- This topic has 120 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by
patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 11, 2009 at 1:07 PM #345140February 11, 2009 at 2:00 PM #344606
CA renter
ParticipantAs long as the taxpayer is taking all the risks, then we really do NOT need a private banking system.
If taxpayers are paying for it during bad times, we might as well profit from it during good times.
Personally, I see no reason for private bankers to be in control of a nation’s currency. It should fall under the control of the U.S. Treasury.
February 11, 2009 at 2:00 PM #344928ParticipantAs long as the taxpayer is taking all the risks, then we really do NOT need a private banking system.
If taxpayers are paying for it during bad times, we might as well profit from it during good times.
Personally, I see no reason for private bankers to be in control of a nation’s currency. It should fall under the control of the U.S. Treasury.
February 11, 2009 at 2:00 PM #345037ParticipantAs long as the taxpayer is taking all the risks, then we really do NOT need a private banking system.
If taxpayers are paying for it during bad times, we might as well profit from it during good times.
Personally, I see no reason for private bankers to be in control of a nation’s currency. It should fall under the control of the U.S. Treasury.
February 11, 2009 at 2:00 PM #345069ParticipantAs long as the taxpayer is taking all the risks, then we really do NOT need a private banking system.
If taxpayers are paying for it during bad times, we might as well profit from it during good times.
Personally, I see no reason for private bankers to be in control of a nation’s currency. It should fall under the control of the U.S. Treasury.
February 11, 2009 at 2:00 PM #345165ParticipantAs long as the taxpayer is taking all the risks, then we really do NOT need a private banking system.
If taxpayers are paying for it during bad times, we might as well profit from it during good times.
Personally, I see no reason for private bankers to be in control of a nation’s currency. It should fall under the control of the U.S. Treasury.
February 11, 2009 at 2:08 PM #344621Anonymous
GuestWe aren’t the first to debate this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Bank_of_the_United_States
February 11, 2009 at 2:08 PM #344943GuestWe aren’t the first to debate this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Bank_of_the_United_States
February 11, 2009 at 2:08 PM #345052GuestWe aren’t the first to debate this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Bank_of_the_United_States
February 11, 2009 at 2:08 PM #345084GuestWe aren’t the first to debate this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Bank_of_the_United_States
February 11, 2009 at 2:08 PM #345180GuestWe aren’t the first to debate this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Bank_of_the_United_States
February 11, 2009 at 3:54 PM #344740(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantWhy not also get rid of all of those lousy private credit unions too ?
February 11, 2009 at 3:54 PM #345063ParticipantWhy not also get rid of all of those lousy private credit unions too ?
February 11, 2009 at 3:54 PM #345171ParticipantWhy not also get rid of all of those lousy private credit unions too ?
February 11, 2009 at 3:54 PM #345204ParticipantWhy not also get rid of all of those lousy private credit unions too ?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.