Menu

Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Will Rancho Penasquitos house price drop ?

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 56 total)
1 2 3 4
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 2, 2009 at 5:51 PM #463935
    sdcellar
    Participant

    [quote=sdrealtor]PQ is a relatively affordable area in a prime location with low/no HOA or Mello Roos fees in a good school district. Everything surrounding it doesnt meet that standard which is why people focus on it.[/quote]RB, right on the other side of the 15? Seems to meet those criteria and while there’s no denying it’s further east, I don’t think it’s any less prime location-wise. A little less affordable, I suppose, depending on what you mean.

    October 2, 2009 at 11:41 PM #463175
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    PQ is an excellent alternative to those who cannot afford Carmel Valley and/or 4S. Some of the elementary schools in PQ score extremely high and of course Poway school district does not hurt either. PQ is closer to the triangle then RB as well. No MR and HOA for most of PQ. Yes Poway, Sabre Springs, Carmel Mtn Ranch and Scripps are alternatives but PQ is a bit cheaper then all of those, a bit closer to the west and downtown, and has a higher demand (from a volume standpoint).

    October 2, 2009 at 11:41 PM #463367
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    PQ is an excellent alternative to those who cannot afford Carmel Valley and/or 4S. Some of the elementary schools in PQ score extremely high and of course Poway school district does not hurt either. PQ is closer to the triangle then RB as well. No MR and HOA for most of PQ. Yes Poway, Sabre Springs, Carmel Mtn Ranch and Scripps are alternatives but PQ is a bit cheaper then all of those, a bit closer to the west and downtown, and has a higher demand (from a volume standpoint).

    October 2, 2009 at 11:41 PM #463712
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    PQ is an excellent alternative to those who cannot afford Carmel Valley and/or 4S. Some of the elementary schools in PQ score extremely high and of course Poway school district does not hurt either. PQ is closer to the triangle then RB as well. No MR and HOA for most of PQ. Yes Poway, Sabre Springs, Carmel Mtn Ranch and Scripps are alternatives but PQ is a bit cheaper then all of those, a bit closer to the west and downtown, and has a higher demand (from a volume standpoint).

    October 2, 2009 at 11:41 PM #463783
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    PQ is an excellent alternative to those who cannot afford Carmel Valley and/or 4S. Some of the elementary schools in PQ score extremely high and of course Poway school district does not hurt either. PQ is closer to the triangle then RB as well. No MR and HOA for most of PQ. Yes Poway, Sabre Springs, Carmel Mtn Ranch and Scripps are alternatives but PQ is a bit cheaper then all of those, a bit closer to the west and downtown, and has a higher demand (from a volume standpoint).

    October 2, 2009 at 11:41 PM #463990
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    PQ is an excellent alternative to those who cannot afford Carmel Valley and/or 4S. Some of the elementary schools in PQ score extremely high and of course Poway school district does not hurt either. PQ is closer to the triangle then RB as well. No MR and HOA for most of PQ. Yes Poway, Sabre Springs, Carmel Mtn Ranch and Scripps are alternatives but PQ is a bit cheaper then all of those, a bit closer to the west and downtown, and has a higher demand (from a volume standpoint).

    October 3, 2009 at 12:10 AM #463180
    sdcellar
    Participant

    What you’re really saying though is that it’s cheaper. Or, at least, there are parts of PQ that are cheaper. For the most part, it’s the cheapest way into PSD. Is this what we’re really talking about?

    If the rest of it carried much weight, it would be more expensive not less.

    October 3, 2009 at 12:10 AM #463372
    sdcellar
    Participant

    What you’re really saying though is that it’s cheaper. Or, at least, there are parts of PQ that are cheaper. For the most part, it’s the cheapest way into PSD. Is this what we’re really talking about?

    If the rest of it carried much weight, it would be more expensive not less.

    October 3, 2009 at 12:10 AM #463717
    sdcellar
    Participant

    What you’re really saying though is that it’s cheaper. Or, at least, there are parts of PQ that are cheaper. For the most part, it’s the cheapest way into PSD. Is this what we’re really talking about?

    If the rest of it carried much weight, it would be more expensive not less.

    October 3, 2009 at 12:10 AM #463788
    sdcellar
    Participant

    What you’re really saying though is that it’s cheaper. Or, at least, there are parts of PQ that are cheaper. For the most part, it’s the cheapest way into PSD. Is this what we’re really talking about?

    If the rest of it carried much weight, it would be more expensive not less.

    October 3, 2009 at 12:10 AM #463995
    sdcellar
    Participant

    What you’re really saying though is that it’s cheaper. Or, at least, there are parts of PQ that are cheaper. For the most part, it’s the cheapest way into PSD. Is this what we’re really talking about?

    If the rest of it carried much weight, it would be more expensive not less.

    October 3, 2009 at 8:29 AM #463207
    MANmom
    Participant

    This area of PQ in the article is already full of low income housing. They are just tearing down some old stuff and building newer low income housing. I really think that PQ must be divided into two distinct areas, on is on the east side of Black Mountain park and the other to the south and west. Old PQ vs. newer PQ, there really isn’t any comparison. If you are saying that because they are building these low-income units that the housing prices will fall, I think that would only happen in the “old PQ” where these are being built.

    October 3, 2009 at 8:29 AM #463399
    MANmom
    Participant

    This area of PQ in the article is already full of low income housing. They are just tearing down some old stuff and building newer low income housing. I really think that PQ must be divided into two distinct areas, on is on the east side of Black Mountain park and the other to the south and west. Old PQ vs. newer PQ, there really isn’t any comparison. If you are saying that because they are building these low-income units that the housing prices will fall, I think that would only happen in the “old PQ” where these are being built.

    October 3, 2009 at 8:29 AM #463745
    MANmom
    Participant

    This area of PQ in the article is already full of low income housing. They are just tearing down some old stuff and building newer low income housing. I really think that PQ must be divided into two distinct areas, on is on the east side of Black Mountain park and the other to the south and west. Old PQ vs. newer PQ, there really isn’t any comparison. If you are saying that because they are building these low-income units that the housing prices will fall, I think that would only happen in the “old PQ” where these are being built.

    October 3, 2009 at 8:29 AM #463816
    MANmom
    Participant

    This area of PQ in the article is already full of low income housing. They are just tearing down some old stuff and building newer low income housing. I really think that PQ must be divided into two distinct areas, on is on the east side of Black Mountain park and the other to the south and west. Old PQ vs. newer PQ, there really isn’t any comparison. If you are saying that because they are building these low-income units that the housing prices will fall, I think that would only happen in the “old PQ” where these are being built.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 56 total)
1 2 3 4
  • The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.