Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › What will happen if oil goes over $200 a barrel and dollar tanks to zero?
- This topic has 65 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 12 months ago by capeman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 18, 2008 at 12:43 PM #207050May 18, 2008 at 12:55 PM #206937capemanParticipant
Think about it this way. We have the worlds largest oil supply in the US that is untapped…
http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/next-energy-news2.13s.html
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/rpt/OilShale.html
The current price of oil makes tapping these reserves extremely cost effective. The world is predicting peak oil in the near future while more than half of the world’s population is currently industrializing (Chindia) and raising demand heavily. We currently control the largest current supply in the Middle East (Iraq) and they owe us for our costs of their freedom. I ask you who is eventually in control of the oil economies of the world?
May 18, 2008 at 12:55 PM #206991capemanParticipantThink about it this way. We have the worlds largest oil supply in the US that is untapped…
http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/next-energy-news2.13s.html
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/rpt/OilShale.html
The current price of oil makes tapping these reserves extremely cost effective. The world is predicting peak oil in the near future while more than half of the world’s population is currently industrializing (Chindia) and raising demand heavily. We currently control the largest current supply in the Middle East (Iraq) and they owe us for our costs of their freedom. I ask you who is eventually in control of the oil economies of the world?
May 18, 2008 at 12:55 PM #207019capemanParticipantThink about it this way. We have the worlds largest oil supply in the US that is untapped…
http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/next-energy-news2.13s.html
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/rpt/OilShale.html
The current price of oil makes tapping these reserves extremely cost effective. The world is predicting peak oil in the near future while more than half of the world’s population is currently industrializing (Chindia) and raising demand heavily. We currently control the largest current supply in the Middle East (Iraq) and they owe us for our costs of their freedom. I ask you who is eventually in control of the oil economies of the world?
May 18, 2008 at 12:55 PM #207046capemanParticipantThink about it this way. We have the worlds largest oil supply in the US that is untapped…
http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/next-energy-news2.13s.html
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/rpt/OilShale.html
The current price of oil makes tapping these reserves extremely cost effective. The world is predicting peak oil in the near future while more than half of the world’s population is currently industrializing (Chindia) and raising demand heavily. We currently control the largest current supply in the Middle East (Iraq) and they owe us for our costs of their freedom. I ask you who is eventually in control of the oil economies of the world?
May 18, 2008 at 12:55 PM #207075capemanParticipantThink about it this way. We have the worlds largest oil supply in the US that is untapped…
http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/next-energy-news2.13s.html
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/rpt/OilShale.html
The current price of oil makes tapping these reserves extremely cost effective. The world is predicting peak oil in the near future while more than half of the world’s population is currently industrializing (Chindia) and raising demand heavily. We currently control the largest current supply in the Middle East (Iraq) and they owe us for our costs of their freedom. I ask you who is eventually in control of the oil economies of the world?
May 18, 2008 at 12:57 PM #206942AecetiaParticipantIt might be a case of dog eat dog, so it is either that or increase crop production, stop subsidizing farmers not to grow crops and think about ways of reducing in all areas.
May 18, 2008 at 12:57 PM #206995AecetiaParticipantIt might be a case of dog eat dog, so it is either that or increase crop production, stop subsidizing farmers not to grow crops and think about ways of reducing in all areas.
May 18, 2008 at 12:57 PM #207026AecetiaParticipantIt might be a case of dog eat dog, so it is either that or increase crop production, stop subsidizing farmers not to grow crops and think about ways of reducing in all areas.
May 18, 2008 at 12:57 PM #207049AecetiaParticipantIt might be a case of dog eat dog, so it is either that or increase crop production, stop subsidizing farmers not to grow crops and think about ways of reducing in all areas.
May 18, 2008 at 12:57 PM #207080AecetiaParticipantIt might be a case of dog eat dog, so it is either that or increase crop production, stop subsidizing farmers not to grow crops and think about ways of reducing in all areas.
May 18, 2008 at 1:16 PM #206967AecetiaParticipantAnd, yes, I agree with more drilling and using our own resources rather than making our enemies richer. I would prefer a technological break through that would create a cleaner, safer fuel that has less impact on the environment, but everyone seems opposed to nukes.
May 18, 2008 at 1:16 PM #207021AecetiaParticipantAnd, yes, I agree with more drilling and using our own resources rather than making our enemies richer. I would prefer a technological break through that would create a cleaner, safer fuel that has less impact on the environment, but everyone seems opposed to nukes.
May 18, 2008 at 1:16 PM #207051AecetiaParticipantAnd, yes, I agree with more drilling and using our own resources rather than making our enemies richer. I would prefer a technological break through that would create a cleaner, safer fuel that has less impact on the environment, but everyone seems opposed to nukes.
May 18, 2008 at 1:16 PM #207074AecetiaParticipantAnd, yes, I agree with more drilling and using our own resources rather than making our enemies richer. I would prefer a technological break through that would create a cleaner, safer fuel that has less impact on the environment, but everyone seems opposed to nukes.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.