then you get a second chance.. If you’re behind on your payments, you can work out a 3-5 year repayment plan.
Obviously does not do you much good (long-term) if you got yourself in an option ARM or your monthly payment is 60% of your net income. But if you’re a responsible buyer, there’s light at the end of the tunnel.
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:30 PM #161630
Eugene
ParticipantAs far as I know, filing for bankruptcy temporarily stops the foreclosure process and allows you to get back on track with your mortgage payments. Mortgage debt is not wiped and bankruptcy courts can’t modify loan terms (e.g. reduce the amount owed). All that happens is that you’re not kicked out while your case is decided, and then you get a second chance.. If you’re behind on your payments, you can work out a 3-5 year repayment plan.
Obviously does not do you much good (long-term) if you got yourself in an option ARM or your monthly payment is 60% of your net income. But if you’re a responsible buyer, there’s light at the end of the tunnel.
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:30 PM #161699
Eugene
ParticipantAs far as I know, filing for bankruptcy temporarily stops the foreclosure process and allows you to get back on track with your mortgage payments. Mortgage debt is not wiped and bankruptcy courts can’t modify loan terms (e.g. reduce the amount owed). All that happens is that you’re not kicked out while your case is decided, and then you get a second chance.. If you’re behind on your payments, you can work out a 3-5 year repayment plan.
Obviously does not do you much good (long-term) if you got yourself in an option ARM or your monthly payment is 60% of your net income. But if you’re a responsible buyer, there’s light at the end of the tunnel.
-
February 27, 2008 at 4:26 PM #161473
gracie
ParticipantI noticed that someone in this community filed for bankruptcy….What does that do? Can you still lose your home? Or by filing bankruptcy does that protect you from losing your home?
-
February 27, 2008 at 4:26 PM #161487
gracie
ParticipantI noticed that someone in this community filed for bankruptcy….What does that do? Can you still lose your home? Or by filing bankruptcy does that protect you from losing your home?
-
February 27, 2008 at 4:26 PM #161507
gracie
ParticipantI noticed that someone in this community filed for bankruptcy….What does that do? Can you still lose your home? Or by filing bankruptcy does that protect you from losing your home?
-
February 27, 2008 at 4:26 PM #161572
gracie
ParticipantI noticed that someone in this community filed for bankruptcy….What does that do? Can you still lose your home? Or by filing bankruptcy does that protect you from losing your home?
-
February 27, 2008 at 12:29 PM #161151
LAAFTERHOURS
Participant4s Renter
Ivy gate is part of the 4s master plan. http://www.4sranch.com
As far as insurance companies go, usually part of your insurance policy covers lost income – they set reserves to hedge against this type of claim. I guess it depends on the limits set forth in your policy but usually this should be part of the homeowners, if you in fact run a business or utilize the property for business income.
-
February 27, 2008 at 12:29 PM #161167
LAAFTERHOURS
Participant4s Renter
Ivy gate is part of the 4s master plan. http://www.4sranch.com
As far as insurance companies go, usually part of your insurance policy covers lost income – they set reserves to hedge against this type of claim. I guess it depends on the limits set forth in your policy but usually this should be part of the homeowners, if you in fact run a business or utilize the property for business income.
-
February 27, 2008 at 12:29 PM #161185
LAAFTERHOURS
Participant4s Renter
Ivy gate is part of the 4s master plan. http://www.4sranch.com
As far as insurance companies go, usually part of your insurance policy covers lost income – they set reserves to hedge against this type of claim. I guess it depends on the limits set forth in your policy but usually this should be part of the homeowners, if you in fact run a business or utilize the property for business income.
-
February 27, 2008 at 12:29 PM #161254
LAAFTERHOURS
Participant4s Renter
Ivy gate is part of the 4s master plan. http://www.4sranch.com
As far as insurance companies go, usually part of your insurance policy covers lost income – they set reserves to hedge against this type of claim. I guess it depends on the limits set forth in your policy but usually this should be part of the homeowners, if you in fact run a business or utilize the property for business income.
-
March 6, 2008 at 9:41 AM #164893
surveyor
Participantlost income and insurance
I’m wondering how insurance deals with rental income lost from a firestorm. I know that insurance companies were paying homeowners loss of use compensation from the fires, but wondering how rental properties were compensated (if at all).
It depends on whether a lender will require rental income protection (and I can only speak to my own situation, as that I am not an authority on insurance and its intricacies). I was only required to have income protection on my commercial/residential property. From my understanding of the policy, yes, the insurance would cover certain expenses if a disaster (such as a fire) destroyed the property.
My SFRs do not have income protection, but the insurance does cover the lender in case of a fire…
(I’d have to re-read the insurance policy that I have, I dont’ have all the details in mind).
-
March 22, 2008 at 9:58 AM #174659
jpinpb
ParticipantHave you guys read the update on Poison Ivy Gate?
http://bubbletracking.blogspot.com/2008/03/three-stooges-of-ivy-gate.html -
March 24, 2008 at 10:10 PM #175805
gracie
Participantwow…I feel sorry for the folks who bought into this development….
-
August 29, 2010 at 8:08 PM #597214
kcal09
ParticipantActually, I went to Ivy Gate this weekend to see an open house (short sale). Some of the homes are vacant and the front yards are overgrown and neglected. It’s a very sad sight!
-
August 29, 2010 at 8:08 PM #597311
kcal09
ParticipantActually, I went to Ivy Gate this weekend to see an open house (short sale). Some of the homes are vacant and the front yards are overgrown and neglected. It’s a very sad sight!
-
August 29, 2010 at 8:08 PM #597855
kcal09
ParticipantActually, I went to Ivy Gate this weekend to see an open house (short sale). Some of the homes are vacant and the front yards are overgrown and neglected. It’s a very sad sight!
-
August 29, 2010 at 8:08 PM #597964
kcal09
ParticipantActually, I went to Ivy Gate this weekend to see an open house (short sale). Some of the homes are vacant and the front yards are overgrown and neglected. It’s a very sad sight!
-
August 29, 2010 at 8:08 PM #598283
kcal09
ParticipantActually, I went to Ivy Gate this weekend to see an open house (short sale). Some of the homes are vacant and the front yards are overgrown and neglected. It’s a very sad sight!
-
March 24, 2008 at 10:10 PM #176155
gracie
Participantwow…I feel sorry for the folks who bought into this development….
-
March 24, 2008 at 10:10 PM #176159
gracie
Participantwow…I feel sorry for the folks who bought into this development….
-
March 24, 2008 at 10:10 PM #176164
gracie
Participantwow…I feel sorry for the folks who bought into this development….
-
March 24, 2008 at 10:10 PM #176255
gracie
Participantwow…I feel sorry for the folks who bought into this development….
-
March 22, 2008 at 9:58 AM #175008
jpinpb
ParticipantHave you guys read the update on Poison Ivy Gate?
http://bubbletracking.blogspot.com/2008/03/three-stooges-of-ivy-gate.html -
March 22, 2008 at 9:58 AM #175012
jpinpb
ParticipantHave you guys read the update on Poison Ivy Gate?
http://bubbletracking.blogspot.com/2008/03/three-stooges-of-ivy-gate.html -
March 22, 2008 at 9:58 AM #175019
jpinpb
ParticipantHave you guys read the update on Poison Ivy Gate?
http://bubbletracking.blogspot.com/2008/03/three-stooges-of-ivy-gate.html -
March 22, 2008 at 9:58 AM #175108
jpinpb
ParticipantHave you guys read the update on Poison Ivy Gate?
http://bubbletracking.blogspot.com/2008/03/three-stooges-of-ivy-gate.html -
March 6, 2008 at 9:41 AM #165206
surveyor
Participantlost income and insurance
I’m wondering how insurance deals with rental income lost from a firestorm. I know that insurance companies were paying homeowners loss of use compensation from the fires, but wondering how rental properties were compensated (if at all).
It depends on whether a lender will require rental income protection (and I can only speak to my own situation, as that I am not an authority on insurance and its intricacies). I was only required to have income protection on my commercial/residential property. From my understanding of the policy, yes, the insurance would cover certain expenses if a disaster (such as a fire) destroyed the property.
My SFRs do not have income protection, but the insurance does cover the lender in case of a fire…
(I’d have to re-read the insurance policy that I have, I dont’ have all the details in mind).
-
March 6, 2008 at 9:41 AM #165214
surveyor
Participantlost income and insurance
I’m wondering how insurance deals with rental income lost from a firestorm. I know that insurance companies were paying homeowners loss of use compensation from the fires, but wondering how rental properties were compensated (if at all).
It depends on whether a lender will require rental income protection (and I can only speak to my own situation, as that I am not an authority on insurance and its intricacies). I was only required to have income protection on my commercial/residential property. From my understanding of the policy, yes, the insurance would cover certain expenses if a disaster (such as a fire) destroyed the property.
My SFRs do not have income protection, but the insurance does cover the lender in case of a fire…
(I’d have to re-read the insurance policy that I have, I dont’ have all the details in mind).
-
March 6, 2008 at 9:41 AM #165222
surveyor
Participantlost income and insurance
I’m wondering how insurance deals with rental income lost from a firestorm. I know that insurance companies were paying homeowners loss of use compensation from the fires, but wondering how rental properties were compensated (if at all).
It depends on whether a lender will require rental income protection (and I can only speak to my own situation, as that I am not an authority on insurance and its intricacies). I was only required to have income protection on my commercial/residential property. From my understanding of the policy, yes, the insurance would cover certain expenses if a disaster (such as a fire) destroyed the property.
My SFRs do not have income protection, but the insurance does cover the lender in case of a fire…
(I’d have to re-read the insurance policy that I have, I dont’ have all the details in mind).
-
March 6, 2008 at 9:41 AM #165308
surveyor
Participantlost income and insurance
I’m wondering how insurance deals with rental income lost from a firestorm. I know that insurance companies were paying homeowners loss of use compensation from the fires, but wondering how rental properties were compensated (if at all).
It depends on whether a lender will require rental income protection (and I can only speak to my own situation, as that I am not an authority on insurance and its intricacies). I was only required to have income protection on my commercial/residential property. From my understanding of the policy, yes, the insurance would cover certain expenses if a disaster (such as a fire) destroyed the property.
My SFRs do not have income protection, but the insurance does cover the lender in case of a fire…
(I’d have to re-read the insurance policy that I have, I dont’ have all the details in mind).
-
February 27, 2008 at 11:57 AM #161135
Coronita
ParticipantAh yes, I remember that thread that you started awhile ago. I don't care about how fire-resistant a house can be. If it's in a fire zone, it's in a fire zone. period. No house (unless made out of concrete completely) is fireproof. I guess the issue I have is as a rental, financially 4s doesn't make sense it seems.
But even if the dollars do line up in the future, I'm just wondering if there are others that would consider 4s as rental, given the past firestorms we had, and the risk these communities are in this firezone….because I don't think it's the last firestorm we will see.
 I'm wondering how insurance deals with rental income lost from a firestorm. I know that insurance companies were paying homeowners loss of use compensation from the fires, but wondering how rental properties were compensated (if at all).
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
February 27, 2008 at 11:57 AM #161152
Coronita
ParticipantAh yes, I remember that thread that you started awhile ago. I don't care about how fire-resistant a house can be. If it's in a fire zone, it's in a fire zone. period. No house (unless made out of concrete completely) is fireproof. I guess the issue I have is as a rental, financially 4s doesn't make sense it seems.
But even if the dollars do line up in the future, I'm just wondering if there are others that would consider 4s as rental, given the past firestorms we had, and the risk these communities are in this firezone….because I don't think it's the last firestorm we will see.
 I'm wondering how insurance deals with rental income lost from a firestorm. I know that insurance companies were paying homeowners loss of use compensation from the fires, but wondering how rental properties were compensated (if at all).
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
February 27, 2008 at 11:57 AM #161170
Coronita
ParticipantAh yes, I remember that thread that you started awhile ago. I don't care about how fire-resistant a house can be. If it's in a fire zone, it's in a fire zone. period. No house (unless made out of concrete completely) is fireproof. I guess the issue I have is as a rental, financially 4s doesn't make sense it seems.
But even if the dollars do line up in the future, I'm just wondering if there are others that would consider 4s as rental, given the past firestorms we had, and the risk these communities are in this firezone….because I don't think it's the last firestorm we will see.
 I'm wondering how insurance deals with rental income lost from a firestorm. I know that insurance companies were paying homeowners loss of use compensation from the fires, but wondering how rental properties were compensated (if at all).
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
February 27, 2008 at 11:57 AM #161239
Coronita
ParticipantAh yes, I remember that thread that you started awhile ago. I don't care about how fire-resistant a house can be. If it's in a fire zone, it's in a fire zone. period. No house (unless made out of concrete completely) is fireproof. I guess the issue I have is as a rental, financially 4s doesn't make sense it seems.
But even if the dollars do line up in the future, I'm just wondering if there are others that would consider 4s as rental, given the past firestorms we had, and the risk these communities are in this firezone….because I don't think it's the last firestorm we will see.
 I'm wondering how insurance deals with rental income lost from a firestorm. I know that insurance companies were paying homeowners loss of use compensation from the fires, but wondering how rental properties were compensated (if at all).
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
February 27, 2008 at 10:40 AM #161080
Aecetia
ParticipantFYI- Fire issues were discussed at length on this thread:
4 closure Ranch errr scratch that “Fire proof” Ranch = new nickname for 4S Ranch
User Forum Topic
Submitted by 4Sbuyer2002 on October 25, 2007 – 9:36pm.
Looks like, per Rancho Santa Fe fire chief, 4S Ranch is deserving of a new nickname. (it should really read “Fire resistant” Ranch but “Fire Proof” Ranch is more catchy . . . don’t you think???? -
February 27, 2008 at 10:40 AM #161097
Aecetia
ParticipantFYI- Fire issues were discussed at length on this thread:
4 closure Ranch errr scratch that “Fire proof” Ranch = new nickname for 4S Ranch
User Forum Topic
Submitted by 4Sbuyer2002 on October 25, 2007 – 9:36pm.
Looks like, per Rancho Santa Fe fire chief, 4S Ranch is deserving of a new nickname. (it should really read “Fire resistant” Ranch but “Fire Proof” Ranch is more catchy . . . don’t you think???? -
February 27, 2008 at 10:40 AM #161115
Aecetia
ParticipantFYI- Fire issues were discussed at length on this thread:
4 closure Ranch errr scratch that “Fire proof” Ranch = new nickname for 4S Ranch
User Forum Topic
Submitted by 4Sbuyer2002 on October 25, 2007 – 9:36pm.
Looks like, per Rancho Santa Fe fire chief, 4S Ranch is deserving of a new nickname. (it should really read “Fire resistant” Ranch but “Fire Proof” Ranch is more catchy . . . don’t you think???? -
February 27, 2008 at 10:40 AM #161184
Aecetia
ParticipantFYI- Fire issues were discussed at length on this thread:
4 closure Ranch errr scratch that “Fire proof” Ranch = new nickname for 4S Ranch
User Forum Topic
Submitted by 4Sbuyer2002 on October 25, 2007 – 9:36pm.
Looks like, per Rancho Santa Fe fire chief, 4S Ranch is deserving of a new nickname. (it should really read “Fire resistant” Ranch but “Fire Proof” Ranch is more catchy . . . don’t you think???? -
February 27, 2008 at 10:30 AM #161071
EconProf
ParticipantBobS
I bicycle through that neighborhood occassionally, and yes, there are a lot of houses for sale there.
They were all sold at the peak of the bubble, and probably with lots of leverage, so will take the biggest hits now on the downside.
They also strike me as the kind of product that will be shunned in the future…monster houses close together with crowded streetscapes. Recessions always force a healthy downsizing of our appetites, something we Americans can use right now.
Also, they would be terrible rentals…do the numbers on costs vs. rents and they make no sense whatsoever. -
February 27, 2008 at 10:30 AM #161088
EconProf
ParticipantBobS
I bicycle through that neighborhood occassionally, and yes, there are a lot of houses for sale there.
They were all sold at the peak of the bubble, and probably with lots of leverage, so will take the biggest hits now on the downside.
They also strike me as the kind of product that will be shunned in the future…monster houses close together with crowded streetscapes. Recessions always force a healthy downsizing of our appetites, something we Americans can use right now.
Also, they would be terrible rentals…do the numbers on costs vs. rents and they make no sense whatsoever. -
February 27, 2008 at 10:30 AM #161105
EconProf
ParticipantBobS
I bicycle through that neighborhood occassionally, and yes, there are a lot of houses for sale there.
They were all sold at the peak of the bubble, and probably with lots of leverage, so will take the biggest hits now on the downside.
They also strike me as the kind of product that will be shunned in the future…monster houses close together with crowded streetscapes. Recessions always force a healthy downsizing of our appetites, something we Americans can use right now.
Also, they would be terrible rentals…do the numbers on costs vs. rents and they make no sense whatsoever. -
February 27, 2008 at 10:30 AM #161174
EconProf
ParticipantBobS
I bicycle through that neighborhood occassionally, and yes, there are a lot of houses for sale there.
They were all sold at the peak of the bubble, and probably with lots of leverage, so will take the biggest hits now on the downside.
They also strike me as the kind of product that will be shunned in the future…monster houses close together with crowded streetscapes. Recessions always force a healthy downsizing of our appetites, something we Americans can use right now.
Also, they would be terrible rentals…do the numbers on costs vs. rents and they make no sense whatsoever. -
February 27, 2008 at 8:56 AM #160964
SD Realtor
ParticipantActually Bugs we are seeing prices for 3/2 in MM at the 400k and below level now. As bad as people talk about MM it is a step up above 92113.
However people who are serious about generating income from rentals would be well served to listen to your point which is to use as little of your own money as possible.
In terms of my own search for possible rental investments I am sitting on the sidelines for awhile now. IMO San Diego does not pose many viable opportunity for rentals yet but they are slowly getting there. Actually Temec will get their first.
SD Realtor
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:56 AM #160976
SD Realtor
ParticipantActually Bugs we are seeing prices for 3/2 in MM at the 400k and below level now. As bad as people talk about MM it is a step up above 92113.
However people who are serious about generating income from rentals would be well served to listen to your point which is to use as little of your own money as possible.
In terms of my own search for possible rental investments I am sitting on the sidelines for awhile now. IMO San Diego does not pose many viable opportunity for rentals yet but they are slowly getting there. Actually Temec will get their first.
SD Realtor
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:56 AM #160995
SD Realtor
ParticipantActually Bugs we are seeing prices for 3/2 in MM at the 400k and below level now. As bad as people talk about MM it is a step up above 92113.
However people who are serious about generating income from rentals would be well served to listen to your point which is to use as little of your own money as possible.
In terms of my own search for possible rental investments I am sitting on the sidelines for awhile now. IMO San Diego does not pose many viable opportunity for rentals yet but they are slowly getting there. Actually Temec will get their first.
SD Realtor
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:56 AM #161064
SD Realtor
ParticipantActually Bugs we are seeing prices for 3/2 in MM at the 400k and below level now. As bad as people talk about MM it is a step up above 92113.
However people who are serious about generating income from rentals would be well served to listen to your point which is to use as little of your own money as possible.
In terms of my own search for possible rental investments I am sitting on the sidelines for awhile now. IMO San Diego does not pose many viable opportunity for rentals yet but they are slowly getting there. Actually Temec will get their first.
SD Realtor
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:18 AM #160911
Bugs
ParticipantAs far as rentals go, it seems to me that you’ll find the most favorable relationship between rents and sale prices in the lower priced neighborhoods. If a 3bd home in 92113 rents for $1,700 and sells for under $280k, why would you bother with a $500k home in 92126 that only rents for a couple hundred bucks more?
The pool of renters at $1700/mo is a lot larger than the pool of renters at $2,000, let alone $2,500.
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:18 AM #160929
Bugs
ParticipantAs far as rentals go, it seems to me that you’ll find the most favorable relationship between rents and sale prices in the lower priced neighborhoods. If a 3bd home in 92113 rents for $1,700 and sells for under $280k, why would you bother with a $500k home in 92126 that only rents for a couple hundred bucks more?
The pool of renters at $1700/mo is a lot larger than the pool of renters at $2,000, let alone $2,500.
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:18 AM #160945
Bugs
ParticipantAs far as rentals go, it seems to me that you’ll find the most favorable relationship between rents and sale prices in the lower priced neighborhoods. If a 3bd home in 92113 rents for $1,700 and sells for under $280k, why would you bother with a $500k home in 92126 that only rents for a couple hundred bucks more?
The pool of renters at $1700/mo is a lot larger than the pool of renters at $2,000, let alone $2,500.
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:18 AM #161013
Bugs
ParticipantAs far as rentals go, it seems to me that you’ll find the most favorable relationship between rents and sale prices in the lower priced neighborhoods. If a 3bd home in 92113 rents for $1,700 and sells for under $280k, why would you bother with a $500k home in 92126 that only rents for a couple hundred bucks more?
The pool of renters at $1700/mo is a lot larger than the pool of renters at $2,000, let alone $2,500.
-
-
February 27, 2008 at 7:47 AM #160868
Raybyrnes
ParticipantThis raises a second question, Can you insure you loss of income in the event of the fire. If you are using the rensts to cover a portion of the mortgage then I would think that you would not only have to insure the property but would also have to carry a policy that would insure the income for 24 months. Otherwise you would need to carry a reserve equal to 2 years rent to offset this type of risk.
-
February 27, 2008 at 7:47 AM #160881
Raybyrnes
ParticipantThis raises a second question, Can you insure you loss of income in the event of the fire. If you are using the rensts to cover a portion of the mortgage then I would think that you would not only have to insure the property but would also have to carry a policy that would insure the income for 24 months. Otherwise you would need to carry a reserve equal to 2 years rent to offset this type of risk.
-
February 27, 2008 at 7:47 AM #160900
Raybyrnes
ParticipantThis raises a second question, Can you insure you loss of income in the event of the fire. If you are using the rensts to cover a portion of the mortgage then I would think that you would not only have to insure the property but would also have to carry a policy that would insure the income for 24 months. Otherwise you would need to carry a reserve equal to 2 years rent to offset this type of risk.
-
February 27, 2008 at 7:47 AM #160966
Raybyrnes
ParticipantThis raises a second question, Can you insure you loss of income in the event of the fire. If you are using the rensts to cover a portion of the mortgage then I would think that you would not only have to insure the property but would also have to carry a policy that would insure the income for 24 months. Otherwise you would need to carry a reserve equal to 2 years rent to offset this type of risk.
-
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:43 AM #160858
Coronita
Participantdumb question..
So I am curious if/when prices come down in 4S such that properties actually pencils in as a possible rental (I know, not likely in this particular community and a long way to go in 4s ranc), would folks be adverse to owning a rental in 4s, given the past wildfires in san diego?
I know that it probably isn't worth worrying about too much. But I'm just thinking if I had a rental out there, it would suck if every so often I needed to worry about a brush fire.
I'm leaning more towards MM as possible rental income. (1) being that it seems like pricing is coming down faster (2) it seems more convenient into companies in sorrento valley area (3) less brush fire worries.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:43 AM #160870
Coronita
Participantdumb question..
So I am curious if/when prices come down in 4S such that properties actually pencils in as a possible rental (I know, not likely in this particular community and a long way to go in 4s ranc), would folks be adverse to owning a rental in 4s, given the past wildfires in san diego?
I know that it probably isn't worth worrying about too much. But I'm just thinking if I had a rental out there, it would suck if every so often I needed to worry about a brush fire.
I'm leaning more towards MM as possible rental income. (1) being that it seems like pricing is coming down faster (2) it seems more convenient into companies in sorrento valley area (3) less brush fire worries.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:43 AM #160890
Coronita
Participantdumb question..
So I am curious if/when prices come down in 4S such that properties actually pencils in as a possible rental (I know, not likely in this particular community and a long way to go in 4s ranc), would folks be adverse to owning a rental in 4s, given the past wildfires in san diego?
I know that it probably isn't worth worrying about too much. But I'm just thinking if I had a rental out there, it would suck if every so often I needed to worry about a brush fire.
I'm leaning more towards MM as possible rental income. (1) being that it seems like pricing is coming down faster (2) it seems more convenient into companies in sorrento valley area (3) less brush fire worries.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
February 27, 2008 at 6:43 AM #160956
Coronita
Participantdumb question..
So I am curious if/when prices come down in 4S such that properties actually pencils in as a possible rental (I know, not likely in this particular community and a long way to go in 4s ranc), would folks be adverse to owning a rental in 4s, given the past wildfires in san diego?
I know that it probably isn't worth worrying about too much. But I'm just thinking if I had a rental out there, it would suck if every so often I needed to worry about a brush fire.
I'm leaning more towards MM as possible rental income. (1) being that it seems like pricing is coming down faster (2) it seems more convenient into companies in sorrento valley area (3) less brush fire worries.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
February 27, 2008 at 11:39 AM #160836
5yearwaiter
ParticipantHello esmith .. do you have speicific links or any listing numbers for this IVYgate properties at 4Closure Ranch?.
5yearswaiter
-
February 27, 2008 at 11:39 AM #161130
5yearwaiter
ParticipantHello esmith .. do you have speicific links or any listing numbers for this IVYgate properties at 4Closure Ranch?.
5yearswaiter
-
February 27, 2008 at 11:39 AM #161147
5yearwaiter
ParticipantHello esmith .. do you have speicific links or any listing numbers for this IVYgate properties at 4Closure Ranch?.
5yearswaiter
-
February 27, 2008 at 11:39 AM #161165
5yearwaiter
ParticipantHello esmith .. do you have speicific links or any listing numbers for this IVYgate properties at 4Closure Ranch?.
5yearswaiter
-
February 27, 2008 at 11:39 AM #161234
5yearwaiter
ParticipantHello esmith .. do you have speicific links or any listing numbers for this IVYgate properties at 4Closure Ranch?.
5yearswaiter
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.