Menu

Home › Forums › Housing › Why is Point Loma so expensive?

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 111 total)
1 2 3 … 6 7 8
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 3, 2008 at 12:07 AM #251298
    PadreBrian
    Participant

    You can get the same house in Barstow for 200k…so what. The reason you’re so pissed is because it’s in Point Loma. lol THAT’S why they are priced like that.

    btw, the chances of Point Loma houses come down like Temecula is zero. There’s a mountain of baby boomers with fat retirements to keep prices up.

    August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251083
    Shadowfax
    Participant

    Plumosa is also one of the best micro-areas of Pt. Loma. PL is an older neighborhood with really interesting topography and older-neighborhood charm (not tract home development feel like MM, CV or CVR). Spouse and I were REALLY trying to buy in PL back in ’98 or ’99 and it was already WAAY out of our range even back then and we were professional DINKS back then.

    The REALLY nice areas on the top of the peninsula will have views of water in both directions…can’t get that in Texas or Barstow. Schools are crappy though. We hope it comes down too.

    August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251242
    Shadowfax
    Participant

    Plumosa is also one of the best micro-areas of Pt. Loma. PL is an older neighborhood with really interesting topography and older-neighborhood charm (not tract home development feel like MM, CV or CVR). Spouse and I were REALLY trying to buy in PL back in ’98 or ’99 and it was already WAAY out of our range even back then and we were professional DINKS back then.

    The REALLY nice areas on the top of the peninsula will have views of water in both directions…can’t get that in Texas or Barstow. Schools are crappy though. We hope it comes down too.

    August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251250
    Shadowfax
    Participant

    Plumosa is also one of the best micro-areas of Pt. Loma. PL is an older neighborhood with really interesting topography and older-neighborhood charm (not tract home development feel like MM, CV or CVR). Spouse and I were REALLY trying to buy in PL back in ’98 or ’99 and it was already WAAY out of our range even back then and we were professional DINKS back then.

    The REALLY nice areas on the top of the peninsula will have views of water in both directions…can’t get that in Texas or Barstow. Schools are crappy though. We hope it comes down too.

    August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251306
    Shadowfax
    Participant

    Plumosa is also one of the best micro-areas of Pt. Loma. PL is an older neighborhood with really interesting topography and older-neighborhood charm (not tract home development feel like MM, CV or CVR). Spouse and I were REALLY trying to buy in PL back in ’98 or ’99 and it was already WAAY out of our range even back then and we were professional DINKS back then.

    The REALLY nice areas on the top of the peninsula will have views of water in both directions…can’t get that in Texas or Barstow. Schools are crappy though. We hope it comes down too.

    August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251313
    Shadowfax
    Participant

    Plumosa is also one of the best micro-areas of Pt. Loma. PL is an older neighborhood with really interesting topography and older-neighborhood charm (not tract home development feel like MM, CV or CVR). Spouse and I were REALLY trying to buy in PL back in ’98 or ’99 and it was already WAAY out of our range even back then and we were professional DINKS back then.

    The REALLY nice areas on the top of the peninsula will have views of water in both directions…can’t get that in Texas or Barstow. Schools are crappy though. We hope it comes down too.

    August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251088
    Shadowfax
    Participant

    deleted

    August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251247
    Shadowfax
    Participant

    deleted

    August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251255
    Shadowfax
    Participant

    deleted

    August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251311
    Shadowfax
    Participant

    deleted

    August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251319
    Shadowfax
    Participant

    deleted

    August 3, 2008 at 10:47 AM #251208
    sdrealtor
    Participant

    I guess it’s been covered but Pt Loma is expensive because its not Texas or Sacto.

    August 3, 2008 at 10:47 AM #251367
    sdrealtor
    Participant

    I guess it’s been covered but Pt Loma is expensive because its not Texas or Sacto.

    August 3, 2008 at 10:47 AM #251375
    sdrealtor
    Participant

    I guess it’s been covered but Pt Loma is expensive because its not Texas or Sacto.

    August 3, 2008 at 10:47 AM #251432
    sdrealtor
    Participant

    I guess it’s been covered but Pt Loma is expensive because its not Texas or Sacto.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 111 total)
1 2 3 … 6 7 8
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.